6098 lines
302 KiB
Plaintext
6098 lines
302 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 1 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 1 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022
|
|||
|
|
Call: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03
|
|||
|
|
(Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03)
|
|||
|
|
Topic: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03-WA2-1
|
|||
|
|
Type of Action: HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
|||
|
|
(HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions)
|
|||
|
|
Proposal number: 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Proposal acronym: STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Type of Model Grant Agreement: HORIZON Lump Sum Grant
|
|||
|
|
Table of contents
|
|||
|
|
Section Title Action
|
|||
|
|
1 General information
|
|||
|
|
2 Participants
|
|||
|
|
3 Budget
|
|||
|
|
4 Ethics and security
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 2 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 2 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
1 - General information
|
|||
|
|
Fields marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
|||
|
|
Topic HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03-WA2-1
|
|||
|
|
Type of Model Grant Agreement HORIZON-AG-LS
|
|||
|
|
Type of Action HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
|||
|
|
Call HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Proposal title STRATUS — Safety & Transformed Resilience for high-Altitude Traffic Unified Services
|
|||
|
|
Note that for technical reasons, the following characters are not accepted in the Proposal Title and will be removed: < > " &
|
|||
|
|
Duration in
|
|||
|
|
months 30
|
|||
|
|
Free keywords
|
|||
|
|
ECHO Phase 3 European Concept For Higher Altitude Operations HAO Service Provider concept Space Transport
|
|||
|
|
Operations New Entrants Supersonic Hypersonic Suborbital HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Abstract *
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS (Safety and Transformed Resilience for High-Altitude Traffic Unified Services) will define a modular and scalable framework
|
|||
|
|
for integrating Higher Airspace Operations (HAO) and Space Transport Operations (STO) into the European ATM framework. The focus
|
|||
|
|
is on the low-density airspace above conventional traffic, generally above flight level FL550. This is where high-performance
|
|||
|
|
supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, automated High Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) fleets, and sub-orbital operations are expected
|
|||
|
|
to multiply in the coming decade.
|
|||
|
|
Building on the exploratory CONOPS produced in the ECHO project, and taking into account the work now underway in ECHO2,
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS will expand the scope to cover a wider set of operational scenarios, vehicle types and service models. It will address the
|
|||
|
|
operational, functional, technical and regulatory foundations required for integration, in line with the priorities of the European ATM
|
|||
|
|
Master Plan for higher-airspace operations, dynamic airspace configuration, service-oriented architectures and cyber-secure
|
|||
|
|
digitalisation. Concentrating on the higher airspace, where traffic density is relatively low, provides the opportunity to mature and
|
|||
|
|
validate innovative concepts and technologies while limiting operational risk to existing ATM.
|
|||
|
|
The objectives of STRATUS follow a logical progression from establishing operational demand in higher airspace, through the
|
|||
|
|
development of concepts and supporting frameworks, to the consideration of regulatory and other relevant implications that may
|
|||
|
|
influence successful implementation.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 419
|
|||
|
|
Has this proposal (or a very similar one) been submitted in the past 2 years in response to a call for
|
|||
|
|
proposals under any EU programme, including the current call?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Please give the proposal reference or contract number.
|
|||
|
|
Previously submitted proposals should be with either 6 or 9 digits.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 3 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 3 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Declarations
|
|||
|
|
Field(s) marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
|||
|
|
1) We declare to have the explicit consent of all applicants on their participation and on the content of this proposal. *
|
|||
|
|
2) We confirm that the information contained in this proposal is correct and complete and that none of the project
|
|||
|
|
activities have started before the proposal was submitted (unless explicitly authorised in the call conditions). *
|
|||
|
|
3) We declare:
|
|||
|
|
- to be fully compliant with the eligibility criteria set out in the call
|
|||
|
|
- not to be subject to any exclusion grounds under the EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
|
|||
|
|
- to have the financial and operational capacity to carry out the proposed project. *
|
|||
|
|
4) We acknowledge that all communication will be made through the Funding & Tenders Portal
|
|||
|
|
electronic exchange system and that access and use of this system is subject to the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms
|
|||
|
|
and Conditions. *
|
|||
|
|
5) We have read, understood and accepted the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms & Conditions and
|
|||
|
|
Privacy Statement that set out the conditions of use of the Portal and the scope, purposes, retention periods, etc. for
|
|||
|
|
the processing of personal data of all data subjects whose data we communicate for the purpose of the application,
|
|||
|
|
evaluation, award and subsequent management of our grant, prizes and contracts (including financial transactions and
|
|||
|
|
audits). *
|
|||
|
|
6) We declare that the proposal complies with ethical principles (including the highest standards of research integrity
|
|||
|
|
as set out in the ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, as well as applicable international and
|
|||
|
|
national law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on
|
|||
|
|
Human Rights and its Supplementary Protocols. Appropriate procedures, policies and structures are in place to foster
|
|||
|
|
responsible research practices, to prevent questionable research practices and research misconduct, and to handle
|
|||
|
|
allegations of breaches of the principles and standards in the Code of Conduct. *
|
|||
|
|
7) We declare that the proposal has an exclusive focus on civil applications (activities intended to be used in military
|
|||
|
|
application or aiming to serve military purposes cannot be funded). If the project involves dual-use items in the sense
|
|||
|
|
of Regulation 2021/821, or other items for which authorisation is required, we confirm that we will comply with the
|
|||
|
|
applicable regulatory framework (e.g. obtain export/import licences before these items are used). *
|
|||
|
|
8) We confirm that the activities proposed do not
|
|||
|
|
- aim at human cloning for reproductive purposes;
|
|||
|
|
- intend to modify the genetic heritage of human beings which could make such changes heritable
|
|||
|
|
(with the exception of research relating to cancer treatment of the gonads, which may be financed), or
|
|||
|
|
- intend to create human embryos solely for the purpose of research or for the purpose of stem
|
|||
|
|
cell procurement, including by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer.
|
|||
|
|
- lead to the destruction of human embryos (for example, for obtaining stem cells)
|
|||
|
|
These activities are excluded from funding. *
|
|||
|
|
9) We confirm that for activities carried out outside the Union, the same activities would have been allowed in at least
|
|||
|
|
one EU Member State. *
|
|||
|
|
10) For Lump Sum Grants with a detailed budget table: We understand and accept that the EU lump sum grants must
|
|||
|
|
be reliable proxies for the actual costs of a project and confirm that the detailed budget for the proposal has been
|
|||
|
|
established in accordance with our usual cost accounting practices and in compliance with the basic eligibility
|
|||
|
|
conditions for EU actual cost grants (see AGA - Annotated Grant Agreement, art 6) and exclude costs that are ineligible
|
|||
|
|
under the Programme. Purchases and subcontracting costs must be done taking into account best value for money
|
|||
|
|
and must be free of conflict of interest. *
|
|||
|
|
The coordinator is only responsible for the information relating to their own organisation. Each applicant remains responsible for the information declared for
|
|||
|
|
their organisation. If the proposal is retained for EU funding, they will all be required to sign a declaration of honour.
|
|||
|
|
False statements or incorrect information may lead to administrative sanctions under the EU Financial Regulation.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 4 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 4 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
2 - Participants
|
|||
|
|
List of participating organisations
|
|||
|
|
# Participating Organisation Legal Name Country Role Action
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCONTROL - EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFBelgium Coordinator
|
|||
|
|
2 DFS DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG GMBH Germany Partner
|
|||
|
|
3 ENAV SPA IT Partner
|
|||
|
|
4 LUFTFARTSVERKET SE Partner
|
|||
|
|
5 NATS (EN ROUTE) PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY UK Partner
|
|||
|
|
6 ENAIRE ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
7 ENTE NAZIONALE PER L'AVIAZIONE CIVILE - ENAC ITALIANIT Partner
|
|||
|
|
8 CONSORCIO AERODROMO AEROPUERTO DE TERUEL ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
9 SkyNav Europe BE Partner
|
|||
|
|
10 ECOLE NATIONALE DE L AVIATION CIVILE FR Partner
|
|||
|
|
11 C.I.R.A. CENTRO ITALIANO RICERCHE AEROSPAZIALI SCPA IT Partner
|
|||
|
|
12 STICHTING KONINKLIJK NEDERLANDS LUCHT - EN RUIMTE NL Partner
|
|||
|
|
13 INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLL CA Partner
|
|||
|
|
14 INGENIERIA Y ECONOMIA DEL TRANSPORTE SME MP SA ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
15 CENTRO DE REFERENCIA INVESTIGACION DESARROLLO E ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
16 INSTITUUT VOOR INFRASTRUCTUUR, MILIEU EN INNOVATI BE Partner
|
|||
|
|
17 OpenUTM Ltd. IE Partner
|
|||
|
|
18 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV DE Partner
|
|||
|
|
19 SCEYE SPAIN S.L. ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
20 ANRA TECHNOLOGIES OU EE Partner
|
|||
|
|
21 HAPS Alliance United States Associated
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 5 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 5 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
# Participating Organisation Legal Name Country Role Action
|
|||
|
|
22 UDARAS EITLIOCHTA NA HEIREANN THE IRISH AVIATION AIreland Associated
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 6 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 6 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Organisation data
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999483733
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL - EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION
|
|||
|
|
Short name: EUROCONTROL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/02/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 7 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 7 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Aviation Transformation Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Department 2
|
|||
|
|
Department name Network Manager Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 8 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 8 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ovidiu Last name* DUMITRACHE
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* ovidiu.dumitrache@eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES Post code 1130
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Website www.eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Senior Manager Research Strategy
|
|||
|
|
Department Aviation Transformation Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Phone +32 2 729 30 52 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
CM Team EUROCONTROL atd.ppu.cmt@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Pablo HARO pablo.haro@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Dragos TONEA dragos.tonea@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Fiona MULLAN fiona.mullan@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 9 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 9 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Pablo Haro Man Spain pablo.haro@euro
|
|||
|
|
control.int Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Ovidiu Dumitrache Man Romania ovidiu.dumitrach
|
|||
|
|
e@eurocontrol.in
|
|||
|
|
t
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Ms Marta FERNANDEZ
|
|||
|
|
CASTRILLO
|
|||
|
|
Woman Spain marta.fernandez-
|
|||
|
|
castrillo@euroco
|
|||
|
|
ntrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Fiona Mullan Woman Ireland fiona.mullan@eur
|
|||
|
|
ocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Dragos Tonea Man Romania dragos.tonea@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Augustin Udrisitoiu Man Romania augustin.udristioi
|
|||
|
|
u@eurocontrol.in
|
|||
|
|
t
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Edgar Reuber Man Germany edgar.reuber@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Gabor Fugedi Man Hungary gabor.fugedi@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Octavian FOTA Man Romania octavian.fota@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Lucia Sandu Woman Moldova lucia.sandu@eur
|
|||
|
|
ocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Stefano Tiberia Man Italy stefano.tiberia@e
|
|||
|
|
urocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Aleksandra Owoc-Berson Woman Poland aleksandra.owoc-
|
|||
|
|
berson@eurocon
|
|||
|
|
trol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 10 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 10 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 11 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 11 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
As a founding member of the SESAR Programme and Joint Undertaking, EUROCONTROL has
|
|||
|
|
been involved in all the phases (Definition, Development and Deployment) contributing
|
|||
|
|
significantly to many of its most important achievements, such as the definition and
|
|||
|
|
maintenance of the European ATM Master Plan, the SESAR 3 Strategic Research and
|
|||
|
|
Innovation Agenda and a large number of Solutions delivered in the context of the SESAR 1
|
|||
|
|
and SESAR 2020.
|
|||
|
|
Dataset
|
|||
|
|
The EUROCONTROL Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Aircraft Performance Model (APM) is a
|
|||
|
|
globally recognized reference database containing aircraft-specific coefficients and
|
|||
|
|
theoretical models used to calculate aircraft performance parameters.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
The EUROCONTROL Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC) permanently monitors the
|
|||
|
|
airspace capacity against traffic load. This allows us to have an accurate picture of the current
|
|||
|
|
and expected European ATM network situation. To ensure the transparent and efficient
|
|||
|
|
operation of the network, we collect all of the real-time data generated by the network and
|
|||
|
|
share it with all operational partners through our Data Collection and Distribution Services
|
|||
|
|
(DCS and DDS).
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
At the EUROCONTROL NMOC we measure, investigate and report on operational processes
|
|||
|
|
and activities throughout all domains relevant to Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management.
|
|||
|
|
All stakeholders provide feedback on the efficiency of the flight planning and airspace data
|
|||
|
|
processing. We compare forecasts with the actual measured outcome in terms of delay and
|
|||
|
|
route extension, while taking into account performance targets. This helps us improve the
|
|||
|
|
performance of the European ATM Network.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2 project (Ref 101114697)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO-2 is building on the deliverables of the ECHO (European Concept of Higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations) project, starting from the
|
|||
|
|
Concept of Operations, to propose validated solutions paving the way towards the
|
|||
|
|
operational integration of HAO in ATM.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO project (ref. SESARER4-
|
|||
|
|
19-2019)
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO (European Concept of Higher airspace Operations) Project aimed at delivering a
|
|||
|
|
comprehensive demand analysis and a comprehensive, innovative and feasible Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Operations enabling near term and future Higher Airspace operations in a safe and orderly
|
|||
|
|
manner.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
NMVP
|
|||
|
|
Validation platform allowing to design and validate solutions for Network Management in a
|
|||
|
|
more flexible way. Validations can now be replayed across NM’s backend systems (Enhanced
|
|||
|
|
Tactical Flow Management System, Integrated Initial Flight Plan Processing System) and the
|
|||
|
|
front-end systems.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 12 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 12 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 13 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 13 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999936820
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
DFS DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG GMBH
|
|||
|
|
Short name: DFS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town LANGEN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 63225
|
|||
|
|
Street AM DFS CAMPUS 10
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 14 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 14 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 15 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 15 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Andreas Last name* UDOVIC
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* andreas.udovic@dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Town LANGEN Post code 63225
|
|||
|
|
Street AM DFS CAMPUS 10
|
|||
|
|
Website www.dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Project Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department Operational Planing
|
|||
|
|
Phone 0610370705758 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Alexander SEYBOLD alexander.seybold@dfs.de +4961077072034
|
|||
|
|
Oliver ALBERT oliver.albert@dfs.de +4961077072073
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 16 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 16 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Andreas Udovic Man Germany andreas.udovic@
|
|||
|
|
dfs.de Category B Senior resea Team member Researcher ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 17 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 17 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 18 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 18 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication • Presentation of „Obelisk“ auf den Kongress „HAPS4ESA Workshop“, 12-14.02.2024,
|
|||
|
|
Leiden
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
• Article: Obelisk - Operationelles Betriebskonzept zur sicheren und effizienten
|
|||
|
|
Luftraumintegration von Stratosphärenplattformen, DFS-Zeitschrift „Innovation im Fokus“
|
|||
|
|
publication in preparation for 2025 foreseen
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
OBELISK • German national founded projetct „Obelisk Operationelles Betriebskonzept zur
|
|||
|
|
sicheren und effizienten Luftraumintegration von Stratosphärenplattformen“ 2019-2024
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 • Participation on „ECHO 2 European Concept für High Altitude Operations 2”
|
|||
|
|
2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 19 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 19 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 20 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 20 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
998197513
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ENAV SPA
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAV
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town ROMA
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 00138
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA SALARIA 716
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.enav.it
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 28/08/2008 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 28/08/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 21 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 21 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Engineering and Infrastructures
|
|||
|
|
Street Via Appia Nuova 1491
|
|||
|
|
Town Rome
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 00178
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 22 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 22 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ramona Last name* SANTARELLI
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* ramona.santarelli@enav.it
|
|||
|
|
Town Rome Post code 00138
|
|||
|
|
Street Via Pietro Boccanelli, 32/34
|
|||
|
|
Website www.enav.it
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. ATM Researcher
|
|||
|
|
Department Innovation and Research
|
|||
|
|
Phone +39 06 81664013 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Ms
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Daniele Teotino daniele.teotino@enav.it +39 0681662364
|
|||
|
|
Angela Iurilli angela.iurilli@enav.it +39 06 81664411
|
|||
|
|
Patrizia Criscuolo patrizia.criscuolo.1@enav.it +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 23 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 23 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Ms Ramona Santarelli Woman Italy ramona.santarelli
|
|||
|
|
@enav.it Category B Senior resea Team member EX2025D1106377 Researcher ID
|
|||
|
|
Ms Marinella Massari Woman Italy marinella.massari
|
|||
|
|
@enav.it
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 24 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 24 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 25 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 25 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication Cleared 06/2020 "Space Traffic Management - La futura gestione del traffico aereo nello
|
|||
|
|
spazio". S. Romano, L. Brucculeri, ENAV, Italy
|
|||
|
|
Publication Cleared 02/2025 "Navigare nel futuro, l'ascesa delle Higher Airspace Operations".
|
|||
|
|
R. Santarelli, Federico Ferrari, ENAV, Italy
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Aerospace 2019, 7, 24, "U-Space Concept of Operations: A Key Enabler for Opening Airspace to
|
|||
|
|
Emerging Low-Altitude Operations".
|
|||
|
|
Cristina Barrado, Mario Boyero, Luigi Brucculeri, Giancarlo Ferrara, Andrew Hately, Peter
|
|||
|
|
Hullah, David Martin-Marrero, Enric Pastor, Anthony Peter Rushton and Andreas Volkert .
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR3 ECHO2 European Concept
|
|||
|
|
for HAO Phase 2
|
|||
|
|
The project aims to define new operating methods to support the safe, secure, and sustainable
|
|||
|
|
development of civil aviation operations taking place in higher airspace.
|
|||
|
|
The project develops three solutions for integrating higher airspace operations in the
|
|||
|
|
European ATM system, focusing on Space Real Time Mission Monitoring supporting Network
|
|||
|
|
Operations, and the integration of HAPS, Supersonic, Hypersonic and Suborbital Operations in
|
|||
|
|
European ATM.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO European Concept for HAO
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO (European Concept of Higher airspace Operations) Project delivers a comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
demand analysis and a comprehensive, innovative and feasible Concept of Operations
|
|||
|
|
enabling near term and future Higher Airspace operations in a safe and orderly manner.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 26 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 26 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 27 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 27 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
942346077
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
LUFTFARTSVERKET
|
|||
|
|
Short name: LFV
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town NORRKOPING
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 602 27
|
|||
|
|
Street HOSPITALSGATAN 30
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 20/03/2014 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 28 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 28 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name LFV Research and Innovation
|
|||
|
|
Street HOSPITALSGATAN 30
|
|||
|
|
Town NORRKOPING
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 602 27
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 29 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 29 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Lindsey Last name* MARTENEZ-HERMOSILLA
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* lindsey.martenez-hermosilla@lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Town NORRKOPING Post code 602 27
|
|||
|
|
Street HOSPITALSGATAN 30
|
|||
|
|
Website www.lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. LFV SESAR Programme- and Contribution Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department LUFTFARTSVERKET
|
|||
|
|
Phone +46 721 429 192 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Ms
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Stefan SIGGELIN stefan.siggelin@lfv.se +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 30 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 30 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 31 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 31 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 32 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 32 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR1 ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
The SESAR IR1 ECHO2 project was built on the deliverables of the ECHO (European Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Higher airspace Operations) project. LFV participated in ECHO2 withc ATCO expertise, both
|
|||
|
|
with the Concept of Operations, but also as active participants of the project EXE.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
LFV R&D Center
|
|||
|
|
Located at ATCC Malmö, the LFV R&D Centre is equipped with lab, simulators, and conference
|
|||
|
|
facilities, and is capable of conducting human-in-the-loop simulations and demonstrations.
|
|||
|
|
The available simulators include NARSIM (for ACC, APP, and TWR), the SAAB RTS simulator,
|
|||
|
|
and the UTM City platform.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 33 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 33 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 34 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 34 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
997542763
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
NATS (EN ROUTE) PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
|
|||
|
|
Short name: NATS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM
|
|||
|
|
Postcode PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.nats.aero
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 35 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 35 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name NATS (En Route) Public Limited Company (CTC)
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Postcode PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 36 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 36 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Patrick Last name* GILES
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* patrick.giles@nats.co.uk
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM Post code PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Website www.nats.aero
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Manager, ATM Portfolio - D&B
|
|||
|
|
Department NATS (En Route) Public Limited Company (CTC)
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Alison ROBERTS alison.roberts@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Matthew GREEN matthew.green@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Richard HAYWARD richard.hayward@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Richard PUGH richard.pugh@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 37 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 37 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Patrick Giles Man United Kingdom patrick.giles@nat
|
|||
|
|
s.co.uk Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Richard Hayward Man United Kingdom richard.hayward
|
|||
|
|
@nats.co.uk
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 38 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 38 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 39 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 39 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement Participation in SESAR ECHO 2 project, including leading the development of the OSED
|
|||
|
|
document for WP - High Altitude Platform Systems.
|
|||
|
|
Service Operational support to UK Ministry of Defence / US Air Force in Europe with regard to current
|
|||
|
|
(military) high altitude operations.
|
|||
|
|
Service Past operational experience of operating very high / very fast commercial airliners
|
|||
|
|
undertaking inter-continental flights (Concorde).
|
|||
|
|
Service Operational involvement in UK-based Space Launches.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR 3 ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO 2 project is further developing concepts identified in the initial ECHO Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Operations document. This work will be a key input to the STRATUS project as it is in the
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 discussions that the need for the STRATUS project was identified.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 40 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 40 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 41 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 41 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
997701843
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/06/1991 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 42 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 42 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Innovation Division
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28022
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
Controls CENTRO DE REFERENCIA INVESTIGACION DESARROLLO E INNOVACION ATM, A.I.E.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 43 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 43 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Francisco José Last name* Jiménez Roncero
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* fjroncero@enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID Post code 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL 2 PARQUE EMPRESARIAL LAS
|
|||
|
|
Website www.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Head of Division
|
|||
|
|
Department Innovation Division
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34 634 880 079 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Daniel DOMINGUEZ ddoperez@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Javier García Moreno jgmoreno@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Jorge Vellón Benito jvellon@e-externas.enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 44 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 44 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 45 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 45 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 46 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 46 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
EUSTM
|
|||
|
|
EUSTM is an end-to end activity towards the definition of a future STM capability:
|
|||
|
|
· Defining the needs in terms of organisation and responsibilities, technology, policy, laws,
|
|||
|
|
guidelines, best practices and standards
|
|||
|
|
· Elaborating detailed specs, a preliminary design, a reference roadmap and a ROM cost
|
|||
|
|
analysis
|
|||
|
|
· Developing an innovative collaborative platform for exchange of information inside the team
|
|||
|
|
and with external stakeholders
|
|||
|
|
· Creating a community of interest on STM
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
The main objective of this project is the modernisation and adaptation of the European ATM
|
|||
|
|
system that allows the integration of the so-called high-altitude operations or Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations (HAO). These types of operations occur above flight level FL550, that is, operations
|
|||
|
|
above 17,000 meters, while flights usually take place around 10,000 meters.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 47 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 47 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 48 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 48 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
988366078
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ENTE NAZIONALE PER L'AVIAZIONE CIVILE - ENAC ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAC IT
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town ROMA
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 00185
|
|||
|
|
Street VIALE CASTRO PRETORIO 118
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.enac.gov.it
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 25/05/1997 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 49 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 49 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Direzione Innovazione Tecnologica
|
|||
|
|
Street VIALE CASTRO PRETORIO 118
|
|||
|
|
Town ROMA
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 00185
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 50 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 50 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Giovanni Last name* Di ANTONIO
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* g.diantonio@enac.gov.it
|
|||
|
|
Town ROMA Post code 00185
|
|||
|
|
Street VIALE CASTRO PRETORIO 118
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Director
|
|||
|
|
Department Direzione Innovazione Tecnologica
|
|||
|
|
Phone 00390644596618 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Fabrizzio ARRU f.arru@enac.gov.it 0039 0644596367
|
|||
|
|
Alessandro BUCCI a.bucci@enac.gov.it 0039 0644596389
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 51 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 51 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Fabrizio Arru Man Italy f.arru@enac.gov.i
|
|||
|
|
t Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Alessandro Bucci Man Italy a.bucci@enac.go
|
|||
|
|
v.it
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Giovanni Di Antonio Man Italy g.diantonio@ena
|
|||
|
|
c.gov.it
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Luigi Morra Man Italy l.morra@enac.go
|
|||
|
|
v.it
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Marco Catalano Man Italy m.catalano@enac
|
|||
|
|
.gov.it
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 52 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 52 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 53 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 53 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO ENAC (IT) was involved in the development of the ECHO CONOPS
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2 ENAC (IT) is currently involved in all 3 WPs and is leading WP3 of the project
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 54 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 54 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 55 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 55 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
969410435
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
CONSORCIO AERODROMO AEROPUERTO DE TERUEL
|
|||
|
|
Short name: CONSORCIO AERODROMO AEROPUERTO DE TERUEL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town TERUEL
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 44396
|
|||
|
|
Street POLIGONO DE TIRO 4
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.aeropuertodeteruel.com/
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 29/12/2006 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 56 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 56 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 57 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 57 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Alejandro Last name* IBRAHIM PERERA
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* aibrahim@aeropuertodeteruel.com
|
|||
|
|
Town TERUEL Post code 44396
|
|||
|
|
Street POLIGONO DE TIRO 4
|
|||
|
|
Website https://www.aeropuertodeteruel.com/en/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. General Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department CONSORCIO AERODROMO AEROPUERTO DE TERUEL
|
|||
|
|
Phone +034 978617742 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 58 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 58 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 59 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 59 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 60 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 60 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
Airport Management: landing, takeoff, aircraft parking.
|
|||
|
|
Aircraft maintenance, parking and recycling.
|
|||
|
|
Security and Surveillance Services.
|
|||
|
|
Maintenance service and cleaning of the facilities.
|
|||
|
|
Support to operations and Handling.
|
|||
|
|
Aviation fuel service.
|
|||
|
|
Aircraft support (ASU compressed air up to B747 type aircraft, sweeper, de-icing equipment).
|
|||
|
|
Flight tests and trials service.
|
|||
|
|
Aeronautical Meteorology Service.
|
|||
|
|
Rescue and firefighting service.
|
|||
|
|
Logistics service in industrial area.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Stratoport Design a stratoport for fix-wing aircrafts and airship. Teruel airport with the capacity for
|
|||
|
|
stratospheric flight aircraft with HAPS-type airships.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Stratospheric airship hangar Teruel Airport Consortium has put out to tender the construction of a hangar and a production
|
|||
|
|
facility for stratospheric airships.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 61 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 61 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 62 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 62 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
870906450
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
Short name: SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Brussels
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.skynavintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 63 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 63 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 64 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 64 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ben Last name* KINGS
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* ben.kings@skynavintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Brussels Post code 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
|||
|
|
Website https://skynavintl.com/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Managing Director/Owner
|
|||
|
|
Department SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
Phone +31615625092 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 65 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 65 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Ben Kings Man ben.kings@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Duncan Auld Man duncan.auld@sky
|
|||
|
|
navintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Zheng Tao Man zheng.tao@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Qina Diao Woman qina.diao@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Julie Caraga Woman julie.caraga@sky
|
|||
|
|
navintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 66 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 66 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 67 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 67 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 subcontractor
|
|||
|
|
Participation in the ECHO2 consortium as a contractor focusing on higher airspace and space
|
|||
|
|
transport integration. Contributions include operational concept refinement, validation
|
|||
|
|
planning, stakeholder mapping, and alignment with ANSP procedures and Network functions.
|
|||
|
|
The work informs scalable approaches for trajectory management and airspace reservations.
|
|||
|
|
Includes project management and deliverable lead.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
Operational ATM experience
|
|||
|
|
Decades of global, operational Air Traffic Control experience across all ATC disciplines (Tower,
|
|||
|
|
Approach, Area, Oceanic) and at all function levels. Operational supervision, flow
|
|||
|
|
management, training, training management, safety and technical committee
|
|||
|
|
representation, operational procedure development, international cross-border negotiations,
|
|||
|
|
airspace design, safety risk assessments and environmental impact studies
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
ICAO drafting and representation
|
|||
|
|
Contributed to drafting and review activities at ICAO in relation to Annex 11, Annex 10 and
|
|||
|
|
PANS-ATM material. Work includes requirements structuring, procedure text, and consistency
|
|||
|
|
checks across datasets and guidance, supporting globally harmonised ATM provisions
|
|||
|
|
relevant to STO and HAO integration. Leading working groups on ATM planning &
|
|||
|
|
implementation, development of Global ATM Operational Concept, development of Aviation
|
|||
|
|
System Block Upgrades
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
State regulatory drafting and representation
|
|||
|
|
Several years of regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil
|
|||
|
|
aviation regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS,
|
|||
|
|
operations and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and
|
|||
|
|
regional provisions. Leadership of ICAO regional groups and task forces related to integration
|
|||
|
|
of space transport activities.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
Project Management & Leadership Expertise
|
|||
|
|
Extensive track record in project and organisational leadership, including executive roles
|
|||
|
|
within IFATCA (International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers’ Associations). Demonstrated
|
|||
|
|
ability to manage complex international initiatives, coordinate diverse stakeholders, and
|
|||
|
|
oversee multi-million-euro budgets. Proven experience in steering strategic aviation projects,
|
|||
|
|
ensuring delivery of innovative outcomes aligned with European policy & industry needs
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR ECHO / ECHO2 – HAO
|
|||
|
|
Integration
|
|||
|
|
Participation in ECHO and ECHO2 on higher airspace and space transport integration. Roles
|
|||
|
|
covered operational scenarios, requirements traceability, validation planning, stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
engagement and alignment with EUROCONTROL and ICAO practices for cross-border
|
|||
|
|
coordination and dynamic, minimal-impact airspace management.
|
|||
|
|
iNEO – Project Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
& Governance Appr.
|
|||
|
|
Development of a rigorous PMP and governance model for multi-partner R&D, covering
|
|||
|
|
schedule baselining, risk and compliance, quality assurance, and reporting. The approach
|
|||
|
|
underpins efficient WP coordination and is directly reusable for STRATUS WP1.
|
|||
|
|
UAE National Regulations
|
|||
|
|
Development Programme
|
|||
|
|
Regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil aviation
|
|||
|
|
regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS, operations
|
|||
|
|
and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and regional
|
|||
|
|
provisions.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 68 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 68 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 69 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 69 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 70 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 70 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
996375756
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ECOLE NATIONALE DE L AVIATION CIVILE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAC FR
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 31400
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... yes
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 27/05/2020 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 71 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 71 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Department 2
|
|||
|
|
Department name ENAC LAB
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 31400
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 72 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 72 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Georges Last name* MYKONIATIS
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* georges.mykoniatis@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE Post code 31400
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Head of Business Development for ENAC LAB
|
|||
|
|
Department ECOLE NATIONALE DE L AVIATION CIVILE
|
|||
|
|
Phone +33619911108 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Aurelie PEAUD aurelie.peuaud@enac.fr +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Florence LAPORTERIE-DEJEAN florence.laporterie-dejean@enac.fr +33562259509
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 73 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 73 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Murat Bronz Man France murat.bronz@en
|
|||
|
|
ac.fr Category A Top grade reLeading 0000-0002-1098-
|
|||
|
|
5240
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Rodolphe Fremond Man France rodolphe.fremon
|
|||
|
|
d@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0009-0008-1513-
|
|||
|
|
9597
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Prof Daniel Delahaye Man France daniel.delahaye@
|
|||
|
|
enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading 0000-0002-4965-
|
|||
|
|
6815
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Andreas Guitart Man France andreas.guitart@
|
|||
|
|
enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member 0000-0002-1944-
|
|||
|
|
2250
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Georges Mykoniatis Man France georges.mykonia
|
|||
|
|
tis@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Leading 0000-0002-5550-
|
|||
|
|
579X
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 74 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 74 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 75 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 75 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication Andréas Guitart, Daniel Delahaye. Design of low-noise arrival and departure procedures in
|
|||
|
|
Paris TMA using Simulated Annealing. 2025. ?hal-05208145?
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Nana Chu, Chenliang Zhang, Kam K.K.Ng, Daniel Delahaye. Unlocking Runway Capacity:
|
|||
|
|
Enhancing Efficiency through Dynamic Pairwise Aircraft Wake Separation. ATRD Symposium
|
|||
|
|
2025, Eurocontrol FAA, Jun 2025, Prague (Czech Republic), Czech Republic. ?hal-05131139?
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Zhao, J.; Wen, Z.; Mohanta, K.; Subasu, S.; Fremond, R.; Su, Y.; Kallaka, R.; Tsourdos, A. UAV
|
|||
|
|
Operations and Vertiport Capacity Evaluation with a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin for Future
|
|||
|
|
Urban Air Mobility Viability. Drones 2025, 9, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9090621
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Raúl Sáez, Homeyra Khaledian, Xavier Prats, Andréas Guitart, Daniel Delahaye, et al.. A Fast
|
|||
|
|
and Flexible Emergency Trajectory Generator Enhancing Emergency Geometric Planning with
|
|||
|
|
Aircraft Dynamics. Fourteenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and
|
|||
|
|
Development Seminar (ATM2021), Sep 2021, New Orleans (virtual), United States.
|
|||
|
|
?hal-03351220?
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Hachem, M., Roos, C., Miquel, T., & Bronz, M. (2025). Improving Incremental Nonlinear
|
|||
|
|
Dynamic Inversion Robustness Using Robust Control in Aerial Robotics. arXiv preprint
|
|||
|
|
arXiv:2501.07223.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO
|
|||
|
|
European Concept of Higher Airspace Operations - SESAR
|
|||
|
|
A concept of operations (ConOps) for higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo-project/
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 Towards the integration between ATM and Higher Altitude Operations - SESAR
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo2-project/
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 76 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 76 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 77 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 77 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999789768
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
C.I.R.A. CENTRO ITALIANO RICERCHE AEROSPAZIALI SCPA
|
|||
|
|
Short name: CIRA
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 81043
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 25/01/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 26/06/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 78 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 78 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Cross Cutting Research Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 81043
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 79 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 79 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Angela Last name* VOZELLA
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* a.vozella@cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA Post code 81043
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Website www.cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Deputy Head of Cross Cutting Research Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Department Cross Cutting Research Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Phone 00390823622723 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Gabriella GIGANTE g.gigante@cira.it 00390823623514
|
|||
|
|
Francesco NEBULA f.nebula@cira.it +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Lidia TRAVASCIO l.travascio@cira.it +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 80 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 80 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr
|
|||
|
|
Francesco Gargiulo
|
|||
|
|
Man Italy
|
|||
|
|
f.gargiulo@cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member https://
|
|||
|
|
www.researchgat
|
|||
|
|
e.net/profile/
|
|||
|
|
Francesco-
|
|||
|
|
Gargiulo
|
|||
|
|
Other ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Francesco Nebula Man Italy f.nebula@cira.it Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0002-3219-
|
|||
|
|
7245
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Angela Errico Woman Italy a.errico@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0009-0009-3716-
|
|||
|
|
4096
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 81 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 81 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 82 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 82 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Escarré, O. B., de Urrengoechea Cantavenera, T., Eroles, M. À. P., Gigante, G., & Gargiulo, F.
|
|||
|
|
(2024). Flying Like Geese: Green, Sustainable, and Efficient. Computing in science &
|
|||
|
|
engineering, 26(2), 54-60.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Gargiulo, F., Gigante, G., Escarré, O. B., & De Urrengoechea, T. (2024, July). SESAR GEESE Project
|
|||
|
|
Validation with CIRA Multi-Agent Simulation Facility: Preliminary Study. In 2024 15th
|
|||
|
|
International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) (pp. 1-8).
|
|||
|
|
IEEE
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Gigante, G., Palumbo, R., Pascarella, D., Pellegrini, A., Duca, G., Piera, M., & Ramos, J. (2021).
|
|||
|
|
Support to Design for Air Traffic Management: An Approach with Agent-Based Modelling and
|
|||
|
|
Evolutionary Search. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 8(1).
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Pellegrini, A., Di Sanzo, P., Bevilacqua, B., Duca, G., Pascarella, D., Palumbo, R., ... & Gigante, G.
|
|||
|
|
(2020). Simulation-based evolutionary optimization of air traffic management. IEEE access, 8,
|
|||
|
|
161551-161570.
|
|||
|
|
Publication Nebula, F., Palumbo, R., Gigante, G., & Vozella, A. (2023). Digital assistant for arrival scheduling
|
|||
|
|
with conflict prevention capabilities. Information, 14(4), 216.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR project 2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
CIRA supports: 1) by Multi Agent Validation Facility the Fast time simulation to validate at
|
|||
|
|
TRL4 the operational concept of integration in controlled airspace of Hypersonic/Supersonic
|
|||
|
|
and Suborbital vehicles 2) by developing a supporting tool
|
|||
|
|
GEESE
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR 2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
CIRA supports by Multi Agent Validation Facility the Fast time simulation to validate at TRL4
|
|||
|
|
the operational concept of WER operations in Continental Route
|
|||
|
|
ATC-TBO
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR 2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
CIRA supports by Multi Agent Validation Facility the Fast time simulation to validate at TRL4
|
|||
|
|
the operational concept of an Air TRaffic Digital assistant implementing tactical conflict
|
|||
|
|
resolution at higher levels of automation
|
|||
|
|
JARVIS
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR project 2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
CIRA develops the Air Traffic Controller digital assistant implementing the tactical conflict
|
|||
|
|
resolution
|
|||
|
|
ECHO Sesar ER project 2020-2022 Operational concept for higher space operations at TRL2
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Multi Agent simulation Facility
|
|||
|
|
It employs a multi-agent framework to establish a fast-time simulation environment capable
|
|||
|
|
of evaluating performance metrics related not only to the aircraft, but also to the agents
|
|||
|
|
representing human operators.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 83 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 83 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 84 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 84 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999987066
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
STICHTING KONINKLIJK NEDERLANDS LUCHT - EN RUIMTEVAARTCENTRUM
|
|||
|
|
Short name: NLR
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town AMSTERDAM
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1059 CM
|
|||
|
|
Street ANTHONY FOKKERWEG 2
|
|||
|
|
Country Netherlands
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.nlr.nl
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 31/12/2021 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 31/12/2021 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 18/09/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 85 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 85 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Air Traffic Management and Airports
|
|||
|
|
Street ANTHONY FOKKERWEG 2
|
|||
|
|
Town AMSTERDAM
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Netherlands
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1059 CM
|
|||
|
|
Department 2
|
|||
|
|
Department name Information Supremacy
|
|||
|
|
Street ANTHONY FOKKERWEG 2
|
|||
|
|
Town AMSTERDAM
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Netherlands
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1059 CM
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 86 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 86 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Wilfred Last name* ROUWHORST
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* wilfred.rouwhorst@nlr.nl
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town. Post code Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Please indicate the position of the person.
|
|||
|
|
Department Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Wissam CHALABI wissam.chalabi@nlr.nl +31885113623
|
|||
|
|
Alexander HAAGSMA alexander.haagsma@nlr.nl +31885113394
|
|||
|
|
Juriaan KOK juriaan.kok@nlr.nl +31885113410
|
|||
|
|
Sharon KUIL sharon.kuil@nlr.nl +31885113265
|
|||
|
|
Diana PEEREBOOM diana.peereboom@nlr.nl +31885113023
|
|||
|
|
Iris VAN DEN BERGHE iris.van.den.berghe@nlr.nl +31885113934
|
|||
|
|
Roland VERCAMMEN roland.vercammen@nlr.nl +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 87 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 87 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Wissam Chalabi Man Sweden wissam.chalabi@
|
|||
|
|
nlr.nl Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Alexander Haagsma Man Netherlands alexander.haags
|
|||
|
|
ma@nlr.nl
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Juriaan Kok Man Netherlands juriaan.kok@nlr.nl Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Wilfred Rouwhorst Man Netherlands wilfred.rouwhors
|
|||
|
|
t@nlr.nl
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 88 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 88 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 89 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 89 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement Supporting Space Traffic Management, NLR TR-2020-199, May 2020.
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement Space Traffic Management, Relevance and potential development opportunities, NLR
|
|||
|
|
TR-2021-218, May 2022.
|
|||
|
|
Software Re-entry Scenario Integration into NearSpace and Air Traffic Management, Software and
|
|||
|
|
document, NLR-TR-2024-138, 2024.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Near Space Research to the operational integration of HAO to ATM. Running internal NLR project.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
NARSIM
|
|||
|
|
Is NLR's Air Traffic Management Real-time Simulator. It is a high fidelity human-in-the-loop
|
|||
|
|
simulator that is used by ANSPs and research centres. The NARSIM software can be used for
|
|||
|
|
simulating the movements of vehicles in HAO and presentation to operators. It has a proven
|
|||
|
|
track record in SESAR.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 90 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 90 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 91 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 91 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
899059730
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS
|
|||
|
|
Short name: IFATCA
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town MONTREAL
|
|||
|
|
Postcode H2Y 1P5
|
|||
|
|
Street 360 ST JACQUES SUITE 2002
|
|||
|
|
Country Canada
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.ifatca.org
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 92 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 92 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 93 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 93 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Marc Last name* BAUMGARTNER
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sesar.coord@ifatca.org
|
|||
|
|
Town MONTREAL Post code H2Y 1P5
|
|||
|
|
Street 360 ST JACQUES SUITE 2002
|
|||
|
|
Website www.ifatca.org
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. SESAR and EASA coordinator
|
|||
|
|
Department INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS
|
|||
|
|
Phone +41792125769 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Canada
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Eugenio DIOTALEVI eugenio.diotalevi@ifatca.org +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 94 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 94 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Marc Baumgartner Man Switzerland sesar.coord@ifatc
|
|||
|
|
a.org Category C Recognised Team member 0000-0003-4443-
|
|||
|
|
329X
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Eugenio Diatolevi Man Italy eugenio.diatolevi
|
|||
|
|
@ifatca.org
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Leading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 95 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 95 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 96 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 96 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication IFATCA Technical Professional Manual WC 10.2.5 AUTOMATION / HUMAN FACTORS
|
|||
|
|
Publication IFATCA Study on High Altitude Operations (HAO), Working Paper 93 2023 leading to IFATCA
|
|||
|
|
policy on HAO
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 97 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 97 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 98 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 98 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999537568
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
INGENIERIA Y ECONOMIA DEL TRANSPORTE SME MP SA
|
|||
|
|
Short name: INECO
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28036
|
|||
|
|
Street PASEO DE LA HABANA 138
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.ineco.es
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 20/06/2016 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 99 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 99 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Aerospace System Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street Avenida del Partenón, 2-4
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28042
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 100 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 100 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* José Manuel Last name* RISQUEZ FERNANDEZ
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* jrisquez@ineco.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid Post code 28042
|
|||
|
|
Street Avenida del Partenón, 2-4
|
|||
|
|
Website www.ineco.com
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. ATM Senior Expert
|
|||
|
|
Department Aerospace System Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Raul SEVILLA GONZALEZ raul.sevilla@ineco.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Paloma MONTERO MARTIN paloma.montero@ineco.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Victor Bustos vbustos@ineco.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 101 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 101 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Jose Manuel Rísquez Man Spain jrisquez@ineco.c
|
|||
|
|
om Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Ms Ángela Abad Woman Spain angela.abad@ine
|
|||
|
|
co.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Paloma Montero Woman Spain paloma.montero
|
|||
|
|
@ineco.com
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Dr Raúl Sevilla Man Spain raul.sevilla@inec
|
|||
|
|
o.com
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reTeam member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 102 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 102 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 103 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 103 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
INECO has contributed with a consultancy service to ENAIRE to perform a detailed ATCO task
|
|||
|
|
analysis in most of the ATC spanish sectors getting along this process a relevant operational
|
|||
|
|
and SACTA/iTEC knowledge useful for the sake of ECHO research needs
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2 (GA 101114697)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO-2 builds on the deliverables of the ECHO project, starting from the Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Operations, to propose validated solutions paving the way towards the operational
|
|||
|
|
integration of HAO in ATM, on three directions: Space Launch Real Time Monitoring Module,
|
|||
|
|
integration of High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) operations into ATM, and integration of
|
|||
|
|
supersonic, hypersonic and suborbital vehicles operations into ATM.
|
|||
|
|
PJ10-W2-Sol73_FCA (GA 874464)
|
|||
|
|
HP and SAF assessment of disruptive operational concepts as ECHO is. Ineco has led the HP
|
|||
|
|
activity within ENAIRE' exercise in teh context of FCA as well as has contributed with Fast Time
|
|||
|
|
simulations to support the preparartion of the RTS exercises. In addition, INECO has worked
|
|||
|
|
together with SAF leaders as well as ENAIRE's exercise oriented.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 104 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 104 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 105 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 105 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
997605619
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
CENTRO DE REFERENCIA INVESTIGACION DESARROLLO E INNOVACION ATM, A.I.E.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: CRIDA
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street CALLE CAMPEZO, 1, 4º, EDIFICIO 7, PARQUE EMP
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.crida.es
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 12/07/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 31/12/2021 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 106 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 106 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
Is controlled by ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 107 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 107 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Pablo Last name* SANCHEZ ESCALONILLA
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* psescalonilla@e-crida.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID Post code 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street CALLE CAMPEZO, 1, 4º, EDIFICIO 7, PARQUE EMPRESARIAL LAS MERCEDES
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Principal Researcher
|
|||
|
|
Department CENTRO DE REFERENCIA INVESTIGACION DESARROLLO E INNOVACION ATM, A.I.E.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Marta Sánchez Cidoncha mscidoncha@e-crida.enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Raquel García Lasheras rglasheras@e-crida.enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Jose Miguel De Pablo Guerrero jmdepablo@e-crida.enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 108 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 108 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Ms Raquel Garcia Lasheras Woman Spain rglasheras@e-
|
|||
|
|
crida.enaire.es Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0001-6973-
|
|||
|
|
7412
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Pablo Sanchez
|
|||
|
|
Escalonilla
|
|||
|
|
Man Spain psescalonilla@e-
|
|||
|
|
crida.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Juan Ruben Vaquero Ramos Man Spain jrvaquero@e-
|
|||
|
|
crida.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 109 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 109 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 110 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 110 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ENSURE
|
|||
|
|
ENSURE is a SESAR3 IR01 project that designs and validates a standard operational interface
|
|||
|
|
between U-space and ATM to enable the safe integration of crewed and uncrewed aircraft. It
|
|||
|
|
includes a unified architecture, data model, operational methodology, and dynamic airspace
|
|||
|
|
configuration services to support ATC in managing mixed-traffic environments. This
|
|||
|
|
experience can be translated to the interface within STRATUS project
|
|||
|
|
ATC-TBO
|
|||
|
|
ATC-TBO is a SESAR 3 IR01 projects that seeks to increase the automatisation levels within ATM
|
|||
|
|
to manage aircraft separation. CRIDA participates in concept definition and the execution of
|
|||
|
|
two exercises. CRIDA will bring this knowledge on increase levels of automation to STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
project
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 111 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 111 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 112 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 112 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
952649902
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
INSTITUUT VOOR INFRASTRUCTUUR, MILIEU EN INNOVATIE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: IMIEU
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUSSEL
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street EGMONTSTRAAT 11-13
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.imieu.eu
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 28/09/2012 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 113 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 113 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 114 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 114 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Frank Last name* Neumann
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* info@imieu.eu
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUSSEL Post code 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street EGMONTSTRAAT 11-13
|
|||
|
|
Website www.imieu.eu and www.u-lta.eu
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Director
|
|||
|
|
Department INSTITUUT VOOR INFRASTRUCTUUR, MILIEU EN INNOVATIE
|
|||
|
|
Phone +31615438225 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Dr Benjamyn Scott b.i.scott@law.leidenuniv.nl +31643446666
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 115 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 115 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Frank Neumann Man Netherlands info@imieu.eu Category B Senior resea Leading 186044495 Other ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Benjamyn Scott Man United Kingdom b.i.scott@law.leid
|
|||
|
|
enuniv.nl Category B Senior resea Team member 0009-0000-8219-
|
|||
|
|
8716
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 116 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 116 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 117 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 117 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
IMIEU has founded the Technology Platform; U-LTA 'Upscaling Lighter-Than-Air
|
|||
|
|
Technology',with support of EU DG RTD in 2016, see also www.u-lta.eu, it includes over 20
|
|||
|
|
parties involved in the development of- low-as well as high altitude LTA/ Airship platforms in
|
|||
|
|
the EU and Worlwide, including academia, startups and scale-ups- co-operating with
|
|||
|
|
Eurocontrol/EASA, working on facilitating the upscaling of LTA Technology, including HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Scott, B.I., Custers, B.H.M. & Lahmann, H.C., (2024) Drone Regulation and A.I. Law, assessing
|
|||
|
|
the intersection of the EU Legal Frameworks for unmanned aircraft and artificial intelligene in,
|
|||
|
|
Air and Space Law, 49 (6) 565/584
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement Dr Scott is Member of the ICAO Secretariat Study Group on Cybersecurity Research Sub-Group
|
|||
|
|
on Legal Aspects
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Co-lead of the LTA- Task Force, at
|
|||
|
|
JARUS/with EASA
|
|||
|
|
The objective of this taskforce of the Jarus Main Body is to provide guidance for the adaptation
|
|||
|
|
of SORA 2.5/Annex F, particularly for Low altitude Lighter-Than-Air/Airship Technology, with
|
|||
|
|
input from developers as well as experts and the NAs
|
|||
|
|
Mbr of the HAO- Taskforce. of
|
|||
|
|
JARUS, lead by EASA
|
|||
|
|
The objective of this taskforce belonging to the Jarus Main Body is to come to specific
|
|||
|
|
guidance for the adaptation of SORA 2.5 to HAPS, both fixed wing as well as airship/balloon
|
|||
|
|
initiatives
|
|||
|
|
Member of WG IV/Certificaiton of
|
|||
|
|
AZEA
|
|||
|
|
This working group is developing a roadmap regarding the certificaiton of innovative zero-
|
|||
|
|
emission aviation. AZEA (the Alliance of Zero Emission Aviation) is led by EU DG DEFIS
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 118 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 118 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 119 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 119 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
873172467
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
OpenUTM Ltd.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: OpenUTM
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Dublin
|
|||
|
|
Postcode D04 T4A6
|
|||
|
|
Street Mespil Business Center, Mespil House, Sussex Ho
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Webpage https://openutm.net
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/02/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 120 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 120 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 121 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 121 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Dr Hrishikesh Last name* Ballal
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* hb@openutm.net
|
|||
|
|
Town Dublin Post code D04 T4A6
|
|||
|
|
Street Mespil Business Center, Mespil House, Sussex House
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Managing Director
|
|||
|
|
Department OpenUTM Ltd.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 122 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 122 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Hrishikesh Ballal Man Ireland hb@openutm.net Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 123 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 123 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 124 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 124 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
OpenUTM is an open-source, standards-compliant stack for Unmanned Traffic Management
|
|||
|
|
(UTM), designed to help organizations build and deploy regulation-ready systems for
|
|||
|
|
managing drone and unmanned aircraft traffic. Its architecture is built around two core
|
|||
|
|
components: Flight Blender, a backend service handling Remote ID, air traffic data,
|
|||
|
|
geofencing, and strategic deconfliction, and Flight Spotlight, a frontend interface providing
|
|||
|
|
maps, timelines, flight noticeboards, and 3D visualizations.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 125 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 125 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 126 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 126 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999981731
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV
|
|||
|
|
Short name: DLR
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town KOLN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 51147
|
|||
|
|
Street LINDER HOHE
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 03/01/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 28/10/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 127 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 127 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Institut of Flight Guidance
|
|||
|
|
Street Lilienthalplatz 7
|
|||
|
|
Town Braunschweig
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 38108
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 128 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 128 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Sven Last name* Kaltenhaeuser
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sven.kaltenhaeuser@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Town Braunschweig Post code 38108
|
|||
|
|
Street Lilienthalplatz 7
|
|||
|
|
Website dlr.de/fl
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Head or Department ATM Simulation
|
|||
|
|
Department Institute of Flight Guidance
|
|||
|
|
Phone +49 531 295 2560 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz Losensky lorenz.losensky@dlr.de +49 531 295 1155
|
|||
|
|
Dirk-Roger Schmitt dirk-roger.schmitt@dlr.de +49 172 295 4416
|
|||
|
|
Andreas Hasselberg andreas.hasselberg@dlr.de +49 531 295 2427
|
|||
|
|
fl controlling fl-controlling@dlr.de +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 129 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 129 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Jens Hampe Man Germany Jens.Hampe@dlr.
|
|||
|
|
de Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0003-3105-
|
|||
|
|
1516
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Frank Morlang Man Germany Frank.Morlang@d
|
|||
|
|
lr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0003-3636-
|
|||
|
|
5215
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Tobias Rabus Man Germany tobias.rabus@dlr.
|
|||
|
|
de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0000-0003-1947-
|
|||
|
|
5447
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Richard Hörder Man Germany richard.hoerder@
|
|||
|
|
dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Maximilian Neumann Man Germany Maximilian.Neum
|
|||
|
|
ann@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Lorenz Losensky Man Germany lorenz.losensky@
|
|||
|
|
dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0000-0002-8762-
|
|||
|
|
1971
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Sven Kaltenhäuser Man Germany sven.kaltenhaeus
|
|||
|
|
er@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0003-2085-
|
|||
|
|
7979
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 130 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 130 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 131 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 131 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Klünker, Carmo und Schmitt, Dirk-Roger (2022) Interoperable data
|
|||
|
|
exchange for safe and efficient launch and re-entry operations in an international
|
|||
|
|
environment, In: Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC. 73rd
|
|||
|
|
International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 18.-22. Okt. 2022, Paris, France
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Hampe, Jens und Rabus, Tobias und Morlang, Frank und Losensky,
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz (2024) The SpaceTracks approach for an efficient Integration of Launch Operations in
|
|||
|
|
European Airspace. In: 1st International Symposium on Small Launchers and Spaceports. 1st
|
|||
|
|
International Symposium on Small Launchers and Spaceports, 2024-10-28 - 2024-10-30,
|
|||
|
|
Harwell, Vereinigtes Königreich. Volltext nicht online.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Hampe, Jens (2024) DESIGN CONSIDERATION AND EVALUATION OF A HUMAN-MACHINE
|
|||
|
|
INTERFACE FOR REAL-TIME MISSION MONITORING OF A LAUNCH AND RE-ENTRY
|
|||
|
|
COORDINATION SYSTEMS :"BUILDING A SAFE AND SECURE SUSTAINABLE SPACE". In:
|
|||
|
|
Proceedings of the International Space Safety Conference, 13. International Association for the
|
|||
|
|
Advancement of Space Safety IAASS. 13th IAASS Conference 2024, 2024-10-08 - 2024-10-10,
|
|||
|
|
Prague, Czech Republic. doi: 10.60575/z2gv-6w55. Volltext nicht fre
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Stahnke, Anouk und Rabus, Tobias und Kaltenhäuser, Sven (2022) Supporting the safety and
|
|||
|
|
efficiency of airspace transition for launch and re-entry operations in Europe, 2nd
|
|||
|
|
International Conference on Flight Vehicles, Aerothermodynamics and Re-entry Missions &
|
|||
|
|
Engineering (FAR), 19 - 23 June 2022. Heilbronn, Germany
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Hampe, Jens und Rabus, Tobias und Morlang, Frank und Losensky,
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz (2024) Towards Efficient Integration of Rocket Launches and Re-entry Operations in
|
|||
|
|
European Airspace: Development and Testing of a Launch Coordination Center. Hampe, Jens
|
|||
|
|
und Stahnke, Anouk (2024) Improving air and space safety through enhanced coordination
|
|||
|
|
with the SpaceTracks Suite microservice architecture. Journal of Space Safety Engineering.
|
|||
|
|
Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.jsse.2024.01.005. ISSN 2468-8967.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO Project
|
|||
|
|
European Concept of Higher Airspace Operations.
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo-project/
|
|||
|
|
Project led by EUROCONTROL with major DLR participation delivering a comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
demand analysis and the concept of operations (ConOps) for higher airspace to allow safe,
|
|||
|
|
efficient and scalable operations.The ConOps also provide the basis to identify future
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure needs that is required to support Higher Airspace Operations (HAO).
|
|||
|
|
DLR/FAA DEP
|
|||
|
|
DLR - FAA Data Exchange Project.
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/content/en/articles/news/2019/04/20191025_dlr-and-us-federal-
|
|||
|
|
aviationadministration-are-cooperating.html
|
|||
|
|
DLR and the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the US Federal Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Administration (FAA) identified the data that need to be exchanged between United States
|
|||
|
|
and European Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) prior to, during and after a launch.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo2-project/
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO 2 Project is dedicated to enhancing air traffic management by integrating space
|
|||
|
|
mission monitoring for launches and re-entries within the EUROCONTROL Network Manager
|
|||
|
|
area. It focuses on creating operational frameworks to manage space operations, including
|
|||
|
|
orbital and sub-orbital trajectories, ensuring they harmonize with existing air traffic.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 132 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 132 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
DLR Launch Coordination Center
|
|||
|
|
(LCC) Development -
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/en/latest/news/2021/03/20210923_dlr-is-developing-a-launch-
|
|||
|
|
coordination-center
|
|||
|
|
DLR's LCC integrates software-based procedures for safe, efficient space launch coordination
|
|||
|
|
through airspace. System includes automated planning components, real-time mission
|
|||
|
|
monitoring via Space Operations Dashboard, and enhanced air traffic controller interfaces.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Air Traffic Validation Center
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/fl/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-1140/
|
|||
|
|
DLR facilities for the validation of concepts, technologies and procedures in air traffic
|
|||
|
|
management. Together, these facilities are known as the Air Traffic Validation Center and are
|
|||
|
|
unique in Europe.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 133 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 133 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 134 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 134 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
870545901
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SCEYE SPAIN S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: Sceye Spain
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28002
|
|||
|
|
Street Suero de Quiñones 34-36
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.sceye.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 04/09/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 135 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 135 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 136 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 136 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Alfredo Last name* Serrano
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* as@sceye.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid Post code 28002
|
|||
|
|
Street Suero de Quiñones 34-36
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Director of EMEA
|
|||
|
|
Department SCEYE SPAIN S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 137 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 137 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Leonard Bouygues Non-binary France lb@sceye.com Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 138 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 138 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 139 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 139 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Cooperative, Seamless, and Global Digital Skies for Higher Airspace (2025) - HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
Aviation Working Group
|
|||
|
|
The Aerospace Industries Association proposes collaborative traffic management for higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace to manage exponential growth of UAS, supersonic, HAPS, and commercial space
|
|||
|
|
operations. This involves community-based rules (user-formed, CAA-approved) and operators
|
|||
|
|
sharing intent via service providers for conflict identification and resolution, ensuring safe and
|
|||
|
|
equitable global mnmgt
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Acceptable Levels of Risks for HAPS (2024) - HAPS Alliance Aviation Working Group
|
|||
|
|
For High Altitude Platform Systems, the HAPS Alliance advocates third-party-centric risk
|
|||
|
|
metrics, measuring risk to ground populations and manned aircraft. This replaces inadequate
|
|||
|
|
platform-centric aviation metrics. The framework sets individual and collective risk limits,
|
|||
|
|
aligned with existing infrastructure risks (e.g.UK ALARP), enabling operators to dynamically
|
|||
|
|
self-manage risk by controlling operational factor
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Operation Using Attended Autonomous Fleet Systems (2022) - HAPS Alliance Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Working Group
|
|||
|
|
A proposal for Collaborative Traffic Management for the Stratosphere (CTMS) for Attended
|
|||
|
|
Autonomous Fleet Systems. This strategy enables safe, scalable HAPS operations through
|
|||
|
|
automation for fleet management and M2M conflict resolution. It uses Community Based
|
|||
|
|
Rules (CBR) and is an exception-centric approach, where human supervisory networks
|
|||
|
|
manage system anomalies, not individual vehicles
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Cooperative Operations In Higher Airspace - A Proposal (2022) - Aerospace Industries
|
|||
|
|
Association (AIA), Emerging Technologies Commitee (ETC), Airspace Working Group
|
|||
|
|
A national strategy for higher airspace operations is crucial due to expected exponential
|
|||
|
|
growth and diverse commercial aircraft. Collaborative traffic management, based on
|
|||
|
|
community-based rules, is proposed to address challenges from increasing demand and
|
|||
|
|
varied vehicle profiles. This approach aims for safe and equitable global ops
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Adaptive Risk-Based Conflict Detection for Stratospheric Flight Operations, Air Traffic Control
|
|||
|
|
Associate (ATCA) - Leonard Bouygues, et al (2020)
|
|||
|
|
This paper proposes an adaptive risk-based framework for conflict deconfliction in
|
|||
|
|
stratospheric flight operations, using a victim-centric model (1st, 2nd, & 3rd party risk) to
|
|||
|
|
address challenges posed by diverse vehicle performance and risk profiles.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Stratospheric Flights
|
|||
|
|
Sceye platform is the most capable LTA HAPS currently in operation. Sceye has flown
|
|||
|
|
successfully more than 20 missions into the stratosphere, demonstrating day-night endurance
|
|||
|
|
using solar power and battery storage, while keeping station over the area of operation.
|
|||
|
|
We have flown multiple payloads, including optical and hyperspectral imaging cameras, SAR,
|
|||
|
|
4G telecommunications, infrasonic sensors, and aerosol particle spectrometers, validating the
|
|||
|
|
platform’s ability to carry diverse instrument
|
|||
|
|
NASA Demonstrated cooperative deconfliction capabilities with other HAPS operators through
|
|||
|
|
NASA-led CE1.5 simulation
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 140 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 140 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Flight Simulators
|
|||
|
|
Sceye designed and built a simulator to model the platform dynamics and trajectory. By using
|
|||
|
|
global weather data, the simulator can predict accurately the platform's navigation path,
|
|||
|
|
ascend and descent trajectories, and also model solar energy management system and
|
|||
|
|
internal gas dynamics.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 141 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 141 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 142 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 142 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
888276725
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ANRA TECHNOLOGIES OU
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ANRA TECHNOLOGIES OU
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town TALLINN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 11314
|
|||
|
|
Street KESKLINNA LINNAOSA JARVEVANA TEE 9
|
|||
|
|
Country Estonia
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.flyanra.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 31/12/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 31/12/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 143 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 143 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 144 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 144 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ajay Last name* Modha
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* amodha@flyanra.com
|
|||
|
|
Town TALLINN Post code 11314
|
|||
|
|
Street KESKLINNA LINNAOSA JARVEVANA TEE 9
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Business Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department ANRA TECHNOLOGIES OU
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Estonia
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 145 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 145 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Ms Abinaya Kannan Woman Italy akannan@flyanra.
|
|||
|
|
com Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Patricia Garcia Pastor Woman Spain Pgpastor@flyanra
|
|||
|
|
.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Dr Ajay Modha Man United Kingdom amodha@flyanra.
|
|||
|
|
com
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 146 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 146 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 147 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 147 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
ANRA NOON: ANRA is an EASA certified U-space Service Provider, and ANRA NOON is an
|
|||
|
|
airspace management software platform for uncrewed aircraft. U-space services support the
|
|||
|
|
management of uncrewed aircraft operations in U-space airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Software ANRA's SIM tool: Provides the engine to drive a Digital Twin experience for virtual drone
|
|||
|
|
operations
|
|||
|
|
Software ANRA AAM Traffic Management tool: airspace management for Advanced Air Mobility aircraft
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Corus five (2025-2028)
|
|||
|
|
The project aims to extend and mature the SESAR U-space Concept of Operations for the
|
|||
|
|
integration of drones into controlled airspace. Building on the success of CORUS and CORUS
|
|||
|
|
XUAM, it is expanding the scope to cover areas currently not included such as above very low
|
|||
|
|
level airspace and near controlled airports. The updated ConOps will include functionalities
|
|||
|
|
and U3/U4 services supporting U-space integration, and propose SESAR Solutions, flight rules,
|
|||
|
|
and airspace structure elements.
|
|||
|
|
ASTM F38 UTM Committee Co-
|
|||
|
|
chair
|
|||
|
|
ANRA is the Co-chair of the ASTM Standards development organisation's F38 UTM technical
|
|||
|
|
committee. The committee has published several UTM standards including the F3548-21 UTM
|
|||
|
|
interoperability standard that is recommended in the AMC/GM for U-space regulations and
|
|||
|
|
the FAA rules. The committee is currently working on standards for Advanced air mobility for
|
|||
|
|
vertiports and eVTOL operations and is engaged with NASA on airspace management topics.
|
|||
|
|
Managing Shared Airspace (2025 -
|
|||
|
|
2026)
|
|||
|
|
The project aims to implement and validate a UK Concept of Operations for UTM supported
|
|||
|
|
UAS operations. It seeks to operationalise an industry-driven approach for UTM services that
|
|||
|
|
support multiple overlapping Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations within shared
|
|||
|
|
airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 148 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 148 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 149 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 149 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
869703941
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
Short name: HAPS ALLIANCE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Wakefield
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 01880
|
|||
|
|
Street 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600
|
|||
|
|
Country United States
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.hapsalliance.org
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 30/08/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 150 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 150 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 151 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 151 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Andrew Thurling Man United States andy@thurling-
|
|||
|
|
aero.com Category A Top grade reTeam member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 152 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 152 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 153 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 153 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Cooperative, Seamless, and Global Digital Skies for Higher Airspace : The purpose of the paper
|
|||
|
|
is to assist the aviation and aerospace global communities in understanding an industry
|
|||
|
|
perspective and vision for a global harmonized, cross-border, and integrated Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations Traffic Management, which supports the seamless integration of highly
|
|||
|
|
automated operations.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Certification Pathways: The purpose of this document is to identify the key challenges
|
|||
|
|
faced by the High Altitude Platform System (HAPS) community in getting regulatory approval
|
|||
|
|
to start commercial operations and recommended actions that the HAPS Alliance can take to
|
|||
|
|
address these challenges. Operational challenges are covered only from the perspective of the
|
|||
|
|
potential impact they have on air vehicle performance.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Acceptable Levels of Risk for HAPS : This paper discusses setting acceptable levels of risk for
|
|||
|
|
High Altitude Platform System (HAPS). It discusses the safety metrics traditionally used in
|
|||
|
|
aviation are not adequate to establish target levels of safety for HAPS. Then it proposes to set
|
|||
|
|
acceptable levels of risk to be consistent with the risk already accepted by the exposed parties.
|
|||
|
|
Then it proposes a framework by which an operator self-manages the collective risk it
|
|||
|
|
generates.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 154 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 154 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 155 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 155 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
927009019
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
UDARAS EITLIOCHTA NA HEIREANN THE IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY
|
|||
|
|
Short name: IAA (COOPANS)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town DUBLIN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode D02 T449
|
|||
|
|
Street D'OLIER STREET 11-12 THE TIMES BUILDING
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.iaa.ie
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 156 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 156 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 157 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 157 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 158 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 158 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 159 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 159 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 160 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 160 of 166 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 161 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 161 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
3 - Budget
|
|||
|
|
No Name of Beneficiary Country Role Requested grant
|
|||
|
|
amount
|
|||
|
|
Income generated
|
|||
|
|
by the action
|
|||
|
|
Financial
|
|||
|
|
contributions
|
|||
|
|
Own resources Total estimated
|
|||
|
|
income
|
|||
|
|
1 Eurocontrol - European Organisation For The Safety Of Air
|
|||
|
|
Navigation BE Coordinator 0.00 0 0 2 550 785 2 550 785.00
|
|||
|
|
2 Dfs Deutsche Flugsicherung Gmbh DE Partner 73 235.00 0 0 15 480 88 715.00
|
|||
|
|
3 Enav Spa IT Partner 73 924.08 0 0 0 73 924.08
|
|||
|
|
4 Luftfartsverket SE Partner 180 375.00 0 0 0 180 375.00
|
|||
|
|
5 Nats (En Route) Public Limited Company UK Partner 119 684.75 0 0 0 119 684.75
|
|||
|
|
6 Enaire ES Partner 95 975.00 0 0 0 95 975.00
|
|||
|
|
7 Ente Nazionale Per L'aviazione Civile - Enac Italian Civil Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Authority IT Partner 102 268.75 0 0 0 102 268.75
|
|||
|
|
8 Consorcio Aerodromo Aeropuerto De Teruel ES Partner 88 000.00 0 0 0 88 000.00
|
|||
|
|
9 Skynav Europe BE Partner 253 269.75 0 0 0 253 269.75
|
|||
|
|
10 Ecole Nationale De L Aviation Civile FR Partner 78 250.00 0 0 0 78 250.00
|
|||
|
|
11 C.i.r.a. Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali Scpa IT Partner 53 907.50 0 0 0 53 907.50
|
|||
|
|
12 Stichting Koninklijk Nederlands Lucht - En Ruimtevaartcentrum NL Partner 157 795.25 0 0 0 157 795.25
|
|||
|
|
13 International Federation Of Air Traffic Controllers Associations CA Partner 63 125.00 0 0 0 63 125.00
|
|||
|
|
14 Ingenieria Y Economia Del Transporte Sme Mp Sa ES Partner 97 575.00 0 0 0 97 575.00
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 162 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 162 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
15 Centro De Referencia Investigacion Desarrollo E Innovacion Atm,
|
|||
|
|
A.i.e. ES Partner 59 250.00 0 0 0 59 250.00
|
|||
|
|
16 Instituut Voor Infrastructuur, Milieu En Innovatie BE Partner 33 462.50 0 0 0 33 462.50
|
|||
|
|
17 Openutm Ltd. IE Partner 7 237.50 0 0 0 7 237.50
|
|||
|
|
18 Deutsches Zentrum Fur Luft - Und Raumfahrt Ev DE Partner 153 000.00 0 0 0 153 000.00
|
|||
|
|
19 Sceye Spain S.l. ES Partner 280 175.00 0 0 0 280 175.00
|
|||
|
|
20 Anra Technologies Ou EE Partner 84 656.25 0 0 0 84 656.25
|
|||
|
|
21 Haps Alliance US Associated 0.00 0 0 0 0.00
|
|||
|
|
22 Udaras Eitliochta Na Heireann The Irish Aviation Authority IE Associated 0.00 0 0 0 0.00
|
|||
|
|
Total 2 055 166.33 2 566 265 4 621 431.33
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 163 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 163 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
4 - Ethics & security
|
|||
|
|
Ethics Issues Table
|
|||
|
|
1. Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Human Embryos Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of human embryos? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
2. Humans Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve human participants? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve interventions (physical also including imaging technology,
|
|||
|
|
behavioural treatments, etc.) on the study participants? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve conducting a clinical study as defined by the Clinical Trial Regulation
|
|||
|
|
(EU 536/2014)? (using pharmaceuticals, biologicals, radiopharmaceuticals, or advanced
|
|||
|
|
therapy medicinal products)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
3. Human Cells / Tissues (not covered by section 1) Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of human cells or tissues? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
4. Personal Data Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve processing of personal data? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve further processing of previously collected personal data (including
|
|||
|
|
use of preexisting data sets or sources, merging existing data sets)?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to export personal data from the EU to non-EU countries? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to import personal data from non-EU countries into the EU or from a non-EU
|
|||
|
|
country to another non-EU country?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the processing of personal data related to criminal convictions or
|
|||
|
|
offences?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
5. Animals Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve animals? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
6. Non-EU Countries Page
|
|||
|
|
Will some of the activities be carried out in non-EU countries? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
In case non-EU countries are involved, do the activities undertaken in these countries raise
|
|||
|
|
potential ethics issues? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
It is planned to use local resources (e.g. animal and/or human tissue samples, genetic material,
|
|||
|
|
live animals, human remains, materials of historical value, endangered fauna or flora samples,
|
|||
|
|
etc.)?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to import any material (other than data) from non-EU countries into the EU or
|
|||
|
|
from a non-EU country to another non-EU country? For data imports, see section 4. Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to export any material (other than data) from the EU to non-EU countries? For
|
|||
|
|
data exports, see section 4. Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve low and/or lower middle income countries, (if yes, detail the benefit-
|
|||
|
|
sharing actions planned in the self-assessment) Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Could the situation in the country put the individuals taking part in the activity at risk? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
7. Environment, Health and Safety Page
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 164 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 164 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to the
|
|||
|
|
environment, to animals or plants.(during the implementation of the activity or further to the
|
|||
|
|
use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity deal with endangered fauna and/or flora / protected areas? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to humans,
|
|||
|
|
including those performing the activity.(during the implementation of the activity or further
|
|||
|
|
to the use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
8. Artificial Intelligence Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the development, deployment and/or use of Artificial Intelligence-
|
|||
|
|
based systems? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
9. Other Ethics Issues Page
|
|||
|
|
Are there any other ethics issues that should be taken into consideration? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
I confirm that I have taken into account all ethics issues above and that, if any ethics issues apply, I will complete the
|
|||
|
|
ethics self-assessment as described in the guidelines How to Complete your Ethics Self-Assessment
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 165 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 165 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Ethics Self-Assessment
|
|||
|
|
Ethical dimension of the objectives, methodology and likely impact
|
|||
|
|
Explain in detail the identified issues in relation to:
|
|||
|
|
- objectives of the activities (e.g. study of vulnerable populations, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
- methodology (e.g. clinical trials, involvement of children, protection of personal data, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
- the potential impact of the activities (e.g. environmental damage, stigmatisation of particular social
|
|||
|
|
groups, political or financial adverse consequences, misuse, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
Compliance with ethical principles and relevant legislations
|
|||
|
|
Describe how the issue(s) identified in the ethics issues table above will be addressed in order to adhere to the ethical principles and
|
|||
|
|
what will be done to ensure that the activities are compliant with the EU/national legal and ethical requirements of the country or
|
|||
|
|
countries where the tasks are to be carried out. It is reminded that for activities performed in a non-EU countries, they should also be
|
|||
|
|
allowed in at least one EU Member State.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 166 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 166 of 166
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101290642
|
|||
|
|
Acronym STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 22:33
|
|||
|
|
Security issues table
|
|||
|
|
1. EU Classified Information (EUCI)2 Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve information and/or materials requiring protection against
|
|||
|
|
unauthorised disclosure (EUCI)? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve non-EU countries which need to have access to EUCI? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
2. Misuse Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity have the potential for misuse of results? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
3. Other Security Issues Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve information and/or materials subject to national security restrictions?
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Are there any other security issues that should be taken into consideration?
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Security self-assessment
|
|||
|
|
Please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 5000)
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
2According to the Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, “European Union
|
|||
|
|
classified information (EUCI) means any information or material designated by an EU security classification, the unauthorised disclosure of which could cause varying
|
|||
|
|
degrees of prejudice to the interests of the European Union or of one or more of the Member States”.
|
|||
|
|
3Classified background information is information that is already classified by a country and/or international organisation and/or the EU and is going to be used by the
|
|||
|
|
project. In this case, the project must have in advance the authorisation from the originator of the classified information, which is the entity (EU institution, EU Member
|
|||
|
|
State, third state or international organisation) under whose authority the classified information has been generated.
|
|||
|
|
4EU classified foreground information is information (documents/deliverables/materials) planned to be generated by the project and that needs to be protected from
|
|||
|
|
unauthorised disclosure. The originator of the EUCI generated by the project is the European Commission.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 16:55:35 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 167 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 1 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Proposal template Part B: technical description
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS — SAFETY AND TRANSFORMED RESILIENCE FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE TRAFFIC
|
|||
|
|
UNIFIED SERVICES
|
|||
|
|
[This document is tagged. Do not delete the tags; they are needed for processing.] #@APP-FORM-HERIAIA@#
|
|||
|
|
List of participants
|
|||
|
|
Participant No. * Participant organisation name Country
|
|||
|
|
1 (Coordinator) EUROCONTROL Belgium (BE)
|
|||
|
|
2 DFS Detusche Flugsicherung GmbH Germany (DE)
|
|||
|
|
3 ENAV SPA Italy (IT)
|
|||
|
|
4 LUFTARSVERKET Sweden (SE)
|
|||
|
|
5 NATS United Kingdom (UK)
|
|||
|
|
6 ENAIRE Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
7 ENAC ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Italy (IT)
|
|||
|
|
8 CONSORCIO DEL AEROPUERTO DE TERUEL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
9 SKYNAV EUROPE Belgium (BE)
|
|||
|
|
10 ECOLE NATIONALE DE L’AVIATION CIVILE France (FR)
|
|||
|
|
11 C.I.R.A. CENTRO ITALIANO RICERCHE
|
|||
|
|
AEROSPAZIALI SCPA
|
|||
|
|
Italy (IT)
|
|||
|
|
12 STICHTING KONINKLIJK NEDERLANDS LUCHT
|
|||
|
|
- EN RUIMTEVAARTCENTRUM
|
|||
|
|
Netherlands (NL)
|
|||
|
|
13 INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR
|
|||
|
|
TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS’ ASSOCIATIONS
|
|||
|
|
Canada (CA)
|
|||
|
|
14 INGENIERIA Y ECONOMIA DEL TRANSPORTE
|
|||
|
|
SME MP SA
|
|||
|
|
Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
15 CENTRO DE REFERENCIA INVESTIGACION
|
|||
|
|
DESARROLLO E INNOVACION ATM, A.I.E.
|
|||
|
|
Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
16 INSTITUUT VOOR INFRASTRUCTUUR, MILIEU
|
|||
|
|
EN INNOVATIE
|
|||
|
|
Belgium (BE)
|
|||
|
|
17 OPENUTM Ireland (IE)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 168 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 2 of 34
|
|||
|
|
18 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND
|
|||
|
|
RAUMFAHRT EV
|
|||
|
|
Germany (DE)
|
|||
|
|
19 SCEYE SPAIN Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
20 ANRA Technologies OU Estonia (EE)
|
|||
|
|
21 HAPS Alliance (Associated partner) United States (US)
|
|||
|
|
22 UDARAS EITLIOCHTA NA HEIREANN THE IRISH
|
|||
|
|
AVIATION AUTHORITY (Associated partner)
|
|||
|
|
Ireland (IE)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. Excellence #@REL-EVA-RE@#
|
|||
|
|
1.1 Objectives and ambition #@PRJ-OBJ-PO@#
|
|||
|
|
Project objectives
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS (Safety and Transformed Resilience for High-Altitude Traffic Unified Services) will define a modular
|
|||
|
|
and scalable framework for integrating Higher Airspace Operations (HAO) and Space Transport Operations (STO)
|
|||
|
|
into the European ATM framework. The focus is on the low-density airspace above conventional traffic, generally
|
|||
|
|
above FL550. This is where high-performance supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, automated HAPS fleets, and
|
|||
|
|
sub-orbital operations are expected to multiply in the coming decade.
|
|||
|
|
Building on the exploratory CONOPS produced in ECHO and taking into account the work now underway in
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2, STRATUS will expand the scope to cover a wider set of operational scenarios, vehicle types and service
|
|||
|
|
models. It will address the operational, functional, technical and regulatory foundations required f or integration, in
|
|||
|
|
line with the priorities of the European ATM Master Plan for higher -airspace operations, dynamic airspace
|
|||
|
|
configuration, service-oriented architectures and cyber -secure digitalisation. Concentrating on the higher airspace,
|
|||
|
|
where traffic density is relatively low, provides the opportunity to mature and validate innovative concepts and
|
|||
|
|
technologies while limiting operational risk to existing ATM.
|
|||
|
|
The objectives of STRATUS follow a logical progression from establishing operational demand in higher airspace,
|
|||
|
|
through the development of concepts and supporting frameworks, to the consideration of regulatory and other
|
|||
|
|
relevant implications that may influence successful implementation. The specific objectives are:
|
|||
|
|
a) Market and stakeholder study
|
|||
|
|
Carry out an updated market and stakeholder study early in the project to establish the foundation for higher-
|
|||
|
|
airspace integration. The study will identify expected airspace users, including HAPS fleets, hypersonic
|
|||
|
|
transports, space transport operations such as orbital launches, sub-orbital flights and re-entries, and relevant
|
|||
|
|
military activities. It will assess expected traffic levels, operational profiles and timelines for entry into
|
|||
|
|
service, providing a realistic picture of higher-airspace occupancy. The results will provide the baseline for
|
|||
|
|
the OSED and CONOPS and ensure that subsequent work is grounded in operational reality. The study will
|
|||
|
|
complement the ongoing HAO market study by EASA by including space transport operations, which can
|
|||
|
|
have a major impact on airspace availability , and therefore this study will deliver a more comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
assessment of overall higher-airspace demand.
|
|||
|
|
b) Higher-airspace CONOPS
|
|||
|
|
Develop an updated CONOPS describing how HAO and STO are integrated into the ATM network in
|
|||
|
|
practice. The CONOPS will identify the main functions required, such as trajectory exchange, conflict
|
|||
|
|
detection, separation, hazard area coordination and contingency response, and map them to potential services
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 169 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 3 of 34
|
|||
|
|
with clearly defined interfaces. It will describe how these services interact with ANSPs, operators, military
|
|||
|
|
authorities and STO actors, ensuring that launches, re-entries and hazard areas are managed consistently with
|
|||
|
|
the wider ATM network. Building on the exploratory ECHO CONOPS, STRATUS will focus on producing
|
|||
|
|
an updated and innovative framework that moves beyond initial scoping and provides a structured basis for
|
|||
|
|
future implementation.
|
|||
|
|
c) STO integration and hazard area management
|
|||
|
|
Define the functions and services required for hazard area generation, promulgation, and dynamic
|
|||
|
|
management. This includes processes for creating and updating hazard areas, how they are exchanged with
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs and operators, and how they interact with 4DOZ concepts. Contingency procedures for off-nominal
|
|||
|
|
launches or re-entries will be addressed, together with the responsibilities of different service providers.
|
|||
|
|
d) Dynamic 4-Dimensional Operating Zones for HAPS (4DOZ)
|
|||
|
|
Extend the 4DOZ concept introduced in ECHO2 by explaining how these zones can operate in relation to
|
|||
|
|
other airspace users and how they can be integrated into higher airspace within the European ATM network.
|
|||
|
|
Particular attention will be given to HAPS operations, which may involve long endurance flights, large
|
|||
|
|
formations, or fleets with unique operational profiles. The project will specify the functions for creating,
|
|||
|
|
resizing and coordinating zones, describe how they can be delivered as services, and outline which providers
|
|||
|
|
would be responsible for their management.
|
|||
|
|
e) Service architecture framework
|
|||
|
|
Outline a modular, digital ( Application Programming Interface (API) based), distributed architecture that
|
|||
|
|
supports the deployment of higher -airspace functions as interoperable services. The framework will apply
|
|||
|
|
zero-trust security, where no user or service is trusted by default and every interaction is authenticated,
|
|||
|
|
authorised and monitored. Redundancy and digital authorisation mechanisms will be built in, allowing States
|
|||
|
|
to maintain control of services within their jurisdiction while still supporting resilient and secure cross-border
|
|||
|
|
operations.
|
|||
|
|
f) Integrated assurance framework
|
|||
|
|
Develop a conceptual methodology that brings safety, cyber -security and resilience together in a single
|
|||
|
|
assurance process. The framework will show how requirements in these areas are linked, how evidence can
|
|||
|
|
be reused across domains, and how the approach c an be exercised through expert review and small desk -
|
|||
|
|
based studies. The aim is to provide a practical way of checking that higher-airspace functions and services
|
|||
|
|
are robust without creating three separate sets of assurance work.
|
|||
|
|
g) Regulatory and implementation considerations
|
|||
|
|
Consider the regulatory and operational issues that will influence the implementation of higher -airspace
|
|||
|
|
services for all users. Areas to be considered include flight rules, licensing and supervision of new service
|
|||
|
|
providers, sovereignty and cross -border o perations, military use of higher airspace, contingency
|
|||
|
|
responsibilities and environmental aspects. STRATUS will review these topics and provide commentary on
|
|||
|
|
their relevance to successful implementation, highlighting where regulatory developments may be n eeded.
|
|||
|
|
The findings will be reflected in an annex to the CONOPS and presented as input to inform further regulatory
|
|||
|
|
and implementation work.
|
|||
|
|
Collectively, these objectives move beyond the initial scoping in ECHO and expand on the ongoing activities in
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2. Whereas ECHO established a first (comparatively narrow) CONOPS at TRL 2, STRATUS will broaden
|
|||
|
|
the scope and then consolidate the results back to a comprehensive TRL 2 by project close. This provides a more
|
|||
|
|
complete and implementation -oriented baseline for higher -airspace integration. In this way, STRATUS ensur es
|
|||
|
|
continuity with existing SESAR work while delivering outputs that are ready to s upport future industrial research
|
|||
|
|
and the priorities of the European ATM Master Plan.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 170 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 4 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Ambition and advance beyond the state of the art
|
|||
|
|
Previous SESAR work has established useful foundations for higher-airspace integration but important gaps remain.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO delivered an initial CONOPS at TRL 2, providing the first structured view of higher -airspace operations.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 is continuing this line of work but remains in progress and has not yet addressed service architectures,
|
|||
|
|
assurance methods or regulatory considerations. Other projects have contributed in related areas, including SEC -
|
|||
|
|
AIRSPACE on cyber security, FARO on resilience metrics, and FCDI on distributed service provision, but none
|
|||
|
|
have combined these elements into a coherent framework tailored for higher-airspace operations and space transport.
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS advances the state of the art by:
|
|||
|
|
a) Establishing a framework for network -wide consistent management of higher-airspace and space transport
|
|||
|
|
operations, ensuring that new entrants are integrated as part of a coherent Europe -wide system rather than
|
|||
|
|
through fragmented national solutions. This reflects the Master Plan ambition of a Digital European Sky that
|
|||
|
|
manages all users seamlessly across borders.
|
|||
|
|
b) Embedding zero -trust, cyber -resilient principles into operational concepts and service architectures,
|
|||
|
|
consistent with the Master Plan’s call for secure digitalisation of ATM services.
|
|||
|
|
c) Providing flexible and dynamic airspace management through 4DOZ, adaptable to traffic mix, vehicle
|
|||
|
|
performance and network conditions, which directly supports the Master Plan priority on dynamic airspace
|
|||
|
|
configuration.
|
|||
|
|
d) Enhancing resilience of higher -airspace services against disruptive events such as health crises, natural
|
|||
|
|
disasters, terrorism and cyber-attacks. STRATUS will explore how resilience requirements can be defined
|
|||
|
|
for new functions and services, building on and extending beyond previous SESAR work.
|
|||
|
|
e) Creating a unified assurance methodology that brings safety, cyber security and resilience into a single
|
|||
|
|
process, reflecting the Master Plan priority on strengthening resilience of ATM services against physical and
|
|||
|
|
cyber threats.
|
|||
|
|
f) Delivering an interoperable distributed architecture that supports a European network of higher -airspace
|
|||
|
|
services in which States retain sovereignty, but solutions can be reused across borders. This contributes to
|
|||
|
|
the Master Plan objective of introducing service -oriented architectures that allow scalability and
|
|||
|
|
harmonisation across Europe.
|
|||
|
|
By consolidating these strands at TRL 2, STRATUS provides a more comprehensive and implementation -oriented
|
|||
|
|
baseline than any previous exploratory research. It ensures that the integration of new entrants such as HAPS,
|
|||
|
|
hypersonic and space transport vehicle s is addressed in line with the development priorities of the European ATM
|
|||
|
|
Master Plan.
|
|||
|
|
R&I maturity
|
|||
|
|
The work will begin at TRL 1–2, building on the exploratory CONOPS delivered in ECHO. STRATUS broadens the
|
|||
|
|
scope to include additional vehicle types, STO interactions, hazard area management, dynamic 4DOZ, service
|
|||
|
|
architectures and assurance methods. This wider scope temporarily lowers maturity, and the project will consolidate
|
|||
|
|
these strands back to a comprehensive TRL 2 by project close.
|
|||
|
|
By the end of the project, concepts, architectures and frameworks will be fully defined, documented and validated
|
|||
|
|
through expert review, stakeholder consultation and targeted desk -based analysis. Where appropriate, small -scale
|
|||
|
|
studies will be used to test specific elements such as hazard area coordination or cyber-resilience principles. No large-
|
|||
|
|
scale simulations or flight trials are foreseen, in line with the scope of an Exploratory Research project.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§PRJ-OBJ-PO§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 171 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 5 of 34
|
|||
|
|
1.2 Methodology #@CON-MET-CM@# #@COM-PLE-CP@#
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS begins by establishing who is expected to operate in higher airspace, through the development of
|
|||
|
|
operational concepts and technical frameworks, to the assessment of assurance and consideration of regulatory
|
|||
|
|
aspects. Each stage builds on the previous one so that by project close the results form a coherent package
|
|||
|
|
consolidated at TRL 2.
|
|||
|
|
Initially a market and stakeholder study will be performed to establish a baseline picture of higher-airspace demand.
|
|||
|
|
This provides traffic expectations and operating characteristics that underpin the later concept work. On this basis
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS develops an updated CONOPS and OSED. These describe how higher -airspace and space transport
|
|||
|
|
operations can be integrated into the ATM network, define the required functions, map them to potential services,
|
|||
|
|
and explain how they interact with ANSPs, operators, military authorities and space transport actors. Special attention
|
|||
|
|
is given to STO integration and hazard area management, and to extending the 4DOZ concept from ECHO2 to show
|
|||
|
|
how dynamic zones can operate in relation to other higher airspace users and the European ATM network.
|
|||
|
|
The project then looks at how these functions could be deployed within a modular, service-oriented architecture. This
|
|||
|
|
includes interoperability through digital APIs, redundancy, digital authorisation and the application of zero -trust
|
|||
|
|
security principles to maintain resilience in distributed and cross-border settings. A conceptual integrated assurance
|
|||
|
|
framework will also be developed, linking safety, cyber securit y and resilience into a single process. This will be
|
|||
|
|
reviewed by experts and exercised through desk-based studies.
|
|||
|
|
Finally, STRATUS examines the regulatory and implementation aspects that could affect higher -airspace services.
|
|||
|
|
These considerations may include flight rules, licensing, sovereignty, contingency planning and environmental
|
|||
|
|
impacts. The focus will be on analysing relevance and potential effects rather than prescribing solutions.
|
|||
|
|
The research is structured around two work packages that cover the exploratory and consolidation phases. Each
|
|||
|
|
reflects one reporting period, in line with SESAR guidance for Exploratory Research projects. This structure ensures
|
|||
|
|
that early definitions and scoping are completed and reviewed before more detailed frameworks are developed.
|
|||
|
|
Part A (WP3, M1–M12) sets the foundation. It begins with the market and stakeholder study that establishes who is
|
|||
|
|
expected to operate in higher airspace in the coming decade, covering HAPS fleets, hypersonic transport, space
|
|||
|
|
transport operations such as orbital launches, sub-orbital flights and re-entries, and relevant military activities. This
|
|||
|
|
study produces traffic profiles, operating characteristics and entry-into-service timelines that serve as the baseline for
|
|||
|
|
the concept work.
|
|||
|
|
Building on this baseline, Part A defines the operational context. It sets the vertical limits, classes and flight rules for
|
|||
|
|
higher airspace, identifies the main functions required for integration, and describes the actors involved. These
|
|||
|
|
include service providers, operators, regulators, airports, spaceports, stratoports and military authorities. The package
|
|||
|
|
also reviews existing ICAO, European and SESAR documentation to identify overlaps, gaps and inconsistencies.
|
|||
|
|
The initial set of functional building blocks is then described. This covers surveillance, communications, navigation,
|
|||
|
|
mission planning, tactical planning and separation where applicable. Early models of 4DOZ are outlined, showing
|
|||
|
|
how dynamic zones might i nteract with other high -altitude users. These elements are captured in the Exploratory
|
|||
|
|
Research Plan, the market study and the initial OSED and CONOPS.
|
|||
|
|
Part B (WP4, M13–M24) builds on these foundations and delivers the main technical results. It refines the functional
|
|||
|
|
building blocks and develops detailed service concepts, extending the 4DOZ models to include coordination
|
|||
|
|
mechanisms, contingency procedures, degraded mode operations and civil–military use.
|
|||
|
|
The project then maps these functions into a high -level architecture framework. This framework applies modular,
|
|||
|
|
service-oriented principles, ensures interoperability through APIs, and incorporates zero -trust cyber security,
|
|||
|
|
redundancy, and sovereign control. The mapping of functions to services and interfaces provides a consistent basis
|
|||
|
|
for future technical development.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 172 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 6 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Alongside this, Part B develops a conceptual integrated assurance framework that brings safety, cyber security and
|
|||
|
|
resilience together in a single process. The framework is exercised through expert review and desk -based studies,
|
|||
|
|
demonstrating how assurance evidence could be captured once and reused across domains.
|
|||
|
|
Finally, Part B considers standardisation and regulatory aspects. The concepts developed are mapped against existing
|
|||
|
|
ICAO, European and national regulations and standards. Areas where clarification or updates may be needed are
|
|||
|
|
highlighted, including sovere ignty, licensing, contingency and environmental considerations. This commentary
|
|||
|
|
provides input for later SESAR phases and regulatory work.
|
|||
|
|
The outputs of Part B include the FRD, final OSED and CONOPS, the Exploratory Research Report, an economic
|
|||
|
|
evaluation, and a commentary on regulatory and implementation issues.
|
|||
|
|
The research is supported by WP1 on project management and by WP2 and WP5 on communication, dissemination
|
|||
|
|
and exploitation. These ensure that results are shared effectively and that open science and FAIR data principles are
|
|||
|
|
followed. They are described in more detail under Implementation.
|
|||
|
|
Methodological challenges and mitigation
|
|||
|
|
A key challenge for higher -airspace research is the absence of operational data. There are no mature fleets of
|
|||
|
|
hypersonic aircraft or routine space transport missions from Europe today, and HAPS operations remain limited.
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS addresses this by using a market and stakeholder study to construct realistic traffic profiles and operating
|
|||
|
|
characteristics. These are complemented by desk-based analysis and expert input, which together provide sufficient
|
|||
|
|
grounding for concept development without relying on unavailable data.
|
|||
|
|
Another challenge lies in the regulatory domain. Questions of sovereignty, licensing, contingency responsibility and
|
|||
|
|
environmental protection are politically sensitive and outside the remit of a research project to resolve. STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
therefore does not attem pt to prescribe solutions. Instead, it documents how these issues affect ATM integration,
|
|||
|
|
highlights dependencies and risks, and provides commentary that can inform future regulatory and industrial work.
|
|||
|
|
The maturity level is also a constraint. STRATUS is scoped to reach TRL 2, which is appropriate for Exploratory
|
|||
|
|
Research. The project is not designed to deliver prototypes or flight demonstrations. Instead, validation is achieved
|
|||
|
|
through expert review, stakeholder consultation and small targeted studies where feasible. This ensures that results
|
|||
|
|
are realistic and technically sound, while leaving space for later industrial research to develop prototypes and
|
|||
|
|
operational trials.
|
|||
|
|
Finally, integrating perspectives from operations, system architecture, cyber security and resilience introduces
|
|||
|
|
complexity. STRATUS mitigates this through an iterative process, where definitions established early in Part A are
|
|||
|
|
used to guide the service and architecture concepts in Part B. This ensures consistency across operational, technical
|
|||
|
|
and regulatory strands and reduces the risk of fragmentation.
|
|||
|
|
Validation approach
|
|||
|
|
Validation in STRATUS is tailored to the scope of an exploratory research project. The aim is to confirm that the
|
|||
|
|
concepts and frameworks developed are credible, feasible, and aligned with operational and regulatory realities,
|
|||
|
|
rather than to demonstrate them in live systems.
|
|||
|
|
The primary method will be structured expert review, involving regulators, ANSPs, operators and other stakeholders
|
|||
|
|
with direct knowledge of higher -airspace operations. Their feedback will be used to assess whether the proposed
|
|||
|
|
functions, services and frameworks are consistent with operational needs and institutional constraints.
|
|||
|
|
Targeted stakeholder workshops will provide additional opportunities to test assumptions and refine the outputs.
|
|||
|
|
These workshops will be used to present draft concepts such as hazard area management or 4DOZ coordination, and
|
|||
|
|
to capture reactions from operational and regulatory perspectives.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 173 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 7 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Scenario-based analysis will be applied where a more detailed check is useful, for example to explore how a dynamic
|
|||
|
|
zone interacts with conventional traffic or how contingency procedures might unfold in a cross-border setting. These
|
|||
|
|
analyses will be desk-based and scoped to remain within available resources.
|
|||
|
|
No large-scale simulations or flight trials are planned, which is consistent with the scope of an Exploratory Research
|
|||
|
|
project. Where feasible, partial proof-of-concept studies may be carried out to illustrate specific technical ideas, and
|
|||
|
|
any software artefacts produced will be open-sourced to support future research.
|
|||
|
|
Compliance with cross-cutting requirements
|
|||
|
|
Do No Significant Harm (DNSH).
|
|||
|
|
The project does not involve physical systems, prototypes, or flight trials. All activities are desk -based, relying on
|
|||
|
|
literature, modelling, and expert review. There are no emissions, no resource use, and no waste generated by the
|
|||
|
|
research itself. Environmental aspects are considered as part of the regulatory commentary, where contingency
|
|||
|
|
planning and space transport hazard areas are assessed in relation to airspace efficiency and environmental protection.
|
|||
|
|
The methodology therefore does not cause significa nt harm to any of the six environmental objectives of the EU
|
|||
|
|
Taxonomy Regulation.
|
|||
|
|
Use of artificial intelligence.
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS does not develop or deploy operational AI systems. References to AI-enabled analytics in the assurance
|
|||
|
|
framework are treated at a conceptual level only. Where relevant, the project will describe how AI could in future be
|
|||
|
|
made technically robust, explainable and reliable, consistent with the requirements in Horizon Europe guidance, but
|
|||
|
|
no AI tools will be delivered within the project.
|
|||
|
|
Interdisciplinarity.
|
|||
|
|
The work requires expertise across several domains: ATM operations, system and software architecture, cyber
|
|||
|
|
security, resilience engineering, and regulatory and institutional frameworks. The methodology integrates these
|
|||
|
|
strands by using a common set of baseline definitions and scenarios in Part A, which are then used to shape technical
|
|||
|
|
and regulatory work in Part B. This ensures that operational, technical and regulatory perspectives remain consistent.
|
|||
|
|
Gender dimension.
|
|||
|
|
The research activities do not involve human participants, biomedical elements, or social-behavioural data. The work
|
|||
|
|
focuses on operational concepts and technical frameworks. As such, there is no direct gender dimension in the
|
|||
|
|
research content. This is consistent with the scope of the call and the nature of the work.
|
|||
|
|
Open science.
|
|||
|
|
All non-sensitive outputs will be published open access . This includes deliverables such as the CONOPS, OSED,
|
|||
|
|
FRD, ERR, ECO-EVAL and regulatory commentary. The project will also ensure that results are shared with other
|
|||
|
|
projects funded under the same call, as required by the SESAR 3 JU. Research data will be m anaged according to
|
|||
|
|
FAIR principles, with a Data Management Plan delivered at Month 6 and updated during the project.
|
|||
|
|
Research data management.
|
|||
|
|
The main research outputs are textual (deliverables, reports, templates, reference models). Limited datasets may be
|
|||
|
|
generated from desk-based studies or scenario modelling. These will be small in size and primarily descriptive. Data
|
|||
|
|
will be stored in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers, published in open formats where possible, and licensed
|
|||
|
|
for reuse under Creative Commons or similar. The DMP will detail responsibilities for data quality, curation and
|
|||
|
|
preservation.
|
|||
|
|
#§CON-MET-CM§# #§COM-PLE-CP§# #§REL-EVA-RE§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 174 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 8 of 34
|
|||
|
|
2. Impact #@IMP-ACT-IA@#
|
|||
|
|
2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS contributes directly to the expected outcomes of the Work Programme topic on innovative methodologies
|
|||
|
|
for ATM safety, security and resilience. The project delivers a set of concepts, frameworks and evaluations that
|
|||
|
|
together provide a consolidated TRL 2 baseline for the safe and secure integration of higher-airspace operations.
|
|||
|
|
• New methodologies for safety, cyber security and resilience . STRATUS develops an integrated assurance
|
|||
|
|
framework that links these domains in a single process. The framework is validated through expert review
|
|||
|
|
and desk-based studies and demonstrates how evidence can be reused across domains.
|
|||
|
|
• Support for virtualised and distributed ATM architectures. The service architecture framework defines how
|
|||
|
|
higher-airspace functions can be deployed as interoperable services. It applies principles such as modularity,
|
|||
|
|
API-based interoperability, redundancy and zero-trust security.
|
|||
|
|
• Network-wide management of higher airspace and space transport . STRATUS delivers an updated
|
|||
|
|
CONOPS and OSED, incorporating hazard area management and 4DOZ. These describe how HAO and STO
|
|||
|
|
services interact with ANSPs, operators and military users, providing a harmonised framework for
|
|||
|
|
integration into the wider ATM network.
|
|||
|
|
• Regulatory and implementation insight . Commentary on sovereignty, licensing, contingency and
|
|||
|
|
environmental issues is captured as an annex to the CONOPS. This provides regulators and standardisation
|
|||
|
|
bodies with structured input on where existing frameworks may need to evolve.
|
|||
|
|
• Market and stakeholder evidence. The updated market study includes HAPS, hypersonic and space transport
|
|||
|
|
operations, complementing EASA’s HAO market study by assessing the effect of STO on airspace
|
|||
|
|
availability. This provides a realistic picture of future demand, directly supporting the EASA Higher
|
|||
|
|
Airspace Operations Roadmap.
|
|||
|
|
Pathways to impact
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS ensures that its results are directly usable by SESAR follow-on activities and by regulators through three
|
|||
|
|
complementary pathways.
|
|||
|
|
The first pathway concerns concept definition and validation. Operational concepts, service models and architectures
|
|||
|
|
will be developed with the involvement of regulators, ANSPs, operators, military representatives and service
|
|||
|
|
providers. Validation will be achieved through structured expert review panels, targeted workshops and scenario -
|
|||
|
|
based desk studies. This approach ensures that the outputs are technically credible, feasible, and consistent with
|
|||
|
|
institutional requirements.
|
|||
|
|
The second pathway is packaging for integration. Deliverables will be presented as ready -to-use frameworks and
|
|||
|
|
reference material that can be incorporated into SESAR industrial projects, EASA rulemaking tasks and ICAO
|
|||
|
|
provisions. Each deliverable will be mapped against the development priorities of the European ATM Master Plan,
|
|||
|
|
including integration of new entrants, dynamic airspace configuration, secure digitalisation and resilience. STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
will also take into account the results of related SESAR projects that addressed these themes in other contexts.
|
|||
|
|
• SEC-AIRSPACE advanced methodologies for cyber -resilience in digitalised ATM services. STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
builds on this work by embedding zero-trust principles and cyber-security baselines into its higher-airspace
|
|||
|
|
architecture.
|
|||
|
|
• FARO examined evolving safety risk assessment frameworks. STRATUS incorporates these insights into its
|
|||
|
|
integrated assurance approach, which links safety, security and resilience.
|
|||
|
|
• FCDI studied operational resilience to disruptive events. STRATUS extends this to higher airspace by
|
|||
|
|
developing concepts for hazard area management, off-nominal re-entries and contingency coordination.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 175 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 9 of 34
|
|||
|
|
The third pathway is stakeholder engagement and dissemination. Engagement with operational and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
communities throughout the project provides early buy -in and facilitates post -project uptake. Dissemination will
|
|||
|
|
target both European and internationa l forums, such as ICAO panels and regional planning groups, to support
|
|||
|
|
harmonisation beyond the EUR Region. Open science practices will be applied to make all non -sensitive results
|
|||
|
|
openly available in trusted repositories, following FAIR principles, so that they can be reused by regulators, industry
|
|||
|
|
and future research projects.
|
|||
|
|
Together, these pathways ensure that STRATUS outputs are not isolated academic results but are positioned to inform
|
|||
|
|
regulatory development, support SESAR industrial research, and guide future service implementation.
|
|||
|
|
Expected long-term impacts (5–10 years after project end)
|
|||
|
|
In the longer-term STRATUS will contribute to the implementation of the European ATM Master Plan and the
|
|||
|
|
Digital European Sky. Its concepts will enable scalable and resilient integration of higher-airspace and space transport
|
|||
|
|
operations in line with Master Plan priorities. This will support a harmonised European approach to HAO/STO
|
|||
|
|
integration, reduce duplication across States, and strengthen the resilience of ATM services to cyber threats, outages
|
|||
|
|
and cross-border disruptions. At the global level, STRATUS results are expected to influence ICAO provisions,
|
|||
|
|
ensuring that European practice shapes worldwide frameworks for higher-airspace operations.
|
|||
|
|
Strategic economic impact
|
|||
|
|
Higher airspace is today a largely unused domain with very low traffic density. This creates a unique opportunity for
|
|||
|
|
Europe to use it as a sandbox to trial new paradigms and technologies with limited operational risk. STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
contributes to de -risking these innovations, accelerating their path into mainstream ATM. A coherent European
|
|||
|
|
framework for higher -airspace operations will also strengthen Europe’s sovereign space launch and transport
|
|||
|
|
capability, support a vibrant industrial ecosystem, and reduce dependence on non-European providers. In the longer
|
|||
|
|
term, this will reinforce European competitiveness, resilience and technological leadership, consistent with the
|
|||
|
|
strategic vision set out in the European ATM Master Plan and in wider EU digital and space policy.
|
|||
|
|
Beneficiaries
|
|||
|
|
Regulators.
|
|||
|
|
EASA, national civil aviation authorities and national space regulators will benefit directly from STRATUS outputs.
|
|||
|
|
The project delivers structured and validated concepts such as the CONOPS, OSED and FRD, along with
|
|||
|
|
commentary on sovereignty, licensing, contingency management and environmental aspects. These materials provide
|
|||
|
|
regulators with an evidence base for future rulemaking and oversight, reducing the time and effort required to
|
|||
|
|
interpret novel higher-airspace activities in the absence of clear standards. By framing the issues in a consistent and
|
|||
|
|
operationally grounded way, STRATUS helps regulators to avoid fragmented approaches and supports alignment
|
|||
|
|
with the European ATM Master Plan and the EASA Higher Airspace Operations Roadmap.
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs and system integrators.
|
|||
|
|
Air navigation service providers and their industry partners gain from the technical frameworks produced in
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS. The project describes how higher -airspace functions such as trajectory management, separation, and
|
|||
|
|
hazard area coordination can be implemen ted as modular services. It also defines interfaces and architectural
|
|||
|
|
principles that make these services interoperable across borders. For ANSPs and system integrators this reduces
|
|||
|
|
development effort, lowers cost and minimises the risk of bespoke national solutions that later require re-engineering.
|
|||
|
|
In the medium term, these outputs provide a practical foundation for testing higher -airspace service provision in
|
|||
|
|
industrial research phases.
|
|||
|
|
Space operators.
|
|||
|
|
Operators involved in orbital launches, sub -orbital missions and re -entries will gain from clearer procedures for
|
|||
|
|
hazard area generation, dynamic zone coordination and contingency management. STRATUS provides a framework
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 176 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 10 of 34
|
|||
|
|
that links these functions with conventional ATM, ensuring that space transport operations are integrated into the
|
|||
|
|
European network in a predictable and consistent way. This reduces regulatory uncertainty for spaceports and launch
|
|||
|
|
service providers and supports Europe’s ambition to develop sovereign and competitive space transport capability.
|
|||
|
|
Higher-altitude operators.
|
|||
|
|
Operators of high-altitude platforms and supersonic/hypersonic transport vehicles will benefit from the definition of
|
|||
|
|
core functions and services that govern operations above conventional controlled airspace. STRATUS clarifies how
|
|||
|
|
HAPS fleets, long -endurance missions and supersonic/hypersonic vehicles interact with ATS, how separation or
|
|||
|
|
deconfliction is managed, and how service continuity is maintained. By capturing these elements in a harmonised
|
|||
|
|
CONOPS and OSED, the project reduces barriers to market entr y and helps these operators plan for scalable
|
|||
|
|
operations in European airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Traditional aviation stakeholders.
|
|||
|
|
Conventional airspace users and airport operators benefit from the assurance that higher -airspace and space
|
|||
|
|
operations are managed in a way that does not compromise safety or predictability in lower altitudes. By defining
|
|||
|
|
how hazard areas and dynamic zones are coordinated with existing ATS, STRATUS ensures that impacts on general
|
|||
|
|
air traffic are minimised. This protects the efficiency of the ATM network while allowing new entrants to grow.
|
|||
|
|
Citizens and the general public.
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS ultimately benefits European citizens by ensuring that new entrants in higher airspace are integrated
|
|||
|
|
without compromising the safety, security or continuity of air traffic services. A resilient and cyber -secure ATM
|
|||
|
|
system reduces the likelihood of large-scale disruption from outages or malicious attacks. The growth of higher -
|
|||
|
|
airspace industries also supports new services and applications, from connectivity to earth observation, which have
|
|||
|
|
a direct societal benefit. By treating higher airspace as a managed and resilient part of the European network,
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS helps safeguard the interests of the travelling public and society at large.
|
|||
|
|
The European Union as a whole.
|
|||
|
|
At the strategic level, STRATUS supports the EU’s goals in competitiveness, sovereignty and defence. A coherent
|
|||
|
|
framework for higher -airspace operations strengthens European sovereign launch and space transport capability,
|
|||
|
|
reduces dependence on non-European providers, and enhances Europe’s role as a global standard-setter. The project
|
|||
|
|
supports the growth of a competitive European industry in high-altitude and space transport services, creating skilled
|
|||
|
|
jobs and dr iving innovation. It also contributes to Europe’s knowledge base in space traffic management and
|
|||
|
|
advanced ATM, reinforcing the EU’s position as a market leader in the global aerospace sector. In the defence and
|
|||
|
|
security dimension, STRATUS supports civil–military coordination and resilience, contributing to the protection of
|
|||
|
|
European infrastructure and assets.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2.2 Measures to maximise impact - Dissemination, exploitation and communication #@COM-DIS-VIS-CDV@#
|
|||
|
|
As an Exploratory Research project, the value of the work lies not only in the concepts developed but in how they
|
|||
|
|
are transferred into later SESAR phases, regulatory processes and wider societal use. The project therefore devotes
|
|||
|
|
significant effort to dissemination, exploitation and communicatio n, with a continuous programme in WP2 and a
|
|||
|
|
dedicated wrap -up in WP5 to ensure post -project continuity. The plan addresses multiple audiences: regulators,
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs, industry, standards bodies, research organisations and the wider public. It combines early sta keholder
|
|||
|
|
engagement, alignment with European and international policy agendas, and open science practices to ensure that
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS results are visible, accessible and ready for immediate reuse.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 177 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 11 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation strategy
|
|||
|
|
The primary exploitation pathway for STRATUS is the uptake of its outputs in SESAR industrial research phases,
|
|||
|
|
EASA regulatory activities and ICAO regional and global guidance. To achieve this, STRATUS will:
|
|||
|
|
• Produce deliverables in a ready -to-integrate format. CONOPS, OSED, FRD, ERR, ECO -EVAL and
|
|||
|
|
regulatory commentary will be drafted in line with SESAR templates and mapped to existing Master Plan
|
|||
|
|
work packages. They will be structured as reference documents that can be directly cited in SESAR solution
|
|||
|
|
projects, EASA rulemaking tasks, or ICAO panel working papers.
|
|||
|
|
• Align early with implementers. Stakeholders positioned to take results forward — including ANSP technical
|
|||
|
|
teams, industry integrators, regulatory drafting groups and SESAR solution consortia — will be engaged
|
|||
|
|
throughout the project. This will ensure that STRATUS outputs are framed in a way that these implementers
|
|||
|
|
can use without translation or adaptation.
|
|||
|
|
• Identify near-term use cases. The project will highlight specific areas where STRATUS concepts can add
|
|||
|
|
value immediately. Examples include cross -border coordination of hazard areas for space transport
|
|||
|
|
operations, the definition of minimum service levels fo r high-altitude service providers, and cyber-resilient
|
|||
|
|
design principles for distributed ATM services.
|
|||
|
|
• Enable rapid reuse. Non -sensitive results will be published under open licences (Creative Commons or
|
|||
|
|
equivalent) to allow direct reuse by industry, regulators and other research teams. Sensitive material will be
|
|||
|
|
restricted but shared under SESAR JU mechanisms with linked projects.
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation will also extend to education, training and research communities. STRATUS deliverables will serve as
|
|||
|
|
material for academic courses, simulation studies and doctoral research on ATM, cyber security and space traffic
|
|||
|
|
management. In this way, the project seeds knowledge that continues to support European innovation beyond the
|
|||
|
|
SESAR framework.
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination activities
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination will be structured in two stages: WP2 covers dissemination during the research phase, while WP5
|
|||
|
|
ensures dedicated wrap-up and outreach in the final six months.
|
|||
|
|
• Regulators and policy-makers. Targeted policy briefs will summarise the regulatory touchpoints identified
|
|||
|
|
in STRATUS and propose potential pathways for integration into European and international frameworks.
|
|||
|
|
Workshops with EASA and national authorities wil l discuss regulatory dependencies, sovereignty,
|
|||
|
|
contingency responsibilities and environmental considerations.
|
|||
|
|
• Operational stakeholders. Technical briefs, interface diagrams and service concept descriptions will be
|
|||
|
|
delivered to ANSPs, HAOSP candidates and military coordination units. These will explain not only the
|
|||
|
|
concepts but also the practical implications for system development, interoperability and operations.
|
|||
|
|
• Standards and R&D communities. Findings will be disseminated through ICAO panels, EUROCAE working
|
|||
|
|
groups, CANSO events and SESAR fora. STRATUS results will be aligned with ongoing standardisation
|
|||
|
|
efforts (e.g. SWIM, cyber security profiles, space traffic c oordination) to maximise their utility for
|
|||
|
|
harmonisation.
|
|||
|
|
• Wider aviation community. Accessible summaries, infographics and webinars will be produced to explain
|
|||
|
|
the significance of higher-airspace integration for aviation safety and resilience. This ensures that industry
|
|||
|
|
and the public at large understand why these developments matter and how Europe is leading the response.
|
|||
|
|
Key dissemination channels include SESAR Innovation Days, ICAO EUR/NAT regional meetings, EUROCAE WG-
|
|||
|
|
105 (UAS/UTM), WG-122 (cyber security), and targeted international events such as the Space Traffic Management
|
|||
|
|
conferences. Mid-project workshops will be held to present interim results and refine them through feedback, while
|
|||
|
|
final promulgation events in WP5 will showcase outcomes to regulators, industry and research actors.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 178 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 12 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Communication activities
|
|||
|
|
The communication strategy is designed to promote STRATUS throughout its full lifespan and beyond. It is built on
|
|||
|
|
three principles: visibility, accessibility and continuity.
|
|||
|
|
• Core message. STRATUS demonstrates how Europe can safely and securely integrate higher -airspace
|
|||
|
|
operations and space transport, creating a resilient and cyber-secure foundation for the Digital European Sky.
|
|||
|
|
• Public narrative. Communications will explain the societal benefits of STRATUS, including safer airspace,
|
|||
|
|
more resilient critical infrastructure, and new services enabled by HAO/STO (e.g. broadband connectivity,
|
|||
|
|
Earth observation, space launch capability).
|
|||
|
|
• Tools and channels. The project will maintain a dedicated website hosting public deliverables, news updates
|
|||
|
|
and event registrations. Social media accounts will be used to reach wider audiences, with content tailored
|
|||
|
|
to industry, regulators and the general public. Periodic newsletters will provide updates to stakeholders.
|
|||
|
|
• Timing. Communications will be linked to key milestones: publication of the market study, interim OSED
|
|||
|
|
and CONOPS, mid-project workshops, and final results in WP5. This ensures that interest peaks at moments
|
|||
|
|
when stakeholders can engage directly with outputs.
|
|||
|
|
Communication activities will also support citizen engagement, making clear how STRATUS contributes to safer
|
|||
|
|
skies, stronger European resilience and the economic opportunities of space and higher airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Post-project continuity
|
|||
|
|
A defining feature of STRATUS is WP5, a dedicated work package for CDE wrap -up after the technical work
|
|||
|
|
concludes. This ensures that dissemination and exploitation continue beyond Month 24 and that outputs are not lost
|
|||
|
|
when the research ends. WP5 will:
|
|||
|
|
• Deliver a final exploitation and impact strategy, with clear pathways for results to enter SESAR IR, EASA
|
|||
|
|
regulatory plans and ICAO provisions.
|
|||
|
|
• Establish a repository of non-sensitive deliverables and supporting material, hosted on a trusted platform, to
|
|||
|
|
guarantee long-term access.
|
|||
|
|
• Organise a high -visibility promulgation event to present results to regulators, ANSPs, operators, industry
|
|||
|
|
and research partners.
|
|||
|
|
• Maintain engagement with EASA, SESAR JU, ICAO and EUROCAE working groups, ensuring STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
outputs continue to inform policy and technical development after project close.
|
|||
|
|
By dedicating the final six months to dissemination and exploitation, STRATUS will demonstrate its commitment to
|
|||
|
|
delivering lasting impact, not just short-term research results.
|
|||
|
|
Intellectual property, open science and data management
|
|||
|
|
All partners will sign a consortium agreement defining ownership and access rights. A results ownership list will be
|
|||
|
|
delivered in the final periodic report. Results with exploitation value will be identified early and categorised as either
|
|||
|
|
open, restricted or protected.
|
|||
|
|
• Open results. Deliverables such as the market study, CONOPS, OSED, FRD, ERR, ECO -EVAL and
|
|||
|
|
regulatory commentary will be released under open licences (Creative Commons).
|
|||
|
|
• Restricted results. Materials containing sensitive information (e.g. cyber threat analysis) will be shared only
|
|||
|
|
under SESAR JU agreements with linked projects.
|
|||
|
|
• Protected results. Where partners develop novel methods with wider commercial potential, appropriate IPR
|
|||
|
|
protection (copyright, trade secrets, design rights) will be considered.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 179 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 13 of 34
|
|||
|
|
The Data Management Plan (M6) will ensure all data are FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable).
|
|||
|
|
Persistent identifiers will be used, datasets will be published in open formats, and all publications will be open access.
|
|||
|
|
Contribution to EU policy, society and further research
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS does not stop at technical deliverables: its outputs will shape the European ATM and space policy
|
|||
|
|
landscape. The project provides commentary that feeds into EASA rulemaking tasks, SESAR Master Plan updates,
|
|||
|
|
and ICAO provisions, supporting the design and adaptation of European and international policy.
|
|||
|
|
For society and citizens, STRATUS improves the safety and resilience of European skies, ensuring that cyber-attacks,
|
|||
|
|
outages or off-nominal space events do not disrupt mobility or endanger public safety. It also underpins the growth
|
|||
|
|
of industries that deli ver tangible benefits, such as high -altitude connectivity, scientific observation, and secure
|
|||
|
|
European access to space.
|
|||
|
|
For the EU economy, STRATUS contributes to competitiveness and sovereignty by de -risking higher -airspace
|
|||
|
|
integration, supporting European launch capability and stimulating industrial innovation. By providing a sandbox for
|
|||
|
|
innovation in low-density airspace, STRATUS allows Europe to test and adopt new paradigms before competitors,
|
|||
|
|
ensuring leadership in the global aerospace sector.
|
|||
|
|
For further research, STRATUS establishes a validated TRL 2 baseline that SESAR industrial phases can take
|
|||
|
|
forward into prototyping, large -scale validation and standardisation. Deliverables will also be made available to
|
|||
|
|
academia and research organisations as a basis for doctoral work, simulation studies and applied research in ATM,
|
|||
|
|
cyber security and space traffic management.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§COM-DIS-VIS-CDV§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 180 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 14 of 34
|
|||
|
|
2.3 Summary
|
|||
|
|
KEY ELEMENT OF THE IMPACT SECTION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
SPECIFIC NEEDS EXPECTED RESULTS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
D & E & C MEASURES
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
What are the specific needs that triggered this
|
|||
|
|
project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Global and technological developments since
|
|||
|
|
the creation of the original ECHO CONOPS
|
|||
|
|
mean that certain key concepts need to be (re)
|
|||
|
|
considered, in order to support the
|
|||
|
|
development of the HAO and STO industries,
|
|||
|
|
and the benefits they are expected to deliver
|
|||
|
|
for European citizens.
|
|||
|
|
Existing airspace users need to be assured that
|
|||
|
|
HAO and STO can be developed and
|
|||
|
|
exploited within European Airspace without
|
|||
|
|
causing excessive disruption to their
|
|||
|
|
operations.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
What do you expect to generate by the end of
|
|||
|
|
the project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
An agreed Concept of Operations, updated
|
|||
|
|
from that produced by ECHO 1 and
|
|||
|
|
considering the various developments since.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This includes the report on EASA’s Opinion
|
|||
|
|
on ECHO 1 following consultation of
|
|||
|
|
Member States and Industry Stakeholders,
|
|||
|
|
published in June 2025.
|
|||
|
|
What dissemination, exploitation and communication measures
|
|||
|
|
will you apply to the results?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A dedicated project website will act as the central hub for public
|
|||
|
|
information, deliverables, and news.
|
|||
|
|
Mid-project stakeholder workshops will present interim results
|
|||
|
|
and gather feedback.
|
|||
|
|
End of project promulgation events will present outcomes and
|
|||
|
|
promote adoption.
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS will engage with target audiences through SESAR
|
|||
|
|
events, ICAO EUR/NAT meetings, EUROCAE working groups,
|
|||
|
|
industry conferences, and webinars.
|
|||
|
|
During the project period, the STRATUS team will identify
|
|||
|
|
exploitation pathways and potential users of project results, to
|
|||
|
|
ensure that communications and dissemination methods are
|
|||
|
|
effective, and lead to the path to exploitation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 181 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 15 of 34
|
|||
|
|
#§IMP-ACT-IA§# TARGET GROUPS OUTCOMES IMPACTS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Who will use or further up -take the
|
|||
|
|
results of the project? Who will benefit
|
|||
|
|
from the results of the project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
European State Regulators (Space and
|
|||
|
|
Airspace)
|
|||
|
|
EASA
|
|||
|
|
Potential HAO and STO operators
|
|||
|
|
(both civil and military)
|
|||
|
|
European citizens and businesses who
|
|||
|
|
will make use of the services offered
|
|||
|
|
by HAO and STO operators.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
What change do you expect to see after
|
|||
|
|
successful dissemination and exploitation of
|
|||
|
|
project results to the target group(s)?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
European Regulators, Airspace Users and
|
|||
|
|
Service Providers will have a clearer view of
|
|||
|
|
the future operating concept for Higher
|
|||
|
|
Airspace Operations and Space Launch /
|
|||
|
|
Return.
|
|||
|
|
ICAO will understand what activities are
|
|||
|
|
necessary at global level to enable effective
|
|||
|
|
and efficient HAO and STO at the anticipated
|
|||
|
|
numbers, without creating excessive levels of
|
|||
|
|
disruption to existing airspace users.
|
|||
|
|
Research Organisations and Manufacturing
|
|||
|
|
Industry will have a better understanding of
|
|||
|
|
the concepts and equipment which will need
|
|||
|
|
more detailed technical development.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Clean-sheet HAO technology baseline. A
|
|||
|
|
documented concept and interface set that
|
|||
|
|
allows HAO to adopt advanced digital CNS,
|
|||
|
|
automation and coordination services without
|
|||
|
|
legacy retrofit constraints, while defining
|
|||
|
|
clear transition rules for climb and descent
|
|||
|
|
through conventional airspace.
|
|||
|
|
What are the expected wider scientific, economic and
|
|||
|
|
societal effects of the project contributing to the
|
|||
|
|
expected impacts outlined in the respective
|
|||
|
|
destination in the work programme?
|
|||
|
|
The scientific community will have an updated
|
|||
|
|
concept to help them identify areas requiring further
|
|||
|
|
detailed research.
|
|||
|
|
Potential providers/users of space transportation /
|
|||
|
|
higher airspace services will have a clearer idea of the
|
|||
|
|
path to commercial/personal exploitation of these
|
|||
|
|
capabilities – in the longer term leading to a viable
|
|||
|
|
new industry sector.
|
|||
|
|
Technology leapfrogging by design. By treating HAO
|
|||
|
|
as a clean -sheet environment above FL550, the
|
|||
|
|
project specifies architectures that can use modern
|
|||
|
|
communications, navigation and surveillance, high -
|
|||
|
|
automation decision support and data -centric
|
|||
|
|
coordination that would be impractical to mandate
|
|||
|
|
fleet-wide below due to retrofit costs and backward -
|
|||
|
|
compatibility constraints.
|
|||
|
|
Spillover benefits to the network. Clear HAO –
|
|||
|
|
ATM interface requirements and transition
|
|||
|
|
procedures enable safe mixed operations and create a
|
|||
|
|
pathway for selective downstream adoption in lower
|
|||
|
|
airspace where benefits justify change, reducing long-
|
|||
|
|
term technical debt.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 182 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 16 of 34
|
|||
|
|
3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation #@QUA-LIT-QL@# #@WRK-PLA-WP@#
|
|||
|
|
3.1 Work plan and resources
|
|||
|
|
The STRATUS work plan is designed to deliver a coherent TRL 2 baseline for the safe and resilient integration of
|
|||
|
|
higher-airspace operations. The structure follows SESAR 3 JU guidance for Exploratory Research, with a focus on
|
|||
|
|
two research work packages aligned to the two reporting periods, supported by management and CDE activities. This
|
|||
|
|
ensures that the project progresses in a logical sequence, allows for interim review of early concepts, and devotes
|
|||
|
|
sufficient resources to dissemination and exploitation.
|
|||
|
|
The plan is organised into five work packages:
|
|||
|
|
• WP1 – Project Management (M1 –M30). Covers coordination, reporting, financial and quality
|
|||
|
|
management, and includes delivery of the Project Management Plan and Data Management Plan.
|
|||
|
|
• WP2 – Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation (M1 –M24). Provides continuous engagement
|
|||
|
|
with stakeholders and early dissemination of results, ensuring alignment with SESAR, EASA and ICAO
|
|||
|
|
activities.
|
|||
|
|
• WP3 – STRATUS Research Activity, Part A (M1–M12). Establishes the baseline. It delivers the market
|
|||
|
|
and stakeholder study, definitions of actors and functions, and the initial OSED and CONOPS.
|
|||
|
|
• WP4 – STRATUS Research Activity, Part B (M13 –M24). Builds on WP3 results. It develops service
|
|||
|
|
concepts, the architecture framework, the integrated assurance methodology and regulatory commentary.
|
|||
|
|
Outputs include the FRD, final OSED and CONOPS, the ERR, ECO -EVAL and implementation
|
|||
|
|
commentary.
|
|||
|
|
• WP5 – CDE Wrap-Up (M25–M30). Ensures post -research impact. It delivers the final exploitation and
|
|||
|
|
impact strategy, open -science compliance report and a final promulgation event to hand over results to
|
|||
|
|
regulators, SESAR industrial phases and standards bodies.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The work plan is structured to reflect the exploratory nature of the project: Part A focuses on scoping and establishing
|
|||
|
|
foundations, while Part B consolidates and extends the results into frameworks that are ready for uptake. WP2 and
|
|||
|
|
WP5 provide a strong CDE framework, ensuring that outputs are visible, accessible and integrated into the European
|
|||
|
|
ATM Master Plan and EASA HAO Roadmap. WP1 provides governance and quality assurance across the project.
|
|||
|
|
This structure ensures efficiency: each work package corresponds to a substantial body of work with clear objectives
|
|||
|
|
and deliverables, and resources are concentrated in WP3 and WP4 where the technical work is carried out. The plan
|
|||
|
|
also ensures continuity, with CDE activities running throughout and a dedicated final phase to maximise impact
|
|||
|
|
beyond the lifetime of the project.
|
|||
|
|
Inter-relations between work packages
|
|||
|
|
The work plan is designed to follow a clear progression from scoping to consolidation, with continuous management
|
|||
|
|
and dissemination. The dependencies between work packages are straightforward and ensure that results are delivered
|
|||
|
|
in a coherent and timely manner.
|
|||
|
|
• WP3 (Part A) sets the foundations for the project. It produces the market and stakeholder study, defines
|
|||
|
|
actors and functions, and delivers the initial OSED and CONOPS. These outputs provide the baseline
|
|||
|
|
material needed for subsequent work.
|
|||
|
|
• WP4 (Part B) builds directly on WP3. The initial concepts, functions and services defined in Part A are
|
|||
|
|
refined and expanded into service concepts, the architecture framework, the assurance methodology and
|
|||
|
|
regulatory commentary. The FRD, final OSED and CON OPS, ERR and ECO -EVAL represent the
|
|||
|
|
consolidated technical outputs of the project.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 183 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 17 of 34
|
|||
|
|
• WP2 (CDE) runs in parallel with WP3 and WP4, ensuring that interim and final results are disseminated as
|
|||
|
|
they are produced. WP2 also collects feedback from stakeholders, feeding it back into WP3 and WP4 to
|
|||
|
|
refine definitions and concepts.
|
|||
|
|
• WP1 (Management) provides coordination, quality assurance and reporting throughout the project, and also
|
|||
|
|
delivers the Project Management Plan and Data Management Plan to ensure consistency in both technical
|
|||
|
|
and administrative aspects.
|
|||
|
|
• WP5 (CDE Wrap -Up) begins once the technical research has been completed in WP4. It ensures that the
|
|||
|
|
outputs are not only finalised but also positioned for uptake, through the final exploitation and impact
|
|||
|
|
strategy, open-science compliance, and a closing promulgation event.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In Gantt terms, WP1 runs across the full project duration. WP2 overlaps with WP3 and WP4 to ensure communication
|
|||
|
|
and dissemination during both technical phases. WP3 is focused in the first reporting period (M1–M12), WP4 in the
|
|||
|
|
second (M13–M24). WP5 is dedicated to the final six months (M25–M30).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This simple and logical structure minimises dependencies, reduces risks of delay, and ensures that each stage of the
|
|||
|
|
project builds cleanly on the previous one.
|
|||
|
|
3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole #@CON-SOR-CS@# #@PRJ-MGT-PM@#
|
|||
|
|
The STRATUS consortium has been deliberately assembled to provide the full range of expertise needed to address
|
|||
|
|
the challenges of integrating higher -airspace operations and space transport into the European ATM system. The
|
|||
|
|
work requires not only technical innovation but also operational credibility, regulatory insight, and strong
|
|||
|
|
dissemination. The consortium reflects this balance, combining organisations with extensive ATM operational
|
|||
|
|
experience, recognised regulatory competence, deep technical expertise i n architectures and cyber -security,
|
|||
|
|
established academic and research institutions, and specialists in communication and stakeholder engagement.
|
|||
|
|
The project’s objectives cannot be achieved by a narrow group of partners. Instead, STRATUS relies on a
|
|||
|
|
multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team that covers the operational, technical, regulatory, research, and societal
|
|||
|
|
dimensions of the problem. The consortium is structured to ensure that each of these dimensions is represented, while
|
|||
|
|
avoiding duplication and ensuring efficiency. The combined capacity of the team ensures that results will be
|
|||
|
|
technically credible, aligned with operational constraints, f easible for regulatory uptake, and communicated
|
|||
|
|
effectively to the relevant communities.
|
|||
|
|
Breadth of expertise
|
|||
|
|
The consortium provides a broad spread of expertise, covering all areas required for STRATUS:
|
|||
|
|
• Operational expertise. Several partners have long experience in air navigation service provision and day-to-
|
|||
|
|
day ATM operations. They provide the knowledge required to judge whether new concepts are realistic, safe,
|
|||
|
|
and capable of integration into the netwo rk. This ensures that STRATUS outputs are firmly grounded in
|
|||
|
|
operational reality rather than theoretical models.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 184 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 18 of 34
|
|||
|
|
• Technical and systems expertise. Research centres and engineering partners bring competence in designing
|
|||
|
|
modular, service-oriented architectures, applying cyber -resilience and zero-trust principles, and modelling
|
|||
|
|
interoperability in distributed environment s. This capability is essential to developing the architecture and
|
|||
|
|
assurance frameworks required in STRATUS.
|
|||
|
|
• Regulatory and policy expertise. Partners with backgrounds in civil aviation authorities, international
|
|||
|
|
organisations, and regulatory processes contribute the experience needed to understand how concepts can be
|
|||
|
|
translated into standards, rulemaking material, and guidance. They provide the link between technical
|
|||
|
|
research and the regulatory processes that will ultimately implement the results.
|
|||
|
|
• Academic and research expertise. Universities and research institutions ensure methodological rigour and
|
|||
|
|
bring the ability to review international state of the art. They provide the systems thinking needed to link
|
|||
|
|
operational, technical, and policy domains , and ensure compliance with open science and FAIR data
|
|||
|
|
principles.
|
|||
|
|
• Stakeholder engagement and communication. Specialist organisations within the consortium contribute the
|
|||
|
|
capability to plan and execute effective dissemination, engagement, and exploitation strategies. This includes
|
|||
|
|
organising workshops, developing outreach materials, and ensuring that project outputs reach the relevant
|
|||
|
|
European and international forums.
|
|||
|
|
Complementarity of roles
|
|||
|
|
The consortium is structured to ensure that each work package is led by a partner with recognised expertise in the
|
|||
|
|
relevant domain. Project management is supported by partners with experience in coordinating European research.
|
|||
|
|
The communication, dissemination and exploitation activities are led by partners with strong networks and outreach
|
|||
|
|
experience. The two main research work packages are supported by a balance of operational, technical, and research
|
|||
|
|
expertise, ensuring that definitions and concepts developed in Part A are expanded into service models, architectures
|
|||
|
|
and assurance frameworks in Part B. The wrap-up phase is supported by organisations with experience in exploitation
|
|||
|
|
and regulatory alignment, ensuring that results are visible and accessible after the project closes.
|
|||
|
|
This complementarity avoids duplication and ensures that all aspects of the project are covered by the most
|
|||
|
|
appropriate expertise. The project benefits from the credibility of established operational and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
organisations, the innovation of technical and research partners, and the reach of communication specialists.
|
|||
|
|
Capacity to deliver
|
|||
|
|
Collectively, the consortium has demonstrated the ability to deliver results at the scale and scope required for
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS:
|
|||
|
|
• Extensive participation in European ATM research and development, including previous SESAR exploratory
|
|||
|
|
and industrial projects, which ensures familiarity with SESAR methodologies, deliverable structures, and
|
|||
|
|
validation approaches.
|
|||
|
|
• Direct involvement in ICAO and EASA activities, ensuring that STRATUS outputs will be aligned with
|
|||
|
|
current international initiatives and can be fed directly into ongoing regulatory and standardisation processes.
|
|||
|
|
• Access to operational data, modelling facilities, simulation environments, and in some cases infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
such as airports and spaceports, ensuring that the work is grounded in practical realities.
|
|||
|
|
• Experience in developing concepts to TRL 2 –3 maturity, validated through expert review, scenario -based
|
|||
|
|
analysis, and structured stakeholder consultation.
|
|||
|
|
• Established networks across the ATM and aerospace communities, including regulators, ANSPs, operators,
|
|||
|
|
industry associations, and standards bodies. These connections ensure that STRATUS results will reach the
|
|||
|
|
communities that can take them forward into implementation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 185 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 19 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Cross-cutting dimensions
|
|||
|
|
The consortium also brings together expertise across cross -cutting areas. Social sciences and human factors are
|
|||
|
|
addressed through partners with operational and human -centred expertise, ensuring that concepts are not only
|
|||
|
|
technically sound but also institutionally and socially acceptable. Open science practices are embedded in the project
|
|||
|
|
through academic partners with strong records in FAIR data management and open access. Gender aspects are
|
|||
|
|
considered in the composition of teams and in recruitment policies, even though the research content itself does not
|
|||
|
|
involve gender analysis.
|
|||
|
|
Geographic and international reach
|
|||
|
|
The consortium spans a broad set of European States, ensuring that diverse operational environments and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
regimes are represented. This supports the goal of developing harmonised concepts that are valid across Europe. The
|
|||
|
|
presence of international partners extends the reach of the project to the global level, ensuring alignment with ICAO
|
|||
|
|
processes and supporting interoperability with non -European systems. This geographic and institutional spread
|
|||
|
|
maximises the chances that STRATUS results will be not only relevant to Europe but also influential worldwide.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§CON-SOR-CS§# #§PRJ-MGT-PM§#
|
|||
|
|
Tables for section 3.1
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1a: List of work packages
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
package
|
|||
|
|
No
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
Package
|
|||
|
|
Title
|
|||
|
|
Lead
|
|||
|
|
Participant
|
|||
|
|
No
|
|||
|
|
Lead
|
|||
|
|
Participant
|
|||
|
|
Short Name
|
|||
|
|
Person-
|
|||
|
|
Months
|
|||
|
|
Start
|
|||
|
|
Month
|
|||
|
|
End
|
|||
|
|
month
|
|||
|
|
WP1 Project
|
|||
|
|
Management
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCON
|
|||
|
|
TROL
|
|||
|
|
30 M1 M30
|
|||
|
|
WP2 Communicat
|
|||
|
|
ion,
|
|||
|
|
Disseminatio
|
|||
|
|
n, &
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCON
|
|||
|
|
TROL
|
|||
|
|
18 M1 M24
|
|||
|
|
WP3 STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Research
|
|||
|
|
Activity,
|
|||
|
|
Part A
|
|||
|
|
20 EUROCON
|
|||
|
|
TROL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
154.53 M1 M12
|
|||
|
|
WP4 STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
Research
|
|||
|
|
Activity,
|
|||
|
|
Part B
|
|||
|
|
20 EUROCON
|
|||
|
|
TROL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
120.78 M13 M24
|
|||
|
|
WP5 CDE Wrap-
|
|||
|
|
up
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCONT
|
|||
|
|
ROL
|
|||
|
|
10.50 M25 M30
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 186 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 20 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1b: Work package description
|
|||
|
|
For each work package:
|
|||
|
|
Work package number WP1
|
|||
|
|
Work package title Project Management & Coordination
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP1 provides the governance, coordination, and quality assurance framework that ensures STRATUS is
|
|||
|
|
delivered on time, within scope, and in line with SESAR 3 JU requirements for Exploratory Research. Its
|
|||
|
|
objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
a) Establish and operate a governance structure that supports clear decision -making, effective
|
|||
|
|
communication, and timely conflict resolution.
|
|||
|
|
b) Manage all contractual, administrative, and financial aspects of the Grant Agreement, including all
|
|||
|
|
mandatory reporting to SESAR 3 JU.
|
|||
|
|
c) Monitor progress against the approved Project Management Plan (PMP) and Data Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
(DMP), ensuring risks are tracked and corrective action taken when required.
|
|||
|
|
d) Deliver all mandatory SESAR milestones and reviews on schedule, including the ERP and ERR.
|
|||
|
|
e) Apply structured quality assurance to ensure all project outputs meet SESAR JU evaluation and open
|
|||
|
|
science standards.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP1 runs for the full 30 months of the project and covers governance, reporting, quality assurance, risk
|
|||
|
|
management, and contractual/financial administration.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Governance and coordination
|
|||
|
|
The governance structure rests on three layers. The Project Management Board (PMB), chaired by
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL and including all partners, meets quarterly to review overall progress, confirm resource use,
|
|||
|
|
address risks, and approve major deliverables. Monthly Work Package Lead (WPL) meetings, chaired by the
|
|||
|
|
Coordinator, monitor technical progress, manage interdependencies, and resolve emerging issues. An
|
|||
|
|
Advisory Board (AB), composed of external stakeholders such as Launch & Re -entry Operators, national
|
|||
|
|
regulators, and defence/space organisations, meets twice (midway and close to project end) to provide
|
|||
|
|
independent feedback and ensure alignment with broader European initiatives. Governance and coordination
|
|||
|
|
activities require about 8 PM across the project.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Project Management Plan (PMP)
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL produces the PMP at Month 3, consolidating inputs from WP leaders and partners. It defines
|
|||
|
|
governance roles, reporting flows, risk and quality processes, communication and document control, and
|
|||
|
|
incorporates the baseline schedule in the SESAR reporting platform. The PMP is updated at Month 12 to reflect
|
|||
|
|
any changes. Preparation and review require around 2 PM in total.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Data Management Plan (DMP)
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL also leads the DMP, due in Month 3 and updated in Month 12. It specifies how STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
outputs are handled in line with FAIR principles, covering formats, metadata, repositories, preservation, and
|
|||
|
|
access rights. All partners participate in the process with document control, while technical partners contribute
|
|||
|
|
information on expected data types. Around 2 PM are allocated to this activity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Reporting and reviews
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 187 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 21 of 34
|
|||
|
|
WP1 coordinates the preparation of all mandatory SESAR 3 JU and Horizon Europe reviews.
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL consolidates inputs from WP leaders into technical and financial reports at M12 and M24.
|
|||
|
|
Although not deliverables, these reports require significant effort (~10 PM). At project close,
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL prepares the Final Project Report (D1.6) with partner contributions, consolidating results,
|
|||
|
|
financials, lessons learned, and updated exploitation and dissemination planning. This requires around 2 PM
|
|||
|
|
across the consortium.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Risk management
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL maintains the project risk register, opened at the kick -off meeting. Risks are updated
|
|||
|
|
monthly at WPL meetings, with escalation of high -priority risks to the PMB. All partners contribute to
|
|||
|
|
identifying and monitoring risks. Around 1 PM are assigned to this activity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quality assurance
|
|||
|
|
All deliverables undergo a two -stage review: an independent technical review by a non -authoring partner,
|
|||
|
|
followed by a compliance review by EUROCONTROL. This ensures consistency with SESAR templates,
|
|||
|
|
Horizon standards, and PMP criteria. Reviews are schedul ed at least two weeks before submission. The QA
|
|||
|
|
process requires about 2 PM across the project.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Financial and administrative management
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL monitors resource allocation under the lump -sum model, tracks person -months and
|
|||
|
|
deliverable completion, and prepares consolidated financial statements. Partners provide quarterly inputs on
|
|||
|
|
effort and resource use. At M30, EUROCONTROL oversees s ubmission of the Final Project Report and
|
|||
|
|
archiving of all documentation. This requires around 2 PM in total.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Role of participants
|
|||
|
|
• EUROCONTROL (Coordinator): leads WP1, chairs the PMB, prepares the PMP and DMP,
|
|||
|
|
consolidates reports, manages financial and contractual compliance, and ensures quality control.
|
|||
|
|
• Advisory Board: external input at mid-term and project close to ensure alignment with wider European
|
|||
|
|
and international frameworks.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number WP2
|
|||
|
|
Work package title Communication, Dissemination & Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP2 ensures that STRATUS results are visible, accessible, and positioned for adoption by SESAR follow-on
|
|||
|
|
projects, regulators, and international bodies. Its objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
a) develop and maintain a communication and dissemination framework that ensures project visibility
|
|||
|
|
from the outset;
|
|||
|
|
b) provide targeted engagement with regulators, ANSPs, operators, standards bodies, and other
|
|||
|
|
stakeholders to build early buy-in;
|
|||
|
|
c) prepare interim and final exploitation strategies that map STRATUS outputs to SESAR and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
priorities;
|
|||
|
|
d) ensure compliance with Horizon Europe open science and FAIR principles, so that all non -sensitive
|
|||
|
|
results are accessible and reusable;
|
|||
|
|
a) deliver structured stakeholder workshops and promulgation events to validate concepts and maximise
|
|||
|
|
impact.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 188 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 22 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP2 runs from Month 1 to Month 24 and is led by EUROCONTROL and supported by all partners for
|
|||
|
|
outreach, content development, and event organisation. A follow -up package (WP5) ensures continuity of
|
|||
|
|
dedicated CDE work during the final six months.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The work begins with the preparation of the Communication & Dissemination Plan (D2.1), delivered at Month
|
|||
|
|
3. This document defines the communication strategy, identifies target audiences, sets key messages, and
|
|||
|
|
establishes performance indicators. It includ es an editorial calendar, event plan, and alignment with SESAR
|
|||
|
|
JU branding requirements. About 2 PM are allocated across the consortium for this deliverable.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In parallel, the project website and online presence (D2.2) are established by Month 3. The website functions
|
|||
|
|
as a public repository of results, news updates, event announcements, and non -confidential deliverables, and
|
|||
|
|
is linked to the SESAR JU portal. This activity requires around 1 PM for setup and ongoing updates.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The plan is updated at Month 12 (Updated CDE Plan, D2.3) to reflect progress, stakeholder feedback, and
|
|||
|
|
adjustments in dissemination strategy. This ensures the project remains visible and aligned with evolving
|
|||
|
|
SESAR priorities. The update is concise but requires coordination, with about 1 PM allocated.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A central activity is the Mid -project Stakeholder Workshop (D2.4), held around Month 18. Organised by
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL, this event presents the interim CONOPS and OSED to regulators, ANSPs, military
|
|||
|
|
representatives, and service providers. The workshop collects structured feedback on the concepts, which is
|
|||
|
|
then fed into WP3 and WP4 work. The Workshop Report records participants, discussions, and how feedback
|
|||
|
|
is integrated into Part B. Organising and documenting the workshop requires around 5–6 PM in total, reflecting
|
|||
|
|
the need for preparation, facilitation, and reporting.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
WP2 also produces the Draft Post -Research Exploitation & Impact Strategy (D2.5) at Month 20. This maps
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS outputs to potential users and adoption pathways, highlights standardisation hooks, and identifies
|
|||
|
|
areas requiring further R&D. It positions the results for continuation in SESAR industrial projects, EASA
|
|||
|
|
regulatory roadmaps, and ICAO provisions. About 4 –5 PM are allocated across the consortium for this
|
|||
|
|
deliverable.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Throughout WP2, dissemination takes place via multiple channels. Partners present results at SESAR events,
|
|||
|
|
ICAO EUR/NAT meetings, EUROCAE working groups, and targeted industry conferences. Academic
|
|||
|
|
partners prepare scientific publications, while operationa l partners contribute to professional forums. Public
|
|||
|
|
outreach is maintained through infographics, social media updates, and newsletters. This continuous activity
|
|||
|
|
ensures that STRATUS maintains visibility across its stakeholder community.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
WP2 accounts for around 15 PM of effort in total. This is proportionate for an ER project and justified by the
|
|||
|
|
need to build awareness and uptake of the project’s outputs well before the final phase. WP5 then extends this
|
|||
|
|
effort to cover post-research exploitation and dissemination, ensuring continuity beyond Month 24.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Role of participants
|
|||
|
|
• EUROCONTROL (Lead): drafts the CDE Plan, manages the website and branding, leads exploitation
|
|||
|
|
strategy, coordinates open science compliance , stakeholder engagement and workshops; provide
|
|||
|
|
content for the website and other communications; support the exploitation strategy; ensure alignment
|
|||
|
|
with SESAR JU dissemination obligations; contribute through conferences, publications and
|
|||
|
|
participation in workshops.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 189 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 23 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Work package number WP3
|
|||
|
|
Work package title STRATUS Research Activity, Part A
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP3 establishes the operational and analytical baseline for STRATUS. Its objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
a) produce an Exploratory Research Plan (ERP) that sets out the validation strategy for an ER project at
|
|||
|
|
TRL2, including expert reviews, stakeholder consultation, and scenario-based desk studies;
|
|||
|
|
b) conduct an updated market and stakeholder study to provide a realistic forecast of demand for higher-
|
|||
|
|
airspace services, explicitly complementing the EASA HAO Market Study by extending the scope to
|
|||
|
|
Space Transport Operations (STO) and military use of higher airspace;
|
|||
|
|
c) prepare an Initial Operational Services and Environment Description (OSED) that defines actors,
|
|||
|
|
functions, baseline scenarios, and interactions, forming the reference point for the CONOPS and
|
|||
|
|
technical frameworks developed in Part B;
|
|||
|
|
d) establish the baseline assumptions for service models and architecture, describing how key functions
|
|||
|
|
could in future be deployed as modular services with interoperable interfaces, ensuring consistency
|
|||
|
|
between operational concepts and the distributed architecture framework refined in WP4;
|
|||
|
|
e) identify candidate areas for proof-of-concept demonstration, where small, targeted exercises could be
|
|||
|
|
designed in Part B to illustrate the feasibility of innovative approaches.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP3 runs during the first 12 months of STRATUS and provides the foundation for the project’s technical,
|
|||
|
|
operational, and regulatory outputs. It is led by EUROCONTROL. All partners contribute through data
|
|||
|
|
provision, expert knowledge, and structured review.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Exploratory Research Plan (ERP, D3.1), due at Month 6, sets out how validation will be carried out in the
|
|||
|
|
project. While no large-scale trials or simulations are foreseen, the ERP ensures a structured validation pathway
|
|||
|
|
appropriate for TRL2. It defines the methods for:
|
|||
|
|
• Expert reviews, specifying the criteria for selecting domain specialists from ANSPs, regulators,
|
|||
|
|
operators, and industry, and the format of review panels.
|
|||
|
|
• Stakeholder workshops, which will provide structured opportunities to present draft concepts (e.g.
|
|||
|
|
early OSED scenarios, preliminary service models) and collect targeted feedback.
|
|||
|
|
• Desk-based scenario analysis, including “what-if” case studies for HAPS operations, STO launches/re-
|
|||
|
|
entries, and mixed-traffic environments.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The ERP also specifies evidence capture: how comments, risks, and validation results are recorded, and how
|
|||
|
|
they feed into deliverables. Core preparation requires ~6–7 PM across the consortium. Further effort of around
|
|||
|
|
8 PM will include background research, structured workshops, expert reviews, iterative drafting, and direct
|
|||
|
|
partner input.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Market and Stakeholder Study (D3.2), delivered at Month 8, is a key differentiator for STRATUS. It
|
|||
|
|
provides a forward-looking picture of who will operate in higher airspace, when, and at what scale. It explicitly
|
|||
|
|
complements the EASA HAO Market Study, which focuses primarily on HAPS and high-performance aircraft,
|
|||
|
|
by adding Space Transport Operations (STO) (orbital launches, sub -orbital transport, re-entries) and military
|
|||
|
|
activity, both of which are critical for airspace availability but under-represented in current studies.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 190 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 24 of 34
|
|||
|
|
The study will:
|
|||
|
|
• Compile demand forecasts for HAPS fleets (communications, ISR, scientific), hypersonic/supersonic
|
|||
|
|
transports, STO missions, and military operations.
|
|||
|
|
• Define operational profiles, including flight durations, altitudes, trajectories, and hazard area
|
|||
|
|
footprints.
|
|||
|
|
• Assess entry-into-service timelines, drawing on manufacturer announcements, regulatory filings, and
|
|||
|
|
industry roadmaps.
|
|||
|
|
• Identify expected service requirements, such as separation assurance, hazard area coordination,
|
|||
|
|
trajectory exchange, and cyber-resilient communications.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
By merging civilian, commercial, military, and STO perspectives, the study delivers a more realistic composite
|
|||
|
|
picture of higher-airspace occupancy. This picture becomes the baseline for the OSED and CONOPS. Core
|
|||
|
|
preparation requires ~8–10 PM, with significant partner consultation and structured review utilising around 16
|
|||
|
|
PM.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Initial OSED (D3.3), delivered at Month 12, builds on the ERP and market study to describe the
|
|||
|
|
operational environment, functions, and stakeholder interactions. It defines:
|
|||
|
|
• Actors: ANSPs, high -altitude service providers, operators (HAPS, hypersonic, STO), regulators
|
|||
|
|
(aviation and space), military stakeholders, and infrastructure entities such as airports, spaceports, and
|
|||
|
|
stratoports.
|
|||
|
|
• Functions: surveillance, communications, navigation, mission and tactical planning, conflict detection,
|
|||
|
|
separation (where needed), hazard area generation, and contingency response.
|
|||
|
|
• Scenarios: routine HAPS flights, hypersonic transport corridors, STO launches/re-entries, and mixed
|
|||
|
|
environments with multiple HAO users.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The OSED also introduces the first mapping of functions into potential service models. For example, hazard
|
|||
|
|
area generation might be described both as an ANSP-led function and as a candidate modular service that can
|
|||
|
|
be published via an API. Similarly, conflict detection can be described as both an operator responsibility and
|
|||
|
|
a function that could be exposed by a higher-airspace service provider. These mappings provide the conceptual
|
|||
|
|
bridge between operational definitions in WP3 and the distributed architectu re explored in WP4. Core
|
|||
|
|
preparation and internal review of the OSED require ~12–15 PM across the consortium, with ~28 PM allocated
|
|||
|
|
to background research, workshops, expert reviews, and any required iterative drafting.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
To ensure coherence, WP3 reviews existing ICAO, European, and SESAR documentation (including ECHO
|
|||
|
|
and ECHO2 outputs) and explicitly records where STRATUS extends the scope. This avoids duplication and
|
|||
|
|
ensures that STRATUS provides added value in areas not yet addressed, such as STO integration, dynamic
|
|||
|
|
4DOZ operation, and integrated safety –security–resilience assurance. These cross-cutting tasks will require
|
|||
|
|
~20 PM across the consortium.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Role of participants
|
|||
|
|
• EUROCONTROL (Lead): coordinates WP3, drafts ERP, consolidates inputs , leads Market and
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder Study, ensures complementarity with EASA HAO Market Study, contributes to ERP
|
|||
|
|
drafting.
|
|||
|
|
• SCEYE: ensures coverage of HAPS and novel operational profiles.
|
|||
|
|
• SkyNav: ensures International & SESAR alignment, supports validation methodology, and reviews
|
|||
|
|
technical assumptions for service models.
|
|||
|
|
• Other partners: contribute data, review deliverables, and provide expertise on STO, military, UAS,
|
|||
|
|
regulation, and system architecture.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 191 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 25 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Work package number WP4
|
|||
|
|
Work package title STRATUS Research Activity, Part B
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
Work Package 4 consolidates the outputs of Part A and develops the main technical and regulatory deliverables
|
|||
|
|
of STRATUS. Its objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
a) produce a Functional Requirements Document (FRD) that defines the detailed requirements for
|
|||
|
|
higher-airspace integration functions and their delivery as services;
|
|||
|
|
b) finalise the OSED to provide a mature and validated description of actors, functions, services, and
|
|||
|
|
scenarios;
|
|||
|
|
c) deliver an Exploratory Research Report (ERR) that summarises findings, assesses progress against
|
|||
|
|
objectives, and captures lessons learned;
|
|||
|
|
d) perform an economic evaluation (ECO-EVAL) to examine costs, benefits, and incentives associated
|
|||
|
|
with higher-airspace services;
|
|||
|
|
e) prepare an Implementation & Regulatory Commentary that analyses how the proposed concepts
|
|||
|
|
interact with existing ICAO, EASA, and national frameworks;
|
|||
|
|
f) integrate all results into a Final Report on a Holistic, Secure, and Resilient HAO framework, ensuring
|
|||
|
|
coherence across operational, architectural, assurance, and regulatory strands.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP4 runs from Month 13 to Month 24 and represents the consolidation phase of STRATUS. It is led by
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL, with other partners contributing according to their expertise. The total effort is ~100 PM,
|
|||
|
|
reflecting its role as the core work package for delivering STRATUS outputs.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The first major deliverable is the Functional Requirements Document (D4.1), due in Month 18. Building on
|
|||
|
|
the initial OSED, the FRD specifies the detailed requirements for key functions such as trajectory exchange,
|
|||
|
|
conflict detection, separation (where need ed), hazard area generation and management, and contingency
|
|||
|
|
response. Requirements are expressed in terms of inputs, outputs, performance indicators, and interfaces.
|
|||
|
|
Special attention is given to dynamic 4 -Dimensional Operating Zones (4DOZ) for HAPS, STO i ntegration,
|
|||
|
|
and interoperability with conventional ATM services. Drafting is led by EUROCONTROL with contributions
|
|||
|
|
from ANSP and other relevant partners to ensure alignment with SESAR standards. Around 25 PM are
|
|||
|
|
allocated to this deliverable, reflecting the need for detailed modelling and iterative review.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
By Month 20, the Final OSED (D4.2) is delivered. This updates and consolidates the initial OSED,
|
|||
|
|
incorporating feedback from stakeholders, results from the market study, and refined functional definitions
|
|||
|
|
from the FRD. The final OSED provides a comprehensi ve description of the actors, services, functions, and
|
|||
|
|
scenarios needed for higher-airspace integration. It clarifies the roles of ANSPs, HAOSP candidates, operators,
|
|||
|
|
regulators, and military stakeholders, and integrates STO operations and hazard area coor dination more
|
|||
|
|
explicitly than in Part A. Preparation of the Final OSED requires ~45 PM across the consortium, reflecting its
|
|||
|
|
importance as a cornerstone reference for future SESAR and regulatory work.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
While STRATUS does not conduct validation in the sense of large-scale simulations or flight trials, WP4 will
|
|||
|
|
identify specific components of the concepts that can be subjected to limited proof-of-concept activities. These
|
|||
|
|
small, targeted exercises will be used to illustrate the feasibility of novel or challenging ideas, such as new
|
|||
|
|
approaches to hazard area management, innovative 4DOZ coordination mechanisms, or alternative cyber -
|
|||
|
|
resilience methods for distributed architectures. Where feasible, prototype tools or models may be produced at
|
|||
|
|
conceptual level and shared openly to demonstrate how the research could be applied in practice. These
|
|||
|
|
activities do not constitute validation in the SESAR sense but provide tangible evidence that the concepts
|
|||
|
|
proposed are workable and merit continuation in later SESAR industrial research phases.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 192 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 26 of 34
|
|||
|
|
The Exploratory Research Report (ERR, D4.3) is delivered at Month 22. It synthesises all findings from
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS, assesses them against the project’s objectives, and documents gaps and lessons learned. The ERR
|
|||
|
|
includes evidence from expert reviews, workshops, and desk-based studies, providing a clear picture of what
|
|||
|
|
has been achieved at TRL2 and where further industrial research is required. Around 32 PM are assigned to
|
|||
|
|
this activity, covering drafting, consolidation, and review.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Also at Month 22, the Economic Evaluation (D4.4) is delivered. This assesses the likely costs and benefits of
|
|||
|
|
higher-airspace integration, examining stakeholder incentives and possible business models for service
|
|||
|
|
provision. It uses qualitative and quantita tive methods, drawing on demand forecasts from the market study
|
|||
|
|
and functional requirements from the FRD. EUROCONTROL leads the analysis, supported by other partners,
|
|||
|
|
with ~10 PM of effort.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Implementation & Regulatory Commentary (D4.5) is produced at Month 24. This commentary maps
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS concepts against existing ICAO, EASA, and national frameworks, and highlights where updates
|
|||
|
|
or clarifications may be needed. It covers sovereignty, lice nsing and supervision of new service providers,
|
|||
|
|
contingency responsibilities, and environmental considerations. Importantly, it does not prescribe solutions
|
|||
|
|
but provides evidence-based commentary on relevance and potential impacts for implantation. Drafting is led
|
|||
|
|
by EUROCONTROL with inputs from regulators in the consortium. Around 15 PM are allocated.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Finally, WP4 delivers the Final Report on a Holistic, Secure, and Resilient HAO (D4.6) at Month 24. This
|
|||
|
|
report integrates the operational, technical, assurance, and regulatory strands into a single consolidated
|
|||
|
|
package. It describes roles, responsibilities, procedures, contingency arrangements, and information flows in
|
|||
|
|
a coherent framework. The report ensures that STRATUS outputs can be directly taken forward into SESAR
|
|||
|
|
industrial research or regulatory processes. This deliverable requires ~17 PM across the consortium.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Role of participants
|
|||
|
|
• EUROCONTROL(Lead): coordinates WP4, leads drafting of FRD, Final OSED, ERR and Final
|
|||
|
|
Holistic Report, ensures operational realism. Ensures methodological alignment with SESAR
|
|||
|
|
standards.
|
|||
|
|
• All partners: provide inputs, review drafts, and participate in expert review of all WP4 deliverables.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number WP5
|
|||
|
|
Work package title CDE Wrap-Up
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP5 ensures that the results of STRATUS continue to deliver impact after the research phase is complete. Its
|
|||
|
|
objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
a) consolidate and finalise the exploitation and impact strategy, positioning STRATUS outputs for uptake
|
|||
|
|
in SESAR industrial projects, regulatory frameworks, and standardisation processes;
|
|||
|
|
b) ensure that all public deliverables, datasets, and artefacts are archived in trusted repositories and
|
|||
|
|
compliant with Horizon Europe open science and FAIR requirements;
|
|||
|
|
c) organise and deliver a final programme of dissemination and promulgation activities, including a
|
|||
|
|
major public event, to ensure visibility across Europe and internationally;
|
|||
|
|
d) mobilise the entire consortium during the final six months to focus on active dissemination, both
|
|||
|
|
internally within their organisations and externally through industry forums, ensuring that STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
results are carried into the operational and regulatory community.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 193 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 27 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP5 runs during the last six months of STRATUS and extends the CDE activities initiated in WP2. It is led
|
|||
|
|
by EUROCONTROL, devoting resources to dissemination across their networks and stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
communities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Final Exploitation & Impact Strategy (D5.1, M26) consolidates the draft from WP2 and integrates the
|
|||
|
|
results of WP3 and WP4. It maps STRATUS outputs to SESAR follow -on projects, EASA rulemaking
|
|||
|
|
priorities, ICAO provisions, and EUROCAE standardisation gr oups. It also outlines adoption pathways for
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs, operators, and regulators, and identifies barriers that require further R&I.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
At Month 28, the Repository & Open Science Compliance Report (D5.2) ensures that all project outputs ,
|
|||
|
|
including deliverables, datasets, and supporting artefacts , are archived in trusted repositories with persistent
|
|||
|
|
identifiers and licensed for re -use. Technical partners provide correctly formatted data and models, while
|
|||
|
|
academic partners ensure FAIR compliance. This guarantees that STRATUS results remain accessible to the
|
|||
|
|
research and regulatory community long after project close.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The final phase culminates in the Promulgation Event and Report (D5.3, M30). This high-profile event, hosted
|
|||
|
|
with support from SESAR JU, presents the consolidated STRATUS outputs, including the OSED, CONOPS,
|
|||
|
|
FRD, assurance framework, and regulatory commentary , to regulators, ANSPs, operators, standards bodies,
|
|||
|
|
and international observers. The event is designed not as a one-way presentation but as a forum for dialogue,
|
|||
|
|
encouraging stakeholders to commit to carrying the results forward. The accompanying report do cuments
|
|||
|
|
agenda, participation, outcomes, and evidence of impact.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In parallel with these formal deliverables, intensive dissemination and communication activities include
|
|||
|
|
internal dissemination within relevant organisations (e.g. regulatory partners briefing their rulemaking units,
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs presenting to operational divisions, research partners embedding outputs into academic curricula) and
|
|||
|
|
external promotion at industry and policy events. Partners will actively pr esent STRATUS results at
|
|||
|
|
conferences such as ICAO regional planning meetings, EUROCAE working groups, industry forums,
|
|||
|
|
professional conferences such as IFATCA, and SESAR events, as well as at targeted national workshops. This
|
|||
|
|
ensures that the outputs are visible in the exact communities that will use them.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Planning for WP5 has accounted for ~6 PM. By design, WP5 is not a passive close-out phase but a concentrated
|
|||
|
|
campaign to anchor STRATUS results in the SESAR, EASA, ICAO, and industry communities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Role of participants
|
|||
|
|
• EUROCONTROL (Lead): coordinates WP5, prepares exploitation strategy, manages repository
|
|||
|
|
compliance, organises final event , ensure open science compliance , co-organise the final event , and
|
|||
|
|
actively disseminate STRATUS results in the final six months internally and externally (conferences,
|
|||
|
|
standards bodies, regulatory fora) to maximise visibility and uptake.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 194 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 28 of 34
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables
|
|||
|
|
Numbe
|
|||
|
|
r
|
|||
|
|
Deliverable
|
|||
|
|
name Short description
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
package
|
|||
|
|
number
|
|||
|
|
Short
|
|||
|
|
name of
|
|||
|
|
lead
|
|||
|
|
participant
|
|||
|
|
Type
|
|||
|
|
Disse
|
|||
|
|
minati
|
|||
|
|
on
|
|||
|
|
level
|
|||
|
|
Delivery
|
|||
|
|
date
|
|||
|
|
(in
|
|||
|
|
months)
|
|||
|
|
D1.1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Kick-off
|
|||
|
|
Meeting
|
|||
|
|
Report
|
|||
|
|
Summary of attendees,
|
|||
|
|
agenda, decisions taken,
|
|||
|
|
action points, and initial
|
|||
|
|
risk identification
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 1
|
|||
|
|
D1.2
|
|||
|
|
Project
|
|||
|
|
Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan (PMP)
|
|||
|
|
Defines how the project is
|
|||
|
|
executed, monitored,
|
|||
|
|
controlled, and closed. The
|
|||
|
|
reference document for all
|
|||
|
|
project control.
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 3
|
|||
|
|
D1.3
|
|||
|
|
Data
|
|||
|
|
Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan (DMP)
|
|||
|
|
Defines how data will be
|
|||
|
|
handled in line with FAIR
|
|||
|
|
principles. Covers all
|
|||
|
|
technical documents,
|
|||
|
|
models, and software
|
|||
|
|
artefacts.
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL DMP PU 3
|
|||
|
|
D1.4
|
|||
|
|
Updated
|
|||
|
|
Project
|
|||
|
|
Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan (PMP)
|
|||
|
|
Update of PMP
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 12
|
|||
|
|
D1.5
|
|||
|
|
Updated
|
|||
|
|
Data
|
|||
|
|
Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan
|
|||
|
|
Update of DMP
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL DMP PU 12
|
|||
|
|
D1.6 Final Project
|
|||
|
|
Report.
|
|||
|
|
Consolidated technical and
|
|||
|
|
financial report, integrating
|
|||
|
|
results, impacts, and
|
|||
|
|
updated exploitation /
|
|||
|
|
dissemination plans.
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 30
|
|||
|
|
D2.1
|
|||
|
|
Communicati
|
|||
|
|
on &
|
|||
|
|
Disseminatio
|
|||
|
|
n Plan
|
|||
|
|
Identifies target audiences,
|
|||
|
|
messages, channels, KPIs,
|
|||
|
|
and how the project will
|
|||
|
|
ensure visibility and uptake
|
|||
|
|
of results. Will include an
|
|||
|
|
editorial calendar, planned
|
|||
|
|
events, and alignment with
|
|||
|
|
SESAR JU branding rules
|
|||
|
|
WP2
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 3
|
|||
|
|
D2.2
|
|||
|
|
Project
|
|||
|
|
Website and
|
|||
|
|
Online
|
|||
|
|
presence
|
|||
|
|
A public library of results,
|
|||
|
|
news feeds, event
|
|||
|
|
announcements, contact
|
|||
|
|
details, and non-
|
|||
|
|
confidential deliverables,
|
|||
|
|
linked from the SESAR JU
|
|||
|
|
portal
|
|||
|
|
WP2
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL DEC PU 3
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 195 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 29 of 34
|
|||
|
|
D2.3 Updated
|
|||
|
|
CDE Plan Update of D2.1. WP2 EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 12
|
|||
|
|
D2.4
|
|||
|
|
Mid-project
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Workshop
|
|||
|
|
Report
|
|||
|
|
Records the workshop
|
|||
|
|
agenda, participants, and
|
|||
|
|
feedback gathered.
|
|||
|
|
Captures stakeholder input
|
|||
|
|
on the interim CONOPS
|
|||
|
|
and OSED, and how that
|
|||
|
|
feedback is integrated into
|
|||
|
|
the project’s second phase
|
|||
|
|
WP2
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 18
|
|||
|
|
D2.5
|
|||
|
|
Draft Post-
|
|||
|
|
Research
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
& Impact
|
|||
|
|
Strategy
|
|||
|
|
Will map STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
outputs to potential users,
|
|||
|
|
identify adoption barriers
|
|||
|
|
and standardisation hooks,
|
|||
|
|
and outline follow-on
|
|||
|
|
research needs.
|
|||
|
|
WP2
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 20
|
|||
|
|
D3.1
|
|||
|
|
ERP –
|
|||
|
|
Exploratory
|
|||
|
|
Research
|
|||
|
|
Plan
|
|||
|
|
How expert reviews, desk
|
|||
|
|
analysis, and scenario
|
|||
|
|
workshops will be
|
|||
|
|
conducted, what evidence
|
|||
|
|
will be collected, and how
|
|||
|
|
interim deliverables will be
|
|||
|
|
validated.
|
|||
|
|
WP3
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 6
|
|||
|
|
D3.2
|
|||
|
|
Market &
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Study
|
|||
|
|
Maps stakeholders,
|
|||
|
|
forecasts demand, and
|
|||
|
|
identifies service needs and
|
|||
|
|
implementation timelines.
|
|||
|
|
Updates earlier EASA and
|
|||
|
|
SESAR work to reflect the
|
|||
|
|
evolving high-altitude
|
|||
|
|
market.
|
|||
|
|
WP3
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 8
|
|||
|
|
D3.3
|
|||
|
|
Initial OSED
|
|||
|
|
–
|
|||
|
|
Operational
|
|||
|
|
Services &
|
|||
|
|
Environment
|
|||
|
|
Description
|
|||
|
|
Captures early service
|
|||
|
|
definitions, stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
roles, and baseline
|
|||
|
|
scenarios, feeding into Part
|
|||
|
|
B where they are refined
|
|||
|
|
and finalised.
|
|||
|
|
WP3
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 12
|
|||
|
|
D4.1
|
|||
|
|
FRD –
|
|||
|
|
Functional
|
|||
|
|
Requirement
|
|||
|
|
s Document
|
|||
|
|
Define functions such as
|
|||
|
|
trajectory negotiation,
|
|||
|
|
conformance monitoring,
|
|||
|
|
separation where required,
|
|||
|
|
and cybersecurity
|
|||
|
|
principles, with clear KPIs
|
|||
|
|
and interface requirements.
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 18
|
|||
|
|
D4.2 Final OSED
|
|||
|
|
Update of D3.3 - a mature
|
|||
|
|
description of actors,
|
|||
|
|
services, and interactions
|
|||
|
|
across high-altitude
|
|||
|
|
operations.
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 20
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 196 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 30 of 34
|
|||
|
|
D4.3
|
|||
|
|
ERR –
|
|||
|
|
Exploratory
|
|||
|
|
Research
|
|||
|
|
Report
|
|||
|
|
Summarises findings,
|
|||
|
|
provides evidence against
|
|||
|
|
objectives, identifies
|
|||
|
|
lessons learned, and
|
|||
|
|
documents gaps for future
|
|||
|
|
research.
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 22
|
|||
|
|
D4.4
|
|||
|
|
ECO-EVAL
|
|||
|
|
– Economic
|
|||
|
|
Evaluation
|
|||
|
|
A structured economic
|
|||
|
|
assessment - a qualitative
|
|||
|
|
analysis of likely benefits
|
|||
|
|
and costs, stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
incentives, and potential
|
|||
|
|
business models.
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 22
|
|||
|
|
D4.5
|
|||
|
|
Implementati
|
|||
|
|
on &
|
|||
|
|
Regulatory
|
|||
|
|
Commentary
|
|||
|
|
Describes where ICAO /
|
|||
|
|
EASA / national
|
|||
|
|
frameworks may need
|
|||
|
|
updating, highlights
|
|||
|
|
sovereignty and
|
|||
|
|
contingency issues, and
|
|||
|
|
notes environmental
|
|||
|
|
considerations
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 24
|
|||
|
|
D4.6
|
|||
|
|
Final Report
|
|||
|
|
on a Holistic
|
|||
|
|
on Secure,
|
|||
|
|
Resilient
|
|||
|
|
HAO
|
|||
|
|
Describes roles,
|
|||
|
|
responsibilities, procedures,
|
|||
|
|
contingency arrangements,
|
|||
|
|
and information flows.
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 24
|
|||
|
|
D5.1
|
|||
|
|
Final
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
& Impact
|
|||
|
|
Strategy
|
|||
|
|
Updated from D2.3,
|
|||
|
|
showing how STRATUS
|
|||
|
|
anticipates the project’s
|
|||
|
|
results to be taken forwards
|
|||
|
|
by the stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
community.
|
|||
|
|
WP5
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 26
|
|||
|
|
D5.2
|
|||
|
|
Repository &
|
|||
|
|
Open
|
|||
|
|
Science
|
|||
|
|
Compliance
|
|||
|
|
Report
|
|||
|
|
Ensures all outputs (public
|
|||
|
|
deliverables, datasets,
|
|||
|
|
software) are archived
|
|||
|
|
properly and accessible
|
|||
|
|
WP5
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 28
|
|||
|
|
D5.3
|
|||
|
|
Final
|
|||
|
|
Promulgation
|
|||
|
|
Event Report
|
|||
|
|
Documents the closing
|
|||
|
|
dissemination activity, with
|
|||
|
|
agenda, participants,
|
|||
|
|
outcomes, and evidence of
|
|||
|
|
impact.
|
|||
|
|
WP5
|
|||
|
|
EUROCO
|
|||
|
|
NTROL R PU 30
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 197 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 31 of 34
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1d: List of milestones
|
|||
|
|
Milestone
|
|||
|
|
number
|
|||
|
|
Milestone
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Related work
|
|||
|
|
package(s)
|
|||
|
|
Due date (in month) Means of verification
|
|||
|
|
1 Project launch
|
|||
|
|
and governance
|
|||
|
|
established
|
|||
|
|
WP1 1 Kick-off Meeting Report
|
|||
|
|
(D1.1)
|
|||
|
|
2 PMP and DMP
|
|||
|
|
approved
|
|||
|
|
WP1 3 PMP (D1.2), DMP (D1.3)
|
|||
|
|
3 CDE
|
|||
|
|
framework
|
|||
|
|
operational
|
|||
|
|
WP2 3 Communication &
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination Plan
|
|||
|
|
(D2.1), Website online
|
|||
|
|
(D2.2)
|
|||
|
|
4 Exploratory
|
|||
|
|
Research Plan
|
|||
|
|
validated
|
|||
|
|
WP3 3
|
|||
|
|
ERP (D3.1)
|
|||
|
|
5 Market and
|
|||
|
|
stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
baseline
|
|||
|
|
established
|
|||
|
|
WP3 8
|
|||
|
|
Market & Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Study (D3.2)
|
|||
|
|
6 Interim OSED
|
|||
|
|
and CONOPS
|
|||
|
|
complete
|
|||
|
|
WP3 12 Initial OSED (D3.3),
|
|||
|
|
Initial CONOPS draft
|
|||
|
|
7 Functional
|
|||
|
|
requirements
|
|||
|
|
agreed
|
|||
|
|
WP4 18
|
|||
|
|
FRD (D4.1)
|
|||
|
|
8 Mid-project
|
|||
|
|
CDE
|
|||
|
|
checkpoint
|
|||
|
|
WP4
|
|||
|
|
18 Mid-Project Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Workshop Report (D2.4)
|
|||
|
|
9 Consolidated
|
|||
|
|
results package
|
|||
|
|
WP2 22 ERR (D4.3), ECO-EVAL
|
|||
|
|
(D4.4)
|
|||
|
|
10 Final
|
|||
|
|
exploitation
|
|||
|
|
and close-out
|
|||
|
|
WP5 30 Final Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
Strategy (D5.1),
|
|||
|
|
Promulgation Event
|
|||
|
|
Report (D5.3)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 198 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 32 of 34
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1e: Critical risks for implementation #@RSK-MGT-RM@#
|
|||
|
|
Description of risk (indicate level of
|
|||
|
|
(i) likelihood, and (ii) severity:
|
|||
|
|
Low/Medium/High)
|
|||
|
|
Work package(s)
|
|||
|
|
involved
|
|||
|
|
Proposed risk-mitigation measures
|
|||
|
|
Market study – not sufficient sources.
|
|||
|
|
(Low likelihood, Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP3 Offset with academic input and
|
|||
|
|
triangulate using industry roadmaps,
|
|||
|
|
regulatory filings, and expert
|
|||
|
|
judgement.
|
|||
|
|
Lack of attendees at stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
promulgation events. (Medium
|
|||
|
|
likelihood, High severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP2 / WP5 Ensure sufficient advance promotion,
|
|||
|
|
targeted invitations to key individuals,
|
|||
|
|
and offer hybrid formats to maximise
|
|||
|
|
participation.
|
|||
|
|
Limited regulator engagement.
|
|||
|
|
(Medium likelihood, High severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP2 / WP3 / WP4 Early involvement of EASA and national
|
|||
|
|
authorities via Advisory Board and
|
|||
|
|
targeted workshops; leverage
|
|||
|
|
SESAR/ICAO networks.
|
|||
|
|
Divergent national positions on
|
|||
|
|
sovereignty and cross-border
|
|||
|
|
operations. (Medium likelihood,
|
|||
|
|
Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP4 Capture differences explicitly in
|
|||
|
|
regulatory commentary; frame outputs
|
|||
|
|
as options/evidence rather than
|
|||
|
|
consensus prescriptions.
|
|||
|
|
Scope creep across vehicle types
|
|||
|
|
(HAPS, hypersonic, STO, military).
|
|||
|
|
(Medium likelihood, Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP3 / WP4 Maintain strict link to TRL 2 scope;
|
|||
|
|
prioritise SESAR Master Plan-relevant
|
|||
|
|
concepts; document excess material as
|
|||
|
|
future research needs.
|
|||
|
|
Partner coordination challenges in
|
|||
|
|
large consortium (20+ partners).
|
|||
|
|
(Medium likelihood, Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP1 Regular PMB and WPL meetings; clear
|
|||
|
|
deliverable ownership; two-stage QA
|
|||
|
|
reviews by non-authoring partners and
|
|||
|
|
Coordinator.
|
|||
|
|
Insufficient data for traffic forecasts
|
|||
|
|
(immature HAPS/space transport
|
|||
|
|
markets). (Medium likelihood,
|
|||
|
|
Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP3 Use multiple sources and expert
|
|||
|
|
judgement; transparently document
|
|||
|
|
uncertainties and assumptions.
|
|||
|
|
Overlap with other SESAR/EASA
|
|||
|
|
studies (risk of duplication). (Low
|
|||
|
|
likelihood, Medium severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP3 / WP4 Continuous alignment with ECHO2,
|
|||
|
|
EASA HAO study, SEC-AIRSPACE etc.;
|
|||
|
|
Advisory Board monitoring to ensure
|
|||
|
|
complementarity.
|
|||
|
|
Underestimation of cross-cutting
|
|||
|
|
complexity (safety, cyber, resilience
|
|||
|
|
integration). (Low likelihood, High
|
|||
|
|
severity)
|
|||
|
|
WP3 / WP4 Iterative approach across work
|
|||
|
|
packages; early baseline definitions;
|
|||
|
|
independent expert reviews to validate
|
|||
|
|
integration.
|
|||
|
|
#§RSK-MGT-RM§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 199 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 33 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1f: Summary of staff effort
|
|||
|
|
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 Total Person-
|
|||
|
|
Months per
|
|||
|
|
Participant
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCONTROL 30,00 18,00 78,00 24,00 8,00 158,00
|
|||
|
|
2 DFS 1,76 2.56 4,32
|
|||
|
|
3 ENAV 4,07 4,02 8,09
|
|||
|
|
4 LUFTARTSVERKET 7,00 7,00 14,00
|
|||
|
|
5 NATS 2,50 4,20 6,70
|
|||
|
|
6 ENAIRE 1,50 2,70 4,20
|
|||
|
|
7 ENAC (IT) 3,20 7,80 11,00
|
|||
|
|
8 CONSORCIO
|
|||
|
|
AERODROMO
|
|||
|
|
AEROPUERTO DE
|
|||
|
|
TERUEL
|
|||
|
|
7,00 7,00 14,00
|
|||
|
|
9 SkyNav Europe 11,20 11,50 22,70
|
|||
|
|
10 ENAC (FR) 5,00 4,00 9,00
|
|||
|
|
11 CIRA 2,00 4,00 6,00
|
|||
|
|
12 NLR 4,60 6,00 10,60
|
|||
|
|
13 IFATCA 2,00 5,00 7,00
|
|||
|
|
14 INECO 5,30 6,00 11.30
|
|||
|
|
15 CRIDA 2.80 2.80 5.60
|
|||
|
|
16 IMIEU 0,60 0,70 1,30
|
|||
|
|
17 OpenUTM 1,20 1,20
|
|||
|
|
18 DLR 5,00 7,00 12,00
|
|||
|
|
19 Sceye Spain 6,00 7,80 2,00 15,80
|
|||
|
|
20 ANRA Technologies
|
|||
|
|
OU
|
|||
|
|
5,00 5,50 10,50
|
|||
|
|
21 HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
(Associated partner)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
22 IAA (Associated
|
|||
|
|
partner)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total Person Months 30,00 18,00 154,53 120,78 10,50 333,81
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 200 ===
|
|||
|
|
Call: [HORIZON-SESAR-2023-DES-ER3] — [Digital European Sky Exploratory Research 03]
|
|||
|
|
EU Grants: Application form (HE RIA and IA)( HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03): V4.0 – 18.12.2024
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 34 of 34
|
|||
|
|
Should this tender be successful EUROCONTROL, as part of the consortium, will participate in the project actions
|
|||
|
|
without requesting funding. EUROCONTROL will, however, fully engage in the project and in particular is
|
|||
|
|
committed to providing the effort, contributions to deliverables and to other activities as set out in this tender and in
|
|||
|
|
the accompanying administrative forms."
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1g: ‘Subcontracting costs’ items
|
|||
|
|
16/IMIEU
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Description of tasks and justification
|
|||
|
|
Subcontracting 18.900,00 IMIEU will subcontract some tasks within WP3 &WP4 to The
|
|||
|
|
International Institute of Air and Space Law of the University of
|
|||
|
|
Leiden.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1h: ‘Purchase costs’ items (travel and subsistence, equipment and other goods, works and
|
|||
|
|
services)
|
|||
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1i: ‘Other costs categories’ items (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services)
|
|||
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1j: ‘In-kind contributions’ provided by third parties
|
|||
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§QUA-LIT-QL§# #§WRK-PLA-WP§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 201 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
|
|||
|
|
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
|
|||
|
|
sealed.
|
|||
|
|
This digital signature mechanism, using a public -private key pair mechanism, uniquely
|
|||
|
|
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
|
|||
|
|
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integr ity.
|
|||
|
|
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
|
|||
|
|
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
|
|||
|
|
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
|
|||
|
|
signature, which can b e verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
|
|||
|
|
symbol.
|
|||
|
|
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
|
|||
|
|
Portal.
|
|||
|
|
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
|
|||
|
|
|