2838 lines
171 KiB
Plaintext
2838 lines
171 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 1 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 1 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022
|
||
Call: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03
|
||
(Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03)
|
||
Topic: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03-WA1-3
|
||
Type of Action: HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
||
(HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions)
|
||
Proposal number: 101289612
|
||
Proposal acronym: QUANTAIR
|
||
Type of Model Grant Agreement: HORIZON Lump Sum Grant
|
||
Table of contents
|
||
Section Title Action
|
||
1 General information
|
||
2 Participants
|
||
3 Budget
|
||
4 Ethics and security
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 2 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 2 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
1 - General information
|
||
Fields marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
||
Topic HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03-WA1-3
|
||
Type of Model Grant Agreement HORIZON-AG-LS
|
||
Type of Action HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
||
Call HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Proposal title Quantum Technologies for Airspace Innovation and Resilience
|
||
Note that for technical reasons, the following characters are not accepted in the Proposal Title and will be removed: < > " &
|
||
Duration in
|
||
months 24
|
||
Free keywords
|
||
Quantum Federated Learning, Quantum Machine Learning, Data Security, Privacy preservation, Demand Capacity
|
||
Balancing, ETOT optimisation, Improve Predictability of ATM operations
|
||
Abstract *
|
||
European air traffic management is becoming increasingly complex. The system now has to handle a growing variety of airspace
|
||
users — from hypersonic vehicles and high-altitude long-endurance platforms such as stratospheric balloons and HAPS, to
|
||
conventional subsonic flights. These vehicles often operate in overlapping altitude bands but have vastly different speeds, climb/
|
||
descent profiles, and manoeuvring capabilities.
|
||
|
||
At the same time, environmental policy drivers are stronger than ever. The EU Green Deal, ICAO’s long-term aspirational goals, and
|
||
national climate strategies are pushing for measurable reductions in both CO₂ and non-CO₂ impacts, such as persistent contrails.
|
||
Resilience has also become a priority, with the network increasingly affected by severe weather, technical failures, and geopolitical
|
||
events that can close or restrict airspace at short notice.
|
||
|
||
One of the biggest technical challenges in all of these contexts is that many stakeholders — States, ANSPs, airlines, and defence
|
||
operators — cannot freely share operationally, privacy, or commercially sensitive data. Without that data, current modelling and
|
||
optimisation tools have to work with partial information, limiting their effectiveness.
|
||
|
||
Previous European research has already demonstrated that Federated Learning (FL) can bridge this gap, enabling accurate
|
||
predictions without requiring data to leave its origin. QUANTAIR proposes to take this further by pairing FL with quantum
|
||
optimisation — allowing us to integrate richer, privacy-protected data from multiple stakeholders, and then solve the resulting large-
|
||
scale, multi-variable problems at speeds suitable for operational decision-making.
|
||
Remaining characters 315
|
||
Has this proposal (or a very similar one) been submitted in the past 2 years in response to a call for
|
||
proposals under any EU programme, including the current call?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Please give the proposal reference or contract number.
|
||
Previously submitted proposals should be with either 6 or 9 digits.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 3 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 3 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Declarations
|
||
Field(s) marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
||
1) We declare to have the explicit consent of all applicants on their participation and on the content of this proposal. *
|
||
2) We confirm that the information contained in this proposal is correct and complete and that none of the project
|
||
activities have started before the proposal was submitted (unless explicitly authorised in the call conditions). *
|
||
3) We declare:
|
||
- to be fully compliant with the eligibility criteria set out in the call
|
||
- not to be subject to any exclusion grounds under the EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
|
||
- to have the financial and operational capacity to carry out the proposed project. *
|
||
4) We acknowledge that all communication will be made through the Funding & Tenders Portal
|
||
electronic exchange system and that access and use of this system is subject to the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms
|
||
and Conditions. *
|
||
5) We have read, understood and accepted the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms & Conditions and
|
||
Privacy Statement that set out the conditions of use of the Portal and the scope, purposes, retention periods, etc. for
|
||
the processing of personal data of all data subjects whose data we communicate for the purpose of the application,
|
||
evaluation, award and subsequent management of our grant, prizes and contracts (including financial transactions and
|
||
audits). *
|
||
6) We declare that the proposal complies with ethical principles (including the highest standards of research integrity
|
||
as set out in the ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, as well as applicable international and
|
||
national law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on
|
||
Human Rights and its Supplementary Protocols. Appropriate procedures, policies and structures are in place to foster
|
||
responsible research practices, to prevent questionable research practices and research misconduct, and to handle
|
||
allegations of breaches of the principles and standards in the Code of Conduct. *
|
||
7) We declare that the proposal has an exclusive focus on civil applications (activities intended to be used in military
|
||
application or aiming to serve military purposes cannot be funded). If the project involves dual-use items in the sense
|
||
of Regulation 2021/821, or other items for which authorisation is required, we confirm that we will comply with the
|
||
applicable regulatory framework (e.g. obtain export/import licences before these items are used). *
|
||
8) We confirm that the activities proposed do not
|
||
- aim at human cloning for reproductive purposes;
|
||
- intend to modify the genetic heritage of human beings which could make such changes heritable
|
||
(with the exception of research relating to cancer treatment of the gonads, which may be financed), or
|
||
- intend to create human embryos solely for the purpose of research or for the purpose of stem
|
||
cell procurement, including by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer.
|
||
- lead to the destruction of human embryos (for example, for obtaining stem cells)
|
||
These activities are excluded from funding. *
|
||
9) We confirm that for activities carried out outside the Union, the same activities would have been allowed in at least
|
||
one EU Member State. *
|
||
10) For Lump Sum Grants with a detailed budget table: We understand and accept that the EU lump sum grants must
|
||
be reliable proxies for the actual costs of a project and confirm that the detailed budget for the proposal has been
|
||
established in accordance with our usual cost accounting practices and in compliance with the basic eligibility
|
||
conditions for EU actual cost grants (see AGA - Annotated Grant Agreement, art 6) and exclude costs that are ineligible
|
||
under the Programme. Purchases and subcontracting costs must be done taking into account best value for money
|
||
and must be free of conflict of interest. *
|
||
The coordinator is only responsible for the information relating to their own organisation. Each applicant remains responsible for the information declared for
|
||
their organisation. If the proposal is retained for EU funding, they will all be required to sign a declaration of honour.
|
||
False statements or incorrect information may lead to administrative sanctions under the EU Financial Regulation.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 4 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 4 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
2 - Participants
|
||
List of participating organisations
|
||
# Participating Organisation Legal Name Country Role Action
|
||
1 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV Germany Coordinator
|
||
2 Qoro Quantum Ltd UK Partner
|
||
3 SkyNav Europe BE Partner
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 5 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 5 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Organisation data
|
||
PIC
|
||
999981731
|
||
Legal name
|
||
DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV
|
||
Short name: DLR
|
||
|
||
Address
|
||
Town KOLN
|
||
Postcode 51147
|
||
Street LINDER HOHE
|
||
Country Germany
|
||
Webpage www.dlr.de
|
||
Specific Legal Statuses
|
||
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
||
Public body ............................................................ no
|
||
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
||
International organisation ...................................... no
|
||
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
||
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
||
SME Data
|
||
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
||
SME self-declared status ...................................... 03/01/2022 - no
|
||
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
||
SME validation ...................................................... 28/10/2008 - no
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 6 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 6 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
||
Department 1
|
||
Department name Space Operations and Astronaut Training
|
||
Street Münchener Straße 20
|
||
Town Oberpfaffenhofen-Weßling
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
not applicable
|
||
Country Germany
|
||
Postcode 82234
|
||
Links with other participants
|
||
Type of link Participant
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 7 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 7 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Main contact person
|
||
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
||
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
||
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
||
First name* Andreas Last name* Spörl
|
||
E-Mail* andreas.spoerl@dlr.de
|
||
Town Oberpfaffenhofen-Weßling Post code 82234
|
||
Street Münchener Straße 20
|
||
Website Please enter website
|
||
Position in org. group lead
|
||
Department Space Operations and Astronaut Training
|
||
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
Country Germany
|
||
Same as organisation
|
||
name
|
||
Other contact persons
|
||
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
||
Catharina Broocks catharina.broocks@dlr.de +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
Sylvia Hutzschenreuter sylvia.hutzschenreuter@dlr.de +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
Mirjam Kopp mirjam.kopp@dlr.de +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 8 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 8 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
||
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
||
Role of
|
||
researcher (in
|
||
the project)
|
||
Reference
|
||
Identifier Type of identifier
|
||
Dr Andreas Spörl Man Germany andreas.spoerl@
|
||
dlr.de Category B Senior resea Leading 0009-0003-0727-
|
||
440X
|
||
Orcid ID
|
||
Ms Catharina Broocks Woman Germany catharina.broock
|
||
s@dlr.de
|
||
Category D First stage r Team member 0000-0002-4965-
|
||
1934
|
||
Orcid ID
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 9 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 9 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
||
Project management
|
||
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
||
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
||
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
||
Civil society representative
|
||
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
||
Research performer
|
||
Technology developer
|
||
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
||
Prototyping and demonstration
|
||
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
||
Public procurer of results
|
||
Private buyer of results
|
||
Finance provider (public or private)
|
||
Education and training
|
||
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
||
Other
|
||
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 10 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 10 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
||
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
Publication
|
||
"Evolving Spacecraft Quantum On-Call Scheduling" (Prüfer S., Sajko W. et al (DLR),
|
||
SpaceOps-2023, ID 388) explores applying Grover's algorithm on quantum computers to
|
||
optimize a simplified operator shift scheduling problem at the German Space Operations
|
||
Center (GSOC). The study of this combinatorial optimization problem improves constraint
|
||
handling and achieves reduced gate costs of up to 90%. While focused on spacecraft, these
|
||
methods are also applicable to other scheduling tasks.
|
||
Publication
|
||
"QUARGS – Quantum Reinforced Ground Station Scheduling" (Leidreiter D. A., Petrak A., et al
|
||
(DLR); SpaceOps-2025; ID 267) investigates the application of quantum computing to optimize
|
||
ground station scheduling for satellite operations. It introduces the QUARGS library that
|
||
utilizes quantum algorithms like QAOA, QA, VQE, and E-VQE. The study compares these
|
||
methods to classical solvers and addresses challenges in scalability and constraint
|
||
implementation.
|
||
Publication
|
||
“QEOPS – Quantum Earth Observation Planning System” (Prüfer S., Anderle M. A. (DLR); IWPSS
|
||
2025) discusses a spacecraft mission planning use-case from the Quantum Mission Planning
|
||
Challenges (QMPC) project by the German Quantum Computing Initiative at DLR. It formalizes
|
||
the problem as an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) task, shares insights from applying
|
||
quantum computing, and compares early results between classical solvers and quantum
|
||
optimization algorithms.
|
||
Software
|
||
QUEASARS - Quantum Evolving Ansatz Variational Solver (Leidreiter D. A., Prüfer S. (DLR),
|
||
https://github.com/DLR-RB/QUEASARS) is an open-source, qiskit-based, python package
|
||
implementing quantum variational eigensolvers which use evolutionary algorithms to find a
|
||
good ansatz during the optimization process, like E-VQE, MoG-VQE or QNEAT. Currently only
|
||
EVQE is implemented.
|
||
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
||
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
QMPC
|
||
Quantum Mission Planning Challenges (QMPC) is a DLR QCI project (Nov<6F>2022–Oct<63>2026)
|
||
developing quantum algorithms to solve real-world mission planning optimization problems
|
||
such as on call operator scheduling, ground station contact planning, and earth observation
|
||
acquisition for the German Space Operations Center (GSOC). It integrates hybrid and quantum
|
||
methods into GSOC workflows and extends to a Vehicle to Grid use case with the project
|
||
partner E.ON.
|
||
MuQuaNet
|
||
MuQuaNet (Munich Quantum Network) is a QKD-based quantum network in Munich,
|
||
enabling secure communication for research and government use. Within it, DLR’s QSOC
|
||
integrates QKD into space operations by linking GSOC to the network and testing quantum-
|
||
encrypted data transmission. These efforts support future QKD-based space missions and
|
||
extend QSOC's role from quantum computing to secure quantum communication.
|
||
QAthMOS
|
||
QAthMOS (Quantum Telemetry and Health Monitoring System) is a QSOC led project aiming
|
||
to enhance satellite operations via quantum powered anomaly detection and predictive
|
||
analytics on telemetry data. It applies quantum machine learning techniques to monitor
|
||
satellite health, detect irregularities, and forecast issues—advancing the integration of
|
||
quantum technologies into operational spaceflight systems.
|
||
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
||
Name of infrastructure of
|
||
equipment
|
||
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 11 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 11 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Quantum computers and
|
||
Simulators
|
||
Our connection to the DLR-QCI (Quantum Computing Initiative) allows access to a variety of
|
||
quantum computers and simulators based on different quantum hardware platforms. Small
|
||
scaled demo examples can therefore be computed and executed on actual quantum
|
||
hardware.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 12 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 12 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Gender Equality Plan
|
||
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
||
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
||
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
||
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
||
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
||
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
||
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
||
decision-makers.
|
||
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
||
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
||
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
||
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
||
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
||
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 13 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 13 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
PIC
|
||
870017348
|
||
Legal name
|
||
Qoro Quantum Ltd
|
||
Short name: Qoro Quantum Ltd
|
||
|
||
Address
|
||
Town Harwell
|
||
Postcode OX11 0QX
|
||
Street R27 Atlas Building, Fermi Avenue,
|
||
Country United Kingdom
|
||
Webpage https://qoro.uk
|
||
Specific Legal Statuses
|
||
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
||
Public body ............................................................ no
|
||
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
||
International organisation ...................................... no
|
||
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
||
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
||
SME Data
|
||
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
||
SME self-declared status ...................................... 18/08/2025 - yes
|
||
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
||
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 14 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 14 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
||
No department involved
|
||
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
||
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
||
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
not applicable
|
||
Country Please select a country
|
||
Postcode Area code.
|
||
Links with other participants
|
||
Type of link Participant
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 15 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 15 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Main contact person
|
||
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
||
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
||
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
||
First name* Stephen Last name* DiAdamo
|
||
E-Mail* stephen@qoroquantum.de
|
||
Town Harwell Post code OX11 0QX
|
||
Street R27 Atlas Building, Fermi Avenue,
|
||
Website www.qoroquantum.net
|
||
Position in org. CTO & Co-Founder
|
||
Department Qoro Quantum Ltd
|
||
Phone +4915254519041 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
Country United Kingdom
|
||
Same as organisation
|
||
name
|
||
Other contact persons
|
||
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
||
Dan Holme dan@qoro.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 16 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 16 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
||
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
||
Role of
|
||
researcher (in
|
||
the project)
|
||
Reference
|
||
Identifier Type of identifier
|
||
Dr Stephen DiAdamo Man Italy stephen@qoroqu
|
||
antum.uk Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0001-5758-
|
||
9563
|
||
Orcid ID
|
||
Ms Amana Liaqat Woman United Kingdom amana@qoroqua
|
||
ntum.uk
|
||
Category C Recognised Team member
|
||
Mr Dan Holme Man United Kingdom dan@qoro.uk Category C Recognised Leading
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 17 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 17 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
||
Project management
|
||
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
||
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
||
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
||
Civil society representative
|
||
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
||
Research performer
|
||
Technology developer
|
||
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
||
Prototyping and demonstration
|
||
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
||
Public procurer of results
|
||
Private buyer of results
|
||
Finance provider (public or private)
|
||
Education and training
|
||
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
||
Other
|
||
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 18 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 18 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
||
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
Publication
|
||
"QAOA in Quantum Datacenters: Parallelization, Simulation, and Orchestration." 2025 IEEE
|
||
International Conference on Quantum Software, 2025. Introduces Qoro’s architecture for
|
||
automated quantum software execution across distributed computing networks.
|
||
Demonstrates orchestration strategies that parallelize workloads and allocate resources
|
||
dynamically, critical foundations for federated quantum computing.
|
||
Publication
|
||
"Practical quantum k-means clustering: Performance analysis and applications in energy grid
|
||
classification." IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 3, 2022. Demonstrates hardware-
|
||
aware quantum machine learning methods, showing performance gains when hardware
|
||
constraints are integrated into software design. Provides evidence for scaling machine
|
||
learning and optimization workloads over heterogeneous quantum-classical infrastructures.
|
||
Publication
|
||
"Quantum algorithms and simulation for parallel and distributed quantum computing." 2021
|
||
IEEE/ACM Second International Workshop on Quantum Computing Software. IEEE, 2021.
|
||
Presents a software framework for parallel execution of quantum algorithms across clusters.
|
||
Lays groundwork for distributed execution models, including federated approaches used in
|
||
this project.
|
||
Software
|
||
Qoro's Divi. Divi is a Python-based software development kit that builds and parallelizes
|
||
quantum programs. It partitions tasks and transmits them to distributed compute resources
|
||
through Composer, enabling large-scale workloads such as optimization and machine
|
||
learning. It supports hybrid execution, key to federated computing.
|
||
Software
|
||
Qoro's Composer. Composer is a scheduling and orchestration engine that dynamically selects
|
||
resources for distributed workloads. It evaluates real-time network and device conditions to
|
||
route jobs efficiently, forming the backbone of federated learning and computation in hybrid
|
||
HPC-quantum environments.
|
||
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
||
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
ESA Business Incubation
|
||
Selected for ESA’s incubation program, Qoro applied Divi and Composer to satellite
|
||
communications optimization. Demonstrated distributed computing and task partitioning
|
||
over satellite constellations, proving the scalability and adaptability of our approach for
|
||
mission-critical environments.
|
||
Pilot projects with HPC centers
|
||
In partnership with CESGA, we deployed Composer to orchestrate quantum-classical
|
||
workloads over HPC nodes, integrating security and scheduling for multi-node execution. This
|
||
work validated interoperability across heterogeneous systems and demonstrated scaling
|
||
strategies relevant to air traffic management.
|
||
Pilot projects with Enterprise
|
||
Collaborated with enterprise partners (e.g., E.ON, Multiverse Computing) to integrate Divi into
|
||
energy and finance workflows. Showcased parallelization and partitioning of real-world
|
||
optimization problems over hybrid clusters, demonstrating readiness to bring federated
|
||
models to complex industries.
|
||
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
||
Name of infrastructure of
|
||
equipment
|
||
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
||
Qoro's cloud computing service
|
||
A scalable cloud platform hosting Qoro’s distributed orchestration stack, enabling
|
||
deployment, benchmarking, and execution of federated quantum-classical workloads across
|
||
multiple sites.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 19 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 19 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Qoro's GPU-based quantum
|
||
simualator
|
||
High-performance GPU-accelerated simulator for quantum circuits, optimized for batch
|
||
execution and hybrid workflows, enabling realistic modeling of large-scale federated
|
||
computing scenarios.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 20 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 20 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Gender Equality Plan
|
||
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
||
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
||
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
||
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
||
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
||
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
||
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
||
decision-makers.
|
||
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
||
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
||
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
||
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
||
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
||
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 21 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 21 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
PIC
|
||
870906450
|
||
Legal name
|
||
SkyNav Europe
|
||
Short name: SkyNav Europe
|
||
|
||
Address
|
||
Town Brussels
|
||
Postcode 1000
|
||
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
||
Country Belgium
|
||
Webpage www.skynavintl.com
|
||
Specific Legal Statuses
|
||
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
||
Public body ............................................................ no
|
||
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
||
International organisation ...................................... no
|
||
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
||
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
||
SME Data
|
||
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
||
SME self-declared status ...................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
||
SME self-assessment ........................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
||
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 22 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 22 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
||
No department involved
|
||
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
||
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
||
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
not applicable
|
||
Country Please select a country
|
||
Postcode Area code.
|
||
Links with other participants
|
||
Type of link Participant
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 23 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 23 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Main contact person
|
||
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
||
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
||
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
||
First name* Ben Last name* Kings
|
||
E-Mail* ben.kings@skynavintl.com
|
||
Town Brussels Post code 1000
|
||
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
||
Website https://skynavintl.com/
|
||
Position in org. Managing Director/Owner
|
||
Department SkyNav Europe
|
||
Phone +31615625092 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
||
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
||
Country Belgium
|
||
Same as organisation
|
||
name
|
||
Other contact persons
|
||
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
||
Duncan Auld duncan.auld@skynavintl.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 24 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 24 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
||
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
||
Role of
|
||
researcher (in
|
||
the project)
|
||
Reference
|
||
Identifier Type of identifier
|
||
Mr Ben Kings Man ben.kings@skyna
|
||
vintl.com Category A Top grade reLeading
|
||
Mr Duncan Auld Man duncan.auld@sky
|
||
navintl.com
|
||
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 25 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 25 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
||
Project management
|
||
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
||
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
||
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
||
Civil society representative
|
||
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
||
Research performer
|
||
Technology developer
|
||
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
||
Prototyping and demonstration
|
||
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
||
Public procurer of results
|
||
Private buyer of results
|
||
Finance provider (public or private)
|
||
Education and training
|
||
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
||
Other
|
||
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 26 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 26 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
||
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
Service
|
||
Operational ATM experience
|
||
Decades of global, operational Air Traffic Control experience across all ATC disciplines (Tower,
|
||
Approach, Area, Oceanic) and at all function levels. Operational supervision, flow
|
||
management, training, training management, safety and technical committee
|
||
representation, operational procedure development, international cross-border negotiations,
|
||
airspace design, safety risk assessments and environmental impact studies
|
||
Service
|
||
Project Management & Leadership Expertise
|
||
Extensive track record in project and organisational leadership, including executive roles
|
||
within IFATCA (International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers’ Associations). Demonstrated
|
||
ability to manage complex international initiatives, coordinate diverse stakeholders, and
|
||
oversee multi-million-euro budgets. Proven experience in steering strategic aviation projects,
|
||
ensuring delivery of innovative outcomes aligned with European policy & industry need
|
||
Service
|
||
ECHO2 subcontractor
|
||
Participation in the ECHO2 consortium as a contractor focusing on higher airspace and space
|
||
transport integration. Contributions include operational concept refinement, validation
|
||
planning, stakeholder mapping, and alignment with ANSP procedures and Network functions.
|
||
The work informs scalable approaches for trajectory management and airspace reservations.
|
||
Includes project management and deliverable lead.
|
||
Service
|
||
ICAO drafting and representation
|
||
Contributed to drafting and review activities at ICAO in relation to Annex 11, Annex 10 and
|
||
PANS-ATM material. Work includes requirements structuring, procedure text, and consistency
|
||
checks across datasets and guidance, supporting globally harmonised ATM provisions
|
||
relevant to STO and HAO integration. Leading working groups on ATM planning &
|
||
implementation, development of Global ATM Operational Concept, development of Aviation
|
||
System Block Upgrades
|
||
Service
|
||
State regulatory drafting and representation
|
||
Several years of regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil
|
||
aviation regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS,
|
||
operations and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and
|
||
regional provisions. Leadership of ICAO regional groups and task forces related to integration
|
||
of space transport activities.
|
||
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
||
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
||
SESAR ECHO / ECHO2 – HAO
|
||
Integration
|
||
Participation in ECHO and ECHO2 on higher airspace and space transport integration. Roles
|
||
covered operational scenarios, requirements traceability, validation planning, stakeholder
|
||
engagement and alignment with EUROCONTROL and ICAO practices for cross-border
|
||
coordination and dynamic, minimal-impact airspace management.
|
||
iNEO – Project Management Plan
|
||
& Governance Appr.
|
||
Development of a rigorous PMP and governance model for multi-partner R&D, covering
|
||
schedule baselining, risk and compliance, quality assurance, and reporting. The approach
|
||
underpins efficient WP coordination and is directly reusable for other HORIZON projects.
|
||
UAE National Regulations
|
||
Development Programme
|
||
Regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil aviation
|
||
regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS, operations
|
||
and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and regional
|
||
provisions.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 27 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 27 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
||
Name of infrastructure of
|
||
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 28 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 28 of 33 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Gender Equality Plan
|
||
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
||
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
||
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
||
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
||
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
||
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
||
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
||
decision-makers.
|
||
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
||
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
||
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
||
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
||
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
||
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 29 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 29 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
3 - Budget
|
||
No Name of Beneficiary Country Role Requested grant
|
||
amount
|
||
Income generated
|
||
by the action
|
||
Financial
|
||
contributions
|
||
Own resources Total estimated
|
||
income
|
||
1 Deutsches Zentrum Fur Luft - Und Raumfahrt Ev DE Coordinator 167 350.00 0 0 0 167 350.00
|
||
2 Qoro Quantum Ltd UK Partner 435 086.16 0 0 20 000 455 086.16
|
||
3 Skynav Europe BE Partner 342 890.63 0 0 0 342 890.63
|
||
Total 945 326.79 20 000
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 30 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 30 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
4 - Ethics & security
|
||
Ethics Issues Table
|
||
1. Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Human Embryos Page
|
||
Does this activity involve Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve the use of human embryos? Yes No
|
||
2. Humans Page
|
||
Does this activity involve human participants? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve interventions (physical also including imaging technology,
|
||
behavioural treatments, etc.) on the study participants? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve conducting a clinical study as defined by the Clinical Trial Regulation
|
||
(EU 536/2014)? (using pharmaceuticals, biologicals, radiopharmaceuticals, or advanced
|
||
therapy medicinal products)
|
||
Yes No
|
||
3. Human Cells / Tissues (not covered by section 1) Page
|
||
Does this activity involve the use of human cells or tissues? Yes No
|
||
4. Personal Data Page
|
||
Does this activity involve processing of personal data? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve further processing of previously collected personal data (including
|
||
use of preexisting data sets or sources, merging existing data sets)?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Is it planned to export personal data from the EU to non-EU countries? Yes No
|
||
Is it planned to import personal data from non-EU countries into the EU or from a non-EU
|
||
country to another non-EU country?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve the processing of personal data related to criminal convictions or
|
||
offences?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
5. Animals Page
|
||
Does this activity involve animals? Yes No
|
||
6. Non-EU Countries Page
|
||
Will some of the activities be carried out in non-EU countries? Yes No 0
|
||
United Kingdom
|
||
In case non-EU countries are involved, do the activities undertaken in these countries raise
|
||
potential ethics issues? Yes No
|
||
It is planned to use local resources (e.g. animal and/or human tissue samples, genetic material,
|
||
live animals, human remains, materials of historical value, endangered fauna or flora samples,
|
||
etc.)?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Is it planned to import any material (other than data) from non-EU countries into the EU or
|
||
from a non-EU country to another non-EU country? For data imports, see section 4. Yes No
|
||
Is it planned to export any material (other than data) from the EU to non-EU countries? For
|
||
data exports, see section 4. Yes No
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 31 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 31 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Does this activity involve low and/or lower middle income countries, (if yes, detail the benefit-
|
||
sharing actions planned in the self-assessment) Yes No
|
||
Could the situation in the country put the individuals taking part in the activity at risk? Yes No
|
||
7. Environment, Health and Safety Page
|
||
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to the
|
||
environment, to animals or plants.(during the implementation of the activity or further to the
|
||
use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Does this activity deal with endangered fauna and/or flora / protected areas? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to humans,
|
||
including those performing the activity.(during the implementation of the activity or further
|
||
to the use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
||
Yes No
|
||
8. Artificial Intelligence Page
|
||
Does this activity involve the development, deployment and/or use of Artificial Intelligence-
|
||
based systems? Yes No 0
|
||
9. Other Ethics Issues Page
|
||
Are there any other ethics issues that should be taken into consideration? Yes No
|
||
I confirm that I have taken into account all ethics issues above and that, if any ethics issues apply, I will complete the
|
||
ethics self-assessment as described in the guidelines How to Complete your Ethics Self-Assessment
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 32 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 32 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Ethics Self-Assessment
|
||
Ethical dimension of the objectives, methodology and likely impact
|
||
6. Non-EU Countries
|
||
Will some of the activities be carried out in non-EU countries?
|
||
|
||
Parts of the research is carried out in UK. The work is of documentary type.
|
||
No impacts and/or misuses on environment, social or political groups are expected.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. Artificial intelligence
|
||
Does this activity involve the development, deployment and/or use of Artificial Intelligence-based systems?
|
||
Yes, first for text generation and second, because the project elaborates on concepts (quantum) machine learning approaches.
|
||
|
||
Remaining characters 4491
|
||
Compliance with ethical principles and relevant legislations
|
||
6. Non-EU Countries
|
||
Due to the involvement of UK as non-EU country, the project confirms compliance to the highest ethical standards.
|
||
All research conducted (in either EU Memberstates or UK) will be of legal type in all mentioned countries.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. Artificial intelligence
|
||
QUANTAIR’s actively integrates privacy, safety, fairness, environmental responsibility, dual-use safeguards, and transparency into its
|
||
objectives. Wherever AI is used, it only contributes as a prelimenary step for further verfication.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Remaining characters 4492
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 33 ===
|
||
Administrative forms
|
||
Page 33 of 33
|
||
Proposal ID 101289612
|
||
Acronym QUANTAIR
|
||
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 17/09/2025 06:50
|
||
Security issues table
|
||
1. EU Classified Information (EUCI)2 Page
|
||
Does this activity involve information and/or materials requiring protection against
|
||
unauthorised disclosure (EUCI)? Yes No
|
||
Does this activity involve non-EU countries which need to have access to EUCI? Yes No
|
||
2. Misuse Page
|
||
Does this activity have the potential for misuse of results? Yes No
|
||
3. Other Security Issues Page
|
||
Does this activity involve information and/or materials subject to national security restrictions?
|
||
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Are there any other security issues that should be taken into consideration?
|
||
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
||
Yes No
|
||
Security self-assessment
|
||
(No Security Issue was marked with Yes)
|
||
Remaining characters 4961
|
||
2According to the Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, “European Union
|
||
classified information (EUCI) means any information or material designated by an EU security classification, the unauthorised disclosure of which could cause varying
|
||
degrees of prejudice to the interests of the European Union or of one or more of the Member States”.
|
||
3Classified background information is information that is already classified by a country and/or international organisation and/or the EU and is going to be used by the
|
||
project. In this case, the project must have in advance the authorisation from the originator of the classified information, which is the entity (EU institution, EU Member
|
||
State, third state or international organisation) under whose authority the classified information has been generated.
|
||
4EU classified foreground information is information (documents/deliverables/materials) planned to be generated by the project and that needs to be protected from
|
||
unauthorised disclosure. The originator of the EUCI generated by the project is the European Commission.
|
||
This proposal version was submitted by Andreas Spörl on 16/09/2025 11:51:52 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 34 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 1 of 50
|
||
|
||
Proposal template Part B: technical description
|
||
QUANTAIR
|
||
[This document is tagged. Do not delete the tags; they are needed for processing.] #@APP-FORM-HERIAIA@#
|
||
List of participants
|
||
Participant No. * Participant organisation name Country
|
||
1 (Coordinator) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR e.V.) Germany
|
||
2 Qoro Quantum United Kingdom
|
||
3 SkyNav International Belgium
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Excellence #@REL-EVA-RE@#
|
||
1.1 Objectives and ambition #@PRJ-OBJ-PO@#
|
||
QUANTAIR investigates the feasibility of applying Quantum Federated machine Learning (QFL) to Air Traffic
|
||
Management (ATM) at TRL 1. Federated Machine Learning (FedML) is a distributed approach in which models are
|
||
trained across multiple independent data sources without requiring the exchange of raw data. This is of clear relevance
|
||
to ATM, where operational datasets are fragmented across various stakeholders such as airlines, ANSPs, airports,
|
||
and regulators, and where data protection, confidentiality, and sovereignty considerations prevent centralisation.
|
||
Quantum computing is still at an early stage and cannot yet be used in operational systems. However, research in
|
||
other fields suggests that certain quantum algorithms can eventually provide advantages when dealing with very large
|
||
or complex problems, such as those involving many interdependent variables [1]. FedML, by contrast, is already a
|
||
recognised approach that allows different stakeholders to train models collaboratively without sharing their raw data
|
||
[2]. In QUANTAIR, the focus is on exploring the feasibility of combining FedML with the capabilities of Quantum
|
||
computing for ATM at TRL 1.
|
||
The project aims to provide the first structured assessment of QFL for ATM. Its contribution is not the development
|
||
of prototypes or operational tools, but rather the creation of a conceptual and methodological foundation on which
|
||
future SESAR research can build. QUANTAIR clarifies whether QFL represents a promising research direction for
|
||
ATM, defines the conditions under which it might deliver benefits, estimates quantum resources, and identifies the
|
||
steps required to advance to TRL 2–3. The previous work by EUROCONTROL for the SESAR programme, called
|
||
AICHAIN [3], proved that classical federated learning (FL) can improve ATM predictions such as ETOT and route
|
||
forecasting without requiring sensitive data to be centralised. This showed clear value in applying FedML to
|
||
fragmented, confidential datasets across airline s, ANSPs, and airports. However, classical FedML faces limits as
|
||
ATM problems grow in size and complexity. Multi-flight trajectory optimisation, higher airspace operations, contrail
|
||
modelling, and large -scale disruption management create exponential decisi on spaces and high -dimensional data
|
||
where classical methods struggle.
|
||
QFL offers a pathway beyond these constraints. Quantum machine learning and sampling techniques could improve
|
||
scalability and trainability, speed up convergence, and capture correlations that classical FedML may miss [4]. They
|
||
also enable richer modelling of rare but safety -critical events, strengthening resilience. The benefit is twofold:
|
||
immediate applicability through privacy-preserving FedML, and long-term potential to exploit quantum acceleration
|
||
once hardware matures. This positions QFL as both a natu ral evolution of AICHAIN’s work and a future -proofed
|
||
approach aligned with SESAR’s digital and green ATM priorities [5]. By targeting ATM, the project provides a
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 35 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 2 of 50
|
||
|
||
demanding testbed for QFL. ATM data is fragmented across many stakeholders, highly sensitive, and time-critical,
|
||
which pushes QFL beyond simpler academic demonstrations. Developing the ATM use cases will expose how QFL
|
||
copes with heterogeneous datasets, pr ivacy constraints, and multi -objective optimisation. These lessons will be
|
||
transferable to other sectors that face similar challenges, such as energy grids, healthcare networks, or logistics chains
|
||
[1]. The project also clarifies where quantum methods add value beyond classical FL, for example in scaling federated
|
||
models, simulating rare events, or solving complex optimisation problems. In doing so, it creates benchmarks,
|
||
reference architectures, and research roadmaps that the wider QFL community can build upon. The outputs therefore
|
||
go beyond ATM: they define generic methods, highlight open technical questions, and establish a foundation for
|
||
advancing QFL across domains.
|
||
To achieve the project objectives, the work is organised around four Exploratory Cases, each representing a distinct
|
||
ATM challenge.
|
||
• PREDICT (Privacy-Respecting Enhanced Departure Integration with Coordinated Timing ) focuses
|
||
on departure predictability and slot allocation. Today, flight departure times are subject to frequent
|
||
uncertainty, creating knock -on effects for network efficiency and traffic flow management. The case
|
||
investigates whether federated models train ed across multiple stakeholders could improve A -CDM
|
||
performance in areas such as estimate accuracy (Estimated Take-Off Time (ETOT), Target Take-Off Time
|
||
(TTOT), etc.) and CTOT regula tion application (supporting the SESAR goal of reduced CTOT allocation
|
||
through 4D trajectory management), without requiring the sharing of commercially sensitive data.
|
||
• HORIQON (High-altitude Operations with Real -time Integrated Quantum -Optimised Navigation)
|
||
examines trajectory planning and integration in higher airspace. As new entrants, such as high -altitude
|
||
platforms and space transport operations, begin to interact with conventional aviation, new methods will be
|
||
required to manage trajectories where littl e operational data currently exists. The case explores how QFL
|
||
could enable collaborative modelling of such trajectories in a way that protects sensitive data and supp orts
|
||
safe integration.
|
||
• SHIELD (Strengthened Handling of Irregular Events and Landing Diversions) addresses diversion
|
||
capacity and network resilience. Disruptions such as weather, technical failures, or security incidents often
|
||
require diversions, but the available diversion capacity across the network is not always visible to all actors.
|
||
This case considers whether QFL could allow stakeholders to model and share diversion capacity information
|
||
without exposing sensitive or commercially confidential data, improving the network’s ability to respond to
|
||
disruptions.
|
||
• CONTRADE (Climate-Optimised Navigation for TRAjectory DEsign) investigates contrail prediction
|
||
to support environmentally optimised planning. Avoiding persistent contrails is recognised as a key measure
|
||
for reducing the climate impact of aviation, but predicting where contrails will form requires combining data
|
||
from multiple sources. The case explores whether QFL could be used to generate contrail risk maps
|
||
collaboratively, improving environmental outcomes while respecting data ownership and privacy.
|
||
PREDICT focuses on operational efficiency and network capacity. HORIQON addresses the integration of new
|
||
entrants such as high-altitude and space transport operations. SHIELD responds to the need for resilience in the face
|
||
of disruption. CONTRADE tackles e nvironmental sustainability by examining contrail avoidance strategies.
|
||
Together, they demonstrate how QFL could be applicable to very different aspects of the ATM system rather than
|
||
concentrating on a single narrow problem.
|
||
Together, these cases ensure that the research addresses operational efficiency, integration of new entrants, resilience,
|
||
and sustainability. They provide representative contexts for assessing QFL concepts at TRL 1, without moving into
|
||
prototyping or operational validation. They were chosen to ensure that results are relevant across the breadth of the
|
||
European ATM Master Plan.
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 36 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 3 of 50
|
||
|
||
QUANTAIR sets out to achieve the following objectives:
|
||
1. Investigate whether FedML is conceptually applicable to ATM problems, while also considering where
|
||
quantum methods might support its scalability.
|
||
• The first objective is to determine the feasibility of applying QFL to representative ATM challenges.
|
||
This involves examining whether distributed learning methods can be adapted to the constraints of
|
||
ATM, such as heterogeneous data sources, privacy restric tions, and operational time -criticality. It
|
||
also considers whether quantum techniques could, in future, play a role in scaling these methods to
|
||
larger or more complex problems. The outcome will be a feasibility analysis supported by conceptual
|
||
models and indicators.
|
||
2. Develop high-level frameworks for QFL in each Exploratory Case.
|
||
• Each of the four cases is chosen to represent a distinct ATM challenge. For each case, the project
|
||
will develop a conceptual framework describing how QFL could be applied, what the learning
|
||
architecture might look like, what kinds of data would be needed, and how results could support
|
||
operational decision-making. These frameworks will be high -level and exploratory, but they will
|
||
provide a structured representation that can be taken forward in subsequent research.
|
||
3. Identify potential benefits, limitations, and open research questions.
|
||
• The third objective is to move beyond purely speculative discussion by systematically assessing both
|
||
advantages and drawbacks. Potential benefits may include improved predictability, resilience, or
|
||
environmental outcomes. Limitations may relate to data qua lity, computational constraints, or
|
||
explainability of the models. Open questions may include how federated models could be validated
|
||
in a safety -critical environment or how quantum methods could be integrated when hardware
|
||
becomes more mature. The identification of such gaps is itself a valuable outcome, as it directs future
|
||
SESAR work towards areas of highest relevance.
|
||
4. Define the steps needed to advance this research to TRL 2–3 in future work.
|
||
• Finally, the project aims to provide a roadmap for subsequent SESAR research. This includes
|
||
identifying the data -sharing frameworks, modelling techniques, and validation approaches that
|
||
would be required for TRL 2–3 studies. It also considers how and when quantum machine learning
|
||
methods might become relevant. This ensures that the project’s outputs are not isolated academic
|
||
results but are directly linked to the SESAR innovation pipeline.
|
||
QUANTAIR responds directly to the scope of HORIZON -SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03-WA1-3 by investigating the
|
||
application of quantum computing methods to ATM. At TRL 1, the emphasis is placed on federated learning
|
||
approaches and their conceptual integration into ATM, while also identifying where quantum machine learning could
|
||
in future support scalability. The objectives are realistic within a TRL 1 framework and are measurable through
|
||
conceptual indicators such as model fidelity, scalability analysis, and qualitative assessment of potential benefits. In
|
||
doing so, the project provides a structured contribution to the SESAR Master Plan’s long-term vision of the Digital
|
||
European Sky and the research priorities set out in the Work Programme.
|
||
In terms of ambition and positioning, QUANTAIR fills a critical research gap. FedML has been explored in limited
|
||
ways within aviation, mostly for localised applications such as airport processes or isolated ANSP datasets. There
|
||
has been no systematic investigation of whether these techniques could be scaled across the network or used in multi-
|
||
stakeholder settings where privacy and sovereignty concerns prevent centralised data sharing. Similarly, while
|
||
quantum computing research is advancing rapidly, applications to ATM have not yet been explored. QUANTAIR is
|
||
therefore the first structured attempt to bring all of the previous research initiatives together into a tangible plan for
|
||
development towards future ATM solutions beyond TRL 3.
|
||
The project targets TRL 1 and does not intend to develop prototypes, demonstrators, or operational tools. Its ambition
|
||
lies instead in being the first project to provide a structured assessment of QFL in holistic ATM, grounded in
|
||
representative use cases, and linked to SESAR’s strategic objectives. The outputs will be conceptual frameworks,
|
||
feasibility analyses, and roadmaps that guide the next phase of research. This ensures that the project is both realistic
|
||
in its scope and ambitious in its contribution, establishing a research direction that could shape European ATM
|
||
innovation for the next decade.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 37 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 4 of 50
|
||
|
||
#§PRJ-OBJ-PO§#
|
||
1.2 Methodology #@CON-MET-CM@# #@COM-PLE-CP@#
|
||
FedML is a machine-learning approach in which models are trained collaboratively across distributed data sources
|
||
without the need to pool raw data in a central repository. This is relevant to ATM, where operational data is
|
||
fragmented between stakeholders (such as airlines, ANSPs, airports, and regulators) and where concerns over
|
||
privacy, sovereignty, and commercial sensitivity prevent centralisation. By allowing stakeholders to contribute to
|
||
shared models without releasing their raw data, FedML provides a potential way of overcoming these barriers.
|
||
In defining the methodology, QUANTAIR focuses on the use of quantum computing as a conceptual analysis. The
|
||
project is scoped at TRL 1 not due to a lack of capability, but because current quantum hardware is not yet sufficiently
|
||
mature to enable higher -TRL validation in ATM. QUANTAIR therefore focuses on conceptual feasibility while
|
||
identifying the pathways that can be pursued once the technology advances. The research examines how federated
|
||
learning frameworks in ATM could, in principle, benefit from quant um methods for future TRLs, particularly in
|
||
handling large-scale optimisation and high-dimensional learning tasks. This ensures the project remains grounded in
|
||
what is achievable at TRL 1, while establishing a forward-looking research pathway relevant to SESAR’s long-term
|
||
ambitions.
|
||
In QUANTAIR, QFL[DS1] is defined as the use of federated learning to enable distributed model training across
|
||
ATM stakeholders, combined with an explicit recognition of the potential role of quantum methods in future TRLs.
|
||
The research is not intended to deliver operational tools but to establish whether this approach is feasible and useful
|
||
in an ATM context.
|
||
The methodology is based on several assumptions. It assumes that relevant data is distributed across multiple
|
||
stakeholders, that this data varies in quality and format, and that privacy and sovereignty concerns will prevent full
|
||
centralisation. It assumes that local training and global aggregation can be adapted to ATM use cases, and that
|
||
scalability may require quantum-enabled methods in future TRLs. These assumptions frame the scope of the work
|
||
and define the limits of the feasibility analysis.
|
||
This conceptual basis is well suited to the project’s objectives. The aim is not to deliver prototypes but to investigate
|
||
feasibility, develop high-level frameworks, identify potential benefits and limitations, and define pathways towards
|
||
higher-TRL research. FedML provides the structure for exploring distributed collaboration in ATM, and quantum
|
||
computing offers a forward-looking perspective that connects the work to the long-term vision of SESAR.
|
||
FedML is a machine-learning approach in which models are trained collaboratively across distributed data sources
|
||
without the need to pool raw data in a central repository. This is relevant to ATM, where operational data is
|
||
fragmented between stakeholders ( such as airlines, ANSPs, airports, and regulators) and where concerns over
|
||
privacy, sovereignty, and commercial sensitivity prevent centralisation. By allowing stakeholders to contribute to
|
||
shared models without releasing their raw data, FedML provides a potential way of overcoming these barriers.
|
||
In defining the methodology, QUANTAIR focuses on the use of quantum computing as a conceptual analysis. The
|
||
project is scoped at TRL 1 not due to a lack of capability, but because current quantum hardware is not yet sufficiently
|
||
mature to enable higher -TRL validation in ATM. QUANTAIR therefore focuses on conceptual feasibility, while
|
||
identifying the pathways that can be pursued once the technology advances. The research examines how federated
|
||
learning frameworks in ATM could, in principle, benefit from quan tum methods once they become more capable,
|
||
particularly in handling large-scale optimisation and high-dimensional learning tasks. This ensures that the project
|
||
remains grounded in what is achievable at TRL 1, while still establishing a forward-looking research pathway that is
|
||
relevant to SESAR’s long-term ambitions.
|
||
In QUANTAIR, QFL is defined as the use of federated learning to enable distributed model training across ATM
|
||
stakeholders, combined with an explicit recognition of the potential role of quantum methods in overcoming
|
||
computational bottlenecks in the future. The research is not intended to deliver operational tools but to establish
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 38 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 5 of 50
|
||
|
||
whether this approach is feasible and useful in an ATM context.
|
||
The methodology is based on several assumptions. It assumes that relevant data is distributed across multiple
|
||
stakeholders, that this data varies in quality and format, and that privacy and sovereignty concerns will prevent full
|
||
centralisation. It assumes that local training and global aggregation can be adapted to ATM use cases, and that
|
||
scalability may eventually require quantum-enabled methods. These assumptions frame the scope of the work and
|
||
define the limits of the feasibility analysis.
|
||
This conceptual basis is well suited to the project’s objectives. The aim is not to deliver prototypes but to investigate
|
||
feasibility, develop high-level frameworks, identify potential benefits and limitations, and define pathways towards
|
||
higher-TRL research. FedML provides the structure for exploring distributed collaboration in ATM, and quantum
|
||
computing offers a forward-looking perspective that connects the work to the long-term vision of SESAR.
|
||
Exploratory Case 1: PREDICT (Privacy-Respecting Enhanced Departure Integration with Coordinated
|
||
Timing)
|
||
One of the four exploratory cases is PREDICT, which examines the problem of departure predictability and slot
|
||
allocation. In the current ATM system, uncertainty in the timing of departures is a persistent source of inefficiency.
|
||
Airlines, airports, and the Network Manager rely on estimates for the various trigger points within the flight, which
|
||
are used to consider airspace loading and whether regulation needs to be applied to protect the airspace. This includes
|
||
estimates used within A -CDM, such as Target Off -Blocks Time (TOBT), Target Start Approval Time (TSAT),
|
||
Estimated Take-Off Time (ETOT) etc., which are used to plan the allocation of slots via Calculated Take-Off Time
|
||
(CTOT) and to coordinate traffic flows, but these estimates are often unreliable and have a tolerance window applied.
|
||
Delays caused by late boarding, pushback, or ground handling propagate through th e system, leading to inefficient
|
||
use of airport capacity and sub -optimal flow management decisions. Improving departure predictability has been a
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 39 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 6 of 50
|
||
|
||
long-standing goal in SESAR, but progress has been constrained by the limitations of centralised modelling
|
||
approaches.
|
||
The challenge is that the information required to predict departures accurately is distributed across multiple actors.
|
||
Airlines hold data on crew, passengers, and turnaround processes. Airports manage gate availability, ground
|
||
handling, and sequencing. Air navigation service providers track surface movements and manage departure
|
||
clearances. The network manager needs a system-wide picture in order to coordinate slots at a regional level. At
|
||
present, much of this information is kept within individual organisations, either because it is operationally sensitive
|
||
or because there are no mechanisms to share it in real time. As a result, centralised models rely on incomplete data,
|
||
and their predictions lack the accuracy needed to deliver significant improvements.
|
||
The PREDICT case investigates whether FedML could provide a more effective framework. In a federated approach,
|
||
each stakeholder would train a local model on its own data, and only model parameters would be shared. A global
|
||
model could then be constructed t hat reflects the behaviour of the entire system without requiring the exchange of
|
||
raw data. For example, an airline’s local model could capture patterns in boarding times, while another airport’s
|
||
model could capture ground handling delays. The aggregated m odel could then produce more reliable A -CDM
|
||
estimates, which in turn could improve slot allocation and flow management decisions.
|
||
At TRL 1, the project does not attempt to build such models but rather to examine their conceptual feasibility. The
|
||
methodology involves defining a high -level framework for how federated models might be constructed in this
|
||
context, identifying what types of data would be needed at each node, and analysing the assumptions required for the
|
||
models to function. Indicators such as potential improvements in model fidelity, the robustness of aggregation across
|
||
heterogeneous datasets, and the scalability of the app roach will be considered. The analysis will also examine the
|
||
limitations of FedML in this application, such as the risk of bias if data quality differs significantly between
|
||
stakeholders or the difficulty of validating models in a safety-critical environment.
|
||
The role of quantum computing is considered solely as a conceptual pathway for future TRLs. With more accurate
|
||
ETOT predictions produced by federated models, the subsequent task of sequencing departure slots becomes a
|
||
high‑dimensional, NP‑hard scheduling problem in which classical methods are known to struggle.
|
||
Here, the federated setup is essential: only by combining distributed insights from airlines, airports, and network
|
||
managers can a sufficiently rich optimisation space be created for downstream quantum‑machine‑learning algorithms
|
||
to act upon. The project w ill evaluate how quantum techniques, particularly hybrid quantum‑classical approaches
|
||
such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), variational quantum circuits, and
|
||
quantum‑annealing‑based methods, could be applied at this global level. F or example, quantum‑machine‑learning
|
||
models, seeded with federated‑learning‑derived estimates, could generate high‑quality slot sequences that minimise
|
||
delay propagation.
|
||
Furthermore, we will investigate whether quantum computers can effectively evaluate the probability of rare but
|
||
critical events, such as sector congestion, enabling unsafe or inefficient allocations to be rejected without exhaustive
|
||
simulation. Hybrid workflows will be designed so that classical pre‑processing (e.g., feature extraction, constraint
|
||
filtering) feeds into the quantum optimiser, while classical post‑processing (e.g., solution refinement, robustness
|
||
checks) cleans and validates the quantum output.
|
||
These techniques illustrate how federated learning provides the conceptual foundation for future quantum integration,
|
||
while hybrid quantum‑classical methods offer a practical bridge between current capabilities and the eventual
|
||
deployment of fully quantum‑enhanced scheduling solutions.
|
||
The expected output of the PREDICT case is therefore twofold: first, a conceptual framework showing how federated
|
||
learning can provide a privacy-preserving yet system-wide approach to departure predictability and slot allocation;
|
||
and second, a roadmap outlining how quantum machine learning could build on this federated foundation in future
|
||
TRL 2–3 work. By emphasising that accurate, system-wide models can only emerge in a federated setting, the case
|
||
highlights that quantum methods are not an alternative to data sharing but a complement that relies on federated
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 40 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 7 of 50
|
||
|
||
inputs to be effective. This dual perspective will clarify both the feasibility and the limitations of QFL, and determine
|
||
whether distributed learning combined with quantum acceleration offers a credible path toward improved A -CDM
|
||
accuracy, operational efficiency, and capacity management.
|
||
|
||
Exploratory Case 2: HORIQON (High-altitude Operations with Real-time Integrated Quantum-Optimised
|
||
Navigation)
|
||
HORIQON addresses trajectory planning and integration in higher airspace. New entrants such as high -altitude
|
||
platforms, sub-orbital vehicles, supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, space transport systems, and certain military
|
||
operations create demands that d iffer significantly from conventional traffic. These vehicles operate with unique
|
||
performance profiles, often cross through controlled airspace at high speed, and interact with en-route flows at non-
|
||
standard altitudes. Current trajectory planning methods a re not well adapted to these conditions, and the lack of
|
||
operational data makes it difficult to develop predictive models. HORIQON investigates whether QFL could provide
|
||
a framework for sharing knowledge across stakeholders, enabling collaborative modellin g of higher -airspace and
|
||
high-speed trajectories while protecting sensitive operational and security-related data.
|
||
The main difficulty is that responsibility for higher airspace operations is spread across multiple organisations. All
|
||
stakeholders hold sensitive operational data, individual states maintain oversight of safety and sovereignty, and
|
||
ANSPs must manage interactions with conventional traffic within current controlled airspace. Sharing of information
|
||
is complex due to national security considerations, the commercial confidentiality of operational profiles, and
|
||
financial sensitivities. As a result, efforts to model higher airspace trajectories are often fragmented, and the lack of
|
||
integrated predictive capability makes it difficult to anticipate how such operations will affect the wider network.
|
||
The HORIQON case examines whether QFL could provide a way of combining insights from distributed datasets
|
||
without requiring disclosure of sensitive information. A federated model could allow the various stakeholders to train
|
||
local models on their own data while contributing to a global model that captures trajectory behaviours in higher
|
||
airspace. For example, space operators could train models on ascent and descent profiles, while ANSPs could
|
||
contribute models on interactions with controlled airspace. Aggre gating these models could improve the ability to
|
||
predict trajectories and their impact on the network, without requiring operators to reveal sensitive operational details.
|
||
At TRL 1, the focus is on developing a conceptual framework for how such federated models might be constructed
|
||
and on identifying the assumptions needed for them to function. The feasibility analysis will consider factors such as
|
||
the extreme heterogeneity of data sources, the sparsity of available datasets, and the sensitivity of mission
|
||
information. Indicators of feasibility will include the ability of federated models to generalise from limited local data,
|
||
the robustness of aggregation when nodes have ver y different information, and the potential scalability of the
|
||
approach.
|
||
The role of quantum computing is considered solely as a conceptual pathway for future TRLs. High -altitude 4D
|
||
trajectory deconfliction requires balancing safety, mission objectives, restricted zones, and sovereignty constraints
|
||
across multiple flight inform ation regions. This rapidly becomes a computationally hard problem, where classical
|
||
methods are unlikely to scale. A federated setup is indispensable since no single operator or authority can or will
|
||
provide the data diversity required to model high-altitude trajectories; only by linking their local models can a realistic
|
||
system-wide view emerge. On this federated foundation, quantum methods could potentially be applied in future
|
||
TRLs.
|
||
We will analyse if quantum machine learning algorithms and hybrid approaches are able to provide scalable ansatzes
|
||
to explore the large space of possible solutions, thus converging more rapidly to high -quality, conflict-free routes
|
||
than classical only approaches may allow. Quantum enhanced algorithms could evaluate rare-event probabilities such
|
||
as high-altitude conflict likelihood or space-weather-induced route degradation, leveraging distributed risk models
|
||
trained by operators. Quantum kernel methods are able to classify trajectory feasibility under multiple constraints,
|
||
refining the features provided.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 41 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 8 of 50
|
||
|
||
While quantum computing offers significant benefits for high -altitude 4D trajectory deconfliction, it is essential to
|
||
consider the potential obstacles that may arise during implementation, such as hardware limitations, regulatory
|
||
obstacles, and difficultie s in integrating quantum algorithms with existing classical systems. Addressing these
|
||
concerns will help ensure that the proposed solution is feasible and effective in practice.
|
||
The project will analyse the basic application principles of appropriate hybrid quantum algorithms in ATM according
|
||
to TRL 1.
|
||
Higher airspace, generally above flight level 550, is at present largely unused by commercial aviation. This relative
|
||
vacancy offers a rare opportunity to introduce new technologies and working methods without the immediate
|
||
constraints of dense traffic. By treating this environment as a testing ground, ATM can explore innovative approaches
|
||
to integration, coordination, and trajectory management more rapidly than in lower airspace, where changes are
|
||
slowed by operational complexity and legacy systems.
|
||
The expected output of the HORIQON case is therefore twofold: first, a conceptual framework for using federated
|
||
learning to support collaborative trajectory modelling in higher airspace; and second, a roadmap identifying where
|
||
quantum machine learning, and classification techniques could naturally extend this framework in later TRLs. By
|
||
making the federated approach explicit as the necessary foundation, the case highlights that quantum computing is
|
||
not a substitute for collaboration, but a complement that depends on federated inputs to be effective.
|
||
Exploratory Case 3: SHIELD (Strengthened Handling of Irregular Events and Landing Diversions)
|
||
SHIELD addresses the challenge of diversion capacity and network resilience. Air traffic management must be able
|
||
to cope with unexpected events such as severe weather, technical failures, medical emergencies, or security incidents.
|
||
When diversions occur, the availability of suitable airports and the capacity of surrounding airspace become critical
|
||
factors. At present, diversion planning is often managed locally, with each airline or ANSP focusing on its own area
|
||
of responsibility. The wider network view is limited, and information on diversion capacity is not always shared
|
||
across stakeholders. This leads to situations where capacity is underused in some areas while others face excessive
|
||
pressure, reducing the resilience of the system as a whole.
|
||
A key difficulty is that the data required to build a comprehensive picture of diversion capacity is distributed and
|
||
often sensitive. Airlines hold data on operational priorities and alternate airport preferences. Airports manage runway
|
||
and parking availab ility, ground handling resources, and emergency procedures. ANSPs control the surrounding
|
||
airspace and determine how many diversions can be safely accommodated. The Network Manager is responsible for
|
||
regional coordination but does not always have access to timely or detailed information from all stakeholders. At a
|
||
broader level, the European Aviation Crisis Coordination Cell (EACCC) is tasked with coordinating responses to
|
||
major disruptions, but its effectiveness depends on the availability of accurate and up-to-date information from across
|
||
the network. This fragmentation makes it difficult to anticipate the network-wide impact of diversions or to allocate
|
||
resources effectively during disruptions.
|
||
The SHIELD case explores whether federated learning could support more effective modelling of diversion capacity.
|
||
In this approach, each stakeholder would train a local model on its own data, capturing patterns such as airport
|
||
throughput under different we ather conditions or airline diversion preferences. These models could then be
|
||
aggregated to create a broader picture of diversion capacity at the network level, without requiring any actor to release
|
||
its raw operational data. Such a framework could improve situational awareness and decision -making during
|
||
disruptive events, helping the system to absorb shocks more effectively.
|
||
At TRL 1, the work does not involve implementing such models but rather examining their feasibility. The analysis
|
||
will define a conceptual framework showing how QFL might be applied to diversion capacity modelling. It will
|
||
consider assumptions such as the availability of local data, the variability of conditions across airports, and the need
|
||
for near-real-time aggregation during an unfolding disruption. Feasibility will be assessed using indicators such as
|
||
whether federated approaches can capture the divers ity of conditions across the network, how robust aggregated
|
||
models would be to incomplete or delayed inputs, and what kinds of benefits might arise in terms of resilience.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 42 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 9 of 50
|
||
|
||
|
||
The role of quantum computing is considered solely as a conceptual pathway for future TRLs. Diversion planning
|
||
requires balancing multiple constraints (such as fuel states, alternate readiness, sector loads, and weather) while
|
||
ensuring safety and minimising delay. This quickly becomes a largescale combinatorial optimisation problem,
|
||
especially during cascading disruptions where time pressure is critical. For diversion capacity, federation is crucial:
|
||
airlines, airports, ANSPs, and the Network Manager each control different pieces of the puzzle, and only their
|
||
combined local models can reveal the network’s true resilience during disruptions.
|
||
On this federated foundation, quantum techniques could potentially be applied in future TRLs. Kernelbased quantum
|
||
anomaly detection could identify unusual diversion patterns from historical disruptions, enabling early recognition
|
||
of bottlenecks in evolving crises. Quantum random walks could explore the connectivity graph of airports and sectors,
|
||
rapidly highlighting underused alternates and feasible redirection chains. Quantum algorithms for probability
|
||
estimation could assess the likelihood of alternate ov erload or excessive airborne holding for candidate diversion
|
||
plans, improving safety assessments without the need for extensive classical Monte Carlo runs.
|
||
Hybrid quantumclassical methods (such as variational quantum circuits), the Quantum Approximate Optimization
|
||
Algorithm (QAOA), and quantumannealing based solvers will be evaluated for the diversion allocation problem
|
||
itself. These algorithms can encode the allocation task, producing high -quality allocations that minimise overload
|
||
and delay even with lastminute changes, while classical pre and postprocessing handles data preparation and result
|
||
validation.
|
||
The project will analyse the basic application principles of appropriate hybrid quantum algorithms in ATM according
|
||
to TRL 1.
|
||
The expected output of the SHIELD case is a feasibility assessment of federated learning for diversion capacity
|
||
modelling, coupled with a forward -looking roadmap showing how quantum optimisation, anomaly detection, and
|
||
probability estimation could reinforce network resilience under disruption. By making the federated approach explicit
|
||
as the foundation, the case highlights that quantum computing is not an alternative to collaboration but a complement
|
||
that depends on federated inputs. In doing so, SHIELD wil l clarify whether distributed approaches can improve
|
||
visibility and coordination during crises, supporting the long-term goal of a more resilient and robust European ATM
|
||
system.
|
||
Exploratory Case 4: CONTRADE (Climate-Optimised Navigation for TRAjectory DEsign)
|
||
CONTRADE investigates contrail prediction to support environmentally optimised planning. Persistent contrails and
|
||
the cirrus clouds they can form are recognised as a significant contributor to the climate impact of aviation. Avoiding
|
||
contrail-forming regions can therefore reduce the environmental footprint of flights, but predicting where contrails
|
||
will occur is technically challenging. Accurate prediction maps require the integration of meteorological data,
|
||
complex atmospheric conditions, aircraft performance characteristics, and traffic patterns. At present, this integration
|
||
is limited, and decision-making relies on simplified models that cannot capture the full variability of the prevailing
|
||
atmospheric conditions.
|
||
The challenge lies in the distributed nature of the relevant data. Meteorological agencies produce forecasts of
|
||
temperature, humidity, and wind fields at multiple altitudes. Airlines hold data on aircraft performance and
|
||
operational routing preferences, in cluding cost-index settings that determine whether the airline prioritises speed,
|
||
fuel efficiency, or other operational factors. This information is highly sensitive, as it reflects commercial strategies
|
||
and fuel-burn targets. ANSPs manage the airspace structure and flow constraints that determine whether avoidance
|
||
trajectories are feasible. In addition, contrail mitigation itself involves a complex trade-off: avoiding contrail-forming
|
||
regions may require flying at less efficient altitudes, leading to highe r fuel burn and associated harmful emissions.
|
||
Each actor therefore possesses part of the information needed, but there is no mechanism for combining it into shared
|
||
contrail-risk maps without significant data exchange. Concerns over intellectual property, operational sensitivity, and
|
||
the lack of common standards further hinder centralised approaches.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 43 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 10 of 50
|
||
|
||
The CONTRADE case investigates whether federated learning could provide a framework for collaborative contrail-
|
||
risk modelling. In this approach, each stakeholder would train local models that capture how their data contributes to
|
||
contrail formation. Meteorological agencies could model atmospheric conditions, while aircraft manufacturers could
|
||
contribute data on performance characteristics and contrail sensitivity of specific airframes and engines. Airlines
|
||
would provide models based on their operational use of these aircraft, including cost-index preferences that determine
|
||
whether flights are optimised for speed, fuel efficiency, or specific fuel-burn targets. ANSPs could contribute models
|
||
that reflect operational feasibility in terms of sector capacity and airspace restrictions. Aggregating these models
|
||
could produce risk maps that are richer and more accurate than those generated by any single actor, without requiring
|
||
raw data to be shared.
|
||
At TRL 1, the work is limited to conceptual analysis. The methodology involves defining the types of local models
|
||
that might be trained, the assumptions needed for aggregation, and the indicators that could be used to judge
|
||
feasibility. These indicators in clude the potential improvement in the resolution and reliability of risk maps, the
|
||
robustness of results when datasets are incomplete or inconsistent, and the scalability of the approach to larger
|
||
geographic regions. The analysis will also consider limitations, such as the challenge of validating contrail predictions
|
||
against observed outcomes and the computational demands of processing large volumes of atmospheric data.
|
||
The role of quantum computing is considered a potential future enabler. Contrail avoidance routing is inherently a
|
||
multi-objective optimisation problem: flights must minimise climate forcing, fuel burn, and congestion
|
||
simultaneously. Classical methods struggle as the number of route/altitude combinations grows.
|
||
Here, the federated setup is essential: only by combining local models from meteorological agencies, aircraft
|
||
manufacturers, airlines, and ANSPs can the diverse data needed for contrail prediction be assembled without
|
||
compromising sensitive inputs.
|
||
On this federated foundation, quantum methods could extend capability. Hybrid quantumclassical optimisation (such
|
||
as variational quantum circuits or the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA)) could evaluate many
|
||
potential route –altitude combina tions more efficiently, enabling targeted contrail avoidance without degrading
|
||
overall network performance. Quantum algorithms for probability estimation could assess the chance of contrail
|
||
persistence along candidate routes using aggregated weather performance models, reducing the need for largescale
|
||
classical sampling. Finally, quantum kernels could project aggregated weather performance data into high -
|
||
dimensional feature spaces where persistent contrail conditions become linearly separable, improving the precision
|
||
of contrail riskmaps.
|
||
The expected outcome of the CONTRADE case is to demonstrate whether federated learning can provide a practical
|
||
basis for collaborative contrail -risk mapping, and to highlight where quantum methods could eventually enhance
|
||
such models. Rather than positioning quantum as a separate solution, the analysis will explore how machine learning,
|
||
estimation, and classification techniques can be layered on top of federated inputs to deliver more accurate and
|
||
actionable risk maps. By extending QFL into the environmenta l domain, CONTRADE broadens the project’s
|
||
relevance: alongside efficiency, integration, and resilience, it directly supports SESAR’s strategic objective of
|
||
reducing aviation’s climate impact and making Europe the most environmentally sustainable region to fly.
|
||
A Coordinated approach
|
||
Taken together, the four exploratory cases ensure that the methodology is comprehensive and representative of the
|
||
challenges facing European ATM. PREDICT addresses operational efficiency in day -to-day traffic management,
|
||
HORIQON looks ahead to the integration of new entrants in higher airspace, SHIELD focuses on network resilience
|
||
under disruption, and CONTRADE examines environmental sustainability. By covering efficiency, integration,
|
||
resilience, and environment, the project avoids concentrating on a single niche problem and instead demonstrates
|
||
how Quantum Federated Learning could, in principle, be applied across the full scope of the European ATM Master
|
||
Plan. This breadth ensures that the feasibility analysis is robust, highlights both common and domain -specific
|
||
challenges, and maximises the value of the results for guiding future SESAR research.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 44 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 11 of 50
|
||
|
||
Transversal cross-cutting
|
||
The four exploratory cases provide the primary structure for the research, but several cross -cutting considerations
|
||
influence the methodology as a whole. These reflect the interdisciplinary nature of the work, the constraints under
|
||
which the research must operate, and the principles that ensure it is consistent with European policy goals.
|
||
The project requires expertise from multiple domains. Air traffic management provides the operational context,
|
||
defining the problems that need to be addressed and the performance criteria against which solutions must be judged.
|
||
Machine learning contributes the methods for distributed model training, while quantum research provides the longer-
|
||
term perspective on scalability and algorithmic possibilities. Regulatory and policy insight ensures that the proposed
|
||
frameworks remain realistic in the institutional environment of European aviation. The combination of these
|
||
perspectives is essential; no single discipline is capable of addressing the research questions in isolation. The
|
||
methodology is therefore deliberately interdisciplinary, ensuring that technical fe asibility is always considered in
|
||
relation to operational relevance and policy constraints.
|
||
The assumptions underpinning the methodology are also common across the exploratory cases. These include the
|
||
expectation that operational data will remain fragmented across multiple stakeholders, that privacy and sovereignty
|
||
concerns will prevent full centralisation, and that datasets will be heterogeneous in both quality and structure. The
|
||
feasibility analyses therefore focus on whether federated learning can function under these conditions rather than
|
||
assuming idealised data availability. A further assumption is that validation of distributed models in a safety-critical
|
||
domain will pose challenges that cannot be fully resolved at TRL 1. Instead, the project aims to identify those
|
||
challenges explicitly, providing a roadmap for how they could be addressed in higher-TRL work.
|
||
The research is conducted in accordance with the “do no significant harm” principle of the EU Taxonomy Regulation.
|
||
The work involves only conceptual frameworks and analyses, and does not generate environmental impacts directly.
|
||
Its contribution is instead positive, particularly in the CONTRADE case, where the methodology is explicitly directed
|
||
towards reducing the climate impact of aviation by enabling contrail avoidance strategies. The project also contributes
|
||
indirectly to sustainability by exploring meth ods that may improve efficiency and resilience, thereby reducing
|
||
unnecessary fuel burn.
|
||
Because the project involves the application of machine learning concepts, attention is given to the robustness and
|
||
explainability of such methods. Federated learning introduces specific risks, including the potential for bias if local
|
||
datasets are unbalanced and the difficulty of validating aggregated models when raw data is not accessible. These
|
||
issues will be examined systematically in the feasibility analyses, and potential safeguards will be identified. The
|
||
project anticipates that any future integration of quantum methods will require similar attention to transparency and
|
||
verification, particularly in a safety-critical environment. The project therefore aligns with European principles on
|
||
trustworthy AI by ensuring that robustness, reproducibility, and explainability are considered from the outset, even
|
||
at TRL 1.
|
||
In summary, the methodology integrates expertise from multiple disciplines, is grounded in explicit assumptions
|
||
about the ATM environment, complies with European sustainability principles, and recognises the importance of
|
||
robustness and explainability in AI methods. These cross-cutting considerations ensure that the exploratory analyses
|
||
are not only technically sound but also aligned with the broader requirements of the aviation system and the European
|
||
research framework.
|
||
Open Scientific Principles and Responsible Research
|
||
The methodology also incorporates principles of open science and responsible research management. Although the
|
||
project is exploratory and limited to TRL 1, the outputs include conceptual frameworks, feasibility assessments, and
|
||
analytical results that can be openly shared. Publications will be made available in open -access journals or
|
||
repositories in line with Horizon Europe requirements. Preprints and working papers will be released where
|
||
appropriate to support early dissemination and peer feedback. Models and analytical frameworks developed during
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 45 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 12 of 50
|
||
|
||
the project will be documented and, where possible, shared in a way that enables scrutiny and reuse by the wider
|
||
research community.
|
||
Research data management follows the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). The project
|
||
will not generate new operational datasets from its activities. Instead, it will make use of modest datasets that may
|
||
include synthetic data c reated for illustrative purposes, publicly available sources such as EUROCONTROL
|
||
performance statistics or open meteorological data, and structured documentation of modelling assumptions. These
|
||
materials will be curated with clear documentation of provenance, scope, and format. A data management plan will
|
||
be produced by month six of the project and updated as required. Persistent identifiers will be used to ensure
|
||
findability, and trusted repositories will be selected for long -term preservation. Access will be granted in line with
|
||
open-access requirements, while any data subject t o restrictions for confidentiality or security will be documented
|
||
with clear justification. Reusability will be supported by applying open licences where appropriate and by providing
|
||
explanatory documentation of models and algorithms.
|
||
The project recognises that the integration of a gender dimension in research content is mandatory under Horizon
|
||
Europe unless clearly irrelevant. In the case of QUANTAIR, the subject matter involves the conceptual exploration
|
||
of federated learning and qua ntum computing in ATM. The scientific and operational questions addressed are not
|
||
influenced by biological sex or social gender factors, and the research outputs do not have a differentiated impact
|
||
along those lines. For this reason, the gender dimension is not directly relevant to the research content. However, the
|
||
project will ensure that dissemination and communication activities are inclusive, using language and imagery that
|
||
reflect diversity, and ensuring that engagement with stakeholders and end users is representative of the community.
|
||
These measures ensure that QUANTAIR is aligned with the principles of open and responsible science. The outputs
|
||
will be accessible to the wider research community, the data will be managed transparently, and inclusivity will be
|
||
ensured in dissemination and communication. Even at TRL 1, these practices increase the value of the research by
|
||
making it reproducible, transparent, and usable as a foundation for future SESAR work.
|
||
Leveraging National and International R&I Activities
|
||
The proposed research builds directly upon major European R&I activities and SESAR strategic priorities, ensuring
|
||
continuity and maximising return on investment from prior programmes. One important foundation is AI-CHAIN
|
||
(EUROCONTROL, 2022–2024), which validated the use of collaborative machine learning on distributed, privacy-
|
||
sensitive ATM datasets, including Estimated Take-Off Times (ETOT) and trajectory prediction. AI-CHAIN
|
||
showed that federated models could deliver improved accuracy without requiring raw data sharing. QUANTAIR
|
||
will extend these results by exploring Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) as a means to address the scalability and
|
||
machine learning challenges identified in AI-CHAIN. This will be achieved by reusing AI-CHAIN benchmarks,
|
||
adapting its federated architectures, and maintaining close contact with EUROCONTROL stakeholders to
|
||
guarantee methodological alignment.
|
||
The SESAR Master Plan 2025 provides further direction. It explicitly recognises that “machine learning is used in
|
||
combination with conventional deterministic algorithms for trajectory prediction, ATFM and ATC conflict
|
||
detection” and calls for the development of AI capabilities enabling the next generation of ATM platforms. It also
|
||
underlines the importance of “virtualisation and cyber-secure data sharing” and identifies “AI for aviation” as an
|
||
industrial research priority. Furthermore, the Master Plan stresses the need for ATM modernisation to shift towards
|
||
“a modern, data-driven and cloud-based service-oriented architecture,” facilitating privacy-preserving and
|
||
interoperable collaboration across stakeholders. QUANTAIR responds to these calls by investigating QFL as a
|
||
privacy-preserving AI mechanism to overcome sovereignty and sensitivity barriers that prevent centralised data
|
||
sharing, aligning its exploratory cases (departure predictability, higher airspace integration, diversion capacity, and
|
||
contrail avoidance) with SESAR Strategic Deployment Objectives, notably SDO 3 on Dynamic Airspace
|
||
Configuration, SDO 5 on the Transformation to Trajectory-Based Operations (TBO), and SDO 8 on Service-
|
||
Oriented Delivery Models. In doing so, the project contributes to SESAR’s long-term roll-out objectives, directly
|
||
addressing the shift towards SDO 5 for precise 4D trajectory optimisation, enabling resilience and scalability in line
|
||
with SDO 3, and supporting the transition to SDO 8. It also adds value to SESAR’s automation and AI research
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 46 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 13 of 50
|
||
|
||
stream, particularly in the areas of high-dimensional optimisation, safety-critical validation, and cross-stakeholder
|
||
model aggregation.
|
||
Beyond SESAR, QUANTAIR will connect to the broader European and international R&I ecosystem. It will
|
||
ensure consistency with Digital Sky Demonstrators, align its environmental work on contrail avoidance and
|
||
climate-optimised trajectories with the Clean Aviation and Zero-Emission Aircraft programmes, and take into
|
||
account international initiatives such as ICAO, FAA NextGen, and NASA ATM-X to ensure interoperability and
|
||
standardisation.
|
||
To embed its results in the SESAR ecosystem, QUANTAIR will feed its conceptual frameworks and feasibility
|
||
analyses into SESAR repositories and knowledge-sharing channels, organise technical workshops with AI-CHAIN
|
||
and SESAR 3 JU expert groups to align assumptions and validation methods, and publish results in open-access
|
||
venues while maintaining strong links with SESAR Innovation Days and technical consultation fora. In this way,
|
||
the project will not duplicate previous work but rather extend and complement SESAR’s federated learning
|
||
strategy, anchoring its results in the Master Plan 2025 vision of a Digital European Sky enabled by AI, privacy-
|
||
preserving data sharing, and service-oriented architectures.
|
||
Interdisciplinary Integration of Expertise
|
||
The consortium combines three complementary disciplines essential to the project: quantum algorithms, distributed
|
||
orchestration, and operational ATM. DLR QSOC contributes expertise in quantum computing, quantum machine
|
||
learning and optimisation, leading the scientific feasibility assessment of applying quantum methods to federated
|
||
learning. Qoro Quantum brings knowledge of distributed systems and orchestration, ensuring that the frameworks
|
||
are technically realistic, privacy-preserving, and aligned with SESAR’s transition to service-oriented architectures.
|
||
SkyNav International adds operational ATM and navigation expertise, embedding safety, regulatory, and
|
||
interoperability requirements into the exploratory cases so that the results reflect real-world constraints and
|
||
stakeholder needs.
|
||
Integration will be achieved through co-design workshops, joint development of conceptual frameworks, and
|
||
systematic cross-review of results. DLR will validate the scientific soundness of the approaches, Qoro will ensure
|
||
architectural robustness and scalability, and SkyNav will test operational relevance against SESAR’s Strategic
|
||
Deployment Objectives. This structure ensures that the project outputs are not isolated academic exercises but
|
||
practical and credible contributions to SESAR’s research pipeline, providing actionable pathways for future work
|
||
on Quantum Federated Learning in ATM.
|
||
The combined skill set is both unique and directly relevant to the project’s aims. Quantum algorithm research alone
|
||
cannot address operational feasibility; distributed orchestration expertise alone cannot resolve ATM privacy and
|
||
sovereignty barriers; and operational ATM expertise alone cannot scale to emerging computational methods. By
|
||
uniting these three perspectives, the consortium can evaluate Quantum Federated Learning in a way no single
|
||
partner could achieve in isolation. This integration ensures that the project bridges the gap between theoretical
|
||
research, technical system design, and operational ATM practice, delivering results that are both innovative and
|
||
usable within the SESAR framework.
|
||
Role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH)
|
||
The proposed work does not directly require integration of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) disciplines, as
|
||
the focus is on the conceptual feasibility of Quantum Federated Learning for Air Traffic Management at TRL 1.
|
||
The research is primarily technical, combining quantum algorithmics, distributed computing architectures, and
|
||
operational ATM knowledge. Its outputs will be high-level frameworks, feasibility analyses, and pathways for
|
||
future research rather than social or behavioural studies.
|
||
That said, the consortium recognises that ATM modernisation is a socio-technical transformation. The SESAR
|
||
Master Plan 2025 explicitly highlights the evolving role of human operators in human–machine teaming and the
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 47 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 14 of 50
|
||
|
||
need for trustworthy AI-based systems to ensure adoption in safety-critical contexts. These aspects fall outside the
|
||
TRL 1 scope of QUANTAIR but are highly relevant to subsequent SESAR research. The project will therefore
|
||
remain attentive to SSH findings from related SESAR activities on data governance, human–machine trust, and
|
||
stakeholder acceptance, and ensure that its conceptual frameworks are compatible with future interdisciplinary
|
||
studies. In this way, while SSH integration is not required for the current exploratory work, the project establishes a
|
||
technical foundation that can be enriched by SSH contributions in later phases.
|
||
Research Data Management and Research Outputs
|
||
QUANTAIR is scoped at TRL 1 and will not generate large operational datasets. The main outputs will be
|
||
conceptual frameworks, feasibility analyses, modelling artefacts, and small synthetic datasets used to test federated
|
||
learning and quantum machine learning concepts. Outputs will be textual (reports, frameworks), numerical
|
||
(synthetic trajectory/weather data), and software-based (lightweight code templates), with total volume <10 GB.
|
||
Where public datasets (e.g. Eurocontrol performance reports, meteorological data) are combined with synthetic
|
||
data, provenance will be documented.
|
||
Findability. All outputs will be assigned persistent identifiers (DOIs) via trusted repositories. Metadata will follow
|
||
Horizon Europe requirements to ensure indexing and searchability.
|
||
Accessibility. Deliverables and publications will be open access. Software and modelling artefacts will be hosted on
|
||
GitHub. Sensitive information, if any, will be restricted but metadata will remain visible for verification.
|
||
Importantly, in line with the federated learning approach, only trained model weights and parameters will be
|
||
shared, never raw stakeholder data.
|
||
Interoperability. Data and code will be provided in non-proprietary formats (CSV, JSON, Python notebooks).
|
||
Metadata will use recognised standards (e.g. Dublin Core) and SESAR taxonomies to ensure compatibility with
|
||
other ATM projects.
|
||
Reusability. Outputs will carry open licenses (CC-BY for documents, Apache 2.0 or MIT for code) to enable reuse
|
||
and integration into future SESAR projects. Documentation and environment files will accompany software to
|
||
support reproducibility.
|
||
Curation and Storage. DLR will curate scientific data and models, Qoro will maintain software repositories, and
|
||
SkyNav will validate operational relevance. Outputs will be preserved in institutional repositories for at least ten
|
||
years. A Data Management Plan will be delivered by Month 6 and updated before project close.
|
||
This approach ensures compliance with FAIR principles and makes results directly reusable by the SESAR
|
||
community in follow-on TRL 2–3 activities.
|
||
|
||
#§CON-MET-CM§# #§COM-PLE-CP§# #§REL-EVA-RE§#
|
||
2. Impact #@IMP-ACT-IA@#
|
||
2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact
|
||
The results of QUANTAIR are expected to make a meaningful contribution to the SESAR programme’s medium -
|
||
term outcomes and to the wider long -term impacts described in the Work Programme. The project is positioned at
|
||
TRL 1, and its immediate outputs are conceptual frameworks and feasibility assessments. The impact therefore lies
|
||
not in the delivery of deployable systems, but in shaping the research agenda by establishing whether Quantum
|
||
Federated Learning (QFL) provides a credible new approach for ATM. By clarifying the potential scope, identifying
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 48 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 15 of 50
|
||
|
||
enabling conditions, and defining pathways to higher-TRL research, the project provides the knowledge base required
|
||
for Europe to maintain leadership in this field, both in federated approaches to ATM and in the application of
|
||
emerging quantum methods for large-scale optimisation and risk assessment.
|
||
The pathways to impact extend across four domains that correspond to the project’s exploratory cases. Each case
|
||
addresses a distinct challenge within the ATM Master Plan, ensuring that the project’s contribution is broad and
|
||
relevant.
|
||
The PREDICT case supports efficiency and capacity by addressing the challenge of departure predictability and slot
|
||
allocation. Delays at departure propagate through the network, and current models are limited because the relevant
|
||
information is fragmented across stakeholders. By investigating whether QFL could enable collaborative prediction
|
||
without compromising data privacy, the project contributes to the SESAR objective of improving predictability as a
|
||
foundation for advanced demand–capacity balancing. Even at TRL 1, the project identifies how federated approaches
|
||
might reduce uncertainty in departure planning and sets out pathways for higher-TRL research that could ultimately
|
||
improve the efficiency of European airspace.
|
||
The HORIQON case supports the safe integration of new entrants in higher airspace. The growing presence of high-
|
||
altitude platforms, sub -orbital flights, super - and hyper-sonic vehicles, and space transport operations introduces
|
||
uncertainty into ATM, and the lack of shared data across stakeholders makes it difficult to model these trajectories.
|
||
QUANTAIR explores whether QFL could provide a framework for collaborative trajectory modelling under strict
|
||
confidentiality constraints. This aligns with SESAR’s objective of ensuring the seamless integration of all airspace
|
||
users and supports the EASA Higher Airspace Operations roadmap. It also complements ICAO’s ongoing work in
|
||
the ATMOPS Panel, ATMRPP, and ICAO Paris, where the need for new coordination mechanisms for high-altitude
|
||
operations has been identified. The project’s outputs provide a research basis that can inform both European and
|
||
global efforts in this domain.
|
||
The SHIELD case contributes to resilience and contingency management by addressing diversion handling and rapid
|
||
network reorganisation. Current approaches are fragmented, with limited visibility of network-wide capacity during
|
||
disruptions. By examining whe ther QFL could enable distributed modelling of diversion capacity, the project
|
||
explores how resilience could be enhanced without requiring stakeholders to share sensitive operational data. This
|
||
directly supports SESAR’s long-term ambition of building a more resilient Digital European Sky. It also aligns with
|
||
ICAO’s GATMOC, which emphasises the need for globally harmonised contingency procedures and collaborative
|
||
decision-making. By identifying how distributed modelling could underpin these objectives, QUANT AIR
|
||
contributes to the policy and research foundations required to manage disruptions more effectively at both regional
|
||
and global levels.
|
||
The CONTRADE case contributes to environmental sustainability by considering contrail prediction mapping.
|
||
Persistent contrails represent one of aviation’s most significant climate impacts, but predicting them requires
|
||
combining data from meteorological agencies, airlines, and ANSPs. QUANTAIR explores whether QFL could be
|
||
used to generate richer and more reliable contrail prediction maps without requiring raw data exchange. This supports
|
||
SESAR’s environmental pillar, directly addresses the Horizon Europe priority of making Europe the most
|
||
environmentally friendly region to fly, and complements wider European climate objectives. It also aligns with
|
||
ICAO’s sustainability agenda by exploring methods to reduce the non -CO₂ impacts of aviation. By identifying
|
||
pathways for integrating distributed contrail modelling into ATM processes, the project sets the stage for future
|
||
research that could enable environmentally optimised trajectory planning.
|
||
Across these domains, the project contributes to the realisation of the Digital European Sky vision. QFL represents
|
||
a novel way of enabling scalable services supported by a digital ecosystem, where distributed data sources can
|
||
contribute to shared models w ithout compromising sovereignty or security. This directly addresses one of the
|
||
structural challenges of the Digital European Sky: how to build a networked architecture that is both data -rich and
|
||
privacy-preserving. While QUANTAIR does not deliver technica l systems, it identifies how distributed and
|
||
potentially quantum -enabled approaches could contribute to this architecture in the longer term, by combining
|
||
federated models with quantum machine learning, estimation, and classification methods capable of han dling the
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 49 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 16 of 50
|
||
|
||
scale and complexity of future ATM services.
|
||
The expected impacts also extend beyond SESAR. By addressing data-sharing challenges in ATM through QFL, the
|
||
project informs EASA’s regulatory strategies for higher airspace, ICAO’s work on contingency and environmental
|
||
management, and the global framework established by the GATMOC. It provides European stakeholders with early
|
||
insight into how quantum methods might eventually support large -scale, secure, and collaborative ATM services,
|
||
strengthening Europe’s position as a leader in both ATM modernisation and quantum research.
|
||
The scale and significance of these impacts must be interpreted in the context of TRL 1. The project does not produce
|
||
immediate operational benefits, but it does set the agenda for higher -TRL work that could. Its contribution lies in
|
||
providing the first st ructured assessment of QFL in ATM, across efficiency, new entrants, resilience, and
|
||
sustainability. By demonstrating that the concept is feasible in principle, QUANTAIR enables future SESAR projects
|
||
to pursue targeted TRL 2 –3 developments with confidence. If successful, this pathway could, over the medium to
|
||
long term, support Europe’s ambition to deliver the most environmentally friendly, efficient, resilient, and digitally
|
||
integrated ATM system in the world.
|
||
The achievement of these impacts depends on several factors beyond the scope of the project. Progress in quantum
|
||
hardware and algorithms may be slower than anticipated, delaying the availability of scalable quantum methods.
|
||
Conversely, rapid advances could create opportunities earlier than expected, underlining the importance of SESAR
|
||
being prepared with conceptual frameworks and use cases that can be taken up as soon as technology allows.
|
||
Stakeholders may also be cautious about adopting federated approaches if they perceive the governance, validation,
|
||
or liability arrangements as unclear. Regulatory frameworks for higher airspace and environmental modelling may
|
||
evolve at different speeds across regions, creating asymmetries in adoption. These are not risks to the project itself,
|
||
but barriers that may influence whether the pathways identified can be realised in practice. By identifying them early,
|
||
QUANTAIR ensures that future SESAR and policy work can anticipate these challenges and address them
|
||
systematically.
|
||
|
||
2.2 Measures to maximise impact - Dissemination, exploitation and communication #@COM-DIS-VIS-CDV@#
|
||
The project adopts a proportionate but structured approach to dissemination, exploitation, and communication to
|
||
ensure that its results are visible, usable, and positioned to generate impact beyond the immediate project lifetime.
|
||
At TRL 1, the outputs are primarily conceptual frameworks, feasibility analyses, and structured assessments of
|
||
Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) in ATM. The plan therefore emphasises knowledge sharing, policy relevance,
|
||
and preparing pathways for follow-on research, rather than commercialisation.
|
||
Communication activities will be modest but continuous, designed to ensure visibility of the project and to inform a
|
||
wider audience about its purpose and benefits. The consortium will establish a project website as a primary
|
||
information point, complemented by short news items and updates on professional social media platforms. These
|
||
activities will highlight the relevance of quantum computing and federated learning to aviation in terms
|
||
understandable to non-specialists, showing how such research contributes to efficiency, resilience, sustainability, and
|
||
the safe integration of new entrants. Outreach will be proportionate to the scale of the project, relying on existing
|
||
channels within the consortium, which collectively offers a global and cross-disciplinary network of contacts across
|
||
research, industry, and regulatory communities.
|
||
Dissemination will focus on the scientific and technical community, particularly those engaged in ATM
|
||
modernisation and quantum computing research. Results will be published in open-access journals and presented at
|
||
conferences such as SESAR Innovation Days and relevant academic venues. Where appropriate, preprints will be
|
||
released to encourage early engagement and peer feedback. The project will also contribute to SESAR knowledge-
|
||
sharing channels and technical workshops to ensure that results feed directly into the wider programme.
|
||
Dissemination will be coordinated so that outputs are available in formats that are accessible and reusable, consistent
|
||
with open science practices.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 50 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 17 of 50
|
||
|
||
Exploitation will take place primarily through institutional and programme channels. The conceptual frameworks
|
||
and feasibility assessments generated by QUANTAIR are intended for direct uptake by future SESAR research at
|
||
TRL 2–3. They also provide material of interest to ATM stakeholders, who can use the findings to inform early
|
||
thinking on data -sharing models and the potential of federated approaches. Regulators such as EASA, and
|
||
international bodies such as ICAO, will also benefit from the insights generat ed, particularly in areas of higher
|
||
airspace operations, contingency management, and environmental sustainability. Although no commercial
|
||
exploitation is expected at TRL 1, the intellectual outputs represent a foundation that can be carried forward in
|
||
subsequent projects or policy initiatives. Intellectual property will be managed in line with Horizon Europe rules,
|
||
with ownership of results defined in the consortium agreement. Given the conceptual nature of the work, results will
|
||
primarily be disseminated openly, with protection measures applied only if necessary to safeguard future exploitation
|
||
potential.
|
||
Feedback to policy measures is an integral part of the plan. The project’s outputs are directly relevant to ongoing
|
||
European and international discussions, including EASA’s Higher Airspace Operations roadmap, ICAO’s ATMOPS
|
||
and ATMRPP panels, and the global framework provided by the GATMOC. By sharing findings through technical
|
||
workshops, regulatory consultations, and programme -level interactions, QUANTAIR will provide evidence to
|
||
support policy development and help shape future research agendas.
|
||
This first version of the dissemination and exploitation plan provides a framework that is appropriate to the scope
|
||
and maturity of the project. A detailed plan will be produced as a mandatory deliverable within three months of
|
||
project start and updated as necessary during the project. Together, these measures will ensure that the outputs of
|
||
QUANTAIR are widely disseminated, appropriately exploited, and communicated effectively to the scientific
|
||
community, policymakers, stakeholders, and the public.
|
||
|
||
References
|
||
[1] Abbas, Amira, et al. "Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization." Nature Reviews Physics (2024): 1-18.
|
||
[2] Li, Li, et al. "A review of applications in federated learning." Computers & Industrial Engineering 149 (2020): 106854.
|
||
[3] Ruiz, Sergio, et al. "Privacy-preserving federated machine learning in ATM: experimental results from two use cases."
|
||
Proceedings of the 12th SESAR Innovation days (2022).
|
||
[4] Ballester, Rocco, Jesus Cerquides, and Luis Artiles. "Quantum federated learning: a comprehensive literature review
|
||
of foundations, challenges, and future directions." Quantum Machine Intelligence 7.2 (2025): 1-29.
|
||
[5] SESAR Joint Undertaking, European ATM Master Plan 2025 Edition (2025).
|
||
|
||
#§COM-DIS-VIS-CDV§#
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 51 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 18 of 50
|
||
|
||
2.3 Summary
|
||
KEY ELEMENT OF THE IMPACT SECTION
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
D & E & C MEASURES
|
||
What dissemination, exploitation and communication
|
||
measures will you apply to the results?
|
||
|
||
Results will be communicated through a dedicated
|
||
website, social media updates, and targeted news items
|
||
for non-specialist audiences. Dissemination to the
|
||
scientific community will use open-access journals,
|
||
preprints, and conferences (SESAR Innovation Days,
|
||
quantum/AI venues). Exploitation will occur through
|
||
SESAR follow-on projects, input to regulatory
|
||
roadmaps (EASA, ICAO), and alignment with
|
||
international R&I activities. All outputs will be openly
|
||
shared under FAIR principles, with repositories
|
||
ensuring transparency and reuse. A mid-project and
|
||
final dissemination event will engage stakeholders
|
||
directly.
|
||
EXPECTED RESULTS
|
||
What do you expect to generate by the end of the
|
||
project?
|
||
|
||
By the end of the project, QUANTAIR will deliver:
|
||
• Conceptual frameworks for applying QFL to
|
||
four representative ATM challenges
|
||
(departure predictability, higher -airspace
|
||
integration, diversion capacity, contrail
|
||
avoidance).
|
||
• Feasibility analyses identifying assumptions,
|
||
indicators, potential benefits, and limitations.
|
||
• Roadmaps defining steps towards TRL 2 –3,
|
||
including conditions under which quantum
|
||
methods may provide added value.
|
||
• Open, reproducible outputs (reports, models,
|
||
synthetic datasets) supporting future SESAR
|
||
research.
|
||
|
||
SPECIFIC NEEDS
|
||
What are the specific needs that triggered this
|
||
project?
|
||
|
||
Air Traffic Management (ATM) faces structural
|
||
barriers to data sharing, scalability, and
|
||
resilience. Operational datasets are fragmented
|
||
across airlines, ANSPs, airports, and regulators,
|
||
making centralised modelling infeasible due to
|
||
sovereignty, confidentiality, and security
|
||
constraints. At the same time, growing system
|
||
complexity (multi-flight optimisation,
|
||
integration of higher-airspace entrants,
|
||
resilience to disruption, and contrail avoidance
|
||
pushes classical methods to their limits. Europe
|
||
requires a structured assessment of whether
|
||
Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) can provide
|
||
a privacy-preserving, scalable framework for
|
||
collaborative modelling that is aligned with
|
||
SESAR’s Digital European Sky ambitions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 52 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 19 of 50
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
#§IMP-ACT-IA§#
|
||
TARGET GROUPS
|
||
Who will use or further up-take the results of the
|
||
project? Who will benefit from the results of the
|
||
project?
|
||
|
||
• SESAR research community and Joint
|
||
Undertaking programme teams.
|
||
• ATM operational stakeholders (airlines,
|
||
ANSPs, airports, Network Manager).
|
||
• Regulatory and policy bodies (EASA, ICAO
|
||
panels, European Commission).
|
||
• Academic and industrial researchers in
|
||
federated learning, quantum computing, and
|
||
AI for aviation.
|
||
• Wider environmental and climate policy
|
||
stakeholders interested in contrail mitigation
|
||
and sustainable aviation.
|
||
OUTCOMES
|
||
What change do you expect to see after
|
||
successful dissemination and
|
||
exploitation of project results to the
|
||
target group(s)?
|
||
|
||
The project will provide the first
|
||
structured evidence base for QFL in
|
||
ATM, enabling SESAR to judge
|
||
whether and how to pursue higher-
|
||
TRL development. Stakeholders will
|
||
gain conceptual frameworks that
|
||
inform data-sharing models,
|
||
integration of new entrants, resilience
|
||
strategies, and climate-optimised
|
||
navigation. Dissemination ensures that
|
||
results are embedded in SESAR
|
||
roadmaps, regulatory debates, and
|
||
international standardisation efforts.
|
||
|
||
IMPACTS
|
||
What are the expected wider scientific, economic and societal
|
||
effects of the project contributing to the expected impacts outlined
|
||
in the respective destination in the work programme?
|
||
|
||
Wider impacts include:
|
||
• Scientific: establishment of benchmarks and
|
||
methodologies for QFL across distributed, safety -critical
|
||
domains.
|
||
• Economic: foundations for more efficient, resilient, and
|
||
sustainable European ATM, reducing costs from delay,
|
||
disruption, and inefficient fuel burn.
|
||
• Societal: enhanced resilience of the air transport system,
|
||
reduced climate impact via contrail avoidance, and
|
||
strengthened European leadership in privacy-preserving AI
|
||
and quantum research.
|
||
In the longer term, QUANTAIR contributes directly to the
|
||
Work Programme objective of delivering the most
|
||
environmentally friendly, efficient, resilient, and digitally
|
||
integrated ATM system worldwide.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 53 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 20 of 50
|
||
|
||
3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation #@QUA-LIT-QL@# #@WRK-PLA-WP@#
|
||
3.1 Work plan and resources
|
||
The design of the QUANTAIR work plan reflects both the scope of a TRL 1 exploratory research project and the
|
||
need to provide clear evidence of progress at defined review points. The structure is kept deliberately lean, with four
|
||
work packages that separate management and outreach activities from the research, while ensuring that each of the
|
||
project’s objectives is addressed in a coherent way. This approach avoids unnecessary fragmentation but still gives
|
||
full visibility to the mandatory elements of management, dissemination, exploitation, and data management.
|
||
|
||
|
||
GANTT-Chart overview including work packages, milestones and deliverables
|
||
|
||
The first work package covers project management and the cross-cutting activities on communication, dissemination,
|
||
and exploitation. This ensures that the day-to-day running of the project, financial and administrative tasks, reporting
|
||
to the SESAR JU, and quality assurance are all handled in one place. The same package also includes the production
|
||
and maintenance of the Project Management Plan, the Data Management Plan, and the Communication and
|
||
Dissemination Plan. These are not treated as box -ticking exercises but as tools to give the consortium a common
|
||
framework for how the work will be organised and how outputs will be shared with the wider research and
|
||
stakeholder community.
|
||
|
||
The research itself is divided into two phases. The first nine months (WP2) are dedicated to setting the foundations.
|
||
This includes scoping the four exploratory cases - PREDICT, HORIQON, SHIELD, and CONTRADE - agreeing the
|
||
assumptions and indicators that will be used to test feasibility, and producing the initial research plan and exploratory
|
||
report. This early phase is designed to provide tangible outputs that can be reviewed and challenged at the interim
|
||
stage, while still leaving scope for refinement. It allows the consortium to put forward initial concepts and
|
||
frameworks without claiming premature certainty, which is consistent with the TRL 1 nature of the project.
|
||
|
||
The second research phase (WP3) runs from month 10 to month 18 and builds directly on the initial results. Here the
|
||
consortium revisits the assumptions, tests them across the four cases, and develops the final research plan and report.
|
||
The emphasis in this phase is on refinement and integration: drawing out the lessons that are common across cases,
|
||
understanding where QFL may have genuine promise for ATM, and identifying the open questions that must be
|
||
addressed in future TRL 2–3 research. This structure gives the project a rhythm: first to establish and scope, then to
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 54 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 21 of 50
|
||
|
||
refine and consolidate. By the end of month 18, the core research outputs are complete and ready for review.
|
||
|
||
The final work package (WP4) is dedicated to ensuring that the results are not only written down but also
|
||
communicated, preserved, and made available for exploitation. This includes the production of the final exploitation
|
||
and impact strategy, compliance with open science and repository requirements, and the organisation of a final event
|
||
to share the findings with both the research community and operational stakeholders. Dedicating a separate work
|
||
package to this task provides clarity and ensures that disse mination and exploitation are not left to the margins of
|
||
project management, but treated as substantive outputs in their own right.
|
||
|
||
The sequencing of activities is straightforward. WP2 provides the initial research outputs and ensures that the
|
||
consortium can demonstrate progress at the interim review. WP3 takes these results forward, deepening the analysis
|
||
and completing the research e ffort. WP4 then consolidates the outputs and ensures their visibility. WP1 runs
|
||
throughout, providing governance, coordination, and quality assurance. The interdependencies are limited but clear:
|
||
WP2 feeds WP3, WP3 feeds WP4, and WP1 underpins the whole process. This simplicity is deliberate, allowing the
|
||
consortium to concentrate on the substance of the research rather than the mechanics of coordination.
|
||
|
||
Overall, the work plan balances clarity with proportionality. The structure makes it possible to demonstrate progress
|
||
at the interim and final stages, while keeping the number of work packages aligned to the scale of a TRL 1 activity.
|
||
Most of the effort is concentrated in the two research phases, where the exploratory cases are scoped, analysed, and
|
||
refined. Management, communication, and exploitation activities run in parallel but remain light and focused,
|
||
ensuring that resources are directed primarily to the research. In this way, the plan ensures that the project’s objectives
|
||
can be met within the available timeframe and that the results are prepared for further development in future SESAR
|
||
research.
|
||
3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole #@CON-SOR-CS@# #@PRJ-MGT-PM@#
|
||
The consortium for QUANTAIR is deliberately small and highly focused. It brings together three partners with
|
||
complementary expertise that together cover the full range of knowledge needed for exploratory research on Quantum
|
||
Federated Learning in Air Traffic Management. This structure avoids fragmentation while ensuring that the project
|
||
objectives are addressed from scientific, operational, and regulatory perspectives.
|
||
|
||
The disciplinary scope is broad. The project combines expertise in advanced computing and federated learning, in
|
||
ATM modelling and SESAR research methods, and in the operational and regulatory environment of European
|
||
aviation. This inter-disciplinary mix is central to the project’s feasibility. Quantum computing and federated learning
|
||
alone cannot be meaningfully assessed without ATM expertise to define realistic use cases and indicators, and ATM
|
||
modelling by itself cannot explore the potential of novel com putational paradigms. By combining the three, the
|
||
project ensures that technical exploration remains grounded in operational reality, while operational questions are
|
||
informed by the latest research in computing and data science.
|
||
|
||
Each partner contributes distinct capabilities. One partner provides established experience in ATM research and
|
||
modelling, including the frameworks and methods that underpin SESAR exploratory research. A second partner
|
||
contributes deep expertise in quantum computing and federated learning, with access to state-of-the-art algorithmic
|
||
research and computational frameworks. The third partner contributes operational and regulatory insight, drawing on
|
||
direct experience with ATM stakeholders, industry bodies, and international regulators. This combination ensures
|
||
that the project not only develops and analyses conceptual frameworks, but also tests their plausibility in the context
|
||
of the real ATM system.
|
||
|
||
The consortium also has access to the infrastructures required for this work. The ATM research partner maintains
|
||
modelling platforms and reference datasets that support exploratory analysis in a SESAR context. The quantum
|
||
computing partner has access to qu antum simulators and federated learning frameworks suitable for conceptual
|
||
testing. The operational partner brings established stakeholder networks and access to policy and regulatory processes
|
||
that allow the project results to be evaluated in relation to real-world governance and adoption constraints. Together,
|
||
these infrastructures provide the project with all the tools needed for TRL 1 exploration.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 55 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 22 of 50
|
||
|
||
|
||
The partners complement one another across the research chain. The computing expertise ensures that new methods
|
||
are explored rigorously, the ATM research expertise ensures that methods are tested against relevant operational
|
||
questions, and the operational expertise ensures that outputs are credible for stakeholders and aligned with regulatory
|
||
processes. None of these alone would be sufficient; together they provide a coherent and proportionate team for the
|
||
project.
|
||
|
||
Cross-cutting considerations are also addressed. The consortium applies open science practices in line with Horizon
|
||
Europe requirements, including publication in open -access journals, sharing of analytical frameworks, and
|
||
compliance with FAIR data management principles. The project also acknowledges that the integration of the gender
|
||
dimension in R&I is not directly relevant to the scientific content, since the research addresses computational and
|
||
operational questions without differentiated gender impacts. However, dissemination and communication activities
|
||
will be inclusive, with attention to diversity in language, imagery, and stakeholder engagement.
|
||
|
||
Overall, the consortium is proportionate to the scale and ambition of QUANTAIR. It combines complementary
|
||
expertise in computing, ATM research, and operational regulation, has access to the required infrastructures, and is
|
||
well positioned to deliver the pr oject’s objectives while preparing the ground for future SESAR research at higher
|
||
maturity levels.
|
||
|
||
#§CON-SOR-CS§# #§PRJ-MGT-PM§#
|
||
Tables for section 3.1
|
||
Table 3.1a: List of work packages
|
||
Work
|
||
package
|
||
No
|
||
Work Package
|
||
Title
|
||
Lead
|
||
Participant
|
||
No
|
||
Lead
|
||
Participant
|
||
Short Name
|
||
Person-
|
||
Months
|
||
Start
|
||
Month
|
||
End
|
||
month
|
||
1 Project
|
||
Management &
|
||
CDE
|
||
1 DLR 10 01 24
|
||
2 QUANTAIR
|
||
Research
|
||
Activity, Part A
|
||
2 Qoro 18 01 09
|
||
3 QUANTAIR
|
||
Research
|
||
Activity, Part B
|
||
2 Qoro 18 09 18
|
||
4 CDE Wrap-up 3 SkyNav 4 18 24
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1b: Work package description
|
||
For each work package:
|
||
Work package number 1
|
||
Work package title Project Management & CDE
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 56 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 23 of 50
|
||
|
||
Objectives
|
||
This work package ensures that the project is managed efficiently and in full alignment with Horizon Europe
|
||
and SESAR 3 JU requirements. It provides governance, financial and administrative management, reporting,
|
||
and quality assurance across the project. I t also covers the planning and execution of communication,
|
||
dissemination, exploitation, and data management activities, ensuring that results are properly documented and
|
||
shared. In doing so, it establishes the framework for the project’s visibility and impact, and leads directly into
|
||
the final CDE phase (WP4) where these activities are consolidated and completed.
|
||
The specific objectives are to:
|
||
1. Ensure effective project governance and coordination, including quality assurance and compliance
|
||
with SESAR 3 JU requirements.
|
||
2. Establish and maintain the project’s management framework through delivery and updating of the
|
||
Project Management Plan (PMP), Data Management Plan (DMP), and related documentation.
|
||
3. Provide timely and accurate reporting, including periodic reports and preparation for SESAR reviews.
|
||
4. Plan and implement communication, dissemination, and exploitation activities, including the
|
||
Communication and Dissemination Plan (CDE), project website, online presence, and events.
|
||
5. Support long-term uptake and impact by drafting and finalising the exploitation and impact strategy,
|
||
ensuring compliance with open science and FAIR data requirements, and preparing the transition into
|
||
the final CDE wrap-up phase.
|
||
|
||
Description of work
|
||
Governance will be provided by a Project Management Board (PMB), chaired by the Coordinator and
|
||
composed of one representative from each partner. The PMB will meet quarterly to review progress, monitor
|
||
risks, and take decisions on both technical and admini strative issues. The Project Coordinator will manage
|
||
day-to-day operations and act as the primary interface with SESAR 3 JU. A Kick-off Meeting (KoM) in Month
|
||
1 will formally establish working procedures, confirm roles and responsibilities, and launch project activities.
|
||
|
||
A Project Management Plan (PMP) will be delivered in Month 3 to formalise procedures for governance,
|
||
reporting, quality assurance, and risk management. This will include internal review mechanisms to ensure
|
||
that all deliverables are technically sound, consistent, and aligned with SESAR standards before submission.
|
||
The PMP will be updated at mid -point (M12) to reflect lessons learned and adjustments. Progress will be
|
||
monitored continuously, with corrective measures applied promptly in case of deviations.
|
||
|
||
Research data will be managed under a Data Management Plan (DMP), produced in Month 3 and updated as
|
||
needed. The DMP will describe the types of data generated, their provenance, and how FAIR principles
|
||
(Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) will be applied. Where confidentiality or security constraints
|
||
apply, these will be documented with clear justification. Datasets and analytical outputs will be preserved in
|
||
trusted repositories with persistent identifiers to ensure long-term access.
|
||
|
||
The Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation (CDE) Plan will also be delivered in Month 3 and
|
||
updated at least once during the project (M12). It will define the channels and activities to ensure visibility and
|
||
uptake of results, including the project website, open -access publications, contributions to SESAR
|
||
dissemination events, and targeted outreach to scientific, operational, and policy audiences. A mid -project
|
||
dissemination event will be held at M12 to share initial results and prepare the ground for the final wrap -up
|
||
phase. WP1 therefore establishes the framework for CDE activities, while the final consolidation and impact
|
||
reporting are delivered in WP4.
|
||
|
||
Exploitation measures will focus on enabling results to be taken forward in future SESAR research and by
|
||
stakeholders such as ANSPs, regulators, and ICAO working groups. Intellectual property will be managed in
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 57 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 24 of 50
|
||
|
||
line with Horizon Europe rules and the consortium agreement, with a principle of openness unless specific
|
||
protection is required to preserve exploitation potential. A draft post-research exploitation and impact strategy
|
||
will be delivered in M24, which then feeds into WP4 for finalisation and promulgation.
|
||
|
||
Reporting will cover all mandatory submissions to SESAR 3 JU, including periodic reports at the end of each
|
||
reporting period and the final project report at closure. SESAR review meetings will be treated as milestones
|
||
in project governance. The consortium will prepare collectively for these reviews, ensuring that deliverables,
|
||
presentations, and supporting evidence are complete and coherent. Internal review meetings will be scheduled
|
||
in advance to prepare for each review and ensure alignment with SESAR expectations.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Work package number 2
|
||
Work package title QUANTAIR Research Activity, Part A
|
||
|
||
Objectives
|
||
This work package establishes the conceptual and analytical foundations for applying Quantum Federated
|
||
Learning (QFL) in Air Traffic Management. It provides the first structured exploration of how QFL could be
|
||
framed within ATM constraints, how it might operate across distributed stakeholders, and what benefits or
|
||
limitations may arise in different operational contexts. The emphasis is on scoping and structuring the research,
|
||
and on producing verifiable outputs that are consistent with the TRL 1 nature of the project and suitable for
|
||
review at the end of the first reporting period.
|
||
The specific objectives are to:
|
||
1. Define the conceptual framework for QFL in ATM, including assumptions on data distribution,
|
||
privacy constraints, stakeholder behaviour, and computational resources.
|
||
2. Scope and characterise the four exploratory cases (PREDICT, HORIQON, SHIELD, CONTRADE),
|
||
identifying the ATM challenges they represent and their relevance to SESAR priorities.
|
||
3. Develop baseline analytical models for each case, using synthetic data and structured representations
|
||
of ATM processes to test conceptual feasibility.
|
||
4. Identify potential benefits, limitations, and open research questions arising from each case, recording
|
||
these in interim deliverables.
|
||
5. Produce a consolidated interim report that synthesises findings across all cases and highlights cross -
|
||
cutting requirements for advancing to TRL 2–3 research.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Description of work
|
||
The purpose of WP2 is to establish the conceptual and analytical basis of the project. The first nine months are
|
||
dedicated to scoping the research in a structured way, producing tangible outputs that allow progress to be
|
||
verified at the interim review. This reflects both the TRL 1 nature of QUANTAIR and the SESAR requirement
|
||
for clear evidence of achievement within the first reporting period. The work ensures that Quantum Federated
|
||
Learning is not treated as an abstract concept, but is defined in relation to the constraints and opportunities of
|
||
Air Traffic Management.
|
||
|
||
The work begins with the development of the conceptual framework for QFL in ATM. This framework sets
|
||
out the core assumptions on which the research is based, including the distribution and heterogeneity of data
|
||
sources, the privacy constraints that prevent raw data exchange, the behavioural preferences of stakeholders
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 58 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 25 of 50
|
||
|
||
such as airlines’ cost -index settings, and the computational resources that can realistically be assumed at
|
||
different maturity levels. It also addresses governance considerations, such as how trust and participation are
|
||
established between stakeholders, and what indicators of feasibility can be applied at TRL 1. This step creates
|
||
the common reference point against which each exploratory case can be analysed.
|
||
|
||
Each of the four exploratory cases is then scoped in detail. For PREDICT, HORIQON, SHIELD, and
|
||
CONTRADE, the partners will describe the operational challenge, its connection to SESAR Master Plan
|
||
objectives, and the specific way in which QFL could apply. This scoping ensures that the project covers a
|
||
broad spectrum of ATM challenges (predictability, high -altitude integration, resilience, and environmental
|
||
optimisation) rather than variations on a single theme. It also defines for each case the boundaries of what can
|
||
be assessed at TRL 1, the types of data or models that would be relevant, and the expected indicators of benefit
|
||
or limitation.
|
||
|
||
Once the scoping is complete, baseline analytical models will be developed for each case. These models will
|
||
use synthetic data and structured representations of ATM processes, rather than operational datasets, to ensure
|
||
that the work remains feasible within a TRL 1 scope. The models are intended to test conceptual feasibility:
|
||
whether QFL can in principle represent the ATM dynamics involved, whether stakeholder constraints can be
|
||
incorporated in a distributed way, and whether potential benefits can be expressed in measurable terms. This
|
||
activity requires close collaboration between the partners: the quantum computing expertise to design federated
|
||
and distributed model structures, the ATM research expertise to represent operational processes, and the
|
||
operational expertise to validate the plausibility of assumptions.
|
||
|
||
Findings from the framework and case models will be captured continuously and compared across cases. This
|
||
cross-case analysis is a critical part of WP2: it ensures that common themes are identified, that lessons from
|
||
one case inform the others, and that ga ps and limitations are recorded in a way that can guide WP3. Interim
|
||
deliverables, including the Exploratory Research Plan (ERP), Exploratory Research Report (ERR), and
|
||
Concept Outlines, provide formal records of this work. These deliverables will undergo internal review and
|
||
PMB approval before submission to SESAR 3 JU, ensuring technical soundness and alignment with SESAR
|
||
standards.
|
||
|
||
Resource allocation in WP2 reflects the intensity of this phase. All three partners are engaged in parallel across
|
||
the four cases, with effort distributed according to expertise: ATM research leads the case scoping and
|
||
conceptual assumptions, the quantum partner leads federated modelling structures, and the operational partner
|
||
ensures realism, regulatory alignment, and tra ceability to stakeholder concerns. The effort in WP2 is
|
||
proportionately the largest, as it defines the trajectory for the remainder of the project and provides the evidence
|
||
required at the first review milestone.
|
||
|
||
By the end of WP2, the project will have established a conceptual framework for QFL in ATM, scoped and
|
||
modelled its application across four distinct operational contexts, and produced the first structured assessment
|
||
of feasibility. These outputs provide the foundation for refinement and integration in WP3, and allow SESAR
|
||
to judge progress at the interim stage with confidence that the project is on track.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Work package number 3
|
||
Work package title QUANTAIR Research Activity, Part B
|
||
|
||
Objectives
|
||
This work package builds directly on the foundations established in WP2. Whereas WP2 defined the
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 59 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 26 of 50
|
||
|
||
conceptual framework and developed initial models for the exploratory cases, WP3 is focused on refinement,
|
||
cross-case synthesis, and the production of final research outputs. The emphasis is on consolidating results
|
||
into a coherent assessment of Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) in ATM, and on defining realistic pathways
|
||
for future research at higher maturity levels. WP3 therefore completes the scientific work of the project before
|
||
the CDE wrap-up phase begins.
|
||
The specific objectives are to:
|
||
1. Refine and extend the exploratory case models developed in WP2, incorporating lessons learned and
|
||
addressing the open questions identified in the first reporting period.
|
||
2. Conduct systematic cross-case analysis to identify common challenges, benefits, and limitations of
|
||
QFL across diverse ATM domains.
|
||
3. Develop structured recommendations for advancing QFL research towards TRL 2 –3, including the
|
||
conditions under which quantum machine learning and other quantum methods could provide
|
||
additional value.
|
||
4. Produce a consolidated final research report that synthesises the project’s findings, documents
|
||
conceptual advances, and defines priorities for future SESAR research.
|
||
5. Frame the results to support dissemination and exploitation, ensuring that outputs are relevant for
|
||
SESAR follow-on projects, ATM stakeholders, and international bodies such as ICAO and EASA.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Description of work
|
||
WP3 represents the second phase of the research activity and builds directly on the foundations established in
|
||
WP2. While the first nine months of the project are focused on scoping and baseline modelling, the following
|
||
nine months are dedicated to refinement, integration, and the delivery of the final research outputs. The aim is
|
||
to consolidate the work of the exploratory cases into a coherent assessment of Quantum Federated Learning in
|
||
ATM, and to provide recommendations and pathways for how this early-stage research can be taken forward
|
||
at higher maturity levels.
|
||
|
||
The work begins with refinement of the exploratory case models. Each case - PREDICT, HORIQON, SHIELD,
|
||
and CONTRADE - will be revisited using the frameworks and assumptions established in WP2. The baseline
|
||
models developed earlier will be extended to incorporate lessons learned, address gaps identified in the interim
|
||
review, and respond to stakeholder feedback where appropriate. Refinement may include adjusting
|
||
assumptions on data distribution or stakeholder behaviour, testing alternative formulations of the federated
|
||
learning approach, or clarifying the conditions under which conceptual feasibility is most evident. This ensures
|
||
that the case outputs are not static one -off analyses but part of an iterative process of validation and
|
||
improvement.
|
||
|
||
Once the case models have been refined individually, the consortium will conduct systematic cross -case
|
||
analysis. The purpose of this activity is to extract common themes and divergences across the four contexts.
|
||
For example, it may be that QFL appears most promising in situations where privacy constraints dominate (as
|
||
in SHIELD or CONTRADE), but less so where operational predictability is already supported by centralised
|
||
models (as in PREDICT). Cross -case analysis allows the consortium to identify these patterns, quantify
|
||
similarities and differences where possible, and derive generalisable insights. It also ensures that the project
|
||
delivers more than four separate case studies: the results are integrated into a broader understanding of where
|
||
QFL can contribute to ATM and where its limitations are most apparent.
|
||
|
||
In parallel, WP3 develops structured recommendations for the future. These recommendations will set out the
|
||
steps required to advance QFL research to TRL 2 –3, including what kinds of datasets, computational tools,
|
||
and stakeholder collaborations will be needed. They will also identify where quantum optimisation and other
|
||
quantum computing methods could in future provide additional value, recognising that current hardware is not
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 60 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 27 of 50
|
||
|
||
yet sufficient for operational validation but that pathways towards higher maturity can be mapped. The
|
||
recommendations will be positioned within the SESAR programme context, linking to Master Plan objectives
|
||
and ensuring coherence with European and international research agendas.
|
||
|
||
The culmination of WP3 is the production of the final consolidated research report. This document will
|
||
synthesise the project’s findings, document the conceptual advances achieved, and set out the open questions
|
||
that remain. It will provide the first structured TRL 1 assessment of QFL in ATM, written in a way that supports
|
||
both technical follow -on research and policy -level consideration. The report will be accompanied by
|
||
consolidated concept outlines for each case, ensuring that results are clearly traceabl e and can be compared
|
||
across contexts.
|
||
|
||
The work in WP3 also contributes directly to dissemination and exploitation. By framing results in a way that
|
||
is relevant for SESAR follow -on projects, ATM stakeholders, and international bodies such as ICAO and
|
||
EASA, the outputs of WP3 are designed to be immediately useful beyond the project itself. This includes
|
||
highlighting potential contributions to international guidance documents (such as ICAO’s GATMOC) and to
|
||
regulatory roadmaps such as the EASA AI and Higher Airspace Operations strategies.
|
||
|
||
The resources allocated to WP3 reflect the need for intensive collaborative work. All partners are fully
|
||
engaged: quantum computing expertise is used to refine federated modelling structures and assess long -term
|
||
scalability; ATM research expertise leads th e cross -case synthesis and ensures coherence with SESAR
|
||
frameworks; and operational and regulatory expertise ensures that recommendations are framed in a way that
|
||
is credible to stakeholders and aligned with the wider aviation ecosystem. WP3 therefore represents the point
|
||
where the strands of the project are brought together, refined, and translated into outputs that are not only
|
||
scientifically sound but also operationally meaningful.
|
||
|
||
By the end of WP3, the project will have moved from initial feasibility exploration to a consolidated set of
|
||
findings. The results will provide a clear picture of how QFL could contribute to ATM, what limitations must
|
||
be addressed, and what steps are required to move forward. This provides a natural transition into WP4, where
|
||
dissemination, exploitation, and open science compliance are finalised and the project’s impact is secured.
|
||
|
||
Work package number 4
|
||
Work package title Post Research CDE Activity
|
||
|
||
Objectives
|
||
This work package consolidates and amplifies the results of the project, ensuring that the outputs of
|
||
QUANTAIR are visible, accessible, and usable for future research, regulatory processes, and operational
|
||
stakeholders. While CDE activities are initiated in WP1, the final phase provides dedicated focus o n
|
||
exploitation, open science compliance, and high -impact dissemination. WP4 demonstrates the consortium’s
|
||
commitment to maximising the value of Horizon Europe and SESAR investment, by delivering results that are
|
||
technically credible, operationally relevant, and aligned with European and international aviation strategies.
|
||
The specific objectives are to:
|
||
1. Finalise the exploitation and impact strategy, translating project results into clear recommendations
|
||
for SESAR follow -on activities, national and European research agendas, and international bodies
|
||
such as ICAO and EASA.
|
||
2. Ensure compliance with open science and FAIR principles , producing a repository of project
|
||
outputs (reports, models, datasets, metadata) in trusted long-term archives with persistent identifiers.
|
||
3. Maximise dissemination to the research community , through open -access publications,
|
||
contributions to SESAR dissemination events, and active presence in scientific fora.
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 61 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 28 of 50
|
||
|
||
4. Promote visibility towards operational and policy stakeholders , including ANSPs, airlines,
|
||
regulators, and industry, by framing project results in terms of operational feasibility, policy relevance,
|
||
and long-term research pathways.
|
||
5. Deliver a final public event and supporting materials, showcasing the project’s achievements and
|
||
providing a platform for dialogue with the wider ATM community, demonstrating the value of SESAR
|
||
exploratory research and its contribution to the Digital European Sky vision.
|
||
|
||
Description of work
|
||
WP4 consolidates the results of the project and ensures that they are visible, accessible, and exploitable beyond
|
||
the lifetime of QUANTAIR. While communication, dissemination, and exploitation activities are initiated
|
||
under WP1 to give early visibility, th is final phase provides dedicated focus on maximising impact. The
|
||
emphasis is on producing a final exploitation and impact strategy, ensuring compliance with open science
|
||
principles, and delivering a high-quality public event that promotes the project’s results to both technical and
|
||
policy audiences.
|
||
|
||
The first strand of work concerns the exploitation and impact strategy. A draft version is developed under
|
||
WP1, but in WP4 this is finalised based on the complete research results. The strategy translates conceptual
|
||
findings into concrete recommendations for SESAR follow-on activities, as well as guidance for national and
|
||
European research agendas. It also identifies how the results can support international bodies such as ICAO,
|
||
for example through inputs to the Global Air Traffic Management Operational Con cept (GATMOC), and
|
||
EASA, through alignment with the AI Roadmap and Higher Airspace Operations strategy. By framing the
|
||
results in terms of both research and policy pathways, the strategy ensures that QUANTAIR provides
|
||
maximum value to SESAR and the wider aviation community.
|
||
|
||
The second strand addresses open science and data preservation. A final repository of project outputs will be
|
||
prepared, ensuring that reports, conceptual models, metadata, and other analytical products are made available
|
||
in trusted long-term archives. All materials will carry persistent identifiers to guarantee findability and access,
|
||
and licensing conditions will be clearly stated to encourage reuse where possible. This ensures that the research
|
||
remains transparent and accessible, in line with the FAIR pri nciples (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable,
|
||
Reusable) and Horizon Europe’s open science obligations. Sensitive or restricted material will be clearly
|
||
documented, with justifications for any limitations on access.
|
||
|
||
The third strand is dissemination to the research community. Results will be submitted for publication in open-
|
||
access journals and conference proceedings, ensuring peer-reviewed visibility and providing a foundation for
|
||
subsequent academic and industrial r esearch. The consortium will also contribute to SESAR dissemination
|
||
events, workshops, and thematic fora, presenting QUANTAIR as a case study of how Horizon Europe
|
||
exploratory research can be used to investigate emerging concepts at TRL 1. This creates continuity with other
|
||
SESAR activities and supports the integration of results into the wider Digital European Sky programme.
|
||
|
||
A fourth strand focuses on visibility towards operational and policy stakeholders. While the research is
|
||
conceptual, its framing will be tailored to the concerns of ANSPs, airlines, regulators, and manufacturers.
|
||
Materials will highlight the operational implications of the findings, such as the handling of sensitive airline
|
||
preferences (e.g. cost index), or the potential for privacy-preserving collaboration on contrail avoidance. The
|
||
project will also prepare concise policy briefs, targeted at European institutions, to make the research outputs
|
||
accessible to decision-makers without requiring them to engage with technical detail.
|
||
|
||
Finally, WP4 delivers a high-impact final dissemination event. This event, organised at the end of the project,
|
||
will bring together the SESAR research community, operational stakeholders, and policy representatives. It
|
||
will showcase the project’s achievements, present the consolidated results, and provide a forum for discussion
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 62 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 29 of 50
|
||
|
||
on how QFL research should be taken forward. Supporting materials, including an event report, presentations,
|
||
and a digital archive of outputs, will ensure that the visibility of the project extends beyond the event itself.
|
||
The work in WP4 requires contributions from all partners. The ATM research partner ensures that the
|
||
exploitation strategy is aligned with SESAR frameworks. The quantum computing partner provides visibility
|
||
on how the conceptual work can evolve as technolog y matures. The operational partner ensures that
|
||
dissemination is framed in terms that resonate with industry and regulators. Together, the consortium ensures
|
||
that the final outputs are technically credible, operationally meaningful, and presented in a way that maximises
|
||
their uptake.
|
||
|
||
By the end of WP4, QUANTAIR will have delivered not only a comprehensive set of scientific results, but
|
||
also the supporting materials, strategies, and outreach activities needed to ensure that those results have impact.
|
||
The project will leave behind a transparent and accessible record of its findings, contribute to SESAR’s long-
|
||
term research programme, and demonstrate the role of Horizon Europe exploratory research in shaping the
|
||
future of ATM.
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables
|
||
Nr. Deliverable
|
||
name Short description
|
||
Work
|
||
package
|
||
number
|
||
Short
|
||
name of
|
||
lead
|
||
participant
|
||
Type
|
||
Disse
|
||
minati
|
||
on
|
||
level
|
||
Delivery
|
||
date
|
||
(in
|
||
months)
|
||
1.1 KOM Report Report from the Kick-off
|
||
Meeting 1 DLR R PU 1
|
||
1.2 Initial PMP
|
||
Initial Project
|
||
Management Plan 1 DLR R PU 3
|
||
1.3 Initial CDE
|
||
Plan
|
||
Initial Communication,
|
||
Dissemination &
|
||
Exploitation plan
|
||
1 SkyNav R PU 3
|
||
1.4 Online
|
||
presence
|
||
Project Website and
|
||
Online presence 1 SkyNav DEC PU 3
|
||
1.5 Initial DMP Initial Data Management
|
||
Plan 1 DLR R PU 6
|
||
1.6 HE Report Periodic HE technical and
|
||
Financial report 1 Qoro R CO 9
|
||
1.7 Updated
|
||
PMP
|
||
Updated Project
|
||
Management Plan 1 DLR R PU 12
|
||
1.8 Updated
|
||
CDE Plan
|
||
Updated Communication,
|
||
Dissemination &
|
||
Exploitation plan
|
||
1 SkyNav R PU 12
|
||
1.9 Mid-project
|
||
Event
|
||
Information event about
|
||
research progress 1 SkyNav OTH PU 12
|
||
1.10 Updates
|
||
DMP
|
||
Updated Data
|
||
Management Plan 1 DLR R PU 15
|
||
1.11 Final project
|
||
report Final project report 1 DLR R CO 24
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 63 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 30 of 50
|
||
|
||
2.1 Initial ERP Initial Exploratory
|
||
Research Plan 2 Qoro R PU 4
|
||
2.2 Initial ERR Initial Exploratory
|
||
Research Report 2 Qoro R PU 6
|
||
2.3 Initial CO Initial Concept Outline 2 Qoro R PU 6
|
||
3.1 Final ERP Final Exploratory Research
|
||
Plan 3 Qoro R PU 16
|
||
3.2 Final ERR Final Exploratory Research
|
||
Report 3 Qoro R PU 18
|
||
3.3 Final CO Final Concept Outline 3 Qoro R PU 18
|
||
4.1 Initial EI
|
||
Strategy
|
||
Initial Post-Research
|
||
Exploitation & Impact
|
||
Strategy
|
||
4 SkyNav R PU 20
|
||
4.2 Final EI
|
||
Strategy
|
||
Final Exploitation & Impact
|
||
Strategy 4 SkyNav R PU 24
|
||
4.3 Compliance
|
||
Report
|
||
Repository & Open Science
|
||
Compliance Report 4 SkyNav R PU 24
|
||
4.4 Final Event
|
||
Report
|
||
Final Promulgation Event
|
||
Report 4 SkyNav R PU 24
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1d: List of milestones
|
||
Milestone
|
||
number
|
||
Milestone name Related work
|
||
package(s)
|
||
Due date (in month) Means of verification
|
||
MS1.1 Project Governance
|
||
Established
|
||
1 1 PMB in place; KoM held;
|
||
PMP development
|
||
launched.
|
||
KoM report (D1.1).
|
||
MS1.2
|
||
|
||
Management and
|
||
CDE Frameworks
|
||
Approved
|
||
1 3 PMP, DMP, and initial
|
||
CDE Plan delivered and
|
||
accepted.
|
||
Submission of
|
||
D1.2/1.3/D1.5.
|
||
MS1.3
|
||
|
||
Mid-Project Review
|
||
Prepared
|
||
1 12 Updated PMP and CDE
|
||
delivered; Mid-project
|
||
event held.
|
||
Submission of D1.5–D1.8.
|
||
MS1.4
|
||
|
||
Draft Exploitation &
|
||
Impact Strategy
|
||
Produced
|
||
|
||
1 18 Exploitation and impact
|
||
strategy delivered in draft,
|
||
ready for hand-over to
|
||
WP4.
|
||
Submission of D1.10.
|
||
MS1.5
|
||
|
||
Final Review &
|
||
Project Closure
|
||
1, 4 24 Final project report
|
||
delivered; SESAR final
|
||
review completed.
|
||
Acceptance of D1.9–
|
||
D1.10.
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 64 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 31 of 50
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1e: Critical risks for implementation #@RSK-MGT-RM@#
|
||
Description of risk (indicate level of
|
||
(i) likelihood, and (ii) severity:
|
||
Low/Medium/High)
|
||
Work package(s)
|
||
involved
|
||
Proposed risk-mitigation measures
|
||
R1. QFL concept does not yield
|
||
meaningful insights at TRL 1
|
||
(Likelihood: Medium; Severity: High).
|
||
Interim models show no plausible
|
||
feasibility signals across exploratory
|
||
cases.
|
||
WP2 WP3 Treat inconclusive or negative results as
|
||
valid TRL 1 outcomes; ensure each case
|
||
has at least two formulations so
|
||
alternatives can be tested; document
|
||
limits clearly and extract learning for
|
||
future TRL 2–3 work.
|
||
R2. Assumptions and frameworks
|
||
diverge between cases leading to
|
||
inconsistent or incomparable results
|
||
(Likelihood: Medium; Severity:
|
||
Medium).
|
||
WP2 WP3
|
||
|
||
Maintain a common framework agreed
|
||
in D2.1; record all assumptions in an
|
||
“assumptions register” reviewed by
|
||
PMB; hold cross-partner review sessions
|
||
before submitting deliverables.
|
||
R3. Baseline models cannot capture
|
||
distributed ATM constraints
|
||
realistically (privacy, governance,
|
||
airline cost-index preferences)
|
||
(Likelihood: Medium; Severity:
|
||
Medium).
|
||
WP2 Start with simplified synthetic scenarios;
|
||
expand gradually; involve operational
|
||
experts early; record limitations
|
||
explicitly in interim reports.
|
||
R4. Exploratory cases overlap too
|
||
much, reducing distinct insights
|
||
(Likelihood: Medium; Severity:
|
||
Medium).
|
||
WP2 WP3
|
||
|
||
Enforce differentiation when scoping
|
||
cases; PMB validates distinct objectives
|
||
for each; adjust case emphasis if overlap
|
||
is detected.
|
||
R5. Over-reliance on synthetic data
|
||
reduces credibility of results
|
||
(Likelihood: Medium; Severity:
|
||
Medium).
|
||
WP2 WP3
|
||
|
||
Anchor synthetic datasets to published
|
||
SESAR references; use sensitivity
|
||
analyses to show robustness; invite
|
||
stakeholder feedback at mid-project
|
||
event.
|
||
R6. Role of quantum computing is
|
||
overstated or too vague (Likelihood:
|
||
Medium; Severity: High).
|
||
WP2 WP3
|
||
|
||
Link all quantum-related statements to
|
||
clear conditions of validity; maintain a
|
||
“claims register”; ensure internal peer
|
||
review of evidence before submission.
|
||
R7. Limited stakeholder engagement
|
||
reduces visibility and uptake
|
||
(Likelihood: Low; Severity: Medium).
|
||
WP1 WP4
|
||
|
||
Use consortium networks across ATM,
|
||
regulatory, and research communities;
|
||
organise mid-project and final events;
|
||
publish open-access outputs and policy
|
||
briefs.
|
||
R8. Unavailability of key staff due to
|
||
illness, turnover, or conflicting
|
||
commitments (Likelihood: Medium;
|
||
Severity: Medium).
|
||
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4
|
||
|
||
Redistribute effort across the consortium
|
||
where possible, using flexibility in the
|
||
Horizon Europe rules; adjust timelines
|
||
for lower-priority tasks to protect critical
|
||
deliverables; replace staff within the
|
||
same partner if necessary, ensuring
|
||
continuity of expertise.
|
||
|
||
#§RSK-MGT-RM§#
|
||
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 65 ===
|
||
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
||
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Part B - Page 32 of 50
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1f: Summary of staff effort
|
||
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 Total Person-
|
||
Months per Participant
|
||
1/DLR 5 5 5 1 16
|
||
2/Qoro 6 14 12 3 35
|
||
3/SkyNav 11.8 6 6 4 27.8
|
||
Total Person Months 22.8 25 23 8 78.8
|
||
|
||
Table 3.1h: ‘Purchase costs’ items (travel and subsistence, equipment and other goods, works and
|
||
services)
|
||
1/DLR
|
||
Cost (€) Justification
|
||
Travel and subsistence 5000 Travel for conferences, workshops, and team meetings
|
||
|
||
Equipment -
|
||
Other goods, works and
|
||
services
|
||
-
|
||
Remaining purchase costs
|
||
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
||
-
|
||
Total 5000
|
||
|
||
2/Qoro
|
||
Cost (€) Justification
|
||
Travel and subsistence 12500 Travel for conferences, workshops, and team meetings
|
||
|
||
Equipment -
|
||
Other goods, works and
|
||
services
|
||
2000 Consortia events, venue and facilities
|
||
Remaining purchase costs
|
||
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
||
-
|
||
Total 12500
|
||
|
||
3/SkyNav
|
||
Cost (€) Justification
|
||
Travel and subsistence 17500 Travel for conferences, workshops, and team meetings
|
||
|
||
Equipment -
|
||
Other goods, works and
|
||
services
|
||
-
|
||
Remaining purchase costs
|
||
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
||
-
|
||
Total 17500
|
||
|
||
#§QUA-LIT-QL§# #§WRK-PLA-WP§#
|
||
|
||
=== PAGE 66 ===
|
||
|
||
|
||
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
|
||
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
|
||
sealed.
|
||
This digital signature mechanism, using a public -private key pair mechanism, uniquely
|
||
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
|
||
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integr ity.
|
||
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
|
||
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
|
||
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
|
||
signature, which can b e verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
|
||
symbol.
|
||
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
|
||
Portal.
|
||
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
|
||
|