3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
SkyNav SESAR Winning Proposal Template
#Literature #StrategicStudies
1. Proposal Overview
Project Title:
Acronym:
Call / Topic:
Duration:
Coordinator:
Consortium Partners:
2. Strategic Framing
Problem Statement
- What systemic European ATM / HAO / STO problem are we solving?
- Why is this problem urgent now?
Strategic Context
- Alignment with SESAR / ATM Master Plan
- Link to ECHO / ECHO2 / prior work
Value Proposition
- What capability gap are we filling?
- Why SkyNav is uniquely positioned
3. Objectives
Primary Objective
- Clear, single-line mission outcome
Supporting Objectives
- Obj 1:
- Obj 2:
- Obj 3:
4. Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
Operational Concept
- How the system operates at network level
Key Features
- Real-time integration
- Situational awareness
- Decision support
Operational Impact
- Safety improvement
- Efficiency gains
- Regulatory enablement
5. Technical Approach
Architecture
- Modular design
- API-based integration
- Scalable framework
Core Modules
- Data ingestion
- Processing / analytics
- User interface
Innovation Elements
- What is new vs current state
6. Work Packages (WPs)
WP1 – Project Management
- Governance
- Reporting
WP2 – Requirements & CONOPS
- Stakeholder engagement
- Operational scenarios
WP3 – System Design & Development
- Architecture
- Prototype
WP4 – Validation & Demonstration
- Simulation
- Live trials
WP5 – Dissemination & Exploitation
- Publications
- Industry engagement
7. Consortium Structure
Partner Roles
- Coordinator:
- SkyNav: Regulatory / operational / software
- ANSPs: Validation
- Industry: Technology
Value of Each Partner
- Why each is essential
8. Impact
Scientific Impact
- Advancement of ATM / HAO knowledge
Operational Impact
- Improved safety and coordination
Economic Impact
- Market creation
- Cost reduction
Regulatory Impact
- Policy influence
9. Exploitation Strategy
Commercialisation Path
- SaaS integration (SkyLex / SkySafe)
Revenue Model
- Subscription
- Consulting follow-on
Market Entry
- EU regulators
- ANSPs
10. Risk Management
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory delays | |||
| Technical complexity | |||
| Consortium alignment |
11. Implementation Timeline
Phase 1
- Setup
Phase 2
- Development
Phase 3
- Validation
Phase 4
- Deployment
12. Key Success Factors
- Strong consortium
- Clear role for SkyNav
- Alignment with SESAR priorities
- Demonstrable operational impact
13. Common Pitfalls (Avoid)
- Overly technical detail
- Weak partner roles
- Lack of system-level framing
- No clear exploitation path
14. Final Checklist
- Aligned with SESAR priorities
- Clear system-level impact
- Strong consortium logic
- Defined SkyNav advantage
- Commercialisation pathway clear
Reflective Prompt
How does this proposal translate SkyNav’s regulatory and operational expertise into a scalable, system-level capability that creates long-term competitive advantage beyond the research programme?
Related Resources
- SESAR ATM Master Plan
- ECHO / ECHO2 documentation
- SkyNav Strategic Plan