# SpaceCom Roadmap

## Roadmap Intent

This roadmap is the big-picture delivery view of SpaceCom. It compresses the master plan into the main stages of platform maturity, from architectural gating through operational deployment readiness.

## Phase 0: Commitment Gates

Before major implementation proceeds, the project clears the blockers that would otherwise force rework later.

- confirm the Space-Track AUP architecture path
- execute the Cesium commercial licence
- lock in self-hosted GitLab as the CI/CD authority
- confirm the contract-led entitlement model
- approve the Redis trust split between application state and worker traffic

Outcome:
- the team can build without uncertainty on ingest architecture, frontend licensing, commercial authority, or deployment governance

## Phase 1: Platform Foundation

Goal:
- establish a safe, testable, developer-ready baseline for the product

Major outcomes:

- containerised stack running locally and in controlled environments
- backend and frontend scaffolding in place
- authentication, RBAC, logging, and network segmentation active
- core docs, ADRs, CI/CD, and pre-commit hooks established
- legal/compliance acceptance gates wired into onboarding and delivery

This phase is about building the foundation correctly, not shipping every feature.

## Phase 2: Physics and Operational Core

Goal:
- turn the prototype into a real hazard-analysis platform

Major outcomes:

- object catalog and ingest pipelines
- SGP4 propagation and frame conversion
- numerical decay prediction
- Monte Carlo uncertainty handling
- corridor generation and event orchestration
- first usable operational globe, alerting, and degraded-mode handling

This is where SpaceCom starts to become technically distinctive.

## Phase 3: User Workflow Maturity

Goal:
- make the platform genuinely usable for operations, not just technically correct

Major outcomes:

- event detail workflows
- operator alert acknowledgement and decision support
- reporting flow
- stronger human-factors treatment
- accessibility and validation improvements
- deeper auditability and readiness controls

This phase converts a capable engine into a credible product.

## Phase 4: Aviation Decision Support Expansion

Goal:
- strengthen the aviation-side operational layer

Major outcomes:

- FIR-aware outputs
- uncertainty communication suitable for non-specialist operators
- NOTAM-adjacent support
- shadow mode workflows
- multi-ANSP coordination features
- stronger safety-case and regulatory documentation

This is the phase where SpaceCom most clearly occupies the bridge between space and aviation.

## Phase 5: Space Operator Expansion

Goal:
- extend the shared physics core into upstream space-operator workflows

Major outcomes:

- space operator portal
- owned-object workflows
- controlled re-entry planning
- API key lifecycle and external integration support
- CCSDS export and partner-facing interfaces

This broadens the platform without abandoning the aviation differentiator.

## Phase 6: Operational Hardening and Evidence

Goal:
- prepare the platform for shadow deployment, procurement credibility, and long-term operation

Major outcomes:

- full observability and reliability maturity
- stronger incident response and recovery posture
- post-deployment safety monitoring
- validation and backcasting evidence
- licensing, privacy, and procurement artefacts
- commercial packaging and contract enforcement

This is where the platform becomes institutionally defensible, not just technically interesting.

## Phase 7: Scale and Deployment Readiness

Goal:
- support real customer use with disciplined scale-up, not speculative over-engineering

Major outcomes:

- capacity thresholds and scaling review process
- tiered deployment model
- shadow ANSP deployment readiness
- long-term operational governance
- roadmap path to higher-availability deployments when justified by usage

## Summary View

The roadmap is intentionally cumulative:

1. clear the blockers
2. build the foundation
3. deliver the physics core
4. deliver the operational workflows
5. expand into both aviation and space-facing products
6. harden for institutional trust
7. scale only when operational evidence justifies it

## Relationship to the Master Plan

This document is a compression of the master plan, not a replacement for it.

- Use [MASTER_PLAN.md](/d:/Projects/SpaceCom/docs/MASTER_PLAN.md) for the detailed architecture, controls, and acceptance criteria.
- Use [Implementation_Plan.md](/d:/Projects/SpaceCom/docs/Implementation_Plan.md) for the sprint-oriented coding plan.