6586 lines
347 KiB
Plaintext
6586 lines
347 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 1 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 1 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022
|
|||
|
|
Call: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-IR-02
|
|||
|
|
(Digital European Sky Industrial Research 02)
|
|||
|
|
Topic: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-IR-02-WA3-2
|
|||
|
|
Type of Action: HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
|||
|
|
(HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions)
|
|||
|
|
Proposal number: 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Proposal acronym: SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Type of Model Grant Agreement: HORIZON Lump Sum Grant
|
|||
|
|
Table of contents
|
|||
|
|
Section Title Action
|
|||
|
|
1 General information
|
|||
|
|
2 Participants
|
|||
|
|
3 Budget
|
|||
|
|
4 Ethics and security
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 2 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 2 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
1 - General information
|
|||
|
|
Fields marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
|||
|
|
Topic HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-IR-02-WA3-2
|
|||
|
|
Type of Model Grant Agreement HORIZON-AG-LS
|
|||
|
|
Type of Action HORIZON-JU-RIA
|
|||
|
|
Call HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-IR-02
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Proposal title SCAN: Reviewing, Adapting and Developing CNS Infrastructure and Services to Ensure the Safe Integration of
|
|||
|
|
HAO And STO Vehicles
|
|||
|
|
Note that for technical reasons, the following characters are not accepted in the Proposal Title and will be removed: < > " &
|
|||
|
|
Duration in
|
|||
|
|
months 36
|
|||
|
|
Free keywords
|
|||
|
|
Higher Altitude Operations Space Transport Operations CNS equipment performance non-barometric altimetry
|
|||
|
|
HAPS integration new entrants
|
|||
|
|
Abstract *
|
|||
|
|
In the context of integrating Space and Higher Altitude Operations in European ATM, there is a need to evaluate and mitigate the
|
|||
|
|
potential performance gap between current CNS and HAO specific requirements. Moreover, it has been established that altimetry
|
|||
|
|
solutions based on barometric measurements are not reliable for safe operations above FL 600. It is therefore needed to identify non-
|
|||
|
|
barometric altimetry solutions compatible with HAO.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
SCAN will build on the outcome of CNS infrastructure studies and flight trials currently ongoing in the ECHO2 project and will move
|
|||
|
|
forward with the ambition to:
|
|||
|
|
a. Propose a set of feasible technical components and services to serve the CNS needs for diverse vehicles operating in the
|
|||
|
|
higher airspace within Europe and beyond;
|
|||
|
|
b. Engage with airspace users (conventional aviation and HAO operators), ANSPs, industry and aviation authorities to align
|
|||
|
|
expectations on benefits and operational acceptability of the proposed CNS solutions or new paradigms for air traffic management.
|
|||
|
|
c. Support a clear path forward for future CNS developments, including standardisation and regulatory framework evolution to
|
|||
|
|
support the European pioneer initiatives on HAO.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 804
|
|||
|
|
Has this proposal (or a very similar one) been submitted in the past 2 years in response to a call for
|
|||
|
|
proposals under any EU programme, including the current call?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Please give the proposal reference or contract number.
|
|||
|
|
Previously submitted proposals should be with either 6 or 9 digits.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 3 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 3 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Declarations
|
|||
|
|
Field(s) marked * are mandatory to fill.
|
|||
|
|
1) We declare to have the explicit consent of all applicants on their participation and on the content of this proposal. *
|
|||
|
|
2) We confirm that the information contained in this proposal is correct and complete and that none of the project
|
|||
|
|
activities have started before the proposal was submitted (unless explicitly authorised in the call conditions). *
|
|||
|
|
3) We declare:
|
|||
|
|
- to be fully compliant with the eligibility criteria set out in the call
|
|||
|
|
- not to be subject to any exclusion grounds under the EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
|
|||
|
|
- to have the financial and operational capacity to carry out the proposed project. *
|
|||
|
|
4) We acknowledge that all communication will be made through the Funding & Tenders Portal
|
|||
|
|
electronic exchange system and that access and use of this system is subject to the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms
|
|||
|
|
and Conditions. *
|
|||
|
|
5) We have read, understood and accepted the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms & Conditions and
|
|||
|
|
Privacy Statement that set out the conditions of use of the Portal and the scope, purposes, retention periods, etc. for
|
|||
|
|
the processing of personal data of all data subjects whose data we communicate for the purpose of the application,
|
|||
|
|
evaluation, award and subsequent management of our grant, prizes and contracts (including financial transactions and
|
|||
|
|
audits). *
|
|||
|
|
6) We declare that the proposal complies with ethical principles (including the highest standards of research integrity
|
|||
|
|
as set out in the ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, as well as applicable international and
|
|||
|
|
national law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on
|
|||
|
|
Human Rights and its Supplementary Protocols. Appropriate procedures, policies and structures are in place to foster
|
|||
|
|
responsible research practices, to prevent questionable research practices and research misconduct, and to handle
|
|||
|
|
allegations of breaches of the principles and standards in the Code of Conduct. *
|
|||
|
|
7) We declare that the proposal has an exclusive focus on civil applications (activities intended to be used in military
|
|||
|
|
application or aiming to serve military purposes cannot be funded). If the project involves dual-use items in the sense
|
|||
|
|
of Regulation 2021/821, or other items for which authorisation is required, we confirm that we will comply with the
|
|||
|
|
applicable regulatory framework (e.g. obtain export/import licences before these items are used). *
|
|||
|
|
8) We confirm that the activities proposed do not
|
|||
|
|
- aim at human cloning for reproductive purposes;
|
|||
|
|
- intend to modify the genetic heritage of human beings which could make such changes heritable
|
|||
|
|
(with the exception of research relating to cancer treatment of the gonads, which may be financed), or
|
|||
|
|
- intend to create human embryos solely for the purpose of research or for the purpose of stem
|
|||
|
|
cell procurement, including by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer.
|
|||
|
|
- lead to the destruction of human embryos (for example, for obtaining stem cells)
|
|||
|
|
These activities are excluded from funding. *
|
|||
|
|
9) We confirm that for activities carried out outside the Union, the same activities would have been allowed in at least
|
|||
|
|
one EU Member State. *
|
|||
|
|
10) For Lump Sum Grants with a detailed budget table: We understand and accept that the EU lump sum grants must
|
|||
|
|
be reliable proxies for the actual costs of a project and confirm that the detailed budget for the proposal has been
|
|||
|
|
established in accordance with our usual cost accounting practices and in compliance with the basic eligibility
|
|||
|
|
conditions for EU actual cost grants (see AGA - Annotated Grant Agreement, art 6) and exclude costs that are ineligible
|
|||
|
|
under the Programme. Purchases and subcontracting costs must be done taking into account best value for money
|
|||
|
|
and must be free of conflict of interest. *
|
|||
|
|
The coordinator is only responsible for the information relating to their own organisation. Each applicant remains responsible for the information declared for
|
|||
|
|
their organisation. If the proposal is retained for EU funding, they will all be required to sign a declaration of honour.
|
|||
|
|
False statements or incorrect information may lead to administrative sanctions under the EU Financial Regulation.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 4 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 4 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
2 - Participants
|
|||
|
|
List of participating organisations
|
|||
|
|
# Participating Organisation Legal Name Country Role Action
|
|||
|
|
1 EUROCONTROL - EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFBelgium Coordinator
|
|||
|
|
2 DFS DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG GMBH DE Partner
|
|||
|
|
3 LUFTFARTSVERKET SE Partner
|
|||
|
|
4 EUROPEAN SATELLITE SERVICES PROVIDER SAS FR Partner
|
|||
|
|
5 NATS (EN ROUTE) PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY UK Partner
|
|||
|
|
6 DIRECTION DES SERVICES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE FR Partner
|
|||
|
|
7 SkyNav Europe BE Partner
|
|||
|
|
8 ECOLE NATIONALE DE L AVIATION CIVILE France Partner
|
|||
|
|
9 LINKOPINGS UNIVERSITET SE Partner
|
|||
|
|
10 C.I.R.A. CENTRO ITALIANO RICERCHE AEROSPAZIALI SCPA IT Partner
|
|||
|
|
11 SCEYE SPAIN S.L. ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
12 SKYDWELLER CANARIAS SL ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
13 SKYDWELLER SL ES Affiliated
|
|||
|
|
14 PARQUE TECNOLOGICO DE FUERTEVENTURASA MP Spain Partner
|
|||
|
|
15 Elson Space España S.L. ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
16 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV DE Partner
|
|||
|
|
17 PILDO CONSULTING SL ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
18 ENAIRE ES Partner
|
|||
|
|
19 OpenUTM Ltd. IE Partner
|
|||
|
|
20 ANRA TECHNOLOGIES UK LTD UK Partner
|
|||
|
|
21 SKYPUZZLER APS DK Partner
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 5 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 5 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
# Participating Organisation Legal Name Country Role Action
|
|||
|
|
22 HAPS Alliance United States Associated
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 6 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 6 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Organisation data
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999483733
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL - EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION
|
|||
|
|
Short name: EUROCONTROL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/02/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 7 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 7 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Aviation Transformation Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Department 2
|
|||
|
|
Department name Network Manager Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1130
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 8 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 8 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ovidiu Last name* DUMITRACHE
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* ovidiu.dumitrache@eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Town BRUXELLES Post code 1130
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue de la Fusée 96
|
|||
|
|
Website www.eurocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Project Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department Aviation Transformation Directorate
|
|||
|
|
Phone +32 2 729 3052 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
CM Team EUROCONTROL atd.ppu.cmt@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Pablo HARO pablo.haro@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Augustin UDRISTIOIU augustin.udristioiu@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Fiona MULLAN fiona.mullan@eurocontrol.int +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 9 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 9 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Pablo Haro Man Spain pablo.haro@euro
|
|||
|
|
control.int Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Ovidiu Dumitrache Man Romania ovidiu.dumitrach
|
|||
|
|
e@eurocontrol.in
|
|||
|
|
t
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Ms Marta Fernandez
|
|||
|
|
Castrillo
|
|||
|
|
Woman Spain marta.fernandez-
|
|||
|
|
castrillo@euroco
|
|||
|
|
ntrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Fiona Mullan Woman Ireland fiona.mullan@eur
|
|||
|
|
ocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Dragos Tonea Man Romania dragos.tonea@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Augustin Udristioiu Man Romania augustin.udristioi
|
|||
|
|
u@eurocontrol.in
|
|||
|
|
t
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Leading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Edgar Reuber Man Germany edgar.reuber@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Gabor Fugedi Man Hungary gabor.fugedi@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Octavian Fota Man Romania octavian.fota@eu
|
|||
|
|
rocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Lucia Sandu Woman Moldova lucia.sandu@eur
|
|||
|
|
ocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mr Stefano Tiberia Man Italy stefano.tiberia@e
|
|||
|
|
urocontrol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Mrs Aleksandra Owoc-Berson Woman Poland aleksandra.owoc-
|
|||
|
|
berson@eurocon
|
|||
|
|
trol.int
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 10 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 10 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 11 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 11 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
As a founding member of the SESAR Programme and Joint Undertaking, EUROCONTROL has
|
|||
|
|
been involved in all the phases (Definition, Development and Deployment) contributing
|
|||
|
|
significantly to many of its most important achievements, such as the definition and
|
|||
|
|
maintenance of the European ATM Master Plan, the SESAR 3 Strategic Research and
|
|||
|
|
Innovation Agenda and a large number of Solutions delivered in the context of the SESAR 1
|
|||
|
|
and SESAR 2020.
|
|||
|
|
Dataset
|
|||
|
|
The EUROCONTROL Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Aircraft Performance Model (APM) is a
|
|||
|
|
globally recognized reference database containing aircraft-specific coefficients and
|
|||
|
|
theoretical models used to calculate aircraft performance parameters.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
The EUROCONTROL Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC) permanently monitors the
|
|||
|
|
airspace capacity against traffic load. This allows us to have an accurate picture of the current
|
|||
|
|
and expected European ATM network situation. To ensure the transparent and efficient
|
|||
|
|
operation of the network, we collect all of the real-time data generated by the network and
|
|||
|
|
share it with all operational partners through our Data Collection and Distribution Services
|
|||
|
|
(DCS and DDS).
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
At the EUROCONTROL NMOC we measure, investigate and report on operational processes
|
|||
|
|
and activities throughout all domains relevant to Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management.
|
|||
|
|
All stakeholders provide feedback on the efficiency of the flight planning and airspace data
|
|||
|
|
processing. We compare forecasts with the actual measured outcome in terms of delay and
|
|||
|
|
route extension, while taking into account performance targets. This helps us improve the
|
|||
|
|
performance of the European ATM Network.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2 project (Ref 101114697)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO-2 is building on the deliverables of the ECHO (European Concept of Higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations) project, starting from the
|
|||
|
|
Concept of Operations, to propose validated solutions paving the way towards the
|
|||
|
|
operational integration of HAO in ATM.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO project (ref. SESARER4-
|
|||
|
|
19-2019)
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO (European Concept of Higher airspace Operations) Project aimed at delivering a
|
|||
|
|
comprehensive demand analysis and a comprehensive, innovative and feasible Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Operations enabling near term and future Higher Airspace operations in a safe and orderly
|
|||
|
|
manner.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
NMVP
|
|||
|
|
Validation platform allowing to design and validate solutions for Network Management in a
|
|||
|
|
more flexible way. Validations can now be replayed across NM’s backend systems (Enhanced
|
|||
|
|
Tactical Flow Management System, Integrated Initial Flight Plan Processing System) and the
|
|||
|
|
front-end systems.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 12 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 12 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 13 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 13 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999936820
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
DFS DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG GMBH
|
|||
|
|
Short name: DFS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town LANGEN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 63225
|
|||
|
|
Street AM DFS CAMPUS 10
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 14 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 14 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 15 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 15 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Andreas Last name* UDOVIC
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* andreas.udovic@dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Town LANGEN Post code 63225
|
|||
|
|
Street AM DFS CAMPUS 10
|
|||
|
|
Website www.dfs.de
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Project Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department Operational Planing
|
|||
|
|
Phone +49610370705758 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Alexander SEYBOLD alexander.seybold@dfs.de +49610370702034
|
|||
|
|
Oliver ALBERT oliver.albert@dfs.de +4961037072073
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 16 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 16 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 17 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 17 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 18 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 18 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication • Presentation of „Obelisk“ auf den Kongress „HAPS4ESA Workshop“, 12-14.02.2024,
|
|||
|
|
Leiden
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
• Article: Obelisk - Operationelles Betriebskonzept zur sicheren und effizienten
|
|||
|
|
Luftraumintegration von Stratosphärenplattformen, DFS-Zeitschrift „Innovation im Fokus“
|
|||
|
|
publication in preparation for 2025 foreseen
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
OBELISK • German national founded projetct „Obelisk Operationelles Betriebskonzept zur
|
|||
|
|
sicheren und effizienten Luftraumintegration von Stratosphärenplattformen“ 2019-2024
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 • Participation on „ECHO 2 European Concept für High Altitude Operations 2”
|
|||
|
|
2023-2026
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 19 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 19 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 20 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 20 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
942346077
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
LUFTFARTSVERKET
|
|||
|
|
Short name: SWEDISH CIVIL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town NORRKOPING
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 602 27
|
|||
|
|
Street HOSPITALSGATAN 30
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 20/03/2014 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 21 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 21 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 22 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 22 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Lindsey Last name* MARTENEZ-HERMOSILLA
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* lindsey.martenez-hermosilla@lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Town NORRKOPING Post code 602 27
|
|||
|
|
Street HOSPITALSGATAN 30
|
|||
|
|
Website www.lfv.se
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. LFV SESAR Programme- and Contribution Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department LUFTFARTSVERKET
|
|||
|
|
Phone +46 721 429 192 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Ms
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Stefan SIGGELIN stefan.siggelin@lfv.se +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 23 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 23 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 24 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 24 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 25 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 25 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR1 ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
The SESAR IR1 ECHO2 project was built on the deliverables of the ECHO (European Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Higher airspace Operations) project. LFV participated in ECHO2 withc ATCO expertise, both
|
|||
|
|
with the Concept of Operations, but also as active participants of the project EXE.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
LFV Research and Innovation
|
|||
|
|
Centre
|
|||
|
|
Located at ATCC Malmö, the LFV R&D Centre is equipped with lab, simulators, and conference
|
|||
|
|
facilities, and is capable of conducting human-in-the-loop simulations and demonstrations.
|
|||
|
|
The available simulators include NARSIM (for ACC, APP, and TWR), the SAAB RTS simulator,
|
|||
|
|
and the UTM City platform.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 26 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 26 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 27 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 27 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
969294229
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
EUROPEAN SATELLITE SERVICES PROVIDER SAS
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ESSP
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 31400
|
|||
|
|
Street 3 RUE TARFAYA
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Webpage essp-sas.eu
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 25/09/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 28 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 28 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Service Provision Unit
|
|||
|
|
Street carretera de la base
|
|||
|
|
Town TORREJON DE ARDOZ
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28850
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 29 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 29 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Alvaro Last name* MORILLO
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* alvaro.morillo@essp-sas.eu
|
|||
|
|
Town Torrejón de Ardoz Post code 28850
|
|||
|
|
Street Carretera de la base km 0,8
|
|||
|
|
Website www.essp-sas.eu
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Surveillance key account manager
|
|||
|
|
Department Strategy and Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34 672 280 598 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Peter LUBRANI peter.lubrani@essp-sas.eu +34 (9182) 62176
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 30 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 30 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 31 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 31 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 32 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 32 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 Contribution to different deliverables: SPR, OSED, CBA, Standards and regulations
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 33 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 33 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 34 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 34 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
997542763
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
NATS (EN ROUTE) PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
|
|||
|
|
Short name: NATS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM
|
|||
|
|
Postcode PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.nats.aero
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 35 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 35 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name NATS (En Route) Public Limited Company (CTC)
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Postcode PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 36 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 36 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Patrick Last name* GILES
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* patrick.giles@nats.co.uk
|
|||
|
|
Town FAREHAM Post code PO15 7FL
|
|||
|
|
Street 4000 PARKWAY WHITELEY
|
|||
|
|
Website www.nats.aero
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Manager, ATM Portfolio - D&B Future Concepts
|
|||
|
|
Department NATS (En Route) Public Limited Company (CTC)
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Alison ROBERTS alison.roberts@nats.co.uk +447917558035
|
|||
|
|
Richard PUGH richard.pugh@nats.co.uk +447827954671
|
|||
|
|
Matthew GREEN matthew.green@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Richard HAYWARD richard.hayward@nats.co.uk +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 37 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 37 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Patrick Giles Man United Kingdom patrick.giles@nat
|
|||
|
|
s.co.uk Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Richard Hayward Man United Kingdom richard.hayward
|
|||
|
|
@nats.co.uk
|
|||
|
|
Category C Recognised Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 38 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 38 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 39 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 39 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement Participation in SESAR ECHO 2 project, including leading the development of the OSED
|
|||
|
|
document for WP - High Altitude Platform Systems.
|
|||
|
|
Service Operational support to UK Ministry of Defence / US Air Force in Europe with regard to current
|
|||
|
|
(military) high altitude operations.
|
|||
|
|
Service Past operational experience of operating very high / very fast commercial airliners (Concorde).
|
|||
|
|
Service NATS provides Communication, Navigation and Surveillance services to commercial, private,
|
|||
|
|
and military aircraft within its designated areas of responsibility.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR 3 ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO 2 project is further developing concepts identified in the initial ECHO Concept of
|
|||
|
|
Operations document. This work will be a key input to the HAO-SCAN project as it is in the
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 discussions that the need for the HAO-SCAN project was identified.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 40 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 40 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 41 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 41 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
928673636
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
DIRECTION DES SERVICES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: DSNA
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town PARIS
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 75720
|
|||
|
|
Street 50 RUE HENRY FARMAN
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Webpage https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/controle-aerien
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 15/04/2015 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 42 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 42 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name DSNA
|
|||
|
|
Street 50 RUE HENRY FARMAN
|
|||
|
|
Town PARIS
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 75720
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 43 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 43 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Thierry Last name* ANDRE
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* thierry-d.andre@aviation-civile.gouv.fr
|
|||
|
|
Town Toulouse Cedex 1 Post code 31035
|
|||
|
|
Street 1 Av. du Dr Maurice Grynfogel - BP 53584
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. ATC expert
|
|||
|
|
Department Direction de la Technique et de l'Innovation
|
|||
|
|
Phone +33 660364397 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Laurence LAPOTRE laurence.lapotre@regis-dgac.net +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Francois-Xavier PRACH francois-xavier.prach@aviation-civile.gouv.fr +33 661711125
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 44 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 44 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 45 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 45 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 46 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 46 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
European concept of higher altitude operations - Phase 2: Towards ATM-HAO integration
|
|||
|
|
The objective is integration, management and monitoring of HAPS, super/hyper sonic, and
|
|||
|
|
space mission operations.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO European concept of higher altitude operations - Phase 1: Comprehensive demand analysis
|
|||
|
|
and basic concept operations (Conops) for higher airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 47 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 47 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 48 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 48 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
870906450
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
Short name: SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Brussels
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.skynavintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 27/09/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 49 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 49 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 50 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 50 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Ben Last name* KINGS
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* ben.kings@skynavintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Brussels Post code 1000
|
|||
|
|
Street Rue Coppens 16
|
|||
|
|
Website https://skynavintl.com/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Managing Director/Owner
|
|||
|
|
Department SkyNav Europe
|
|||
|
|
Phone +31615625092 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Belgium
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 51 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 51 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Ben Kings Man ben.kings@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com Category A Top grade reLeading Other ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Duncan Auld Man duncan.auld@sky
|
|||
|
|
navintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Zheng Tao Man zheng.tao@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Qina Diao Woman qina.diao@skyna
|
|||
|
|
vintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
Ms Julie Caraga Woman julie.caraga@sky
|
|||
|
|
navintl.com
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 52 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 52 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 53 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 53 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 subcontractor
|
|||
|
|
Participation in the ECHO2 consortium as a contractor focusing on higher airspace and space
|
|||
|
|
transport integration. Contributions include operational concept refinement, validation
|
|||
|
|
planning, stakeholder mapping, and alignment with ANSP procedures and Network functions.
|
|||
|
|
The work informs scalable approaches for trajectory management and airspace reservations.
|
|||
|
|
Includes project management and deliverable lead.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
Operational ATM experience
|
|||
|
|
Decades of global, operational Air Traffic Control experience across all ATC disciplines (Tower,
|
|||
|
|
Approach, Area, Oceanic) and at all function levels. Operational supervision, flow
|
|||
|
|
management, training, training management, safety and technical committee
|
|||
|
|
representation, operational procedure development, international cross-border negotiations,
|
|||
|
|
airspace design, safety risk assessments and environmental impact studies
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
ICAO drafting and representation
|
|||
|
|
Contributed to drafting and review activities at ICAO in relation to Annex 11, Annex 10 and
|
|||
|
|
PANS-ATM material. Work includes requirements structuring, procedure text, and consistency
|
|||
|
|
checks across datasets and guidance, supporting globally harmonised ATM provisions
|
|||
|
|
relevant to STO and HAO integration. Leading working groups on ATM planning &
|
|||
|
|
implementation, development of Global ATM Operational Concept, development of Aviation
|
|||
|
|
System Block Upgrades
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
State regulatory drafting and representation
|
|||
|
|
Several years of regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil
|
|||
|
|
aviation regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS,
|
|||
|
|
operations and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and
|
|||
|
|
regional provisions. Leadership of ICAO regional groups and task forces related to integration
|
|||
|
|
of space transport activities.
|
|||
|
|
Service
|
|||
|
|
Project Management & Leadership Expertise
|
|||
|
|
Extensive track record in project and organisational leadership, including executive roles
|
|||
|
|
within IFATCA (International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers’ Associations). Demonstrated
|
|||
|
|
ability to manage complex international initiatives, coordinate diverse stakeholders, and
|
|||
|
|
oversee multi-million-euro budgets. Proven experience in steering strategic aviation projects,
|
|||
|
|
ensuring delivery of innovative outcomes aligned with European policy & industry need
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SESAR ECHO / ECHO2 – HAO
|
|||
|
|
Integration
|
|||
|
|
Participation in ECHO and ECHO2 on higher airspace and space transport integration. Roles
|
|||
|
|
covered operational scenarios, requirements traceability, validation planning, stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
engagement and alignment with EUROCONTROL and ICAO practices for cross-border
|
|||
|
|
coordination and dynamic, minimal-impact airspace management.
|
|||
|
|
iNEO – Project Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
& Governance Appr.
|
|||
|
|
Development of a rigorous PMP and governance model for multi-partner R&D, covering
|
|||
|
|
schedule baselining, risk and compliance, quality assurance, and reporting. The approach
|
|||
|
|
underpins efficient WP coordination and is directly reusable for other HORIZON projects.
|
|||
|
|
UAE National Regulations
|
|||
|
|
Development Programme
|
|||
|
|
Regulatory drafting support for a Gulf State authority, updating national civil aviation
|
|||
|
|
regulations, AMC/GM-style guidance and implementation procedures across ANS, operations
|
|||
|
|
and oversight. Emphasis on practicality, traceability and alignment with ICAO and regional
|
|||
|
|
provisions.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 54 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 54 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 55 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 55 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 56 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 56 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
996375756
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ECOLE NATIONALE DE L AVIATION CIVILE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAC
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 31400
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... yes
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 27/05/2020 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 57 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 57 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name ENAC LAB
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 31400
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 58 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 58 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Georges Last name* MYKONIATIS
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* georges.mykoniatis@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Town TOULOUSE Post code 31400
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENUE EDOUARD BELIN 7
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Head of Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Department ENAC LAB
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country France
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Aurelie PEAUD aurelie.peuaud@enac.fr +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Florence LAPORTERIE-DEJEAN florence.laporterie-dejean@enac.fr +33562259509
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 59 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 59 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Murat Bronz Man France murat.bronz@en
|
|||
|
|
ac.fr Category A Top grade reLeading 0000-0002-1098-
|
|||
|
|
5240
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Rodolphe Fremond Man France rodolphe.fremon
|
|||
|
|
d@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0009-0008-1513-
|
|||
|
|
9597
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Georges Mykoniatis Man France georges.mykonia
|
|||
|
|
tis@enac.fr
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0002-5550-
|
|||
|
|
579X
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 60 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 60 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 61 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 61 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Elmira Fattahzadeh, G Mykoniatis. COOPERATIVE STRATEGIC DECONFLICTION FOR THE
|
|||
|
|
HIGHER AIRSPACE USERS. 9th International Conference on Experiments/Process/System
|
|||
|
|
Modeling/Simulation/Optimization, Jul 2021, Athens, Greece. ?hal-03320530?
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
R. Kallaka, J. Zhao, R. Fremond and A. Tsourdos, "Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for
|
|||
|
|
Multi-Objective UAV Routing Considering Operational Complexities," 2025 Integrated
|
|||
|
|
Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), Brussels, Belgium, 2025, pp.
|
|||
|
|
1-13, doi: 10.1109/ICNS65417.2025.10976917.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Avoni, L., Bronz, M., Condomines, J. P., & Moschetta, J. M. (2025). Enhancing ASWING Flight
|
|||
|
|
Dynamics Simulations with Closed-Loop Control for Flexible Aircraft. In AIAA AVIATION
|
|||
|
|
FORUM AND ASCEND 2025 (p. 3425).
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
A. Guitart, C. Demouge, D. Delahaye and E. Feron, "Multi Criteria Methodology for Aircraft
|
|||
|
|
Trajectory Planning Algorithm Selection: A Survey," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
|
|||
|
|
Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 12893-12911, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1109/
|
|||
|
|
TITS.2024.3397331.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Hachem, M., Roos, C., Miquel, T., & Bronz, M. (2025). Improving Incremental Nonlinear
|
|||
|
|
Dynamic Inversion Robustness Using Robust Control in Aerial Robotics. arXiv preprint
|
|||
|
|
arXiv:2501.07223.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO
|
|||
|
|
European Concept of Higher Airspace Operations - SESAR
|
|||
|
|
A concept of operations (ConOps) for higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo-project/
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
Towards the integration between ATM and Higher Altitude Operations - SESAR
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo2-project/
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 62 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 62 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 63 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 63 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999852236
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
LINKOPINGS UNIVERSITET
|
|||
|
|
Short name: LIU
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town LINKOPING
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 581 83
|
|||
|
|
Street CAMPUS VALLA
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.liu.se
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... yes
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 17/01/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 28/10/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 64 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 64 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Street ITN
|
|||
|
|
Town Norrköping
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 60374
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 65 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 65 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Valentin Last name* POLISHCHUK
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* valentin.polishchuk@liu.se
|
|||
|
|
Town Norrköping Post code 60374
|
|||
|
|
Street ITN
|
|||
|
|
Website http://tiny.cc/valatm
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Associate Professor
|
|||
|
|
Department Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Phone +460736569219 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Billy JOSEFSSON billy.josefsson@liu.se +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 66 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 66 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Billy Josefsson Man Sweden billy.josefsson@li
|
|||
|
|
u.se Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 67 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 67 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 68 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 68 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication L. Sedov, V. Polishchuk, V. Bulusu. Ground risk vs. Efficiency in Urban Drone Operations. ATM
|
|||
|
|
Seminar'21
|
|||
|
|
Publication L. Sedov, V. Polishchuk, T. Maury, M. Ulloa, D. Lykova. Qualitative and quantitative risk
|
|||
|
|
assessment of urban airspace operations. SID'21
|
|||
|
|
Publication J. Nunez-Portillo, T. Polishchuk, V. Polishchuk, H. Hardell. Evaluating Impact of Non-nominal
|
|||
|
|
Space Mission Event on Conventional Air Traffic. SID'23
|
|||
|
|
Publication V. Duchamp, L. Sedov, V. Polishchuk. Density-Adapting Layers towards PBN for UTM. ATM
|
|||
|
|
Seminar'19
|
|||
|
|
Software GUI for identifying areas subject to risk depending on CNS capabilities https://
|
|||
|
|
undefiened.github.io/uav_risk/
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2 EU HAO ConOps Phase 2
|
|||
|
|
UTMOK influence of CNS on VLL airspace capacity
|
|||
|
|
DAA UAV CNS requirements
|
|||
|
|
QRA identifying urban areas subject to risk depending on CNS capabilities
|
|||
|
|
Space data for CNS coordination with the US actors on CNS for rockets
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Quantitative Risk Analysis GUI for identifying areas subject to risk depending on CNS capabilities https://
|
|||
|
|
undefiened.github.io/uav_risk/
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 69 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 69 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 70 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 70 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999789768
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
C.I.R.A. CENTRO ITALIANO RICERCHE AEROSPAZIALI SCPA
|
|||
|
|
Short name: CIRA
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 81043
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 25/01/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 26/06/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 71 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 71 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Cross-Cutting Research Direction
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 81043
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 72 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 72 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Domenico Last name* Pascarella
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* d.pascarella@cira.it
|
|||
|
|
Town CAPUA Post code 81043
|
|||
|
|
Street VIA MAIORISE
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Deputy Head of Security Research Unit
|
|||
|
|
Department Cross-Cutting Research Direction
|
|||
|
|
Phone +390823623105 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Dr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Italy
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Angela VOZELLA a.vozella@cira.it +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Giovanni Cuciniello g.cuciniello@cira.it +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 73 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 73 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Domenico Pascarella Man Italy d.pascarella@cira.
|
|||
|
|
it Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0003-1332-
|
|||
|
|
4234
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Angela Vozella Woman Italy a.vozella@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0002-3215-
|
|||
|
|
9011
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Ivan Iudice Man Italy i.iudice@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0001-8504-
|
|||
|
|
7075
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Vittorio Ugo Castrillo Man Italy v.castrillo@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0003-4604-
|
|||
|
|
9750
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Giovanni Cuciniello Man Italy g.cuciniello@cira.
|
|||
|
|
it
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0001-8715-
|
|||
|
|
7606
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Gianfranco Morani Man Italy g.morani@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0002-9390-
|
|||
|
|
9736
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Dr Gianluca Corraro Man Italy g.corraro@cira.it Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0001-6188-
|
|||
|
|
4370
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 74 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 74 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 75 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 75 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Automated Identification and Evaluation of Threat Scenarios for U-Space Solutions (https://
|
|||
|
|
doi.org/10.1145/3735978) – This paper provides a preliminary definition of a model-based
|
|||
|
|
methodology for the automated security risk assessment of U-space solutions, employing the
|
|||
|
|
SESAR Security Risk Assessment Methodology (SecRAM) as a baseline. Results are presented for
|
|||
|
|
a case study about drone-based pharmaceutical delivery in U-space environment.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Security Assessment of Drone Teams and Swarms Using an Extended SecRAM Methodology
|
|||
|
|
(https://doi.org/10.1109/TechDefense63521.2024.10863721) – The paper provides a security
|
|||
|
|
risk assessment approach for multi-drone systems, based on an enhanced version of the SESAR
|
|||
|
|
Security Risk Assessment Methodology (SecRAM). A sandwich methodology is proposed,
|
|||
|
|
integrating model-based notation and systematic literature review. The approach is tested on
|
|||
|
|
a use case involving a drone team and a mobile edge server.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Design of Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces With Reconfigurable Amplitude and Phase for
|
|||
|
|
Multiuser Downlink Beamforming (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10824842) – The
|
|||
|
|
paper proposes a novel technology based on stacked intelligent metasurfaces (SIM) in wireless
|
|||
|
|
communication applications for multiuser downlink beamforming.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Navigation Algorithms for Precision Re-Entry of a Launcher First-Stage (http://
|
|||
|
|
dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-4094) – Development of Navigation Algorithms for re-entry of re-
|
|||
|
|
usable launcher systems.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Dual-Frequency Multi-Constellation Global Navigation Satellite System/Inertial
|
|||
|
|
Measurements Unit Tight Hybridization for Urban Air Mobility Applications (https://
|
|||
|
|
doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110955). Development of a tightly coupled sensor fusion
|
|||
|
|
between a dual-frequency multi-constellation GNSS receiver, an inertial measurements unit
|
|||
|
|
and the barometric altitude from an air data computer. The implemented navigation
|
|||
|
|
algorithm is integrated with autonomous fault detection and of GPS/Galileo/BeiDou
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
JARVIS
|
|||
|
|
SESAR IR Project (2023-2026) - CIRA is the SESAR solution leader of the ATC-DA (SESAR solution
|
|||
|
|
0365) for conflict resolution leveraging Reinforcement Learning. CIRA is also leading the task
|
|||
|
|
for providing the security risk assessment of ATC-DA.
|
|||
|
|
U-ELCOME
|
|||
|
|
CINEA Project (2022-2025) - Among other things, CIRA led and performed execution of the U-
|
|||
|
|
space Security Risk Assessment for the Italian cluster, providing: the specification and design of
|
|||
|
|
a model-based automated methodology for the Security Risk Assessment of U-space solutions;
|
|||
|
|
the implementation of the methodology to U-space pharmaceutical delivery.
|
|||
|
|
SMART
|
|||
|
|
Italian PNRR Project (2024-2025) - Development of smart metasurfaces for advancing radio
|
|||
|
|
technologies in smart propagation environments for dual IoT 6G applications. CIRA
|
|||
|
|
contributes to the development/prototyping of algorithms for the synthesis of reconfigurable
|
|||
|
|
metasurfaces platforms in use cases related to future aerial platforms assisting 6G and beyond
|
|||
|
|
future communications.
|
|||
|
|
SALFGEN
|
|||
|
|
Development of Avionics for Future Generation Reusable Launchers funded by Italian Space
|
|||
|
|
Agency. In this framework CIRA performed the development and numerical verification of the
|
|||
|
|
Guidance, Navigation and Control algorithms for the re-entry and precision landing of a
|
|||
|
|
Launcher First-Stage and supported the partners in the definition of an Automatic Flight
|
|||
|
|
Termination System for Launchers.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 76 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 76 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
USV-DTFT2
|
|||
|
|
Development of the GNC system for both ascent and descent phase of the CIRA FTB-2
|
|||
|
|
unmanned Re-entry vehicle which performed an unpropelled re-entry Drop-Test from an
|
|||
|
|
altitude of about 25Km carried-up by a stratospheric balloon. GNC algorithms include
|
|||
|
|
dedicate Virtual air data sensor aimed to estimate air data measurement without dedicate air
|
|||
|
|
data sensors.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 77 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 77 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 78 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 78 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
870545901
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SCEYE SPAIN S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: Sceye Spain
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28002
|
|||
|
|
Street Suero de Quiñones 34-36
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.sceye.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 04/09/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 79 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 79 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 80 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 80 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Alfredo Last name* SERRANO
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* as@sceye.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Madrid Post code 28002
|
|||
|
|
Street Suero de Quiñones 34-36
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Director of EMEA
|
|||
|
|
Department SCEYE SPAIN S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Stephanie LUONGO sl@sceye.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Leonard BOYGUES leonard.bouygues@gmail.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 81 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 81 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Leonard Bouygues Non-binary France lb@sceye.com Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 82 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 82 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 83 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 83 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
Sceye platform is the most capable LTA HAPS currently in operation. Sceye has flown
|
|||
|
|
successfully more than 20 missions into the stratosphere, demonstrating day-night endurance
|
|||
|
|
using solar power and battery storage, while keeping station over the area of operation.
|
|||
|
|
We have flown multiple payloads, including optical and hyperspectral imaging cameras, SAR,
|
|||
|
|
4G telecommunications, infrasonic sensors, and aerosol particle spectrometers, validating the
|
|||
|
|
platform’s ability to carry diverse instrument
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
Cooperation with NASA
|
|||
|
|
Demonstrated cooperative deconfliction capabilities with other HAPS operators through
|
|||
|
|
NASA-led CE1.5 simulation
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Cooperative, Seamless, and Global Digital Skies for Higher Airspace (2025) - HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
Aviation Working Group
|
|||
|
|
The Aerospace Industries Association proposes collaborative traffic management for higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace to manage exponential growth of UAS, supersonic, HAPS, and commercial space
|
|||
|
|
operations. This involves community-based rules (user-formed, CAA-approved) and operators
|
|||
|
|
sharing intent via service providers for conflict identification and resolution, ensuring safe and
|
|||
|
|
equitable global mnmg
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Acceptable Levels of Risks for HAPS (2024) - HAPS Alliance Aviation Working Group
|
|||
|
|
For High Altitude Platform Systems, the HAPS Alliance advocates third-party-centric risk
|
|||
|
|
metrics, measuring risk to ground populations and manned aircraft. This replaces inadequate
|
|||
|
|
platform-centric aviation metrics. The framework sets individual and collective risk limits,
|
|||
|
|
aligned with existing infrastructure risks (e.g.UK ALARP), enabling operators to dynamically
|
|||
|
|
self-manage risk by controlling operational factor
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Operation Using Attended Autonomous Fleet Systems (2022) - HAPS Alliance Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Working Group
|
|||
|
|
A proposal for Collaborative Traffic Management for the Stratosphere (CTMS) for Attended
|
|||
|
|
Autonomous Fleet Systems. This strategy enables safe, scalable HAPS operations through
|
|||
|
|
automation for fleet management and M2M conflict resolution. It uses Community Based
|
|||
|
|
Rules (CBR) and is an exception-centric approach, where human supervisory networks
|
|||
|
|
manage system anomalies, not individual vehicles
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Direct-to-Device Connectivity
|
|||
|
|
In May 2021, Sceye set a long range record in 4G broadband connectivity from the
|
|||
|
|
stratosphere connecting directly with smartphones on the ground . For this demonstrator,
|
|||
|
|
Sceye used the latest generation OpenRAN equipment and demonstrated true direct-to-device
|
|||
|
|
broadband connectivity up to a distance of 140Km with only 5 MHz spectrum.
|
|||
|
|
MIMO Array Antenna
|
|||
|
|
In October 2021, Sceye successfully connected a 4G antenna with 3D beamforming from the
|
|||
|
|
stratosphere.
|
|||
|
|
This was the first time that an active array antenna with 3D beamforming technology
|
|||
|
|
connected directly from the stratosphere to a smartphone on the ground, demonstrating that
|
|||
|
|
Sceye's HAPS can use its altitude and range to efficiently extend broadband across areas
|
|||
|
|
without coverage.
|
|||
|
|
First Full-Diurnal Flight for LTA
|
|||
|
|
In August 2024), Sceye achieved a 24+ hour stratospheric flight, demonstrating day-night
|
|||
|
|
endurance using solar power and battery storage. Sceye is the first HAPS platform to ever
|
|||
|
|
demonstrate closure of power loop while staying over an area of operation. The HAPS
|
|||
|
|
maintained position over a target area, carried advanced payloads (optical cameras, infrared
|
|||
|
|
sensors, synthetic aperture radar), and enabled wildfire detection, and methane leak
|
|||
|
|
monitoring
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 84 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 84 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
NASA and EPA Partnership
|
|||
|
|
Signed a Space Act Agreement with NASA and a cooperating research and development
|
|||
|
|
agreement with the USGS to use HAPS for climate and disaster monitoring (e.g., methane
|
|||
|
|
leaks, wildfires, ecosystem surveys). Sceye achieved world’s first real-time methane detection
|
|||
|
|
from the stratosphere in partnership with U.S EPA & State of New Mexico
|
|||
|
|
Pre-commercial Telecom
|
|||
|
|
Demonstrator
|
|||
|
|
Engaged with international Telecom operators to fly communication and observation
|
|||
|
|
missions in the Americas and East Asia to demonstrate 4G/5G coverage from stratosphere for
|
|||
|
|
unserved areas and provide emergency communication and observation support to first
|
|||
|
|
responders in case of natural disaster.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Platform
|
|||
|
|
Sceye's High Altitude Platform System (HAPS) is a Lighter-than-Air platform designed, built,
|
|||
|
|
and tested to ensure reliable launch, ascent, and transition to float altitude in the stratosphere.
|
|||
|
|
Sceye's HAPS can carry and power 200kg+ of diverse payload systems, enabling it as a multi-
|
|||
|
|
mission platform
|
|||
|
|
Stratoport Hangar
|
|||
|
|
Sceye has established cooperation with Government of Aragon in Spain to set up a Hangar at
|
|||
|
|
Teruel Airport facilities spanning across 20ha, for production and operations of Sceye HAPS to
|
|||
|
|
support commercial missions across EMEA which will support the creation of highly-skilled
|
|||
|
|
employment in the region
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 85 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 85 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 86 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 86 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
875470494
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SKYDWELLER CANARIAS SL
|
|||
|
|
Short name: SKYDWELLER CANARIAS SL
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town PUERTO DEL ROSARIO
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 35612
|
|||
|
|
Street ANTIGUO AEROPUERTO DE LOS ESTANCOS
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 07/11/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 87 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 87 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Street Carretera de Fuencarral 5
|
|||
|
|
Town Alcobendas
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28108
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 88 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 88 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Sebastien Last name* RENOUARD
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sebastien.renouard@skydweller.aero
|
|||
|
|
Town Alcobendas Post code 28108
|
|||
|
|
Street Calle de Fuencaral 5
|
|||
|
|
Website https://www.skydweller.aero/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Chief Commercial Officer EMEA
|
|||
|
|
Department Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34648235463 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Antoine LECA antoine.leca@skydweller.aero +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 89 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 89 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Jose Vega Man Spain jose.vega@skydw
|
|||
|
|
eller.aero Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
Mr Ruben Moreno Man Spain ruben.moreno@s
|
|||
|
|
kydweller.aero
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 90 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 90 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 91 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 91 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
SKYDWELLER participates in this project that will build on research from the ECHO project on
|
|||
|
|
developing a concept of operations (CONOPS) for higher airspace. Specifically, the project will
|
|||
|
|
focus on introducing to the CONOPS a module on space launch real-time monitoring, and
|
|||
|
|
packages covering ground and air-ground operational integration procedures. The
|
|||
|
|
integration of High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) is also covered.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Skydweller HAPS The Skydweller HAPS is based on the Solar Impulse 2 aircraft– the culmination of 14 years of
|
|||
|
|
engineering work and over €190 million in research and development
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 92 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 92 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 93 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 93 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
892237138
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SKYDWELLER SL
|
|||
|
|
Short name: SKYDWELLER
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town CIUDAD REAL
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 13300
|
|||
|
|
Street AERODROMO MANUEL SANCHEZ VALDEPENAS
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage skydweller.aero
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is unknown (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 94 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 94 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Street Carretera de Fuencarral 5
|
|||
|
|
Town Alcobendas
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28108
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 95 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 95 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 96 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 96 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 97 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 97 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 98 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 98 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 99 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 99 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
906263241
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
PARQUE TECNOLOGICO DE FUERTEVENTURASA MP
|
|||
|
|
Short name: PARQUE TECNOLOGICO DE FUERTEVENTURASA MP
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town PUERTO DEL ROSARIO
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 35613
|
|||
|
|
Street LUGAR AEROPUERTO DE LOS ESTANCOS
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.ptfue.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/12/2021 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 100 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 100 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Street ITN
|
|||
|
|
Town Norrköping
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 60374
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 101 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 101 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Sergio David Last name* DIAZ MARTINEZ
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sdiaz@ptfue.com
|
|||
|
|
Town PUERTO DEL ROSARIO Post code 35613
|
|||
|
|
Street LUGAR AEROPUERTO DE LOS ESTANCOS
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. HEAD OF SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIC PROJECTS AREA
|
|||
|
|
Department SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIC PROJECTS
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Ayose Kim HERNANDEZ akim@ptfue.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Jorge FERREIRA GOMEZ jferreira@ptfue.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Alvaro LOPEZ alopez@ptfue.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 102 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 102 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 103 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 103 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 104 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 104 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 105 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 105 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 106 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 106 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
875281053
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
Elson Space España S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: Elson Space España
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Teruel
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 44195
|
|||
|
|
Street Poligano Industrial PLATEA ZONA LI-1, Num. 5
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage https://elsonspace.com/
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 19/11/2024 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 107 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 107 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 108 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 108 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Míriam Last name* Royo Navarro
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* miriam@elsonspace.com
|
|||
|
|
Town Teruel Post code 44195
|
|||
|
|
Street Poligano Industrial PLATEA ZONA LI-1, Num. 5
|
|||
|
|
Website https://elsonspace.com/elson-space-espana/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Managing Director
|
|||
|
|
Department Elson Space España S.L.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34639277383 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Ms
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Chris Hall chris.h@elsonspace.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 109 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 109 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 110 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 110 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 111 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 111 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 112 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 112 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 113 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 113 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
999981731
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND RAUMFAHRT EV
|
|||
|
|
Short name: DLR
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town KOLN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 51147
|
|||
|
|
Street LINDER HOHE
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 03/01/2022 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 28/10/2008 - no
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 114 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 114 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Institut of Flight Guidance
|
|||
|
|
Street Lilienthalplatz 7
|
|||
|
|
Town Braunschweig
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 38108
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 115 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 115 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Sven Last name* Kaltenhaeuser
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sven.kaltenhaeuser@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Town Braunschweig Post code 38108
|
|||
|
|
Street Lilienthalplatz 7
|
|||
|
|
Website dlr.de/fl
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Head of Department ATM-SIM
|
|||
|
|
Department Institut of Flight Guidance
|
|||
|
|
Phone +49 531 295 2560 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Germany
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz Losensky lorenz.losensky@dlr.de +49 531 295 1155
|
|||
|
|
Dirk-Roger Schmitt dirk-roger.schmitt@dlr.de +49 172 295 4416
|
|||
|
|
Andreas Hasselberg andreas.hasselberg@dlr.de +49 531 295 2427
|
|||
|
|
fl controlling fl-controlling@dlr.de +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 116 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 116 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Mr Richard Hörder Man Germany richard.hoerder@
|
|||
|
|
dlr.de Category D First stage r Team member Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Jens Hampe Man Germany Jens.Hampe@dlr.
|
|||
|
|
de
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0003-3105-
|
|||
|
|
1516
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Frank Morlang Man Germany Frank.Morlang@d
|
|||
|
|
lr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member 0000-0003-3636-
|
|||
|
|
5215
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Maximilian Neumann Man Germany Maximilian.Neum
|
|||
|
|
ann@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Tobias Rabus Man Germany tobias.rabus@dlr.
|
|||
|
|
de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0000-0003-1947-
|
|||
|
|
5447
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Lorenz Losensky Man Germany lorenz.losensky@
|
|||
|
|
dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category D First stage r Team member 0000-0003-2085-
|
|||
|
|
7979
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
Mr Sven Kaltenhäuser Man Germany sven.kaltenhaeus
|
|||
|
|
er@dlr.de
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Leading 0000-0002-8762-
|
|||
|
|
1971
|
|||
|
|
Orcid ID
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 117 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 117 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 118 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 118 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Klünker, Carmo und Schmitt, Dirk-Roger (2022) Interoperable data
|
|||
|
|
exchange for safe and efficient launch and re-entry operations in an international
|
|||
|
|
environment, In: Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC. 73rd
|
|||
|
|
International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 18.-22. Okt. 2022, Paris, France
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Stahnke, Anouk und Rabus, Tobias und Kaltenhäuser, Sven (2022) Supporting the safety and
|
|||
|
|
efficiency of airspace transition for launch and re-entry operations in Europe, 2nd
|
|||
|
|
International Conference on Flight Vehicles, Aerothermodynamics and Re-entry Missions &
|
|||
|
|
Engineering (FAR), 19 - 23 June 2022. Heilbronn, Germany
|
|||
|
|
Other achievement
|
|||
|
|
MAPHEUS is DLR’s annual sounding rocket programme, reaching ~260 km altitude and ~6
|
|||
|
|
minutes of microgravity. Since 2009, 15 missions enabled high-impact experiments in
|
|||
|
|
materials science, life sciences, and technology testing. Achievements include rapid payload
|
|||
|
|
turnaround, safe recovery, and results published in international journals, strengthening
|
|||
|
|
Europe’s leadership in microgravity research.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Hampe, Jens und Rabus, Tobias und Morlang, Frank und Losensky,
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz (2024) The SpaceTracks approach for an efficient Integration of Launch Operations in
|
|||
|
|
European Airspace. In: 1st International Symposium on Small Launchers and Spaceports. 1st
|
|||
|
|
International Symposium on Small Launchers and Spaceports, 2024-10-28 - 2024-10-30,
|
|||
|
|
Harwell, Vereinigtes Königreich. Volltext nicht online.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Kaltenhäuser, Sven und Hampe, Jens und Rabus, Tobias und Morlang, Frank und Losensky,
|
|||
|
|
Lorenz (2024) Towards Efficient Integration of Rocket Launches and Re-entry Operations in
|
|||
|
|
European Airspace: Development and Testing of a Launch Coordination Center. In:
|
|||
|
|
Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC. 75th International Astronautical
|
|||
|
|
Congres, 2024-10-14 - 2024-10-18, Mailand, Italien. ISSN 0074-1795.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO Project
|
|||
|
|
European Concept of Higher Airspace Operations.
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo-project/
|
|||
|
|
Project led by EUROCONTROL with major DLR participation delivering a comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
demand analysis and the concept of operations (ConOps) for higher airspace to allow safe,
|
|||
|
|
efficient and scalable operations.The ConOps also provide the basis to identify future
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure needs that is required to support Higher Airspace Operations (HAO).
|
|||
|
|
DLR/FAA DEP
|
|||
|
|
DLR - FAA Data Exchange Project.
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/content/en/articles/news/2019/04/20191025_dlr-and-us-federal-
|
|||
|
|
aviationadministration-are-cooperating.html
|
|||
|
|
DLR and the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the US Federal Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Administration (FAA) identified the data that need to be exchanged between United States
|
|||
|
|
and European Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) prior to, during and after a launch.
|
|||
|
|
ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
https://higherairspace.eu/echo2-project/
|
|||
|
|
The ECHO 2 Project is dedicated to enhancing air traffic management by integrating space
|
|||
|
|
mission monitoring for launches and re-entries within the EUROCONTROL Network Manager
|
|||
|
|
area. It focuses on creating operational frameworks to manage space operations, including
|
|||
|
|
orbital and sub-orbital trajectories, ensuring they harmonize with existing air traffic.
|
|||
|
|
MAPHEUS
|
|||
|
|
MAPHEUS is a DLR rocket programme providing a proven platform for interdisciplinary
|
|||
|
|
microgravity research, managed end-to-end by DLR institutes and partners. Activities include
|
|||
|
|
payload development, qualification, campaign execution, and post-flight analysis. With 15
|
|||
|
|
successful launches, MAPHEUS demonstrates strong capacity for complex, multi-partner
|
|||
|
|
missions, directly relevant to space access, technology validation, and ESA cooperation
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 119 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 119 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
DLR Launch Coordination Center
|
|||
|
|
(LCC) Development -
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/en/latest/news/2021/03/20210923_dlr-is-developing-a-launch-
|
|||
|
|
coordination-center
|
|||
|
|
DLR's LCC integrates software-based procedures for safe, efficient space launch coordination
|
|||
|
|
through airspace. System includes automated planning components, real-time mission
|
|||
|
|
monitoring via Space Operations Dashboard, and enhanced air traffic controller interfaces.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Air Traffic Validation Center
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/fl/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-1140/
|
|||
|
|
DLR facilities for the validation of concepts, technologies and procedures in air traffic
|
|||
|
|
management. Together, these facilities are known as the Air Traffic Validation Center and are
|
|||
|
|
unique in Europe.
|
|||
|
|
MAPHEUS
|
|||
|
|
https://www.dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/mapheus
|
|||
|
|
MAPHEUS DLR rocket programme providing a proven platform for interdisciplinary research
|
|||
|
|
with sounding rockets.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 120 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 120 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 121 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 121 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
998162690
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
PILDO CONSULTING SL
|
|||
|
|
Short name: PILDOLABS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town BARCELONA
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 08019
|
|||
|
|
Street c/ Bac de Roda 120 (Local 2)
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.pildo.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 31/12/2021 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... 31/12/2021 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 17/02/2009 - yes
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 122 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 122 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Engineering Business Unit
|
|||
|
|
Street c/ Bac de Roda 120 (Local 2)
|
|||
|
|
Town BARCELONA
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 08019
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 123 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 123 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Santiago Last name* Soley
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* santiago.soley@pildo.com
|
|||
|
|
Town BARCELONA Post code 08019
|
|||
|
|
Street c/ Bac de Roda 120 (Local 2)
|
|||
|
|
Website https://pildo.com/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. CEO
|
|||
|
|
Department PILDO CONSULTING SL
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34 931828840 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Daniel Garcia daniel.garcia@pildo.com +34 931828840
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 124 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 124 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 125 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 125 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 126 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 126 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
The OWL: Software tool aimed at monitoring GNSS and SBAS performances and detect RF
|
|||
|
|
interferences at airports, heliports, and vertiports, ensuring the signal is compliant with ICAO
|
|||
|
|
requirements.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
SBAS Altimetry Project funded by EUROCONTROL to validate the use of SBAS as in support to altimetry and
|
|||
|
|
speed determination in current helicopter GNSS-based operations.
|
|||
|
|
SAMVA
|
|||
|
|
Led by PildoLabs, the project aimed to foster the adoption of EGNOS technology in rotorcraft
|
|||
|
|
service provision, laying the groundwork for the seamless integration of autonomous VTOL
|
|||
|
|
aircraft.
|
|||
|
|
DELOREAN
|
|||
|
|
Led by PildoLabs, the project aimed to develop EGNSS requirements for the integration of
|
|||
|
|
urban air mobility operations. The project was underpinned by operational cases, engaging
|
|||
|
|
two main commercial service operators. The project was based on the use of COTS drones, and
|
|||
|
|
experimental avionics with advanced EGNSS receivers.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
PildoBox
|
|||
|
|
Compact custom-designed device that integrates a MCMF GNSS receiver, an ADS-B receiver,
|
|||
|
|
and a small-form computer. Designed for 24/7 operation, with support for remote
|
|||
|
|
configuration and diagnostics.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 127 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 127 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 128 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 128 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
997701843
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Webpage http://www.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ yes
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is not an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/06/1991 - no
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 129 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 129 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Innovation Division
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 28022
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 130 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 130 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Francisco Jose Last name* JIMENEZ RONCERO
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* fjroncero@enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Town MADRID Post code 28022
|
|||
|
|
Street AVENIDA DE ARAGON S/N BLOQUE 330, PORTAL 2 PARQUE EMPRESARIAL LAS
|
|||
|
|
Website www.enaire.es
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Innovation Manager
|
|||
|
|
Department Innvoation Division
|
|||
|
|
Phone +34 634 880 079 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Spain
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Daniel Dominguez Perez ddoperez@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Javier Garcia Moreno jgmoreno@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Francisco Manuel Tortosa Lopez fmtortosa@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Alberto Blanch Romero abromero@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Jorge Vellon Benito jvellon@e-externas.enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Jesus Mario GARCIA CANO jmgcano@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Fernando DIAZ GARCIA fdigarcia@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Mohammed SHIPON mshipon@enaire.es +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 131 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 131 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 132 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 132 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 133 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 133 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
ECHO 2
|
|||
|
|
The main objective of this project is the modernisation and adaptation of the European ATM
|
|||
|
|
system that allows the integration of the so-called high-altitude operations or Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations (HAO). These types of operations occur above flight level FL550, that is, operations
|
|||
|
|
above 17,000 meters, while flights usually take place around 10,000 meters.
|
|||
|
|
EUSTM
|
|||
|
|
EUSTM is an end-to end activity towards the definition of a future STM capability:
|
|||
|
|
· Defining the needs in terms of organisation and responsibilities, technology, policy, laws,
|
|||
|
|
guidelines, best practices and standards
|
|||
|
|
· Elaborating detailed specs, a preliminary design, a reference roadmap and a ROM cost
|
|||
|
|
analysis
|
|||
|
|
· Developing an innovative collaborative platform for exchange of information inside the team
|
|||
|
|
and with external stakeholders
|
|||
|
|
· Creating a community of interest on STM
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 134 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 134 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 135 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 135 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
873172467
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
OpenUTM Ltd.
|
|||
|
|
Short name: OpenUTM
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Dublin
|
|||
|
|
Postcode D04 T4A6
|
|||
|
|
Street Mespil Business Center, Mespil House, Sussex Ho
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Webpage https://openutm.net
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 14/02/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 136 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 136 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Street Mespil Business Center, Mespil House, Su
|
|||
|
|
Town Dublin
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Postcode D04 T4A6
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 137 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 137 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Hrishikesh Last name* Ballal
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* hb@openutm.net
|
|||
|
|
Town Dublin Post code D04 T4A6
|
|||
|
|
Street Mespil Business Center, Mespil House, Sussex House
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Managing Director
|
|||
|
|
Department OpenUTM Ltd.
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Ireland
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 138 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 138 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Hrishikesh Ballal Man Ireland hb@openutm.net Category B Senior resea Leading
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 139 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 139 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 140 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 140 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
OpenUTM is an open-source, standards-compliant stack for Unmanned Traffic Management
|
|||
|
|
(UTM), designed to help organizations build and deploy regulation-ready systems for
|
|||
|
|
managing drone and unmanned aircraft traffic. Its architecture is built around two core
|
|||
|
|
components: Flight Blender, a backend service handling Remote ID, air traffic data,
|
|||
|
|
geofencing, and strategic deconfliction, and Flight Spotlight, a frontend interface providing
|
|||
|
|
maps, timelines, flight noticeboards, and 3D visualizations.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 141 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 141 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 142 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 142 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
894907645
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
ANRA TECHNOLOGIES UK LTD
|
|||
|
|
Short name: ANRA TECHNOLOGIES UK LTD
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town CRANFIELD, BEDS
|
|||
|
|
Postcode MK43 0DG
|
|||
|
|
Street 114 HIGH STREET
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.flyanra.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 09/09/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 143 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 143 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Street 114 HIGH STREET
|
|||
|
|
Town CRANFIELD, BEDS
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Postcode MK43 0DG
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 144 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 144 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Amit Last name* Ganjoo
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* aganjoo@flyanra.com
|
|||
|
|
Town CRANFIELD, BEDS Post code MK43 0DG
|
|||
|
|
Street 114 HIGH STREET
|
|||
|
|
Website Please enter website
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. CEO
|
|||
|
|
Department ANRA TECHNOLOGIES UK LTD
|
|||
|
|
Phone +xxx xxxxxxxxx Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country United Kingdom
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Brent Klavon bklavon@flyanra.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Ajay Modha amodha@flyanra.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 145 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 145 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Ajay Modha Man United Kingdom amodha@flyanra.
|
|||
|
|
com Category A Top grade reLeading
|
|||
|
|
Mr David Murphy Man United Kingdom dmurphy@flyanr
|
|||
|
|
a.com
|
|||
|
|
Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 146 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 146 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 147 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 147 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
ANRA NOON: ANRA is an EASA certified U-space Service Provider, and ANRA NOON is an
|
|||
|
|
airspace management software platform for uncrewed aircraft. U-space services support the
|
|||
|
|
management of uncrewed aircraft operations in U-space airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Software
|
|||
|
|
ANRA's AWARE tool: Provides supplemental data for flight safety and business intelligence. The
|
|||
|
|
service facilitates geospatial data layers such as network infrastructure or weather to be
|
|||
|
|
included into UTM services such as flight authorisation and monitoring services during flight.
|
|||
|
|
Software ANRA's SIM tool: Provides the engine to drive a Digital Twin experience for virtual drone
|
|||
|
|
operations
|
|||
|
|
Software ANRA AAM Traffic Management tool: airspace management for Advanced Air Mobility aircraft
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Corus five (2025-2028)
|
|||
|
|
Corus five aims to facilitate full airspace integration of UAS systems alongside existing
|
|||
|
|
airspace users providing a reference architecture, addressing air traffic management service
|
|||
|
|
gaps in flight rules and airspace management and informing both regulatory gaps and future
|
|||
|
|
R&D requirements
|
|||
|
|
Managing Shared Airspace (2025 -
|
|||
|
|
2026)
|
|||
|
|
The project aims to implement and validate a UK Concept of Operations for UTM supported
|
|||
|
|
UAS operations. It seeks to operationalise an industry-driven approach for UTM services that
|
|||
|
|
support multiple overlapping Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations within shared
|
|||
|
|
airspace.
|
|||
|
|
U-ELCOME (2022-2025)
|
|||
|
|
The U-ELCOME project is designed to support Europe-wide U-space implementation off the
|
|||
|
|
ground by fostering a fully scalable market uptake of U1 and U2 U-space services through a set
|
|||
|
|
of tests and demonstrations in various operational environments across 15 locations,
|
|||
|
|
including includes integrations with national ATC providers, in Spain, Italy, and France.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Cloud-based service Cloud service access in line with commercially deployed ones
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 148 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 148 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 149 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 149 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
881888402
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
SKYPUZZLER APS
|
|||
|
|
Short name: Skypuzzler
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town COPENHAGEN
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 1100
|
|||
|
|
Street OSTERGADE 16 4
|
|||
|
|
Country Denmark
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.skypuzzler.com
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... no
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 20/07/2023 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... 31/12/2023 - yes
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 150 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 150 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
No department involved
|
|||
|
|
Department name Name of the department/institute carrying out the work.
|
|||
|
|
Street Please enter street name and number.
|
|||
|
|
Town Please enter the name of the town.
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Please select a country
|
|||
|
|
Postcode Area code.
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 151 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 151 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Main contact person
|
|||
|
|
This will be the person the EU services will contact concerning this proposal (e.g. for additional information, invitation to hearings, sending of
|
|||
|
|
evaluation results, convocation to start grant preparation). The data in blue is read-only. Details (name, first name and e-mail) of Main Contact
|
|||
|
|
persons should be edited in the step "Participants" of the submission wizard.
|
|||
|
|
First name* Sebastian Last name* Babiarz
|
|||
|
|
E-Mail* sebastian.babiarz@skypuzzler.com
|
|||
|
|
Town COPENHAGEN Post code 1100
|
|||
|
|
Street OSTERGADE 16 4
|
|||
|
|
Website https://www.skypuzzler.com/
|
|||
|
|
Position in org. Director Business Development
|
|||
|
|
Department SKYPUZZLER APS
|
|||
|
|
Phone +48882404111 Phone 2 +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
Gender Woman Man Non BinaryTitle Mr
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
Country Denmark
|
|||
|
|
Same as organisation
|
|||
|
|
name
|
|||
|
|
Other contact persons
|
|||
|
|
First Name Last Name E-mail Phone
|
|||
|
|
Ronni Winkler Østergaard ronni.ostergaard@skypuzzler.com +4524422752
|
|||
|
|
Jacob Løfdahl jacob.loefdahl@skypuzzler.com +xxx xxxxxxxxx
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 152 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 152 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
Dr Elgiz Baskaya Woman France elgiz.baskaya@sk
|
|||
|
|
ypuzzler.com Category B Senior resea Team member
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 153 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 153 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 154 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 154 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Service Nordic Patent Service: Skypuzzler patent for Tactical Deconfliction of Unmanned Aerial
|
|||
|
|
Vehicles European Patent Application no. 23179563.4
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
CONDUCT
|
|||
|
|
The project aimed to develop a breakthrough solution for automated tactical drone
|
|||
|
|
deconfliction. This will enable safe and efficient flight route adjustments in real-time when
|
|||
|
|
multiple drones are flying in the same airspace beyond visual line of sight.
|
|||
|
|
EIC: SKYPUZZLER
|
|||
|
|
Project: 101188110 — Skypuzzler — HORIZON-EIC-2024-ACCELERATOR-02
|
|||
|
|
Skypuzzler is a novel Digital Air Traffic Control (ATC) software project aimed at empowering
|
|||
|
|
the global commercial drone market through its autonomous tactical deconfliction service to
|
|||
|
|
solve a rising problem of drone safety. By using a sophisticated mathematical algorithm,
|
|||
|
|
Skypuzzler integrates seamlessly into Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) systems enabling
|
|||
|
|
drones to avoid collisions
|
|||
|
|
Autonomous deConfliction of
|
|||
|
|
Drone-Congested areas
|
|||
|
|
The Skypuzzler AC-DC (Autonomous deConfliction of Drone-Congested areas) Kick-Start
|
|||
|
|
Project, under the ESA ARTES programme, focuses on the objective of enabling our integrated
|
|||
|
|
Digital Air Traffic Control (iDATC) product to deconflict drones at higher levels of precision by
|
|||
|
|
using our software-to-software approach, integrating with the drone's SatNav capabilities,
|
|||
|
|
thereby removing the need for installing extra cost or energy-consuming equipment on the
|
|||
|
|
drone.
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
iDATC as a Service
|
|||
|
|
Integrated Digital ATC system provides Conflict Resolution Service, an advanced deterministic
|
|||
|
|
algorithm that can be incorporated as a software-to-software module to UTM and drone
|
|||
|
|
operator systems.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 155 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 155 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 156 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 156 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
PIC
|
|||
|
|
869703941
|
|||
|
|
Legal name
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
Short name: High Altitude Platform Station Alliance Inc.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Address
|
|||
|
|
Town Wakefield
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 01880
|
|||
|
|
Street 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600
|
|||
|
|
Country United States
|
|||
|
|
Webpage www.hapsalliance.org
|
|||
|
|
Specific Legal Statuses
|
|||
|
|
Legal person .......................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
Public body ............................................................ no
|
|||
|
|
Non-profit ............................................................... yes
|
|||
|
|
International organisation ...................................... no
|
|||
|
|
Secondary or Higher education establishment ...... no
|
|||
|
|
Research organisation ........................................... no
|
|||
|
|
SME Data
|
|||
|
|
Based on the below details from the Participant Registry the organisation is an SME (small- and medium-sized enterprise) for the call.
|
|||
|
|
SME self-declared status ...................................... 30/08/2025 - yes
|
|||
|
|
SME self-assessment ........................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
SME validation ...................................................... unknown
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 157 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 157 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Departments carrying out the proposed work
|
|||
|
|
Department 1
|
|||
|
|
Department name Communications and Transport Systems
|
|||
|
|
Street ITN
|
|||
|
|
Town Norrköping
|
|||
|
|
Same as proposing organisation's address
|
|||
|
|
not applicable
|
|||
|
|
Country Sweden
|
|||
|
|
Postcode 60374
|
|||
|
|
Links with other participants
|
|||
|
|
Type of link Participant
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 158 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 158 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Researchers involved in the proposal
|
|||
|
|
Title First Name Last Name Gender Nationality E-mail Career Stage
|
|||
|
|
Role of
|
|||
|
|
researcher (in
|
|||
|
|
the project)
|
|||
|
|
Reference
|
|||
|
|
Identifier Type of identifier
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 159 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 159 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Role of participating organisation in the project
|
|||
|
|
Project management
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and engagement
|
|||
|
|
Provision of research and technology infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
Co-definition of research and market needs
|
|||
|
|
Civil society representative
|
|||
|
|
Policy maker or regulator, incl. standardisation body
|
|||
|
|
Research performer
|
|||
|
|
Technology developer
|
|||
|
|
Testing/validation of approaches and ideas
|
|||
|
|
Prototyping and demonstration
|
|||
|
|
IPR management incl. technology transfer
|
|||
|
|
Public procurer of results
|
|||
|
|
Private buyer of results
|
|||
|
|
Finance provider (public or private)
|
|||
|
|
Education and training
|
|||
|
|
Contributions from the social sciences or/and the humanities
|
|||
|
|
Other
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 50)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 160 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 160 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 publications, widely-used datasets, software, goods, services, or any other achievements relevant to the call content.
|
|||
|
|
Type of achievement Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Cooperative, Seamless, and Global Digital Skies for Higher Airspace : The purpose of the paper
|
|||
|
|
is to assist the aviation and aerospace global communities in understanding an industry
|
|||
|
|
perspective and vision for a global harmonized, cross-border, and integrated Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations Traffic Management, which supports the seamless integration of highly
|
|||
|
|
automated operations.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
HAPS Certification Pathways: The purpose of this document is to identify the key challenges
|
|||
|
|
faced by the High Altitude Platform System (HAPS) community in getting regulatory approval
|
|||
|
|
to start commercial operations and recommended actions that the HAPS Alliance can take to
|
|||
|
|
address these challenges. Operational challenges are covered only from the perspective of the
|
|||
|
|
potential impact they have on air vehicle performance.
|
|||
|
|
Publication
|
|||
|
|
Acceptable Levels of Risk for HAPS : This paper discusses setting acceptable levels of risk for
|
|||
|
|
High Altitude Platform System (HAPS). It discusses the safety metrics traditionally used in
|
|||
|
|
aviation are not adequate to establish target levels of safety for HAPS. Then it proposes to set
|
|||
|
|
acceptable levels of risk to be consistent with the risk already accepted by the exposed parties.
|
|||
|
|
Then it proposes a framework by which an operator self-manages the collective risk it
|
|||
|
|
generates.
|
|||
|
|
List of up to 5 most relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal.
|
|||
|
|
Name of Project or Activity Short description (Max 500 characters)
|
|||
|
|
Description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work.
|
|||
|
|
Name of infrastructure of
|
|||
|
|
equipment
|
|||
|
|
Short description (Max 300 characters)
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 161 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 161 of 167 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Gender Equality Plan
|
|||
|
|
Does the organization have a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) covering the elements listed below? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Minimum process-related requirements (building blocks) for a GEP
|
|||
|
|
- Publication: formal document published on the institution's website and signed by the top management
|
|||
|
|
- Dedicated resources: commitment of human resources and gender expertise to implement it.
|
|||
|
|
- Data collection and monitoring: sex/gender disaggregated data on personnel (and students for establishments
|
|||
|
|
concerned) and annual reporting based on indicators.
|
|||
|
|
- Training: Awareness raising/trainings on gender equality and unconscious gender biases for staff and
|
|||
|
|
decision-makers.
|
|||
|
|
- Content-wise, recommended areas to be covered and addressed via concrete measures and targets are:
|
|||
|
|
o work-life balance and organisational culture;
|
|||
|
|
o gender balance in leadership and decision-making;
|
|||
|
|
o gender equality in recruitment and career progression;
|
|||
|
|
o integration of the gender dimension into research and teaching content;
|
|||
|
|
o measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 162 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 162 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
3 - Budget
|
|||
|
|
No Name of Beneficiary Country Role Requested grant
|
|||
|
|
amount
|
|||
|
|
Income generated
|
|||
|
|
by the action
|
|||
|
|
Financial
|
|||
|
|
contributions
|
|||
|
|
Own resources Total estimated
|
|||
|
|
income
|
|||
|
|
1 Eurocontrol - European Organisation For The Safety Of Air
|
|||
|
|
Navigation BE Coordinator 0.00 0 0 1 972 168 1 972 168.00
|
|||
|
|
2 Dfs Deutsche Flugsicherung Gmbh DE Partner 137 681.25 0 59 006 0 196 687.25
|
|||
|
|
3 Luftfartsverket SE Partner 254 709.88 0 0 109 161 363 870.88
|
|||
|
|
4 European Satellite Services Provider Sas FR Partner 95 988.20 0 0 41 138 137 126.20
|
|||
|
|
5 Nats (En Route) Public Limited Company UK Partner 56 147.79 0 0 24 064 80 211.79
|
|||
|
|
6 Direction Des Services De La Navigation Aerienne FR Partner 182 656.25 0 78 281 0 260 937.25
|
|||
|
|
7 Skynav Europe BE Partner 561 397.73 0 0 240 569 801 966.73
|
|||
|
|
8 Ecole Nationale De L Aviation Civile FR Partner 124 162.50 0 0 53 213 177 375.50
|
|||
|
|
9 Linkopings Universitet SE Partner 99 225.00 0 0 42 525 141 750.00
|
|||
|
|
10 C.i.r.a. Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali Scpa IT Partner 178 190.46 0 0 76 367 254 557.46
|
|||
|
|
11 Sceye Spain S.l. ES Partner 3 586 975.00 0 0 1 537 275 5 124 250.00
|
|||
|
|
12 Skydweller Canarias Sl ES Partner 1 339 800.00 0 0 574 200 1 914 000.00
|
|||
|
|
13 Skydweller Sl ES Affiliated 0.00 0 0 0 0.00
|
|||
|
|
14 Parque Tecnologico De Fuerteventurasa Mp ES Partner 164 281.25 0 0 70 406 234 687.25
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 163 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 163 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
15 Elson Space España S.l. ES Partner 911 562.75 0 0 390 670 1 302 232.75
|
|||
|
|
16 Deutsches Zentrum Fur Luft - Und Raumfahrt Ev DE Partner 687 225.88 0 0 294 525 981 750.88
|
|||
|
|
17 Pildo Consulting Sl ES Partner 233 187.50 0 0 99 938 333 125.50
|
|||
|
|
18 Enaire ES Partner 322 866.25 0 0 138 371 461 237.25
|
|||
|
|
19 Openutm Ltd. IE Partner 81 279.63 0 0 34 834 116 113.63
|
|||
|
|
20 Anra Technologies Uk Ltd UK Partner 193 909.63 0 0 83 104 277 013.63
|
|||
|
|
21 Skypuzzler Aps DK Partner 475 343.75 0 0 203 719 679 062.75
|
|||
|
|
22 Haps Alliance US Associated 0.00 0 0 0 0.00
|
|||
|
|
Total 9 686 590.70 137 287 5 986 247
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 164 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 164 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
4 - Ethics & security
|
|||
|
|
Ethics Issues Table
|
|||
|
|
1. Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Human Embryos Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of human embryos? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
2. Humans Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve human participants? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve interventions (physical also including imaging technology,
|
|||
|
|
behavioural treatments, etc.) on the study participants? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve conducting a clinical study as defined by the Clinical Trial Regulation
|
|||
|
|
(EU 536/2014)? (using pharmaceuticals, biologicals, radiopharmaceuticals, or advanced
|
|||
|
|
therapy medicinal products)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
3. Human Cells / Tissues (not covered by section 1) Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of human cells or tissues? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
4. Personal Data Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve processing of personal data? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve further processing of previously collected personal data (including
|
|||
|
|
use of preexisting data sets or sources, merging existing data sets)?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to export personal data from the EU to non-EU countries? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to import personal data from non-EU countries into the EU or from a non-EU
|
|||
|
|
country to another non-EU country?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the processing of personal data related to criminal convictions or
|
|||
|
|
offences?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
5. Animals Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve animals? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
6. Non-EU Countries Page
|
|||
|
|
Will some of the activities be carried out in non-EU countries? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
In case non-EU countries are involved, do the activities undertaken in these countries raise
|
|||
|
|
potential ethics issues? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
It is planned to use local resources (e.g. animal and/or human tissue samples, genetic material,
|
|||
|
|
live animals, human remains, materials of historical value, endangered fauna or flora samples,
|
|||
|
|
etc.)?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to import any material (other than data) from non-EU countries into the EU or
|
|||
|
|
from a non-EU country to another non-EU country? For data imports, see section 4. Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Is it planned to export any material (other than data) from the EU to non-EU countries? For
|
|||
|
|
data exports, see section 4. Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve low and/or lower middle income countries, (if yes, detail the benefit-
|
|||
|
|
sharing actions planned in the self-assessment) Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Could the situation in the country put the individuals taking part in the activity at risk? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
7. Environment, Health and Safety Page
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 165 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 165 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to the
|
|||
|
|
environment, to animals or plants.(during the implementation of the activity or further to the
|
|||
|
|
use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity deal with endangered fauna and/or flora / protected areas? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the use of substances or processes that may cause harm to humans,
|
|||
|
|
including those performing the activity.(during the implementation of the activity or further
|
|||
|
|
to the use of the results, as a possible impact) ?
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
8. Artificial Intelligence Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve the development, deployment and/or use of Artificial Intelligence-
|
|||
|
|
based systems? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
9. Other Ethics Issues Page
|
|||
|
|
Are there any other ethics issues that should be taken into consideration? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
I confirm that I have taken into account all ethics issues above and that, if any ethics issues apply, I will complete the
|
|||
|
|
ethics self-assessment as described in the guidelines How to Complete your Ethics Self-Assessment
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 166 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 166 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Ethics Self-Assessment
|
|||
|
|
Ethical dimension of the objectives, methodology and likely impact
|
|||
|
|
Explain in detail the identified issues in relation to:
|
|||
|
|
- objectives of the activities (e.g. study of vulnerable populations, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
- methodology (e.g. clinical trials, involvement of children, protection of personal data, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
- the potential impact of the activities (e.g. environmental damage, stigmatisation of particular social
|
|||
|
|
groups, political or financial adverse consequences, misuse, etc.)
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
Compliance with ethical principles and relevant legislations
|
|||
|
|
Describe how the issue(s) identified in the ethics issues table above will be addressed in order to adhere to the ethical principles and
|
|||
|
|
what will be done to ensure that the activities are compliant with the EU/national legal and ethical requirements of the country or
|
|||
|
|
countries where the tasks are to be carried out. It is reminded that for activities performed in a non-EU countries, they should also be
|
|||
|
|
allowed in at least one EU Member State.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 167 ===
|
|||
|
|
Administrative forms
|
|||
|
|
Page 167 of 167
|
|||
|
|
Proposal ID 101288550
|
|||
|
|
Acronym SCAN
|
|||
|
|
Horizon Europe ver 1.00 20241022 Last saved 16/09/2025 18:16
|
|||
|
|
Security issues table
|
|||
|
|
1. EU Classified Information (EUCI)2 Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve information and/or materials requiring protection against
|
|||
|
|
unauthorised disclosure (EUCI)? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve non-EU countries which need to have access to EUCI? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
2. Misuse Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity have the potential for misuse of results? Yes No
|
|||
|
|
3. Other Security Issues Page
|
|||
|
|
Does this activity involve information and/or materials subject to national security restrictions?
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Are there any other security issues that should be taken into consideration?
|
|||
|
|
If yes, please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 1000)
|
|||
|
|
Yes No
|
|||
|
|
Security self-assessment
|
|||
|
|
Please specify: (Maximum number of characters allowed: 5000)
|
|||
|
|
Remaining characters 5000
|
|||
|
|
2According to the Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information, “European Union
|
|||
|
|
classified information (EUCI) means any information or material designated by an EU security classification, the unauthorised disclosure of which could cause varying
|
|||
|
|
degrees of prejudice to the interests of the European Union or of one or more of the Member States”.
|
|||
|
|
3Classified background information is information that is already classified by a country and/or international organisation and/or the EU and is going to be used by the
|
|||
|
|
project. In this case, the project must have in advance the authorisation from the originator of the classified information, which is the entity (EU institution, EU Member
|
|||
|
|
State, third state or international organisation) under whose authority the classified information has been generated.
|
|||
|
|
4EU classified foreground information is information (documents/deliverables/materials) planned to be generated by the project and that needs to be protected from
|
|||
|
|
unauthorised disclosure. The originator of the EUCI generated by the project is the European Commission.
|
|||
|
|
This proposal version was submitted by Ovidiu DUMITRACHE on 16/09/2025 11:57:36 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Funding & Tenders Portal Submission System.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 168 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 1 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Proposal template Part B: technical description
|
|||
|
|
SCAN: REVIEWING, ADAPTING AND DEVELOPING CNS INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES
|
|||
|
|
TO ENSURE THE SAFE INTEGRATION OF HAO AND STO VEHICLES
|
|||
|
|
[This document is tagged. Do not delete the tags; they are needed for processing.] #@APP-FORM-HERIAIA@#
|
|||
|
|
List of participants
|
|||
|
|
Participant No. * Participant organisation name Country
|
|||
|
|
1 (Coordinator) EUROCONTROL Belgium (BE)
|
|||
|
|
2 DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH Germany (DE)
|
|||
|
|
3 Swedish Civil Aviation Administration Sweden (SE)
|
|||
|
|
4 European Satellite Services Provider France (FR)
|
|||
|
|
5 NATS United Kingdom (UK)
|
|||
|
|
6 Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne France (FR)
|
|||
|
|
7 SkyNav Europe Belgium (BE)
|
|||
|
|
8 Ecole Nationale de l’Aviation Civile France (FR)
|
|||
|
|
9 Linkopings Universitet Sweden (SE)
|
|||
|
|
10 C.I.R.A. Centro Italiano di Ricerche Aerospaziali Italy (IT)
|
|||
|
|
11 Sceye Spain SL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
12 Skydweller Canarias SL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
12-AE13 Skydweller SL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
14 Parque Tecnologico de Fuerteventura SA Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
15 Elson Space Espana SL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
16 Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft - und Raumfahrt Germany (GE)
|
|||
|
|
17 Pildo Consulting SL Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
18 ENAIRE Spain (ES)
|
|||
|
|
19 OpenUTM Ltd. Ireland (IE)
|
|||
|
|
20 ANRA Technologies United Kingdom (UK)
|
|||
|
|
21 Skypuzzler APS Denmark (DK)
|
|||
|
|
22 (Associated partner) HAPS Alliance United States (USA)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 169 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 2 of 49
|
|||
|
|
1. Excellence #@REL-EVA-RE@#
|
|||
|
|
1.1 Objectives and ambition #@PRJ-OBJ-PO@#
|
|||
|
|
Recent technological breakthroughs have enabled the development of new vehicles with new mission profiles,
|
|||
|
|
ranging from low-speed High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) to very high-speed operations, notably supersonic
|
|||
|
|
and hypersonic transport, plus commercial space transport activities transiting from and to European States. These
|
|||
|
|
new Higher Airspace Operations (HAO) will need to be integrated with traditional and new airspace users (drones,
|
|||
|
|
RPAS, U-space) as they will temporarily transit the current ATM environment and will be generally conducted above
|
|||
|
|
most General Air Traffic (GAT) and Operational Air Traffic (OAT) on a global scale. Moreover, some of their
|
|||
|
|
mission profiles consider extended durations of operations up to several months.
|
|||
|
|
Communications, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS) infrastructure, and the radio spectrum they require, are the
|
|||
|
|
foundation of the aviation operational performance, enabling ever -increasing airspace capacity. Without them , air
|
|||
|
|
transport could not be safely and expeditiously performed. To safely accommodate this growth in current areas of
|
|||
|
|
operation, it is essential to appropriately manage scarce resources like radio frequency bands, secondary surveillance
|
|||
|
|
radar (SSR) codes and Mode S interrogator codes sustainably. However, many of these elements may not be usable
|
|||
|
|
within higher airspace, for example, due to reach and coverage limitations , and therefore new and innovative CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities need to be considered. The appropriate elements of the CNS infrastructure will be technical enablers for
|
|||
|
|
the effective integration of HAO. While very limited HAO missions are supported today by existing ATM processes
|
|||
|
|
and systems in segregated airspace, the number of operations is expected to grow substantially in the coming years
|
|||
|
|
due to swiftly developing innovation in HAO and airspace management technologies appropriate for use within the
|
|||
|
|
higher airspace. This will involve different geographical distributions and types of vehicles.
|
|||
|
|
New entrants will provide new challenges in terms of flight -performance envelopes, operating at altitudes sparsely
|
|||
|
|
used today and where their operational behaviour and performance may generate additional complexity regarding
|
|||
|
|
traffic management. Due to the wide range of trajectories of these vehicles and the lack of accuracy in altimetry at
|
|||
|
|
high levels (reportedly up to 3000 ft difference between barometric altimetry and geometric altimetry due to very
|
|||
|
|
low air density), using current ATM methods in higher airspace operations and space launches often results in a
|
|||
|
|
requirement for segregation of large areas. It is therefore imperative that such operations take place safely, efficiently
|
|||
|
|
and without a disproportional impact on more conventional air traffic operations. Change is needed to evolve from
|
|||
|
|
how we work today for these operations to fully achieve their economical, national security, and societal benefits in
|
|||
|
|
Europe, and ensure equitable access to airspace to all users, including civil and military operators.
|
|||
|
|
Therefore, a major challenge is to assess the behaviour of current CNS systems and research new CNS solutions in
|
|||
|
|
the higher airspace needed for a safe, fair and effective integration of these vehicles. By providing validated flight
|
|||
|
|
trajectories that would better characterize these new operational profiles, procedural packages, real time CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities and potentially other types of services , e.g. space weather forecast, catering for the unconventional
|
|||
|
|
operational needs of HAO and STO, Europe would position itself at the forefront through the SCAN project.
|
|||
|
|
Specific Objectives
|
|||
|
|
The objectives of the SCAN project are directly derived from the scope of the topic HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-
|
|||
|
|
IR-02-WA3-2: Enhanced CNS capabilities, addressing more specifically R&I needs for:
|
|||
|
|
o IR-3-01 regarding resilient integrated CNS/MET as a service accommodating the specific needs of higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace operations (HAO), and
|
|||
|
|
o IR-3-09 on CNS capabilities to increase ATM system robustness.
|
|||
|
|
The project aims to build further on the work delivered in the ECHO “European Concept of Operations for Higher
|
|||
|
|
Airspace Operations” and the ongoing ECHO2 Horizon 2020 SESAR funded projects. https://higherairspace.eu/
|
|||
|
|
The SCAN project will deliver one SESAR Solution “CNS means to serve HAO”, with the following objectives:
|
|||
|
|
a. Assess the current Communication, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS) capabilities and limitations for HAO
|
|||
|
|
(including HAPS, supersonic-hypersonic and space launch and re-entry) at altitudes higher than FL500;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 170 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 3 of 49
|
|||
|
|
b. Perform flight trials (with multiple diverse HAPS platforms and sounding rockets) to collect CNS data and
|
|||
|
|
assess their actual performances in the higher airspace;
|
|||
|
|
c. To gather CNS user needs for HAO, considering the need for resilience, e.g. in GNSS denied scenarios, and
|
|||
|
|
cost-effectiveness;
|
|||
|
|
d. Perform a gap analysis to assess whether the user needs are met by the available or innovative CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities;
|
|||
|
|
e. Investigate the use of geometric altimetry in the higher airspace to deal with current limitations of barometric
|
|||
|
|
altimetry due to very low air density; Define procedures for transition between barometric and geometric;
|
|||
|
|
f. Explore new business model for CNS as a Service (CNSaaS) to enhance resilience of current CNS
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure using and interfacing space-based assets;
|
|||
|
|
g. Explore the feasibility of new CNS technologies and new paradigms for supporting future air traffic
|
|||
|
|
management methods, such as Cooperative Operating Environments, for HAO integration;
|
|||
|
|
h. Define and validate a set of at least 5 quantitative KPIs (e.g., for accuracy, availability, latency) to benchmark
|
|||
|
|
new CNS technologies against the state-of-the-art;
|
|||
|
|
i. Improve telemetry for airspace management of space launches;
|
|||
|
|
j. Investigate the potential to use cryptographically verified identity and 4D position of HAO vehicles;
|
|||
|
|
k. Provide recommendations for standardisation and regulation with respect to CNS provision and HAO vehicle
|
|||
|
|
requirements equipage;
|
|||
|
|
Ambition
|
|||
|
|
SCAN will build on the outcome of CNS infrastructure studies and flight trials currently ongoing in the ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
project and will move forward with the ambition to:
|
|||
|
|
a. Propose a set of feasible technical components and services to serve the CNS needs for diverse vehicles
|
|||
|
|
operating in the higher airspace within Europe and beyond;
|
|||
|
|
b. Engage with airspace users (conventional aviation and HAO operators) , ANSPs, industry and aviation
|
|||
|
|
authorities to align expectations on benefits and operational acceptability of the proposed CNS solutions or
|
|||
|
|
new paradigms for air traffic management.
|
|||
|
|
c. Support a clear path forward for future CNS developments, including standardisation and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
framework evolution to support the European pioneer initiatives on HAO.
|
|||
|
|
Initial TRL: 2-6, functional prototype and early validation in ECHO2.
|
|||
|
|
Target TRL: 6, pre-deployment validation in operationally representative environment with wider scope than ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
since SCAN is a large-scale initiative to flight-validate a multi-layered, resilient CNS architecture using diverse
|
|||
|
|
HAPS platforms and a sounding rocket.
|
|||
|
|
#§PRJ-OBJ-PO§#
|
|||
|
|
1.2 Methodology #@CON-MET-CM@# #@COM-PLE-CP@#
|
|||
|
|
The activities to be performed to accomplish the objectives of the SESAR solution “CNS means to serve HAO”
|
|||
|
|
will largely follow a waterfall type methodology, with various phases aiming at delivering the mandatory SESAR
|
|||
|
|
solution data pack for Industrial Research activities, as identified within the SESAR 3 JU Project Handbook, edition
|
|||
|
|
02.00, released in December 2024 by the SJU. The solution target output is at TRL6 maturity level , so it requires
|
|||
|
|
validation in a relevant environment close to operations.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 171 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 4 of 49
|
|||
|
|
The work will be carried out in six work packages . WP1 “Project Management” and WP2 “Communication,
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination & Exploitation” run for the whole duration of the project. The core of the studies on CNS for HAO
|
|||
|
|
on deriving user needs and CNS capabilities for HAO is done in WP3 “CNS means to serve HAO – Part 1” whereas
|
|||
|
|
WP “4 Validation Trials – Part 1" is where CNS features will be tested in flight with diverse HAPS platforms and
|
|||
|
|
a sounding rocket in the first half of the project. Likewise, in the second half of the project , WP5 “CNS means to
|
|||
|
|
serve HAO – Part 2” will assess to which extent the CNS user needs are met with current or i nnovative CNS
|
|||
|
|
services, complemented with additional HAO flight trials in WP6 “Validation Trials – Part 2”.
|
|||
|
|
The solution will align to the following phases:
|
|||
|
|
Phase 1 – scope definition will delineate the operational and technological envelope of the solution, starting from
|
|||
|
|
the relevant elements on CNS and user needs assessed in the ECHO2 project and other national initiatives. The main
|
|||
|
|
deliverable of Phase 1 is a preliminary version of the Contextual Note for the solution , in terms of scope, main
|
|||
|
|
operational and performance benefits, relevant system impacts as well as recommendations regarding additional
|
|||
|
|
activities to be conducted during the industrialization or as part of deployment. Phase 1 – scope definition will be
|
|||
|
|
developed in WP3 “CNS means to serve HAO – Part 1” (M01 – M18).
|
|||
|
|
Phase 2 – Operational requi rements definition will a ddress the safety and performance requirements, and
|
|||
|
|
interoperability requirements related to CNS for HAO. Phase 2 will be developed in WP3 "CNS means to serve HAO
|
|||
|
|
– Part 1”, that will collect CNS user needs for HAO and perform a theoretical assessment of CNS technological
|
|||
|
|
solutions and will deliver the initial SPR-INTEROP/OSED (M01-M18) followed by WP5 "CNS means to serve
|
|||
|
|
HAO – Part 2” that will perform gaps and risks analysis for the CNS solutions, resulting in the delivery of the final
|
|||
|
|
SPR-INTEROP/OSED (M19-M36).
|
|||
|
|
Phase 3 – System/procedure design and development will focus on describing the functional, non-functional and
|
|||
|
|
interface requirements related to the CNS for HAO solution. The main deliverable of Phase 3 is the technical
|
|||
|
|
specifications/interface requirements (TS/IRS) that will be developed in WP5 "CNS means to serve HAO – Part 2”
|
|||
|
|
(M19-M36).
|
|||
|
|
Phase 4 – Validation will address validation planning, execution and reporting. Validation planning will identify
|
|||
|
|
how many and what type of validation exercises, mostly based on actual flight trials with HAPS and sounding rockets,
|
|||
|
|
are required and sufficient to ensure that the solution CNS for HAO achieve its objectives. For each of these exercises,
|
|||
|
|
scenarios derived from the operational and functional requirements will be developed, including the description of
|
|||
|
|
the validation objectives and associated KPIs, and of all related CNS features to be assessed in flight. Based on these
|
|||
|
|
scenarios, the foreseen validation activities will be executed and, upon their completion, the results against defined
|
|||
|
|
KPIs, findings and lessons learned will be documented in comprehensive reports.
|
|||
|
|
The main deliverables of Phase 4 are the actual validation exercises, together with the corresponding validation plans
|
|||
|
|
(VALP) and validation reports (VALR). WP4 “Validation trials – Part 1” will produce the initial VALP and initial
|
|||
|
|
VALR (M01-M18) whereas WP6 “Validation trials – Part 2” will result in the final VALP and final VALR (M19-
|
|||
|
|
M36).
|
|||
|
|
Phase 5 – Cost-Benefit Analysis will illustrate the potential benefits of the proposed CNS solutions to serve
|
|||
|
|
operations in the higher airspace, and whether they are expected to exceed the incurred costs over a given time
|
|||
|
|
horizon. The main deliverable of Phase 5 is the Cost -benefit analysis (CBA) to be developed in WP5 "CNS means
|
|||
|
|
to serve HAO – Part 2” (M19-M36). The CBA assumptions will be discussed and validated during workshops and
|
|||
|
|
communication events as well as with the Advisory Board.
|
|||
|
|
Phase 6 – Standardisation and Regulation will perform gap analyses and proposals for updating the pertinent
|
|||
|
|
standardisation (STAND) e.g. via EUROCAE, as well as the applicable regulation (REG) including Acceptable
|
|||
|
|
Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) for HAO. These deliverables will be developed in WP3
|
|||
|
|
(M01-M18) and WP5 (M19-M36). This activity will work on the outcomes of ECHO2 and collaborate with relevant
|
|||
|
|
activities in the frame of EUROCAE WG-105 UAS, EASA (e.g. guidance material on the "regulatory sandbox” for
|
|||
|
|
HAO), and JARUS (e.g. HAO use case – to define changes needed to SORA to assess the risk of HAO with UAS ,
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 172 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 5 of 49
|
|||
|
|
and JARUS CS -HAPS, Airworthiness recommendations for HAPS, http://jarus-rpas.org/publications/) as well as
|
|||
|
|
with national initiatives such as the “national HAO WG” led by AESA in Spain.
|
|||
|
|
CNS technological components will be considered for evaluation in the higher airspace, as described below.
|
|||
|
|
Communications. SCAN aims to examine the suitability of current and innovative solutions for communication
|
|||
|
|
service provision in the higher airspace, such as, but not limited to:
|
|||
|
|
• VHF/UHF/HF
|
|||
|
|
• VHF/HF Datalink
|
|||
|
|
• SATCOM (including highly directional phased array terminals), e.g. Iris
|
|||
|
|
• E-band and 5G backhauling
|
|||
|
|
• Free Space Optic Communication (FSOC)
|
|||
|
|
• Ground-ground communication
|
|||
|
|
• Innovative means e.g. connected aircraft technologies (between HAPS and their operators via diverse
|
|||
|
|
commercial link providers).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The current communication infrastructure for conventional aviation is not always suited for higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
operations. Technologies such as VHF, UHF, and HF are limited by line-of-sight and signal strength at high altitudes.
|
|||
|
|
SATCOM offers global coverage but can suffer from latency issues and bandwidth limitations for high -data-rate
|
|||
|
|
applications, and highly directional phased array terminals are needed to support specific mission profiles. The
|
|||
|
|
project will assess the performance and limitations of these te chnologies for various HAO and STO use cases. The
|
|||
|
|
project will also explore emerging communication technologies like 5G backhauling, Free Space Optic
|
|||
|
|
Communication (FSOC), and connected aircraft concepts to support resilient and high -bandwidth data links. An
|
|||
|
|
overview of each system's advantages, disadvantages, current levels of support for HAO and STO, and costs will be
|
|||
|
|
performed, including proof-of-concept with flight tests (with HAPS and sounding rockets).
|
|||
|
|
Navigation (positioning). The project aims to examine the suitability of current and innovative solutions for
|
|||
|
|
Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) service provision in the higher airspace:
|
|||
|
|
• Multi-frequency multi-constellation (MFMC) GNSS receivers, including augmentations such as ABAS and
|
|||
|
|
SBAS(EGNOS), leveraging Galileo differentiators e.g. authentication schemes enabled by OSNMA.
|
|||
|
|
• Pressure/geometric altimetry sensors, as input to the navigation and position reporting (SUR) functions.
|
|||
|
|
• SATCOM Multilateration
|
|||
|
|
• Inertial Navigation System (INS)
|
|||
|
|
• Magnetometer
|
|||
|
|
• Celestial navigation (star trackers)
|
|||
|
|
• VHF Omni-Directional Range (VOR), Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), TACAN (Tactical Air
|
|||
|
|
Navigation Systems), provided the Size, Weight and Power-Cost (SWaP-C) constraints are met.
|
|||
|
|
• 6G
|
|||
|
|
• Ground-based navigation support by new technologies, e.g. Mode N (a ground-based alternative navigation
|
|||
|
|
system concept aiming to provide reliable aircraft navigation by passive signal reception from ground
|
|||
|
|
stations, enhancing resilience against GNSS outages and spectrum congestion in current systems).
|
|||
|
|
• Other Alternative PNT means
|
|||
|
|
• Multi-sensor fusion with uncertainty estimate.
|
|||
|
|
• Barometric conversion to geometric height estimate using MET data.
|
|||
|
|
Navigation in the higher airspace presents unique challenges, particularly due to the low air density, which makes
|
|||
|
|
traditional barometric altimetry unreliable. The project will conduct a detailed assessment of various navigation
|
|||
|
|
technologies to ensure they meet the PNT requirements for HAO and STO. This includes a deep dive into advanced
|
|||
|
|
GNSS receivers, particularly those leveraging Galileo's authentication schemes to detect spoofing. The project will
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 173 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 6 of 49
|
|||
|
|
also investigate alternative PNT sources like celestial navigation (star trackers) and magnetometers, which can
|
|||
|
|
provide a robust backup in GNSS -denied scenarios. Additionally, the project will explore the use of multi -sensor
|
|||
|
|
fusion to combine data from different sources into a single, highly accurate position estimate. A critical part of this
|
|||
|
|
work will be the assessment of geometric altimetry and the definition of transition procedures between barometric
|
|||
|
|
and geometric altitude, as this is essential for seamless integration with conventional air traffic. An overview of each
|
|||
|
|
system's advantages, disadvantages, current levels of support for HAO and STO, and costs will be performed,
|
|||
|
|
including proof-of-concept with flight tests (with HAPS and sounding rockets).
|
|||
|
|
Surveillance. SCAN aims to examine the suitability of current and innovative solutions for surveillance service
|
|||
|
|
provision in the higher airspace, such as:
|
|||
|
|
• Position reporting over IP networks, e.g. adaptation of Network remote ID, a concept taken from the UAS
|
|||
|
|
domain.
|
|||
|
|
• Primary/Secondary Surveillance Radar (PSR/SSR)
|
|||
|
|
• Multi-lateration (MLAT)
|
|||
|
|
• ADS-B, including s atellite-based ADS-B, enabling tracking of HAO vehicles over areas without radar
|
|||
|
|
coverage.
|
|||
|
|
• ADS-C
|
|||
|
|
• Direct telemetry data from HAO operators
|
|||
|
|
An overview of each system's advantages, disadvantages, current levels of support for HAO and STO and costs will
|
|||
|
|
be performed, including proof-of-concept with flight tests (with HAPS and sounding rockets).
|
|||
|
|
Some radar installations are capable of tracking multiple vehicles expected to operate in higher airspace, including
|
|||
|
|
HAPS and supersonic aircraft. However, Secondary Surveillance Radars (SSR) are dependent on accurate
|
|||
|
|
measurements from pressure altimeters, many of which may not be reliable above FL560 due to lack of testing and
|
|||
|
|
certification specifications for this altitude band. Industry development of high -altitude barometric altimeters could
|
|||
|
|
potentially support SSR surveillance of traffic above FL600 . However, many automation systems with inputs from
|
|||
|
|
SSR have software settings that limit coverage ceilings.
|
|||
|
|
Version 2 1090 Extended Squitter ADS-B may be an adequate surveillance source for many HAO participants, both
|
|||
|
|
in continental and oceanic airspace. However, as with radar, more accurate altimeters may be necessary to support
|
|||
|
|
HAO. Additionally, Version 2 ADS -B would likely be limited to vehicles traveling below Mach 2.03 due to both
|
|||
|
|
encoding limitations and ITAR restrictions on GNSS receivers that provide position and velocity data. Version 3
|
|||
|
|
ADS-B messages could potentially support operations up to a geometr ic altitude of roughly 1,000,000 ft AGL,
|
|||
|
|
however ITAR speed restrictions would still apply. SCAN will investigate innovative methods for the tracking of
|
|||
|
|
high-speed vehicles which respect international restrictions such as those applied by ITAR.
|
|||
|
|
All systems considered with SCAN will be assessed from a civil/military dual use perspective , so the project will
|
|||
|
|
seek to identify feasible ways of monitoring vehicles moving faster than Mach 2.03 with due consideration towards
|
|||
|
|
the security sensitivity of those elements . Data concerning accuracy, integrity, availability, continuity and
|
|||
|
|
functionality of the current European CNS infrastructure as well as from new innovative solutions will be gathered
|
|||
|
|
through flight trials with multiple diverse HAPS performed at flight levels above FL500, complemented with data
|
|||
|
|
collected with sounding rockets. This will allow the extension of navaids, communication and surveillance
|
|||
|
|
performance models to include the characterization of vertical performance beyond currently used flight level bands,
|
|||
|
|
enabling an informed decision-making process to outline optimal CNS solutions for HAO integration.
|
|||
|
|
Cross-cutting methodology elements
|
|||
|
|
SCAN brings together expertise from multiple disciplines to address the full range of technical, operational, and
|
|||
|
|
regulatory challenges associated with the CNS infrastructure necessary to successfully integrating HAO and STO
|
|||
|
|
into the European network. Air traffic management specialists, CNS experts, spaceflight operations experts, HAPS
|
|||
|
|
operators, U-space (or third party) service providers, systems engineers, data scientists, and regulatory authorities
|
|||
|
|
will work in close coordination, ensuring that the solut ions are grounded in both operational reality and technical
|
|||
|
|
feasibility. Additional inputs will come from cybersecurity experts. HAO such as HAPS are highly exposed Cyber-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 174 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 7 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Physical Systems that, due to the integration of novel technologies, have vulnerabilities that could lead to several
|
|||
|
|
threat scenarios. This necessitates a focus on HAO cyber security and the adoption of "security -by-design"
|
|||
|
|
approaches to ensure that future solutions meet security requirements from the early design stages.
|
|||
|
|
This combination of disciplines ensures that the CNS solution for HAO is not developed in isolation but considers
|
|||
|
|
the operational, technical, and environmental factors that affect their use.
|
|||
|
|
The project will maintain an active link with relevant national and international initiatives. Results from the ECHO2
|
|||
|
|
project will be a starting point for S CAN’s work, ensuring continuity in concepts, interfaces, and validation assets.
|
|||
|
|
Engagement with standardisation bodies such as EUROCAE will enable technical specifications, data models, and
|
|||
|
|
operational procedures developed in SCAN to feed into wider industry adoption.
|
|||
|
|
In line with the “Do No Significant Harm” principle under the EU Taxonomy Regulation, the methodology includes
|
|||
|
|
a focus on minimising the environmental footprint of HAO and STO operations. By optimising hazard volumes,
|
|||
|
|
improving predictability, and enabling more efficient reroutes, the CNS solution aim to optimise energy consumption.
|
|||
|
|
Environmental performance will be monitored as part of the validation process, with adjustments made where
|
|||
|
|
necessary to ensure that no significant harm is caused to environmental objectives. SCAN is also aligned with the
|
|||
|
|
EU Green Deal, as HAPS are enabling elements for green aviation and earth monitoring services. Concerning the
|
|||
|
|
European Strategic Autonomy, SCAN strengthens Europe's position, e.g. by leveraging Galileo's unique features
|
|||
|
|
(like OSNMA) and reducing reliance on non-European CNS solutions.
|
|||
|
|
The project’s methodology supports open science principles. Non -sensitive datasets, interface definitions, and
|
|||
|
|
technical documentation will be made openly available, enabling other research and operational projects to build on
|
|||
|
|
SCAN’s outputs. Research outputs will follow the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles:
|
|||
|
|
they will be stored in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers, published under open licences where possible,
|
|||
|
|
and documented to facilitate reuse. SCAN will generate open-source code and technologies that will be in the public
|
|||
|
|
domain. Sensitive operational data will be subject to controlled access arrangements, ensuring it can be used for
|
|||
|
|
verification without compromising security.
|
|||
|
|
Although the gender dimension is not expected to influence the technical design of the solution, human factors will
|
|||
|
|
be considered in interface and procedure development to ensure that systems are usable and effective for a diverse
|
|||
|
|
operational workforce. The project team will include diverse perspectives in workshops and validation exercises,
|
|||
|
|
ensuring that the developed concepts and tools are accessible and intuitive for all users.
|
|||
|
|
These cross-cutting elements are integral to the methodology rather than being treated as separate concerns. By
|
|||
|
|
embedding interdisciplinarity, alignment with external initiatives, environmental safeguards, open science practices,
|
|||
|
|
and inclusivity into the c ore of the work, S CAN maximises the likelihood that its solutions will be accepted,
|
|||
|
|
standardised, and deployed across the European ATM network and beyond.
|
|||
|
|
1.3 State of the art
|
|||
|
|
Within European airspace, traffic density varies across Europe. In the ATM context, traffic complexity refers to the
|
|||
|
|
number of simultaneous or near-simultaneous interactions of trajectories in a given volume of airspace that generates
|
|||
|
|
additional workload for the Air Traffic Controller (ATCO) to resolve before a conflict would occur. Trajectories refer
|
|||
|
|
to the flight paths of individual aircraft, and interactions occur when these trajectories come into proximity or conflict
|
|||
|
|
with each other. Complexity of the traffic and flows have a major impact on the definition, scoping and execution of
|
|||
|
|
Air Traffic Service (ATS) provided in today’s airspace environment.
|
|||
|
|
In the ECHO1 project, a study was conducted to observe the airspace classification of European Civil Aviation
|
|||
|
|
Conference FIRs above FL660. ATS is provided by more than 60 Area Control Centres (ACC) and by more than 30
|
|||
|
|
Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) where Class C airspace has been published from FL195 up to FL660.
|
|||
|
|
Many States have declared in the national AIPs their airspace above FL660 as G -class airspace. On the other hand,
|
|||
|
|
some States have opted for no airspace definition (e.g. UK, Poland, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Romania, Czech Republic,
|
|||
|
|
Albania, Armenia and Azerbaijan) or unclassified airspace (as it is the case for Turkey, Ukraine, Croatia, Belgium,
|
|||
|
|
and Slovakia).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 175 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 8 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Consequently, this airspace class declaration (e.g.: G-class above FL660) implies that ATS such as Flight Information
|
|||
|
|
Services and Alerting services can be currently provided in the present ATM environment. It should be noted that
|
|||
|
|
today there is little, or no surveillance and communication capability provided by ANSPs above FL660. However, it
|
|||
|
|
is generally believed that the current CNS capabilities are not adequate for service provision at altitudes above FL600
|
|||
|
|
in terms of antennae signal protection, strength and coverage width. Thus, the provision of CNS with the current
|
|||
|
|
systems could only be limited to the lower levels of HAO. Additionally, increases of jamming and spoofing incidents
|
|||
|
|
in GNSS frequency bands, due to current geopolitical contexts , are driving calls for a more resilient CNS
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure.
|
|||
|
|
The management of the European ATM network has been built on strong cooperation between all stakeholders based
|
|||
|
|
on the Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) principle (e.g. airspace users, service providers, regulators, the EU
|
|||
|
|
and its agencies, international organizations, etc.). It has been supported and codified by a coherent set of EU
|
|||
|
|
regulations which confers clear responsibilities on all actors involved. Hence, the management of the network is an
|
|||
|
|
essential component of the European ATM system , and by exte nsion for HAO , which will be an integral part of
|
|||
|
|
network operations and where the airspace is seen as a continuum.
|
|||
|
|
How SCAN goes beyond
|
|||
|
|
HAO offers a unique opportunity to promote an operational vision that, from the outset, aims to address some of the
|
|||
|
|
structural elements that in the past have required significant time and effort to improve. Perhaps one of the most
|
|||
|
|
familiar examples, the airspace organization and structure across the Network Manager area, has been subject to
|
|||
|
|
constant developments to reduce fragmentation and improve interoperability. Such improvements have required a
|
|||
|
|
bottom-up approach and several decades to be fully implemented across the network. The lessons learned from this
|
|||
|
|
experience should be taken into consideration and the development of the higher airspace should start with a new
|
|||
|
|
approach. The higher airspace has been utilised almost entirely by military actors and as transit for space vehicles in
|
|||
|
|
the past. Challenges posed by new entrants and the underlying conditions of their operations will lead to an increase
|
|||
|
|
in interactions among HAO and between HAO and conventional air traffic and STO transits in the airspaces below.
|
|||
|
|
Assessing the demand for HAO is critical for the evaluation of future operational means to ensure a safe and
|
|||
|
|
practicable use of airspace. Within the ECHO project, a thorough demand analysis was conducted, including the
|
|||
|
|
development of specific demand scenarios and an impact assessment of new entrant’s operations.
|
|||
|
|
Within the diversity of vehicles expected to operate in the higher airspace, High Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS)
|
|||
|
|
represent a class of low -velocity and economical aerial vehicle, characterized by their constrained manoeuvring
|
|||
|
|
capabilities, which can operate in the stratosphere for extensive periods of time spanning days, weeks and months.
|
|||
|
|
The viability of these operations derives from using solar irradiation as a primary energy source, keeping the
|
|||
|
|
equipment functioning at these elevated altitudes for extended durations. Three types of HAPS emerge based on their
|
|||
|
|
construction mechanism: Heavier Than Air (HTA) HAPS category, distinguished by small propulsion systems and
|
|||
|
|
large wingspans with gliding capabilities for descent; the motorized Lighter Than Air (LTA) variant, characterized
|
|||
|
|
by utilization of fluids lighter than air for controlled elevation changes apart from the motors to control speed and
|
|||
|
|
manoeuvrability; and Balloons, which are the group most limited in terms of manoeuvrability, using wind
|
|||
|
|
predictions and other fluids to control the position.
|
|||
|
|
While the ECHO project defined the conceptual framework for HAO and ECHO2 is planning early flight trials with
|
|||
|
|
HAPS, SCAN moves decisively beyond by being the first large-scale initiative to flight-validate a multi-layered,
|
|||
|
|
resilient CNS architecture using three distinct HAPS from leading operators such as Elson Space and Skydweller
|
|||
|
|
(with HTA vehicles) as well as Sceye (LTA airship HAPS) and a sounding rocket. This will provide empirical data
|
|||
|
|
on CNS performance above FL500 in European airspace and beyond , a critical gap ECHO could only address
|
|||
|
|
theoretically. Elson Space and Sceye have their operation base s at Teruel airport (LETL) whereas Skydweller is
|
|||
|
|
based at the Fuerteventura stratoport in the Canary Islands.
|
|||
|
|
The main applications of HAPS cover domains such as telecommunications, disaster relief, antenna relay, earth
|
|||
|
|
observation, ISR, and scientific exploration among others. These remotely controlled or managed platforms can be
|
|||
|
|
orchestrated into fleets to facilitate broader application scope and extended coverage. Initial projections made in the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 176 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 9 of 49
|
|||
|
|
ECHO research project suggested an anticipated deployment of 1000 HAPS in Europe annually before the close of
|
|||
|
|
the current decade. Although it now appears that this level of traffic is less likely to be experienced prior to 2030, it
|
|||
|
|
is reasonable to consider that traffic numbers will surpass that level within the 2030s. HAPS services can be expected
|
|||
|
|
to be utilised predominantly for telecommunications in low to medium densely populated areas. In addition, HAPS
|
|||
|
|
can be used, among other things, for maritime surveillance and border security measures. European regions with
|
|||
|
|
apparent potential for HAPS deployment are ther efore peripheral areas like Scandinavia or the Mediterranean.
|
|||
|
|
Unfavourable environmental conditions, e.g. at higher al titudes or during winter season, however, pose significant
|
|||
|
|
hurdles for current technology. Due to the limited manoeuvrability and low speeds, the transition through ATS
|
|||
|
|
airspace is a critical flight phase for HAPS. Blocking large volumes of highly utilized airspace for a considerable
|
|||
|
|
amount of time like in the core area must be assessed and particularly minimized regarding the potential impact on
|
|||
|
|
the entire network. Nevertheless, HAPS must address some challenges to achieve their entrance at scale in this new
|
|||
|
|
era of aviation. Transition of HAPS from Lower to Higher Airspace is crucial without impacting and ensuring
|
|||
|
|
minimal disruption to traditional air traffic flows. Furthermore, operations may cover several Flight Information
|
|||
|
|
Regions (FIR) from different countries, thereby standard regulation and flight authorization protocols are required.
|
|||
|
|
Lastly, among other challenges, the enhancement of meteorological forecasting assumes a paramount relevance for
|
|||
|
|
these types of vehicles.
|
|||
|
|
Currently available CNS services, certified in conformity with Regulation (EU) 2017/373, will not necessarily be
|
|||
|
|
capable of supporting HAO operations. The requirements for certain CNS services might be extended to also meet
|
|||
|
|
the HAO needs, once defined, although innovative solutions that may include new paradigms of ATM may prove to
|
|||
|
|
be more suitable for HAO. The CNS equipment for HAO , meeting the required performance levels, should be
|
|||
|
|
established with a technology agnostic approach, independently from existing aviation equipment, taking into
|
|||
|
|
account the specificity of HAO in terms of very high altitude, sometimes high-speed, exposure to radiation and space
|
|||
|
|
weather effects, as well as SWaP-C requirements considering also the diversity of vehicles.
|
|||
|
|
Current CNS capabilities for STO in higher airspace rely primarily on ground -based radars, space -based tracking
|
|||
|
|
networks, and limited ADS -B/MLAT coverage. Traditional SSR/MSSR radars have poor coverage at extreme
|
|||
|
|
altitudes and steep trajectories due to bea m geometry and radar horizon limitations. Current space surveillance
|
|||
|
|
networks and specialized tracking radars can detect fast moving vehicles but often lack the latency and precision
|
|||
|
|
required to track diverse vehicle-types in an integrated traffic environment. ADS-B in its current specification and
|
|||
|
|
use is ineffective for most launch vehicles due to equipment constraints, antenna orientation, and line -of-sight loss
|
|||
|
|
during high-speed ascent or re-entry. Space-based ADS-B constellations have the potential to improve coverage but
|
|||
|
|
face latency, bandwidth, and certification challenges for safety-critical operations. Optical and infrared tracking offer
|
|||
|
|
high precision but are weather-dependent and limited in real-time integration with ATC systems. Data fusion across
|
|||
|
|
disparate surveillance sources is inconsistent, and standardised interfaces for sharing real-time trajectory data with
|
|||
|
|
civil ATM are lacking. High-velocity and high-dynamic vehicles challenge existing tracking algorithms, leading to
|
|||
|
|
prediction errors. There is currently no globally harmonized surveillance framework for suborbital and orbital re -
|
|||
|
|
entry traffic in controlled airspace. A potential solution to addressing these gaps would be robust, low-latency, multi-
|
|||
|
|
sensor surveillance networks, including telemetry data provided by an operator, with space-based augmentation and
|
|||
|
|
real-time data sharing standards. Modifications of the existing ADS-B standard, extending the maximum
|
|||
|
|
transmittable altitude beyond 126.700 ft, may allow purely passive reception of transponders within quasi -optical
|
|||
|
|
range from terrestrial locations or from earth orbit on a satellite and potentially covering the whole range of HAO.
|
|||
|
|
New approaches can also be developed based on cooperative operating environments in which operators will
|
|||
|
|
maintain safe distance using cooperative strategic conflict detection and resolution based on shared intent.
|
|||
|
|
Depending on the air traffic management operations and responsibilities in HAO (which are to be defined in
|
|||
|
|
STRATUS project), appropriate CNS technology should be selected. RF interference and performance impacts to
|
|||
|
|
existing CNS systems w ill be studied and considered, including the allocation of exclusive radio frequencies, if
|
|||
|
|
needed. In this regard, the EU Space Surveillance and Tracking service, providing today space debris re -entry
|
|||
|
|
predictions could provide additional and more general support to civil aviation: it would have to be assessed whether
|
|||
|
|
its sensors and assets (radars, telescopes, etc.) could track not only re -entering debris, but also higher airspace
|
|||
|
|
operations. Due to the high altitude, HAO will be more exposed to space weather effects. However, while today MET
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 177 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 10 of 49
|
|||
|
|
services provide space weather forecast for conventional aviation, they do not provide forecast for the layer of
|
|||
|
|
airspace above FL600.
|
|||
|
|
The Concept of Operations (v1.0, Dec 2022) developed by the ECHO project indicates that during the transiting
|
|||
|
|
phase of HAO through the conventional traffic, separation will be ensured by ATC based on established separation
|
|||
|
|
criteria. In the Higher Airspace, HAO will be carried out based on the agreed trajectory or 4D operating zone, acting
|
|||
|
|
as a dynamic airspace reservation. Assuming that HAO will be made up of cooperating traffic and non -cooperating
|
|||
|
|
traffic, (i.e. traffic that can change their flight trajectory and those who cannot), dedicated HAO separation rules will
|
|||
|
|
be necessary in addition to Regulation (EU) 923/2012, the Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA). These
|
|||
|
|
rules should reflect the different types of movement, speed and manoeuvring capability. Separation should be ensured
|
|||
|
|
also for vertical moving vehicles and any kind of 4D trajectory. The principle of vertical separation measured in
|
|||
|
|
barometric altitude might not be applicable in HAO due to very low air pressure which makes a reliable pres sure
|
|||
|
|
altitude unavailable. SCAN will study altimetry solutions for HAO including tests in flight of geometric and
|
|||
|
|
barometric positioning sources as well as transition criteria among them. Airborne collision avoidance, as regulated
|
|||
|
|
in Regulation (EU) 1332/2011, might not be feasible in HAO traffic for the same reasons. The capability of current
|
|||
|
|
airborne collision avoidance needs to be assessed and potentially amended for HAO usage , complemented with
|
|||
|
|
strategic conflict detection tools.
|
|||
|
|
Regarding the value proposition to address the SESAR WA3-2 on “Enhanced CNS capabilities”, SCAN will focus
|
|||
|
|
on demonstrating a highly cost -effective, resilient and secure CNS solution for HAO , that will be proven in
|
|||
|
|
flight with HAPS platforms and a sounding rocket, and will adapt UTM technologies to HAO, e.g. network remote
|
|||
|
|
ID.
|
|||
|
|
SCAN will develop the solution following an end-to-end layered approach as illustrated in the following figure:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 1: Overall CNS as a modular network architecture
|
|||
|
|
• Layer #1 – multi-sensor PNT onboard the HAO platforms. The vehicles determine their 4D position, velocity
|
|||
|
|
and time with multiple diverse sensors with dissimilar modes of failure, such as MFMC GNSS, inertial, satellite-
|
|||
|
|
based MLAT. Each positioning source provides an independent PNT solution and quality indicators that can be
|
|||
|
|
fused onboard or reported for later on assessment.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 178 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 11 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Layer #2 – secure telemetry via redundant, dissimilar and asynchronous general -purpose data links
|
|||
|
|
(satellite links, proprietary links, etc.). The aircraft transmits telemetry messages over asynchronous datalinks.
|
|||
|
|
The telemetry is prioritized according to the available bandwidth and routed over available data links, enabling
|
|||
|
|
the system to gracefully degrade.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer #3 – real time information available to the HAO operator on position-velocity-time and uncertainty
|
|||
|
|
estimation of HAO vehicles. When not done on the aircraft, the telemetry measures are fused into a single
|
|||
|
|
position estimate with uncertainty computation, which can degrade gracefully if sensors are unavailable.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer #4 – Authenticated aircraft identity, position and uncertainty estimates shared with interested and
|
|||
|
|
authorized parties with need-to-know over secure network via web API (adapted from Network Remote ID).
|
|||
|
|
• Transversal cyber-security layer – Modern Zero-Trust cybersecurity framework along the entire chain. This
|
|||
|
|
includes GNSS satellite authentication (e.g. Galileo OSNMA), aircraft authentication over telemetry, digital
|
|||
|
|
signature of telemetry messages, authentication and authorization framewo rk over API exchanges, and
|
|||
|
|
encryption where necessary/desired.
|
|||
|
|
The flow of information through the entire chain from the HAO vehicle to the end-recipient, e.g. an ANSP, is secured
|
|||
|
|
by using authentication mechanisms guaranteeing that the position and identity of all vehicles are true. Moreover,
|
|||
|
|
multi-sensor and redundancies across the whole chain ensure the resiliency of the CNS solution, considering RF
|
|||
|
|
interference events, ionospheric activity, failure of individual systems, etc.
|
|||
|
|
This approach on CNS for HAO will be researched in WP 3 and WP5. Those elements that are mature enough will
|
|||
|
|
be tested in flight during the planned validation trials with HAPS in WP4 and WP6.
|
|||
|
|
#§CON-MET-CM§# #§COM-PLE-CP§# #§REL-EVA-RE§#
|
|||
|
|
2. Impact #@IMP-ACT-IA@#
|
|||
|
|
2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact
|
|||
|
|
The s olution “CNS means to serve HAO ” addresses the technical, operational, standardisation and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
challenges concerning the necessary CNS infrastructure and services, both existing and innovative, that will allow
|
|||
|
|
HAO operations into European airspace and beyond.
|
|||
|
|
The SCAN project will provide benefits to internal and external stakeholders, while significantly advancing th e
|
|||
|
|
definition and validation of CNS systems and services suitable to HAO . Within the project, EUROCONTROL and
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs are concern ed with obtaining a validated SESAR solution for HAO that is operationally feasible in both
|
|||
|
|
continental and remote/oceanic airspace including cross-border missions.
|
|||
|
|
Moreover, the aviation industry and leading HAPS operators are interested in testing and validating in flight different
|
|||
|
|
CNS solutions onboard their HAPS vehicles. External to the project, European institutions, aviation authorities,
|
|||
|
|
ICAO, standardisation and regulatory bodies will benefit from the project's developments. SCAN will set up an
|
|||
|
|
Advisory Board to provide visibility to key external stakeholders and gather their views and recommendations to
|
|||
|
|
ensure that the project's objectives are met, i.e. to define and demonstrate feasible, cost-effective, resilient and secure
|
|||
|
|
CNS means to serve HAO. Relevant stakeholders, e.g. the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the
|
|||
|
|
Spanish aviation safety agency (AESA) have already expressed their willingness to join the SCAN's Advisory Board.
|
|||
|
|
Contribution of the project results to the outcomes in the topic
|
|||
|
|
• Environment; suitable CNS infrastructure and services will allow for a more efficient utilisation of the airspace,
|
|||
|
|
allowing for preferred routes of the vehicles, e.g. affected airlines burning less fuel or supersonic vehicles flying
|
|||
|
|
low noise profiles. On the other hand, the HAPS vehicles involved in the project enable more widespread use of
|
|||
|
|
environmentally sustainable platforms, which could reduce the need for more emitting vehicles.
|
|||
|
|
• Capacity; the availability of suitable and wide-spread CNS services will allow reduced separations resulting in
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 179 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 12 of 49
|
|||
|
|
the possibility to accommodate more vehicles in the concerned volumes of airspace.
|
|||
|
|
• Cost-efficiency, innovative CNS services such as those to be explored in SCAN (e.g. satcom, and network-based
|
|||
|
|
telemetry) can significantly reduce the need for ground-based infrastructure investments to support HAO.
|
|||
|
|
• Operational efficiency, as the availability of CNS services tailored to HAO help reduce the need for large airspace
|
|||
|
|
reservations, enabling also cooperative operating environments allowing shared airspace use.
|
|||
|
|
• Safety, as a result of proposing and testing in flight onboard performance monitoring and alerting CNS functions
|
|||
|
|
as well as redundancies and robust and resilient CNS systems able to cope with RF interference events or
|
|||
|
|
ionospheric activity.
|
|||
|
|
Contribution of the project results to the wider impacts in the longer term
|
|||
|
|
• Scientific outcomes and impact, based mainly on the collection and assessment of CNS data in actual flight trials
|
|||
|
|
in the higher airspace what will illustrate current performances and identify possible gaps to meet user needs.
|
|||
|
|
The results of the SCAN project will provide valuable inputs on standardisation and regulation and will pave the
|
|||
|
|
way for future commercial operations of new entrants in the higher airspace.
|
|||
|
|
• Economic/technological impacts, as resilient and secure CNS services tailored to HAO will allow more operators
|
|||
|
|
to perform diverse and innovative missions. The potential use of these vehicles to support the CNS infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
further strengthens this resilience and provides business opportunities for higher airspace operators. CNS as a
|
|||
|
|
Service use cases will be explored within SCAN with a view to promoting economic and technological
|
|||
|
|
development within Europe.
|
|||
|
|
• Societal outcomes and impact, improving the efficient integration of HAO and STO transits will support access
|
|||
|
|
to the higher airspace in Europe. Moreover, tailored CNS solutions for HAO will enable the minimisation of the
|
|||
|
|
impact of HAO on conventional air traffic, contributing to en vironmentally friendly and cost -efficient air
|
|||
|
|
transport for European citizens. Finally, it will also result i n job creation for highly skilled positions , as new
|
|||
|
|
manufacturing centres for HAO vehicles as well as operation centres and ground infrastructure, e.g. stratoports,
|
|||
|
|
start to be deployed in several locations in Europe.
|
|||
|
|
Scale and significance of project's contribution to the expected outcomes and impact
|
|||
|
|
The scale of the project's contribution to the expected outcome will be influenced by the extent to which its SESAR
|
|||
|
|
solution is deployed. The adoption of the CNS for HAO solution provides a cornerstone to facilitate safe, efficient
|
|||
|
|
and scalable HAO operations and it would position European industry and service providers to compete and win
|
|||
|
|
significant portions of the global market for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
In addition, the significance of the SCAN project's contribution can be explained in qualitative terms:
|
|||
|
|
• market access for innovative concepts;
|
|||
|
|
• safeguarding the use of the higher airspace for emerging commercial operators;
|
|||
|
|
• clarity in the CNS requirements and equipage for users;
|
|||
|
|
• enabling new Earth observation and remote sensing services providing persistence and flexibility to complement
|
|||
|
|
existing satellite, unmanned and manned aircraft operations in a growing market estimated to be 4bn euro pa by
|
|||
|
|
2026.
|
|||
|
|
• environmental benefits through increased use of solar electric platforms and services to persistently monitor and
|
|||
|
|
enable reducing the impact from greenhouse gases, wildfires or certain illegal activities such as oil dumping.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 180 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 13 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Project's content towards impact
|
|||
|
|
The regulatory and standardisation state of the art for CNS in HAO is currently in rapid development, with several
|
|||
|
|
European and international bodies actively working towards the establishment of harmonised frameworks. The
|
|||
|
|
SCAN project will help align these efforts to maximise industrialisation impact and ensure safe, efficient integration
|
|||
|
|
of new entrants such as HAPS, supersonic, hypersonic, and STO in European higher airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Regulatory State of the Art
|
|||
|
|
EASA is leading a multi -year initiative to develop a regulatory framework for HAO, addressing safety, security,
|
|||
|
|
environmental, and cyber risks, with deliverables including technical studies on CNS civil needs and capacities at
|
|||
|
|
high altitudes, demand analys is, and draft regulatory amendments. A regulatory roadmap has been published by
|
|||
|
|
EASA, highlighting preparatory actions, literature reviews, market analysis, and initial CNS spectrum needs required
|
|||
|
|
for developing HAO regulations. Concerning PBN, certain nav igation specifications for civil aviation may be
|
|||
|
|
considered as starting point to assess their applicability for operations in the higher airspace, e.g. RNP 1, and facilitate
|
|||
|
|
compatibility with evolving CNS services. SESAR activities and the ATM Master Plan emphasise scalable,
|
|||
|
|
interoperable solutions for emerging HAO traffic, coordinated with institutional partners including
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL, EDA, ESA, and EASA, to accelerate regulatory alignment and deployment. A key element for
|
|||
|
|
converging towards a proportionate regulatory frame is to implement "regulatory sandboxes”, as described in EASA's
|
|||
|
|
roadmap on HAO, “supporting Member States and the industry to conduct the first tests and demonstrations in the
|
|||
|
|
EU, exempting these tests from the application of relevant EU regulations”.
|
|||
|
|
Standardisation State of the Art
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE develops minimum performance specifications and means of compliance for aircraft CNS equipment.
|
|||
|
|
Its technical working groups extend activities to airborne and ground -based CNS/ATM systems and collaborate
|
|||
|
|
globally with RTCA (US) to promote harmonisation. EUROCAE standards serve as reference means of compliance
|
|||
|
|
to EASA and national authorities, underlining their direct influence on regulatory implementation for CNS
|
|||
|
|
technologies. Ongoing standardisation efforts include updates for ATM functions, ground systems, and airborne CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities, with attention to the unique operational and environmental demands at high altitudes.
|
|||
|
|
The strategy for developing and consolidating needs
|
|||
|
|
• Establish a fluent dialogue between the SCAN project and the key stakeholders: EASA, EUROCAE, JARUS,
|
|||
|
|
and National Supervisory Authorities to prioritise regulatory and standardisation needs emerging from HAO
|
|||
|
|
flight trials and studies.
|
|||
|
|
• Use flight trial findings to identify CNS capability gaps, validate theoretical models, and derive operational
|
|||
|
|
requirements, including spectrum management and contingency procedures.
|
|||
|
|
• Derive proposals as candidate standards and regulatory amendments, and submit these to EUROCAE for
|
|||
|
|
Working Group development, ensuring they are aligned with EASA regulatory processes and ICAO global
|
|||
|
|
initiatives.
|
|||
|
|
• Engage stakeholder consultation (industry, research, service providers) to iteratively refine requirements, with
|
|||
|
|
oversight by National Aviation Authorities for certification procedures and operational authorisations.
|
|||
|
|
• Support standardisation by contributing validated evidence and operational concepts from European HAO trials
|
|||
|
|
to EUROCAE and JARUS, facilitating recognition as global standards at ICAO level.
|
|||
|
|
2.2 Measures to maximise impact - Dissemination, exploitation and communication #@COM-DIS-VIS-CDV@#
|
|||
|
|
The project will maximise its impact by executing a comprehensive plan for dissemination, exploitation, and
|
|||
|
|
communication activities, designed to ensure project results are effectively shared, adopted, and recognised across
|
|||
|
|
diverse stakeholder groups. Thes e measures leverage best practice frameworks from SESAR and Horizon Europe,
|
|||
|
|
with activities strategically tailored to every segment of the airspace ecosystem.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 181 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 14 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination Measures
|
|||
|
|
• Scientific Community: Publication of research results and technical deliverables in open access journals and
|
|||
|
|
presentation at international conferences and workshops (e.g., SESAR Innovation Days, ATM and CNS
|
|||
|
|
symposia).
|
|||
|
|
• End Users (air navigation service providers, operators): Custom workshops, webinars, and demonstration events
|
|||
|
|
showcasing flight trial outcomes and practical CNS solution guidelines.
|
|||
|
|
• Industry: Engagement via SESAR innovation platforms, joint panels with EUROCAE, and technical papers in
|
|||
|
|
trade publications to encourage uptake and further R&D investment.
|
|||
|
|
• Dissemination outputs will include technical reports, data sets, standardisation proposals, and policy briefs
|
|||
|
|
regularly updated and distributed through the project website, digital repository, and direct mailing.
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation Measures
|
|||
|
|
• Intellectual Property: Early identification and protection of key exploitable results (KERs), including patents
|
|||
|
|
where applicable, supported by a confidential results tracking system shared among project partners.
|
|||
|
|
• Technical Standards: Preparation of validated CNS requirements and contributing project outcomes to
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE working groups, JARUS, and EASA for incorporation into new standards and regulatory guidance.
|
|||
|
|
• Commercialisation: Stakeholder mapping and engagement with financial actors , coupled with business
|
|||
|
|
architecture workshops to build exploitation capacity among members and industry users.
|
|||
|
|
• Monitoring and feedback mechanisms will be in place to adapt exploitation strategies as project results mature.
|
|||
|
|
Communication Measures
|
|||
|
|
• Targeted stakeholders: Information days, newsletters, and interactive website updates will ensure ongoing
|
|||
|
|
accessibility and transparency of project progress towards the benefits of innovative CNS solutions for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
• Proactive use of social media (LinkedIn, X/Twitter), press releases, podcasts, and video explainers to inform and
|
|||
|
|
engage the general public.
|
|||
|
|
• Public events and content will be in multiple languages where appropriate to broaden reach across Europe.
|
|||
|
|
• Communication activities are supported by metrics for reach, engagement, and impact, with periodic updates
|
|||
|
|
based on analytics.
|
|||
|
|
Target Groups
|
|||
|
|
• Scientific community: publications, conferences, workshops for increased research uptake towards materialising
|
|||
|
|
highly-cost effective, resilient and secure CNS as a service solution for HAO
|
|||
|
|
• ANSPs: workshops, webinars, technical briefs, in order to a ccelerate awareness on the role and limitations of
|
|||
|
|
current CNS for HAO as well as innovative CNS means for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
• HAO operators: to discuss and consolidate the CNS user needs identified in the project and to disseminate the
|
|||
|
|
outcomes on the role and limitations of current and innovative CNS means for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
• EASA: to ensure the project's findings on CNS are fed into the regulatory activities, e.g. sandbox to facilitate
|
|||
|
|
early flight trials.
|
|||
|
|
• National Supervisory Authorities, to provide them with visibility on the CNS user needs and feasible means of
|
|||
|
|
compliance, as well as to address the flight authorisation of the proposed HAPS flight trials in European airspace.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 182 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 15 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• ICAO: to ensure regional developments on CNS for HAO are harmonised and integrated into their global vision
|
|||
|
|
on HAO.
|
|||
|
|
• Standardisation bodies, notably EUROCAE and the relevant WGs such as WG-105 UAS.
|
|||
|
|
• Military authorities, NATO and EDA, to ensure that needs of military operations in the higher airspace and civil-
|
|||
|
|
military convergence requirements on CNS are properly addressed.
|
|||
|
|
• Industry: trade events, standardisation panels, to foster innovation transfer.
|
|||
|
|
• Financial actors: Business workshops, investor guide, to enable commercialisation.
|
|||
|
|
• Public at large: social media, press, info events, aiming at boosting awareness and engagement.
|
|||
|
|
All activities will be reviewed and updated regularly, with the initial plan delivered in month 3 and major revisions
|
|||
|
|
at project milestones, ensuring focus and alignment with the evolving airspace landscape.
|
|||
|
|
Intellectual property rights (IPR) and results ownership
|
|||
|
|
SCAN will generate a range of results, including technical specifications on CNS for HAO , software prototypes,
|
|||
|
|
validation methodologies, operational procedures, acceptable means of compliance and guidance material on
|
|||
|
|
airborne and ground CNS equipment suitable for HAO . The consortium will manage intellectual property in a way
|
|||
|
|
that protects individual contributions while ensuring the widest possible uptake of the results.
|
|||
|
|
An IPR framework will be agreed in the Consortium Agreement before the project start. This will define ownership
|
|||
|
|
rules, access rights, and conditions for both internal use and external exploitation. Results created by a single partner
|
|||
|
|
will remain the property of that partner. Results developed jointly will be owned collectively, with clear arrangements
|
|||
|
|
for use and decision-making agreed in advance.
|
|||
|
|
The project will distinguish between outputs intended for open publication and those requiring controlled access.
|
|||
|
|
Public deliverables such as non-sensitive specifications, operational guidance, and performance assessments will be
|
|||
|
|
released under open licences to support adoption and interoperability. For results containing commercially sensitive
|
|||
|
|
or security-critical information, access will be restricted to authorised stakeholders under agreed conditions. In such
|
|||
|
|
cases, the consortium will determine the most appropriate protection mechanism, which may include copyright,
|
|||
|
|
design rights, or, where relevant, patent applications.
|
|||
|
|
#§COM-DIS-VIS-CDV§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 183 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 16 of 49
|
|||
|
|
2.3 Summary
|
|||
|
|
KEY ELEMENT OF THE IMPACT SECTION
|
|||
|
|
SPECIFIC NEEDS EXPECTED RESULTS D & E & C MEASURES
|
|||
|
|
What are the specific needs that triggered
|
|||
|
|
this project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Need to gather CNS needs for HAO
|
|||
|
|
missions performed by diverse vehicles,
|
|||
|
|
such as HAPS and supersonic/hypersonic.
|
|||
|
|
Cyber-security and aircraft authentication
|
|||
|
|
for infrastructure supporting highly
|
|||
|
|
automated operations.
|
|||
|
|
Cost-effectiveness of infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
supporting HAO operations, enabling
|
|||
|
|
scaled, low-margin HAO applications
|
|||
|
|
such as connectivity provision.
|
|||
|
|
Need to assess the behaviour in the higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace of current CNS systems and
|
|||
|
|
services, which is mostly unknown.
|
|||
|
|
Need to study suitability of
|
|||
|
|
barometric/geometric altimetry for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
Need for establishing CNS means of
|
|||
|
|
compliance for HAO missions.
|
|||
|
|
What do you expect to generate by the end of the
|
|||
|
|
project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Validated solution data pack at target TRL 6, based
|
|||
|
|
on flight trials to assess CNS means, for the SESAR
|
|||
|
|
solution “CNS means to serve HAO” that would
|
|||
|
|
facilitate the integration of HAO missions in
|
|||
|
|
European airspace and beyond.
|
|||
|
|
Contributions of suitable elements to enable HAO
|
|||
|
|
as input to the standardisation and regulatory
|
|||
|
|
bodies, mainly EUROCAE, EASA, JARUS.
|
|||
|
|
Communication, dissemination and exploitation
|
|||
|
|
measures with target stakeholders in the HAO
|
|||
|
|
domain.
|
|||
|
|
What dissemination, exploitation and communication
|
|||
|
|
measures will you apply to the results?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination, organising workshops, webinars, and
|
|||
|
|
demonstration events showcasing flight trial outcomes and
|
|||
|
|
practical CNS solution guidelines. Engagement of industry
|
|||
|
|
via SESAR innovation platforms, joint panels with
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE, and technical papers in trade publications to
|
|||
|
|
encourage uptake and further R&D investment. Scientific
|
|||
|
|
Community: Publication of research results in open access
|
|||
|
|
journals and presentation at international conferences and
|
|||
|
|
workshops (e.g., SESAR Innovation Days, ATM and CNS
|
|||
|
|
symposia).
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation. Technical Standards: Preparation of validated
|
|||
|
|
CNS requirements and contributing project outcomes to
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE working groups, JARUS, and EASA for
|
|||
|
|
incorporation into new standards and regulatory guidance.
|
|||
|
|
Intellectual Property: Early identification and protection of
|
|||
|
|
key exploitable results (KERs), including patents where
|
|||
|
|
applicable, supported by a confidential results tracking
|
|||
|
|
system shared among project partners. Commercialisation:
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder mapping and engagement with financial actors
|
|||
|
|
(venture capital, strategic investors), coupled with business
|
|||
|
|
architecture workshops to build exploitation capacity
|
|||
|
|
among members and industry users.
|
|||
|
|
Communication. Public Awareness: proactive use of social
|
|||
|
|
media (LinkedIn, X/Twitter), press releases, podcasts, and
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 184 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 17 of 49
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
TARGET GROUPS OUTCOMES IMPACTS
|
|||
|
|
Who will use or further up-take the results
|
|||
|
|
of the project? Who will benefit from the
|
|||
|
|
results of the project?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
HAO operators: to gather their CNS user
|
|||
|
|
needs and evaluate available current and
|
|||
|
|
innovative CNS solutions.
|
|||
|
|
EASA: to ensure the project's findings on
|
|||
|
|
CNS are fed into the regulatory activities,
|
|||
|
|
e.g. sandbox to facilitate early flight trials.
|
|||
|
|
HAO Service provider s: appropriate and
|
|||
|
|
suitable infrastructure is required for the
|
|||
|
|
safe and efficient operation of traffic
|
|||
|
|
within HAO airspace.
|
|||
|
|
ANSPs: to understand the limitations of
|
|||
|
|
current CNS, maintain general situational
|
|||
|
|
awareness within airspace managed by
|
|||
|
|
them (including traffic not managed or
|
|||
|
|
separated by ANSPs), as well as
|
|||
|
|
awareness and implementation, as
|
|||
|
|
required, of new and innovative CNS
|
|||
|
|
necessary for HAO vehicles.
|
|||
|
|
What change do you expect to see after successful
|
|||
|
|
dissemination and exploitation of project results to
|
|||
|
|
the target group(s)?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Environment; suitable CNS infrastructure and
|
|||
|
|
services will allow for more efficient utilisation of
|
|||
|
|
the airspace, allowing for preferred routes of the
|
|||
|
|
vehicles, e.g. affected airlines burning less fuel or
|
|||
|
|
supersonic vehicles flying low noise profiles.
|
|||
|
|
Capacity; the availability of suitable and wide -
|
|||
|
|
spread CNS services for HAO will enable the wide
|
|||
|
|
utilisation of the higher airspace, allowing the
|
|||
|
|
accommodation of an increasing number of vehicles
|
|||
|
|
as demand evolves.
|
|||
|
|
Cost-efficiency, innovative CNS services such as
|
|||
|
|
those to be explored in SCAN e.g. ground-ground.
|
|||
|
|
Communications, and networked infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
leveraging internet -based APIs , can significantly
|
|||
|
|
reduce the need for ground-based infrastructure for
|
|||
|
|
HAO operations.
|
|||
|
|
Operational efficiency, e.g. because of flying user -
|
|||
|
|
preferred routes for HAO missions enabled by
|
|||
|
|
What are the expected wider scientific, economic and
|
|||
|
|
societal effects of the project contributing to the expected
|
|||
|
|
impacts outlined in the respective destination in the work
|
|||
|
|
programme?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Scientific outcomes and impact, based mainly on the
|
|||
|
|
collection and assessment of CNS data in actual flight trials
|
|||
|
|
in the higher airspace, will illustrate current performances
|
|||
|
|
and identify possible gaps to meet user needs. The results of
|
|||
|
|
the SCAN project will provide valuable inputs on
|
|||
|
|
standardisation and regulation and will pave the way for
|
|||
|
|
future commercial operations of new entrants in the higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace.
|
|||
|
|
Economic/technological impacts, by conducting flight trials
|
|||
|
|
with HAPS the potential use of these aircraft can be shown,
|
|||
|
|
and possible new business cases may be identified.
|
|||
|
|
CNS as a Service use cases will be developed ensuring CNS
|
|||
|
|
services are provided in the required volumes of airspace at
|
|||
|
|
an affordable cost.
|
|||
|
|
Societal outcomes and impact, improving the efficient
|
|||
|
|
integration of HAO and STO transits will support access to
|
|||
|
|
the higher airspace in Europe. Moreover, tailored CNS
|
|||
|
|
solutions for HAO will enable the minimisation of the
|
|||
|
|
video explainers to inform and engage the general public
|
|||
|
|
about HAO and the benefits of innovative CNS solutions.
|
|||
|
|
Broader Stakeholders: Information days, targeted
|
|||
|
|
newsletters, and interactive website updates will ensure
|
|||
|
|
ongoing accessibility and transparency of project progress.
|
|||
|
|
Public events and content will be in multiple languages
|
|||
|
|
where appropriate to broaden reach across Europe.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 185 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 18 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Standardisation bodies, notably
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE. National Supervisory
|
|||
|
|
Authorities, to provide them with
|
|||
|
|
visibility on the CNS user needs and
|
|||
|
|
feasible means of compliance, as well as
|
|||
|
|
to address the flight authorisation of the
|
|||
|
|
proposed HAPS flight trials in European
|
|||
|
|
airspace.
|
|||
|
|
National security agencies, providing
|
|||
|
|
awareness on resiliency and security
|
|||
|
|
(particularly for verified aircraft identity)
|
|||
|
|
gaps of existing CNS solutions to support
|
|||
|
|
highly automated fleet operations, and
|
|||
|
|
verify the identity of aircraft.
|
|||
|
|
ICAO: to ensure regional developments
|
|||
|
|
on CNS for HAO are harmonised and
|
|||
|
|
integrated into their global vision on
|
|||
|
|
HAO.
|
|||
|
|
Military authorities, NATO and EDA, to
|
|||
|
|
ensure that needs of military operations in
|
|||
|
|
the higher airspace and civil -military
|
|||
|
|
convergence requirements on CNS are
|
|||
|
|
properly addressed.
|
|||
|
|
Other agencies such as FRONTEX ,
|
|||
|
|
European Environment Agency, etc.
|
|||
|
|
wide-spread CNS services.
|
|||
|
|
Safety, as a result of proposing and testing in flight
|
|||
|
|
onboard performance monitoring and alerting CNS
|
|||
|
|
functions as well as redundancies and robust and
|
|||
|
|
resilient CNS systems able to cope with RF
|
|||
|
|
interference events or ionospheric activity.
|
|||
|
|
Security and Cybersecurity – Gap identification,
|
|||
|
|
recommendations and possible solutions to meet the
|
|||
|
|
needs of increased airspace automation.
|
|||
|
|
Overall ecosystem resilience – A modular
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure ecosystem that can gracefully degrade
|
|||
|
|
without collapsing, enabling the dynamic
|
|||
|
|
adaptation of deconfliction margins.
|
|||
|
|
Privacy / Confidentiality – The ability for sensitive
|
|||
|
|
operations (e.g. defence operations, or national
|
|||
|
|
security sensitive a irborne connectivity
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure) to report 4D position confidentially
|
|||
|
|
to authorized recipients on a need-to-know basis.
|
|||
|
|
impact of HAO on conventional air traffic, contribut ing to
|
|||
|
|
environmentally friendly and cost-efficient air transport for
|
|||
|
|
European citizens. Finally, it will also result in job creation
|
|||
|
|
for highly skilled positions, as new manufacturing centres
|
|||
|
|
for HAO vehicles as well as operation centres and ground
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure, e.g. stratoports, start to be deployed in several
|
|||
|
|
locations in Europe.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§IMP-ACT-IA§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 186 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 19 of 49
|
|||
|
|
3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation #@QUA-LIT-QL@# #@WRK-PLA-WP@#
|
|||
|
|
3.1 Work plan and resources
|
|||
|
|
The SCAN project includes six work packages, as depicted in Figure 1.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 2: Work Breakdown Structure
|
|||
|
|
WP1 “Project Management”: coordination of all activities, financial and administrative oversight, quality assurance,
|
|||
|
|
risk management, and reporting to SESAR 3 JU.
|
|||
|
|
WP2 “Communication, Dissemination & Exploitation”: stakeholder engagement, promotion of results, exploitation
|
|||
|
|
planning, communication with specialist and public audiences, and application of the FAIR principles for all project
|
|||
|
|
outputs, supported by a managed public and internal repository.
|
|||
|
|
WP3 “CNS means to serve HAO – Part 1” and WP “4 Validation Trials – Part 1" will take place in the first reporting
|
|||
|
|
period, followed by a similar scheme for the second on e WP5 “CNS means to serve HAO – Part 2 ” and WP6
|
|||
|
|
“Validation Trials – Part 2”.
|
|||
|
|
Timing and sequencing
|
|||
|
|
The first phase (M1 –M6) focuses on requirements gathering, stakeholder engagement, and assessment of CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities for HAO. After the initial assessment of CNS user needs and CNS capabilities, a gap analysis will be
|
|||
|
|
carried out, and a set of specific CNS features will be proposed for testing in-flight with HAPS and a sounding rocket
|
|||
|
|
within the Validation Trials work packages. Work on the flight trials will start early in the project regarding the flight
|
|||
|
|
authorisation process with the corresponding aviation authorities.
|
|||
|
|
Interdependencies
|
|||
|
|
WP1 provides coordination, governance, and quality control for all other work packages.
|
|||
|
|
WP2 supports WP3–WP6 through communication, data management, and stakeholder engagement.
|
|||
|
|
WP3–WP5 develop the solution "CNS means to serve HAO” as illustrated in Figure 2.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 187 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 20 of 49
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 3: WP interdependencies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 188 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 21 of 49
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Gantt chart is shown in Figure 4.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 4: SCAN's Gantt chart
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 189 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 22 of 49
|
|||
|
|
3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole #@CON-SOR-CS@# #@PRJ-MGT-PM@#
|
|||
|
|
The SCAN consortium is a robust, multi -disciplinary team uniquely positioned to meet the project's objectives by
|
|||
|
|
bringing together Europe's leading actors from across the entire aviation value chain.
|
|||
|
|
A Comprehensive, Pan-European Partnership
|
|||
|
|
The consortium's structure is designed to ensure a holistic approach, blending high -level regulatory and network
|
|||
|
|
oversight with hands -on operational experience and specialised technical expertise. This composition ensures that
|
|||
|
|
the developed outcomes are not only technologically advanced but also operationally viable, safe, and aligned with
|
|||
|
|
future European regulatory frameworks. The partnership includes a representative cross-section of ANSPs, industry,
|
|||
|
|
aerospace research organisations, flight testing experts, and major HAPS operators.
|
|||
|
|
Key Partner Capabilities
|
|||
|
|
• Coordinator and Network Manager (EUROCONTROL) : As project coordinator, EUROCONTROL
|
|||
|
|
provides unparalleled pan-European expertise in air navigation safety, network management, and civil -military
|
|||
|
|
coordination. It will ensure the project aligns with the broader European ATM network strategy, provide essential
|
|||
|
|
network data for analysis, and act as a crucial bridge to regulatory bodies and the wider ATM community.
|
|||
|
|
• Operational Validation and Infrastructure (HAPS Operators) : The direct involvement of three leading
|
|||
|
|
HAPS operators, Elson Space, Skydweller (HTA vehicles), and Sceye (LTA airship), is a cornerstone of the
|
|||
|
|
project. This provides access to diverse flight platforms for the validation trials in WP4 and WP6, led by Sceye.
|
|||
|
|
This diversity is critical for testing the CNS solutions in varied operational environments, ensuring the results
|
|||
|
|
are robust and not limited to a single vehicle type. The HAPS Operators are supported by the HAPS Alliance as
|
|||
|
|
an associated partner. Furthermore, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) enables payload integration and flight
|
|||
|
|
testing of solution prototypes on a research rocket (suborbital).
|
|||
|
|
• Air Navigation Service Provision (ANSPs) : The participation of ANSPs including NATS (UK), DFS
|
|||
|
|
(Germany), DSNA (France), LFV (Sweden) and ENAIRE (Spain) grounds the project's solutions in the realities
|
|||
|
|
of current and future air traffic service provision. They provide critical input on real -world ATC procedures,
|
|||
|
|
safety requirements, and the operational feasibility of integrating HAO traffic, ensuring the pr oject's outcomes
|
|||
|
|
are practical for deployment within European airspace. ESSP provide CNS focused service delivery experience
|
|||
|
|
and, as a multi-service CNS provider, operate complex space -based systems and deliver critical services under
|
|||
|
|
strict regulation conditions.
|
|||
|
|
• Research and Scientific rigour: The German Aerospace Center (DLR), as a leading Research and Technology
|
|||
|
|
Organisation, provides the scientific foundation for the project. DLR will contribute its advanced modelling and
|
|||
|
|
simulation capabilities, ensure the methodological soundness of the validation activities, and perform
|
|||
|
|
independent analysis of CNS performance data, adding a layer of scientific validation to the project's results.
|
|||
|
|
This is supported by input from LIU, CIRA, ENAC (France) and other research focused institutions, ensuring
|
|||
|
|
that the output of the project is scientifically robust and adheres to Open Scientific Principles. Along with their
|
|||
|
|
scientific contributions, ENAC (France) will contribute to the dissemination activity completing the link back
|
|||
|
|
into the education of current and future aviation professionals (ATC Officers, Pilots, Air Operations/Engineers).
|
|||
|
|
• Concept Development and Management : SkyNav Europe provides expertise in ATM operational concept
|
|||
|
|
development along with standardisation and regulatory analysis that will be key in leading the core technical
|
|||
|
|
work packages WP3 and WP5. SkyNav will guide the solution from initial concept to final analysis, overseeing
|
|||
|
|
the integration of flight data, consolidating requirements, and formulating contributions to standardisation bodies
|
|||
|
|
to ensure the solution is operationally viable. Sceye provide management expertise aligned with their operational
|
|||
|
|
capabilities within the project’s validation Work Packages. This ensures the planning and execution of test flights
|
|||
|
|
remains realistic and effective, while utilising their operational flexibility to navigate the regulatory requirements
|
|||
|
|
for the validation flights to be conducted.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 190 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 23 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Future-focused, progressive concepts will be proposed and developed through the inclusion of leading U-space
|
|||
|
|
specialists, in the form of OpenUTM, ANRA and Skypuzzler. As higher airspace operations will be dealing
|
|||
|
|
with predominantly New Entrants, many in the form of uncrewed vehicles, the expertise that these partners bring
|
|||
|
|
to the project is highly valuable. The emerging U-space ecosystem is being built upon progressive technologies
|
|||
|
|
and concepts, many of which will likely be similar or parallel to those necessary for HAO . Additionally,
|
|||
|
|
Skypuzzler’s Conflict Resolution Services (CRS) provide the safety-critical deconfliction layer that complements
|
|||
|
|
CNS capabilities for Hig her Airspace Operations (HAO). While CNS ensures positioning, navigation,
|
|||
|
|
surveillance, and communication, CRS ensures that this information is translated into actionable separation
|
|||
|
|
assurance. CRS is therefore essential for enabling cooperative operating e nvironments, minimising segregated
|
|||
|
|
airspace, and scaling HAO operations safely.
|
|||
|
|
• Other supporting participants include Parque Tecnologico de Fuerteventura, who provide access to the
|
|||
|
|
Canarias Stratoport, a dedicated and fully equipped European test facility for HAPS and UAS operations. Pildo
|
|||
|
|
Labs brings world-class expertise in the validation of satellite navigation systems and PBN procedures. They
|
|||
|
|
contribute to validation data analysis along with risk analysis of the CNS Framework.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 4: Elson Space HAPS (left), Sceye airship HAPS (centre), Skydweller HAPS (right)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 5: airship HAPS facilities at Teruel airport (left), Fuerteventura stratoport (right)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Figure 6: Mapheus rocket (DLR)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 191 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 24 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Aligned for Success
|
|||
|
|
This consortium structure directly addresses the call's objectives by creating a complete ecosystem capable of
|
|||
|
|
advancing the SESAR solution "CNS means to serve HAO" to a pre-deployment maturity level (TRL-6). The blend
|
|||
|
|
of regulatory oversight, operational end -users with critical infrastructure, scientific validation, and expert project
|
|||
|
|
management ensures a seamless workflow from defining user needs (WP3) to validating performance in live flight
|
|||
|
|
trials (WP4, WP6) and delivering a robust data pack for future industrialisation and regulation (WP5).
|
|||
|
|
#§CON-SOR-CS§# #§PRJ-MGT-PM§#
|
|||
|
|
Tables for section 3.1
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1a: List of work packages
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
packag
|
|||
|
|
e No
|
|||
|
|
Work Package Title Lead
|
|||
|
|
Partic
|
|||
|
|
ipant
|
|||
|
|
No
|
|||
|
|
Lead
|
|||
|
|
Participan
|
|||
|
|
t Short
|
|||
|
|
Name
|
|||
|
|
Person-
|
|||
|
|
Months
|
|||
|
|
Start
|
|||
|
|
Month
|
|||
|
|
End
|
|||
|
|
month
|
|||
|
|
WP1 Project Management 1 ECTL 31.50 M01 M36
|
|||
|
|
WP2
|
|||
|
|
Communication,
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination and
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
1 ECTL 27.65 M01 M36
|
|||
|
|
WP3 CNS means to serve HAO –
|
|||
|
|
Part 1
|
|||
|
|
7 SkyNav
|
|||
|
|
Europe
|
|||
|
|
113.54 M01 M18
|
|||
|
|
WP4 Validation Trials – Part 1 11 Sceye 264.28 M01 M18
|
|||
|
|
WP5 CNS means to serve HAO –
|
|||
|
|
Part 2
|
|||
|
|
7 SkyNav
|
|||
|
|
Europe
|
|||
|
|
117.71 M19 M36
|
|||
|
|
WP6 Validation Trials – Part 2 11 Sceye 281.45 M19 M36
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1b: Work package description
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 1
|
|||
|
|
Work package title PROJECT MANAGEMENT
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP1 provides the governance, coordination, and quality assurance framework that ensures SCAN is delivered
|
|||
|
|
on time, to scope, and to the maturity levels required for SESAR 3 JU Industrial Research projects. Its
|
|||
|
|
objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
1. Establish and operate a governance structure in line with SESAR 3 JU requirements, ensuring clear
|
|||
|
|
decision-making, effective internal communication, and timely conflict resolution.
|
|||
|
|
2. Manage all contractual, administrative, and financial aspects of the Grant Agreement, including all formal
|
|||
|
|
reporting to SESAR 3 JU.
|
|||
|
|
3. Monitor progress against the approved Project Management Plan (PMP), work plan, and solution maturity
|
|||
|
|
targets, ensuring that corrective action is taken where required.
|
|||
|
|
4. Deliver all mandatory SESAR milestones, reviews, and maturity exit criteria on schedule.
|
|||
|
|
5. Maintain a structured quality assurance process to ensure all outputs meet SESAR evaluation, maturity
|
|||
|
|
assessment, and quality standards.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 192 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 25 of 49
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP1 will run for the full duration of SCAN. The governance structure will be centred on a Project Management
|
|||
|
|
Board (PMB) and a Technical Coordination Team (TCT).
|
|||
|
|
1. The PMB, chaired by the Project Coordinator, meets quarterly (or more often if required) to make strategic
|
|||
|
|
decisions, resolve contractual or resourcing issues, and monitor progress against the Grant Agreement.
|
|||
|
|
Membership includes senior representatives fro m each partner, all WP leaders, and the SESAR 3 JU
|
|||
|
|
Programme Manager as an observer. The PMB also approves all major deliverables before submission.
|
|||
|
|
2. The TCT, chaired by the Technical Coordinator, meets monthly to monitor technical progress, manage
|
|||
|
|
cross-WP dependencies, and ensure results are consistent across other SESAR Solutions dealing with
|
|||
|
|
HAO. WP leaders provide monthly progress updates, risk status, and confirmation of resource utilisation.
|
|||
|
|
3. When specific issues require rapid resolution or specialist input, the Coordinator may establish short-term
|
|||
|
|
Task Forces reporting to the TCT or PMB.
|
|||
|
|
SCAN’s SESAR Solution will be implemented as work packages aligned to the two SESAR reporting periods:
|
|||
|
|
Months 1 –18 (initial development, specification, and early validation) and Months 19 –36 (refinement,
|
|||
|
|
completion of validation, and final TRL 6 deliverables). WP1 will ensure coordination between the “first-half”
|
|||
|
|
and “ second half ” WPs for the S ESAR S olution so that dependencies, feedback, and updates are carried
|
|||
|
|
forward effectively between reporting periods.
|
|||
|
|
Initial mobilisation (first quarter)
|
|||
|
|
Convene the Kick-off Meeting (T0+1 month) to formally launch the project with all partners and SESAR 3
|
|||
|
|
JU. The meeting will confirm governance arrangements, reporting cycles, dependencies, and integration with
|
|||
|
|
SESAR maturity processes.
|
|||
|
|
Finalise and submit the PMP (T0+3 months), defining the final title, description, and scope of each SESAR
|
|||
|
|
Solution, confirming initial maturity levels, and setting performance expectations. The PMP will include the
|
|||
|
|
Risk Management Plan, Quality Management Plan, internal communication plan, document control
|
|||
|
|
procedures, reporting templates, and the updated milestone schedule.
|
|||
|
|
Mandatory SESAR milestones
|
|||
|
|
WP1 will ensure the delivery of all mandatory SESAR milestones with full internal preparation cycles to
|
|||
|
|
guarantee readiness:
|
|||
|
|
• Kick-off Meeting (T0+1 month) – Agenda, participant list, and minutes submitted to SESAR 3 JU.
|
|||
|
|
• PMP Submission (T0+3 months) – Drafted by the Coordinator with partner input; internally reviewed one
|
|||
|
|
month before submission.
|
|||
|
|
• Technical Project Review (T0+10 months) – Preceded by an internal mock review to verify completeness
|
|||
|
|
of technical evidence and early identification of gaps.
|
|||
|
|
• End of First Reporting Period (T0+18 months) – Consolidation of technical and administrative reports,
|
|||
|
|
updated maturity self-assessments, and confirmation that lump-sum completion criteria are met.
|
|||
|
|
• Horizon Europe Project Review (T0+21 months) – Readiness check confirming that all technical,
|
|||
|
|
financial, and maturity documentation is complete and fully traceable.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Solution Technical Deliverables (Tend–4 months) – Internal technical and compliance reviews prior
|
|||
|
|
to submission, ensuring alignment with maturity exit criteria.
|
|||
|
|
• Exit Maturity Gate(s) (Tend–2 months) – Delivery of final maturity self-assessment packages and closure
|
|||
|
|
of outstanding review actions.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Non -Technical Deliverables (Tend –2 months) – Includes final CDE reports, updated Data
|
|||
|
|
Management Plan, and other administrative outputs.
|
|||
|
|
• Grant Agreement Closure (Tend) – Submission of final technical and financial reports, and complete
|
|||
|
|
archiving of project documentation.
|
|||
|
|
Risk management
|
|||
|
|
Risk management will be continuous and proactive. A risk register will be created at project start and
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 193 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 26 of 49
|
|||
|
|
maintained by the TCT, with monthly updates and quarterly PMB reviews. Each risk will be scored for
|
|||
|
|
probability and impact, with mitigation actions assigned to specific owners. High -priority risks will be
|
|||
|
|
escalated immediately to the PMB. This process will draw on prior project experience, particularly in
|
|||
|
|
anticipating potential delays in validation, regulatory changes, or partner resource constraints.
|
|||
|
|
Quality assurance
|
|||
|
|
A two-stage quality review process will be applied to all deliverables: a) Technical review by experts from a
|
|||
|
|
partner not responsible for drafting, ensuring accuracy, operational relevance, and technical completeness, and
|
|||
|
|
b) Compliance review by the Coordinator, ensuring alignment with SESAR 3 JU submission formats, Horizon
|
|||
|
|
Europe rules, and the quality criteria set out in the PMP. Reviews will conclude at least two weeks before
|
|||
|
|
submission deadlines to allow for any required corrections.
|
|||
|
|
Administrative and financial management
|
|||
|
|
Management will follow the lump -sum funding model. WP1 will track person -months and deliverable
|
|||
|
|
completion status by WP to ensure lump-sum payment criteria are met. The Coordinator will monitor resource
|
|||
|
|
allocation to prevent imbalances and prepare financia l and technical reports for each reporting period in
|
|||
|
|
accordance with Horizon Europe requirements.
|
|||
|
|
Integration with SESAR schedule
|
|||
|
|
The WP1 framework integrates the SESAR 3 JU milestone and review timetable into all project governance
|
|||
|
|
and monitoring activities. Internal preparation cycles, risk tracking, and quality assurance processes are
|
|||
|
|
scheduled to ensure that deliverables and maturity assessments are complete and ready for submission ahead
|
|||
|
|
of formal deadlines. This approach ensures contractual compliance, early identification of risks, and the orderly
|
|||
|
|
completion of each reporting period and maturity gate.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 2
|
|||
|
|
Work package title COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND EXPLOITATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
WP2 manages SCAN’s external visibility, stakeholder engagement, and exploitation planning to ensure that
|
|||
|
|
the project’s outputs are widely understood, accessible to relevant stakeholders, and positioned for operational
|
|||
|
|
uptake. The objectives are to:
|
|||
|
|
1. Implement a communication strategy that informs and engages the aviation, HAO operators, ANSPs, and
|
|||
|
|
research communities, as well as standardisation, regulatory and policy stakeholders, throughout the
|
|||
|
|
project.
|
|||
|
|
2. Disseminate results in a structured way, ensuring that relevant technical, operational, and policy
|
|||
|
|
communities have access to the outputs in formats they can apply.
|
|||
|
|
3. Develop and maintain an exploitation plan that identifies opportunities for operational deployment,
|
|||
|
|
standardisation, and regulatory uptake of the SCAN Solution on CNS to serve HAO.
|
|||
|
|
4. Coordinate messaging across the two reporting periods to ensure continuity between the “first -half” and
|
|||
|
|
“second-half” solution WPs.
|
|||
|
|
5. Ensure all dissemination and exploitation activities comply with Horizon Europe requirements, SESAR 3
|
|||
|
|
JU guidelines, and any applicable intellectual property and confidentiality constraints.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 194 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 27 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP2 runs for the full project duration and works in close coordination with WP1 and all solution WPs to
|
|||
|
|
ensure that communication, dissemination, and exploitation (CDE) activities are integrated into the overall
|
|||
|
|
work plan. CDE activities will be planned and executed in a way that supports both reporting periods:
|
|||
|
|
In Months 1–18, the focus will be on raising awareness of the project, engaging key stakeholders, and preparing
|
|||
|
|
the ground for validation and exploitation activities.
|
|||
|
|
In Months 19 –36, the focus shifts to consolidating technical results, promoting validated outcomes, and
|
|||
|
|
supporting uptake pathways such as standardisation, regulatory engagement, and operational trials.
|
|||
|
|
Communication
|
|||
|
|
The communication plan will include:
|
|||
|
|
1. Promotion of the SCAN’s objectives, activities, and benefits to defined target audiences, including higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace operators, ANSPs, avionics industry, state regulators, EASA, the Network Manager, international
|
|||
|
|
organizations (ICAO, JARUS), standardisation bodies (EUROCAE, ISO), and the research community.
|
|||
|
|
2. A public project website will be established in the first quarter, providing up -to-date information, public
|
|||
|
|
deliverables, news, and event materials.
|
|||
|
|
3. Targeted communication channels will include SESAR events, ICAO EUR/NAT meetings, EUROCAE
|
|||
|
|
working groups, specialised industry conferences, and selected journals.
|
|||
|
|
4. Project updates will be shared regularly through SESAR 3 JU channels to maximize reach within the
|
|||
|
|
ATM/space operations community.
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination activities will focus on delivering technical results to their intended user communities in formats
|
|||
|
|
they can adopt. Outputs will include:
|
|||
|
|
1. Technical deliverables and reports (public and restricted versions as applicable).
|
|||
|
|
2. Conference papers and peer-reviewed journal articles.
|
|||
|
|
3. Presentations to operational forums and technical panels.
|
|||
|
|
4. Workshops and webinars to engage stakeholders in the review of preliminary and final results.
|
|||
|
|
The dissemination plan will ensure alignment with SESAR intellectual property rules, managing the release of
|
|||
|
|
restricted or pre-standardisation material appropriately.
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation
|
|||
|
|
The exploitation plan will identify concrete pathways for deploying the SCAN Solution on CNS for HAO into
|
|||
|
|
operational environments after the project concludes. This will include:
|
|||
|
|
1. Mapping solution outputs to candidate standardisation and regulatory processes, such as EUROCAE WG
|
|||
|
|
activities, EASA rulemaking tasks, and JARUS.
|
|||
|
|
2. Identifying opportunities for integration into the European CNS infrastructure.
|
|||
|
|
3. Assessing the operational, regulatory, and commercial viability of the CNS for HAO solution in
|
|||
|
|
consultation with end users.
|
|||
|
|
4. Ensuring exploitation considerations are addressed in both the first and second reporting periods, with
|
|||
|
|
early market and regulatory engagement to prepare the ground for implementation.
|
|||
|
|
Coordination across reporting periods
|
|||
|
|
WP2 will ensure that CDE activities for the “first -half” and “second-half” solution WPs are continuous and
|
|||
|
|
mutually reinforcing. Early outputs and draft deliverables will be positioned to inform stakeholders during the
|
|||
|
|
first reporting period, while finalis ed deliverables in the second reporting period will be accompanied by
|
|||
|
|
targeted exploitation and uptake actions.
|
|||
|
|
IPR and confidentiality
|
|||
|
|
The WP will maintain a register of all project outputs with associated intellectual property rights, access
|
|||
|
|
conditions, and confidentiality classifications. This will ensure that dissemination and exploitation activities
|
|||
|
|
remain compliant with the Grant Agreement, Horizon Europe rules, and SESAR 3 JU guidance. On the other
|
|||
|
|
hand, the project will use open standards and generate open-source code and technologies that will be in the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 195 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 28 of 49
|
|||
|
|
public domain.
|
|||
|
|
Measurement and reporting
|
|||
|
|
The effectiveness of CDE activities will be monitored through engagement metrics (event participation,
|
|||
|
|
website analytics, stakeholder feedback) and reviewed at least quarterly by the PMB. WP2 will produce
|
|||
|
|
updated dissemination, and exploitation plans as mandatory project deliverables, with a final version ready at
|
|||
|
|
project close to support post-project uptake.
|
|||
|
|
Milestones within WP2:
|
|||
|
|
• Full Project Web Presence Established (M6) This includes the launch of the public project website and
|
|||
|
|
the finalisation of the initial Communication, Dissemination, and Exploitation (CDE) Plan.
|
|||
|
|
• First Stakeholder Engagement Workshop (M12) A workshop held with key stakeholders (e.g., HAO
|
|||
|
|
operators, ANSPs) to present initial findings on CNS user needs and gather feedback.
|
|||
|
|
• Mid-Project Dissemination Event Completed (M18) A public webinar or event to share the results from
|
|||
|
|
the first reporting period, including initial validation findings.
|
|||
|
|
• First Draft of Standardisation /Regulatory Contributions (M24) Initial proposals based on project
|
|||
|
|
findings are drafted and shared with relevant EUROCAE working groups for preliminary review.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Exploitation Plan Defined (M30) The plan for the commercial and operational exploitation of the
|
|||
|
|
project's results is finalised, with clear pathways for uptake.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 3
|
|||
|
|
Work package title CNS MEANS TO SERVE HAO – PART 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
This work package, titled "CNS means to serve HAO – Part 1" is the initial phase of the project's technical
|
|||
|
|
work. Its primary goal is to establish the conceptual and analytical foundations for the CNS solution by
|
|||
|
|
assessing both existing and innovative CNS capabilities. The outputs of this work will directly inform the
|
|||
|
|
validation activities in WP4 and the detailed analyses in WP5.
|
|||
|
|
The specific objectives for WP3 are to assess and develop:
|
|||
|
|
1. CNS user needs assessment: Compile a comprehensive set of CNS user needs for Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations (HAO), covering civil and military use cases with a specific focus on new entrants like HAPS,
|
|||
|
|
supersonic/hypersonic vehicles, and space launch/re-entry operators.
|
|||
|
|
2. CNS technological solutions: Conduct a theoretical assessment of current and innovative CNS
|
|||
|
|
capabilities and their limitations at altitudes above FL500.
|
|||
|
|
3. Innovative modular network approach: Define a layered, technology-agnostic network architecture for
|
|||
|
|
CNS provision that is both resilient and secure.
|
|||
|
|
4. Collaborative cyber security framework: Build a collaborative security framework using a Zero -Trust
|
|||
|
|
architecture to assess and verify cyber security capability and defend against cyber threats and investigate
|
|||
|
|
the ICAO Trust Framework.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 196 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 29 of 49
|
|||
|
|
5. CNS as a service: Define and assess the CNS as a Service (CNSaaS) concept, exploring new business
|
|||
|
|
models and identifying suitable technologies.
|
|||
|
|
6. Standardisation and Regulation: Perform an initial gap analysis of existing standardisation and
|
|||
|
|
regulatory frameworks and provide recommendations for updating relevant documentation.
|
|||
|
|
Deliverables
|
|||
|
|
This section outlines the key SESAR deliverables that will be produced by WP3. These deliverables represent
|
|||
|
|
the tangible outcomes of the initial research and theoretical work, and they serve as crucial inputs for the
|
|||
|
|
subsequent validation trials in WP4 and the detailed analyses in WP5. They document the project’s early
|
|||
|
|
concepts for services, technical specifications, and regulatory proposals.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.1 Initial SPR -INTEROP/OSED: This deliverable will provide the initial operational services and
|
|||
|
|
environment description, mapping out the early-stage concepts and stakeholder interactions.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.2 Initial TS/IRS: This will define the initial technical specifications and interface requirements for the
|
|||
|
|
proposed CNS solution.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.3 Intermediate SPR -INTEROP/OSED: This deliverable will be an updated version of the initial
|
|||
|
|
OSED, reflecting the refined concepts based on early feedback and research.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.4 Intermediate TS/IRS: An updated version of the technical specifications, incorporating new
|
|||
|
|
findings from the intermediate phase.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.5 Initial STAND: This deliverable will present the initial proposals for standardization.
|
|||
|
|
• D3.6 Initial REG: This will contain the initial proposals for regulatory amendments.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of Work
|
|||
|
|
This section outlines the work to be performed within Work Package 3, focusing on defining and assessing
|
|||
|
|
new CNS capabilities for Higher Airspace Operations (HAO).
|
|||
|
|
WP3.1 CNS user needs assessment
|
|||
|
|
This work package will compile a comprehensive set of CNS user needs for Higher Airspace Operations
|
|||
|
|
(HAO), covering both civil and military use cases. The assessment will be based on surveys of HAO
|
|||
|
|
operators and service providers, with a specific focus on High -Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS),
|
|||
|
|
supersonic and hypersonic vehicles, and space launch and re-entry operators (LRO).
|
|||
|
|
WP3.2 CNS technological solutions (theoretical)
|
|||
|
|
This sub-work package will conduct a theoretical assessment of current and innovative CNS capabilities and
|
|||
|
|
their limitations at altitudes higher than FL500.The work will involve a systematic literature analysis of
|
|||
|
|
existing research and will also gather relevant results from research conducted by relevant organisations such
|
|||
|
|
as NASA and the FAA.
|
|||
|
|
The assessment will cover a range of CNS technologies, including:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 197 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 30 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Communications: A review of current aviation communications (e.g., VHF, HF, SATCOM) and
|
|||
|
|
innovative solutions like connected aircraft technologies.
|
|||
|
|
• Navigation (positioning): An examination of advanced PNT systems such as multi -frequency multi-
|
|||
|
|
constellation (MFMC) GNSS receivers leveraging Galileo differentiators, inertial systems, celestial
|
|||
|
|
navigation, and the potential use of 6G. It will also include conversion of geometrical altitude into
|
|||
|
|
barometric altitude algorithms/procedures theoretical assessment.
|
|||
|
|
• Surveillance: An assessment of network remote ID, satellite -based ADS -B, ADS -C, SSR radars,
|
|||
|
|
modified ADS-B for HAO and the use of direct telemetry data from operators.
|
|||
|
|
• Conflict Detection and Resolution: Address the challenge of conflict detection and resolution tailored
|
|||
|
|
for HAO.
|
|||
|
|
Particular attention will be paid to the use of geometric altimetry and the potential for a 6G CNS network,
|
|||
|
|
including an aerial layer of HAPS acting as relays.
|
|||
|
|
WP3.3 Innovative modular network approach for CNS provision
|
|||
|
|
This work package will focus on developing a modular, technology -agnostic network approach for CNS
|
|||
|
|
provision to HAO. The goal is to define a layered architecture that can provide resilient and secure services
|
|||
|
|
by using a variety of redundant data links and a central operator-level fusion of multi-sensor data.
|
|||
|
|
This includes defining the following layers (as illustrated in Figure 1 above):
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 1 (Onboard): Multi-sensor Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) using diverse sensors.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 2 (Telemetry): Secure telemetry via redundant and dissimilar data links.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 3 (Operator): Real-time information available to the HAO operator, with multi-sensor data fusion,
|
|||
|
|
supporting services (Traffic Management and Conflict Resolution Service) and uncertainty computation.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 4 (Sharing): Authenticated position and identity data shared with authorised parties via a secure
|
|||
|
|
web API.
|
|||
|
|
It will also include a cross-cutting security layer: a transversal zero-trust cybersecurity framework across the
|
|||
|
|
entire chain to ensure resilience and security.
|
|||
|
|
WP3.4 Collaborative cyber security framework for CNS using Zero-Trust architecture
|
|||
|
|
This sub-work package is dedicated to building a collaborative security framework to build resilience and
|
|||
|
|
defend against cyber threats in the new aeronautical CNS environment , including the definition of the
|
|||
|
|
preliminary plan of the Security Risk Assessment ( SecRA) activities, considering the SESAR SecRAM
|
|||
|
|
methodology as a reference.
|
|||
|
|
The research will aim to define and validate a global security collaboration framework based on use cases
|
|||
|
|
across various CNS domains, considering the entire end -to-end chain. This approach directly addresses the
|
|||
|
|
limitations of current siloed security models by promoting an integrated, holistic defence strategy.
|
|||
|
|
The work includes:
|
|||
|
|
• Developing a HAPS-Specific Cybersecurity Framework and an Asset and Vulnerability Analysis to
|
|||
|
|
provide the theoretical basis for the digital verifier tool.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 198 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 31 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Researching solutions to mitigate radio frequency interference , with a focus on creating aircraft -
|
|||
|
|
installed active radio aerials capable of adapting to and mitigating the impact of jamming and spoofing
|
|||
|
|
attacks.
|
|||
|
|
• Building a Cybersecurity Verifier Tool , a digital artefact that will allow HAPS operators to
|
|||
|
|
independently validate CNS data integrity and self-assess compliance.
|
|||
|
|
• Investigating the use of the ICAO Trust Framework as a potential basis for authentication and security
|
|||
|
|
concepts.
|
|||
|
|
• Defining a preliminary plan to perform the Security Risk Assessment (SecRA) of the HAO baseline,
|
|||
|
|
tailored to the "Initialise" level of the SESAR SecRAM methodology, and to be finalized in WP5.4.
|
|||
|
|
Note: This research element also covers the monitoring and mitigation of potential cybersecurity risks
|
|||
|
|
introduced by new entrants (e.g., HAO) and builds on ongoing work from the FCDI “Collaborative Cyber
|
|||
|
|
Security Framework for CNS” project.
|
|||
|
|
The intended reporting sub-deliverables for WP3.4 are the preliminary version of the Security Assessment
|
|||
|
|
Plan (SecAP) and an initial documentation for the cyber security verifier tool.
|
|||
|
|
WP3.5 CNS as a service
|
|||
|
|
The work in this sub -work package will focus on defining and assessing a CNS as a Service (CNSaaS)
|
|||
|
|
concept for Higher Airspace Operations (HAO). This approach aims to decouple the provision of critical
|
|||
|
|
CNS functionalities from physical infrastructure, allowing for flexible, subscription-based services delivered
|
|||
|
|
by independent organisations.
|
|||
|
|
The work will proceed as follows:
|
|||
|
|
• CNSaaS Concept Development: a comprehensive CNSaaS concept will be developed, exploring new
|
|||
|
|
business models designed to enhance the resilience of existing CNS infrastructure by leveraging and
|
|||
|
|
interfacing with space-based assets.
|
|||
|
|
• Identification of Suitable Technologies: The project will identify and assess which CNS technologies
|
|||
|
|
and functions are suitable for a CNSaaS model.
|
|||
|
|
• Business Model Assessment: on relevant business models for providing these services, ensuring they
|
|||
|
|
are cost-effective and align with the needs of HAO operators, Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs),
|
|||
|
|
and other aviation stakeholders.
|
|||
|
|
• Technological Demonstrations: The project will outline possible technological demonstrations of
|
|||
|
|
several CNS components that can be tested in flight as part of the validation trials in WP4 and WP6. This
|
|||
|
|
will include investigating the potential use of a cryptographically verified vehicle identity.
|
|||
|
|
• Infrastructure Monitoring Services: The scope also includes the research and development of CNS
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure monitoring services to ensure the ongoing performance and reliability of the CNSaaS
|
|||
|
|
solution.
|
|||
|
|
WP3.6 Standardisation and Regulation
|
|||
|
|
This sub -work package will perform a comprehensive gap analysis and develop proposals to update the
|
|||
|
|
pertinent standardisation and regulatory frameworks for CNS provision in the higher airspace . Building on
|
|||
|
|
the CNS user needs, technological assessments, and flight trial data from WP4, the team will prepare
|
|||
|
|
recommendations for new standards and regulatory amendments. SCAN will submit proposals to relevant
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 199 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 32 of 49
|
|||
|
|
working groups at EUROCAE and prepare guidance material for submission to bodies such as EASA and
|
|||
|
|
JARUS (Task Force on SORA 3.0 - HAO use case). Collaborative activities with national and international
|
|||
|
|
organisations (e.g., ICAO) will ensure that European developments are harmonised with global frameworks.
|
|||
|
|
Milestones for WP3:
|
|||
|
|
• CNS User Needs Assessment Completed (M6) A comprehensive report detailing the consolidated CNS
|
|||
|
|
requirements from HAPS, supersonic, and space launch operators is delivered.
|
|||
|
|
• Initial Technical Specifications (TS/IRS) and OSED Delivered (M12) The first complete draft of the
|
|||
|
|
operational concept and technical specifications for the modular CNS architecture is completed and
|
|||
|
|
submitted for review.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Gap Analysis for Standardisation & Regulation Delivered (M18) The initial analysis identifying
|
|||
|
|
gaps in current standards (e.g., EUROCAE) and regulations (e.g., EASA) is finalised and delivered.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 4
|
|||
|
|
Work package title VALIDATION TRIALS – PART 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives To perform flight trials with multiple HAO vehicles flying in Higher Airspace to collect CNS
|
|||
|
|
data, and validate CNS technologies for various HAO users, including HAPS and a Sounding Rocket. The
|
|||
|
|
flight trials will be carried out with diverse HAPS platforms including both Lighter-than-Air and Heavier-
|
|||
|
|
than-Air platforms. The diversity of platforms and the wide-ranging payload lifting capacity will enable
|
|||
|
|
validation of technologies suited to diverse needs. Partners will include Elson Space, Sceye and Skydweller
|
|||
|
|
as well as sounding rockets.
|
|||
|
|
The validation program will aim to validate several aspects.
|
|||
|
|
1. Validation of specific CNS technologies and components , e.g. Directional LEO Sat com with Phased
|
|||
|
|
Array, SATCOM MLAT, GNSS, modified ADS-B.
|
|||
|
|
2. Validation of the connected-aircraft framework enabling a modular, redundant and technology agnostic
|
|||
|
|
architecture that leverages multiple technologies.
|
|||
|
|
3. Validation of the framework’s resiliency and ability to gracefully degrade – Testing the ability to
|
|||
|
|
handle the loss of some data links or positioning sources, and adjusting position uncertainty due to loss of
|
|||
|
|
navigation technologies, etc.
|
|||
|
|
4. Validation of HAO operator supporting systems – Testing data aggregation and conflict detection and
|
|||
|
|
resolution services, to ensure automation and scalability.
|
|||
|
|
5. Validation of the cyber -security and zero -trust framework across the entire chain , from s atellite
|
|||
|
|
authentication for PVT computation (e.g. Galileo OSNMA) to aircraft identity authentication over
|
|||
|
|
telemetry, sent to the operator and aircraft identity authentication over position reporting network.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The validation will first identify the specific CNS systems and features for testing in flight and be followed by
|
|||
|
|
the preparation of the flight trials, including the authorisation process by the aviation authorities, setting up the
|
|||
|
|
CNS payloads, execution of the flights and the analysis of the collected data.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 200 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 33 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
The work will be organised in the following sub-work-packages:
|
|||
|
|
WP4.1 Identification of specific CNS systems, features and test scenarios to validate in flight, considering
|
|||
|
|
the HAO user needs, potential CNS capabilities (addressed in WP3), and test platform lifting/power capacities.
|
|||
|
|
WP4.2 Technical development / adaptation efforts of necessary technologies.
|
|||
|
|
• Develop an OpenAPI specification and data exchange mechanism for HAPS operators to feed
|
|||
|
|
telemetry data over secure internet APIs (possible adaptation from Network Remote ID standard )
|
|||
|
|
(Layer #4 in Fi gure 1). This work package will define a standardised, machine-readable format for
|
|||
|
|
HAPS operators to communicate position and identity to authorized recipients using the OpenAPI
|
|||
|
|
standard. The specification will detail critical data fields, including position, altitude (barometric,
|
|||
|
|
geometric), uncertainty estimates, platform/operator identity. Furthermore, this task includes defining
|
|||
|
|
the secure mechanism for data exchange, specifying API endpoints, communication protocols, and
|
|||
|
|
authentication requirements (e.g leveraging ICAO Trust Framework).
|
|||
|
|
• Develop automated cybersecurity verifier (supporting Layer#4) enabling the automated programmatic
|
|||
|
|
validation of the integrity and authenticity of position report streams from any compliant HAPS
|
|||
|
|
operator.
|
|||
|
|
• Develop position estimation logic (ground based or on the aircraft) fusing multiple position sensors
|
|||
|
|
(GNSS, Baro, Satcom MLAT, etc.) into a single position and uncertainty estimates. This work will
|
|||
|
|
aim at developing logic which can enable graceful degradation to alternate positioning techniques in
|
|||
|
|
case of some solutions being unavailable. It may include the logic enabling the conversion of
|
|||
|
|
geometrical altitude into barometric altitude using MET data, enabling the safe separation of aircraft
|
|||
|
|
using different altitude technologies and datums, without needing to rely on transition altitudes. (Layer
|
|||
|
|
#1 or layer#3)
|
|||
|
|
• Develop telemetry routing logic for the transmission of telemetry data over multiple
|
|||
|
|
asynchronous data links of different bandwidth capacity and latency , and develop a telemetry
|
|||
|
|
prioritization scheme allowing the prioritization of essential position telemetry as connectivity
|
|||
|
|
bandwidth degrades. (Layer #2)
|
|||
|
|
• Based on the performed assessment of current ADS-B performance limitations enhancements will be
|
|||
|
|
implemented into a prototype transponder capable of operating under the revised specifications. A
|
|||
|
|
downward compatible ADS -B transponder message modification for HAO beyond altitudes of
|
|||
|
|
126.700 ft, capable to provide surveillance information throughout the HA including fast and ultrafast
|
|||
|
|
vehicle operations , will be developed . This work aims at message modifications and related data
|
|||
|
|
processing, to be embedded into a test transponder for validation via a rocket launch experiment ,
|
|||
|
|
Develop strong authentication and cyber-security logic on the telemetry communication links between
|
|||
|
|
the aircraft and operator. (Layer #2)
|
|||
|
|
WP4.3 Preparation of the flight trials for the evaluation of CNS capabilities in the higher airspace (> FL500).
|
|||
|
|
A plan for the flight campaigns with HAPS will be developed including:
|
|||
|
|
• Platforms: fixed-wing heavier than air HAPS (Elson Space and Skydweller) and lighter than air HAPS
|
|||
|
|
(Sceye).
|
|||
|
|
• Definition of the flight plans: flight trajectory, dates, duration, contingencies, number of flights
|
|||
|
|
needed, with due consideration of the overflown areas in continental and oceanic airspace.
|
|||
|
|
• Test planning: CNS features to be logged per HAPS platform, per flight #, and geographical areas
|
|||
|
|
(oceanic/over land masses) from ground level up to the higher airspace above FL500.
|
|||
|
|
• Flight authorization: interaction with the pertinent aviation authorities to get the approval of the flights
|
|||
|
|
with each HAPS aircraft based on an agreed method (e.g. SORA, permit to fly, others) to substantiate
|
|||
|
|
the safety of the flight. This step will build on the outcome of ECHO2 Solution #2 “Sandbox module
|
|||
|
|
and procedural package for the Integration of HAPS operations in European ATM” . It also has a
|
|||
|
|
critical dependency of ongoing work on HAPS by EASA and JARUS:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 201 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 34 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• EASA: guidance material on the ‘regulatory sandbox’ concept supporting Member States and the
|
|||
|
|
industry to conduct the first tests and demonstrations in the EU, exempting these tests from the
|
|||
|
|
application of relevant EU regulations. Ref. EASA Proposal for a Roadmap on HAO, March 2023.
|
|||
|
|
• JARUS: ongoing work on the adaptation of SORA for HAO (for HAPS that qualify as UAS) along
|
|||
|
|
two work streams: a) probabilistic approach for UAS with very limited propulsion especially LTA ,
|
|||
|
|
and b) deterministic approach for more controllable configurations.
|
|||
|
|
It is important to note that the HAO flight campaigns herein proposed can be considered as experimental
|
|||
|
|
flights, so alleviations should be identified and agreed with the aviation authority (e.g. to reduce the level of
|
|||
|
|
SAIL in SORA), until normal commercial HAO operations start.
|
|||
|
|
As an element for consideration in the flight authorization process, the potential impact of the HAO on areas
|
|||
|
|
on the ground and on volumes of the airspace below the flight will be evaluated (this can be done interactively,
|
|||
|
|
close to real -time, extending the GUI tools https://undefiened.github.io/uav_risk/ for assessment and
|
|||
|
|
mitigation of drone flights ground and air impact).
|
|||
|
|
WP4.4 Preparation of the hardware and software elements of the CNS solutions to be tested in flight .
|
|||
|
|
This may be based on current airborne/ground systems used by the HAPS, in each case, or be installed as a
|
|||
|
|
payload onboard the HAPS.
|
|||
|
|
• Procurement, setting up and installation of the CNS elements for data collection, considering the Size,
|
|||
|
|
Weight and Power-Cost (SWaP-C) factor, mass and balance, power consumption and other constraints of
|
|||
|
|
the HAPS platform: antennas, receiver/transponder/datalink, power supply, data logging of the CNS
|
|||
|
|
features to be collected in flight, etc.
|
|||
|
|
• Key assessment metrics for the CNS features to be assessed:
|
|||
|
|
o Communications: signal integrity, latency and handover performance, availability;
|
|||
|
|
o Navigation (positioning): e.g. GNSS and Satcom MLAT horizontal and vertical positioning
|
|||
|
|
accuracy, availability, integrity, INS performance; multi-source navigation reliability and graceful
|
|||
|
|
degradation; impact of high -altitude conditions , impact of long -duration flight at altitude
|
|||
|
|
(months);
|
|||
|
|
o Surveillance: network-based position reporting (network remote ID ), ADS-B
|
|||
|
|
transmission/reception reliability, SSR detection coverage, MLAT feasibility, latency in
|
|||
|
|
surveillance relays, continuity of situational awareness.
|
|||
|
|
• Ground tests, to ensure correct data logging of CNS data, formats, electromagnetic interference ( EMI)
|
|||
|
|
compatibility, etc.
|
|||
|
|
• Methodology for the assessment of the collected CNS data.
|
|||
|
|
• Development of threat modelling and cyber-security templates for HAPS flights.
|
|||
|
|
WP 4.5 Validate the Cyber security verifier tool in operational demonstrations.
|
|||
|
|
WP4.6 Execution of flight trials
|
|||
|
|
There will be three sub-WP, one per HAPS vehicle (Elson Space, Sceye and Skydweller).
|
|||
|
|
• Execution of the flight; data will be collected during the whole flight to assess the variation of CNS
|
|||
|
|
performances with altitude.
|
|||
|
|
• Analysis of the collected data including the derivation of the true 4D trajectory of the HAPS as well as the
|
|||
|
|
assessment of the capabilities and possible limitations of the different CNS features of interest.
|
|||
|
|
• Demonstrate strategic and tactical resolution capabilities using CNS data feeds (ADS -B v2/3, telemetry,
|
|||
|
|
geometric altimetry).
|
|||
|
|
Elson Space España will contribute to the in-flight validation activities in WP4 and WP6 with their Heavier-
|
|||
|
|
Than-Air (HTA) HAPS platform, providing up to three flights in the stratosphere, each lasting up to two
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 202 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 35 of 49
|
|||
|
|
weeks, for CNS testing. These flights are expected to take place over the Teruel region with possible
|
|||
|
|
expansion to the Mediterranean and Canary Islands , pending necessary flight permissions. Additionally,
|
|||
|
|
Elson Space will contribute to the physical and networking payload integration activities, developing solutions
|
|||
|
|
to integrate the various CNS sensors and facilitating the soak testing of the avionics to minimize the risk of
|
|||
|
|
electromagnetic interference (EMI) during flight. The platform's flexible payload ba y allows for the
|
|||
|
|
straightforward integration of various CNS equipment within a 10kg mass and 200W power budget, enabling
|
|||
|
|
comprehensive data collection to address the project's core research questions.
|
|||
|
|
Sceye builds and operates solar -powered, lighter -than-air HAPS for stratospheric infrastructure. Our
|
|||
|
|
aerodynamically shaped balloon delivers a large SWaP (Size, Weight and Power) budget, enabling the ability
|
|||
|
|
to carry and power multiple payloads of over 200 kg an d 2 kW of power consumption while remaining over
|
|||
|
|
an operating area for extended periods of time – months to potentially years – enabling multi-service operation.
|
|||
|
|
Sceye focuses on universal broadband internet connectivity, climate monitoring, environm ental and natural
|
|||
|
|
resource management, natural disaster prevention and monitoring, and emergency response support and
|
|||
|
|
coordination. The single-use platform operates under Unmanned Free Balloon regulations (FAA’s Part 101
|
|||
|
|
and ICAO Annex 2 Appendix over international waters). The platform maintains level flight through buoyancy
|
|||
|
|
using a super -pressure envelope and features an Assistive Impulse Device (AID) that can be activated at
|
|||
|
|
altitude to counteract moderate winds to stay on station or navigate into more favourable winds. To date, Sceye
|
|||
|
|
has successfully completed over 20 stratospheric flights, proving its ability to fly for full diurnal cycles,
|
|||
|
|
maintain position in moderate winds, and perform remote sensing and telecommunication demonstrations,
|
|||
|
|
including direct-to-device connectivity through a 4G MIMO array antenna with smartphones on the ground.
|
|||
|
|
A new hangar is currently being built in Teruel, Spain, which will serve as a base for EMEA operations. The
|
|||
|
|
Sceye platform is a digitally connected aircraft with a modular architecture. It can support multiple,
|
|||
|
|
independent, and asynchronous data links, such as directional Ku/Ka SATCOM, L -Band SATCOM, E-Band
|
|||
|
|
backhaul, and FSOC, which are used to report telemetry and or payload data to ground automation systems.
|
|||
|
|
In this project, Sceye will conduct a single, multi-month flight from Spain, leveraging its high SWaP (Size,
|
|||
|
|
Weight, and Power) capability. Multi -sensor navigation data will be reported to ground automation systems
|
|||
|
|
via multiple asynchronous data links. This data will then be de -duplicated and fused by ground automation
|
|||
|
|
and communicated in real -time to au thorized recipients through secure, internet -based APIs. This will
|
|||
|
|
demonstrate how distributed connectivity networks can provide cost -effective, resilient, and secure
|
|||
|
|
surveillance solutions with global reach, facilitating private information sharing with authorized stakeholders
|
|||
|
|
(such as Air Navigation Service Providers, operators, and National Security Agencies) on a need -to-know
|
|||
|
|
basis.
|
|||
|
|
The Skydweller solar-powered medium-altitude pseudo-satellite (HAPS), which operates up to FL500, will
|
|||
|
|
conduct flight trials from the Canary Islands Stratoport in Fuerteventura (in WP6). These trials will
|
|||
|
|
evaluate the performance of current and innovative communications and navigation systems (CNS) in a higher
|
|||
|
|
airspace environment. Over one three-month period, a flight (one or two) will be carried out, depending on
|
|||
|
|
project requirements and aircraft availability, over the Canary Islands and oceanic sectors , pending flight
|
|||
|
|
authorization. Skydweller will provide a 150 kg payload capacity and a 1 kW power budget, which will allow
|
|||
|
|
for the integration of a variety of CNS sensors and provide a wide range of testing possibilities. Payload
|
|||
|
|
integration and disintegration activities for CNS sensors should take about two months for each work package.
|
|||
|
|
WP4.7 improve telemetry for airspace management of STO launches - preparation of rocket trial [DLR]
|
|||
|
|
In preparation for the validation of the modified transponder functions for HA operation, the payload
|
|||
|
|
integration for the planned MAPHEUS sounding rocket launch must be prepared. The work includes the
|
|||
|
|
specification of the required interfaces, the adaptation of the flight hardware to the environmental parameters
|
|||
|
|
of the installation space in the rocket (payload accommodation) as well as the connection to the power supply,
|
|||
|
|
antennas and position data provision. Hardware qualification for the rocket flight must be carried out (e.g.
|
|||
|
|
shaker, vacuum tests if necessary, EMC). The integration of the flight hardware into the rocket takes place in
|
|||
|
|
direct preparation for the flight.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 203 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 36 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Milestones for WP4:
|
|||
|
|
• Flight authorisation for HTA HAPS secured (M12) Formal authorisations / permits to fly HTA HAPS
|
|||
|
|
(Elson Space and Skydweller) have been obtained from all relevant national aviation authorities for the
|
|||
|
|
flight trials scheduled in the first reporting period.
|
|||
|
|
• Flight authorisation for LTA HAPS secured (M12) Formal authorisations / permits to fly LTA HAPS
|
|||
|
|
(Sceye) have been obtained from all relevant national aviation authorities for the flight trials scheduled in
|
|||
|
|
the first reporting period.
|
|||
|
|
• First Phase of HAPS Flight Trials Executed & Data Analysed (M18) At least one flight trial with a
|
|||
|
|
HAPS platform has been successfully completed, and the initial CNS data has been collected, processed,
|
|||
|
|
and documented in an initial Validation Report (VALR).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 5
|
|||
|
|
Work package title CNS MEANS TO SERVE HAO – PART 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
This work package is a direct continuation of WP3 and directly incorporates the findings of WP4 and WP6 (which
|
|||
|
|
will be ongoing, in parallel to WP5). Its primary goal is to perform a detailed gap and risk analysis of the CNS
|
|||
|
|
framework, using the theoretical concepts from WP3 and the real -world flight data collected dur ing the initial
|
|||
|
|
validation trials in WP4. The work in WP5 will serve as the foundation for the final consolidation of the CNS
|
|||
|
|
solution and will prepare the groundwork for the final validation trials in WP6.
|
|||
|
|
WP5 will continue addressing and consolidating:
|
|||
|
|
1. CNS user needs assessment: Refine the comprehensive set of CNS user needs identified in WP3 by
|
|||
|
|
validating them against the data collected during the in-flight trials.
|
|||
|
|
2. CNS technological solutions: Conduct a detailed gap and risk analysis for communications, navigation, and
|
|||
|
|
surveillance, applying real-world data from flight trials to the theoretical assessments from WP3.
|
|||
|
|
3. Innovative modular network approach: Validate and refine the layered, technology -agnostic architecture
|
|||
|
|
for CNS provision to ensure it can provide resilient and secure services, as proven by the flight trial data.
|
|||
|
|
4. Innovative modular network approach: Validate and refine the layered, technology -agnostic architecture
|
|||
|
|
for CNS provision to ensure it can provide resilient and secure services, as proven by the flight trial data.
|
|||
|
|
5. Collaborative cyber security framework: Consolidate and validate the zero-trust cybersecurity framework
|
|||
|
|
and develop a Cybersecurity Verifier Tool to enable HAPS operators to self-assess compliance and validate
|
|||
|
|
CNS data integrity. This tool will be built by creating a HAPS Asset Classification Module, implementing
|
|||
|
|
a Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis Engine to assess vulnerabilities and potential attack vectors against
|
|||
|
|
core security principles, and creating a Standardised Cybersecurity Capability Report Gene rator to
|
|||
|
|
produce a publicly accessible, evidence-based report.
|
|||
|
|
6. CNS as a service: Validate and refine the CNS as a Service (CNSaaS) concept, exploring new business
|
|||
|
|
models and technical requirements for providing critical CNS functionalities as flexible, subscription -based
|
|||
|
|
services.
|
|||
|
|
7. CRS as an enabler of scalable operations: Validate and refine the CRS as a critical component of scalable
|
|||
|
|
operations and part of CNSaaS.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 204 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 37 of 49
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of Work
|
|||
|
|
This section outlines the work to be performed within Work Package 5, which builds on the initial research and
|
|||
|
|
theoretical assessments from WP3. The work focuses on performing detailed gap and risk analyses using the data
|
|||
|
|
collected during the flight trials in WP4 and WP6 to ensure the proposed CNS capabilities meet the needs of
|
|||
|
|
Higher Airspace Operations (HAO).
|
|||
|
|
WP5.1 CNS user needs assessment
|
|||
|
|
This work package will continue to refine the comprehensive set of CNS user needs for Higher Airspace
|
|||
|
|
Operations (HAO), covering both civil and military use cases. It will take the initial needs identified in WP3 and
|
|||
|
|
validate them against the data collected during the in-flight trials in WP4 and WP6. The assessment will be based
|
|||
|
|
on surveys of HAO operators and service providers, with a specific focus on High -Altitude Platform Systems
|
|||
|
|
(HAPS), supersonic and hypersonic vehicles, and space launch and re-entry operators (LRO).
|
|||
|
|
WP5.2 CNS technological solutions (theoretical)
|
|||
|
|
This sub-work package will conduct a gap and risk analysis of the current and innovative CNS capabilities and
|
|||
|
|
their limitations at altitudes higher than FL500. Building on the theoretical assessments from WP3, this work will
|
|||
|
|
now apply real -world data from the WP4 and WP6 flight tria ls. The work will involve a systematic literature
|
|||
|
|
analysis and will also gather relevant results from research conducted by US organisations like NASA and the
|
|||
|
|
FAA. The analysis will cover a range of CNS technologies, including:
|
|||
|
|
• Communications: A review of current aviation communications (e.g., VHF, HF, SATCOM) and innovative
|
|||
|
|
solutions like connected aircraft technologies.
|
|||
|
|
8. Standardisation and Regulation: Perform a comprehensive gap analysis of regulatory frameworks and
|
|||
|
|
develop proposals for updating relevant standardisation and regulatory documentation based on the project's
|
|||
|
|
findings.
|
|||
|
|
Deliverables: This section outlines the key SESAR deliverables that will be produced by WP5. These deliverables
|
|||
|
|
represent the tangible outputs of the detailed gap and risk analyses, which serve as crucial inputs for the final
|
|||
|
|
validation trials and the overall project’s solution pack.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.1 Final SPR -INTEROP/OSED: This deliverable provides the final, refined operational services and
|
|||
|
|
environment description, incorporating findings from all work packages and flight trials.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.2 Final TS/IRS: This will define the final technical specifications and interface requirements for the
|
|||
|
|
proposed CNS solution, ready for pre-deployment validation.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.3 Final STAND: This deliverable will present the final, consolidated proposals for standardisation, based
|
|||
|
|
on the project’s technical findings.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.4 Final REG: This will contain the final, consolidated proposals for regulatory amendments.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.5 CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis): This document will present a structured economic analysis of the
|
|||
|
|
proposed CNS solution, assessing its potential benefits against high-level costs.
|
|||
|
|
• D5.6 Contextual Note: This deliverable will provide a summary of the project’s scope, operational and
|
|||
|
|
performance benefits, system impacts, and recommendations for future activities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 205 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 38 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Navigation (positioning): An examination of advanced PNT systems such as multi -frequency multi -
|
|||
|
|
constellation (MFMC) GNSS receivers, inertial systems, celestial navigation, and the potential use of 6G.
|
|||
|
|
• Surveillance: A theoretical assessment of network remote ID, satellite -based ADS-B, ADS-C, SSR radars,
|
|||
|
|
modified ADS-B for HAO and the use of direct telemetry data from operators.
|
|||
|
|
• Conflict Detection and Resolution: Review, improve and implement CRS technical specification for interface
|
|||
|
|
with CNS services
|
|||
|
|
Particular attention will be paid to the use of geometric altimetry and the potential for a 6G CNS network,
|
|||
|
|
including an aerial layer of HAPS acting as relays.
|
|||
|
|
WP5.3 Innovative modular network approach for CNS provision
|
|||
|
|
This work package will focus on validating and refining the modular, technology-agnostic network approach for
|
|||
|
|
CNS provision to HAO. The goal is to ensure the layered architecture defined in WP3 can provide resilient and
|
|||
|
|
secure services by using a variety of redundant data links and a central operator-level fusion of multi-sensor data,
|
|||
|
|
as proven by the flight trial data. This includes validating the following layers:
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 1 (Onboard): Multi-sensor Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) using diverse sensors.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 2 (Telemetry): Secure telemetry via redundant and dissimilar data links.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 3 ( Operator): Real-time information available to the operator, with multi -sensor data fusion and
|
|||
|
|
uncertainty computation.
|
|||
|
|
• Layer 4 (Sharing): Authenticated position and identity data shared with authorised parties via a secure web
|
|||
|
|
API.
|
|||
|
|
It will also validate the cross -cutting security layer: a transversal zero -trust cybersecurity framework across the
|
|||
|
|
entire chain to ensure resilience and security.
|
|||
|
|
WP5.4 Collaborative cyber security framework for CNS using Zero-Trust architecture
|
|||
|
|
This sub-work package is dedicated to building a collaborative security framework to defend against cyber threats
|
|||
|
|
in the new aeronautical CNS environment. Building on the initial research from WP3, this work will now focus
|
|||
|
|
on the practical application of the framework.
|
|||
|
|
From a long -term research and engineering perspective, the project will explore automated Security Risk
|
|||
|
|
Assessment to manage the complexity of HAO and increase the cost-efficiency of engineering secure systems.
|
|||
|
|
The work will aim to define and validate a global security collaboration framework based on use cases across
|
|||
|
|
various CNS domains, considering the entire end-to-end chain. The main outcomes of this work will include:
|
|||
|
|
• Performing a preliminary Security Risk Assessment (SecRA) of the HAO baseline, tailored to the "Initialise"
|
|||
|
|
level of the SESAR SecRAM methodology.
|
|||
|
|
• Establishing a methodology for the SecRA of HAO and executing it to address the main security risk factors,
|
|||
|
|
in order to select the preliminary security controls and security requirements.
|
|||
|
|
• Identifying methodological components and general recommendations for security aspects across HAO
|
|||
|
|
solutions, with a particular focus on extending the SecRAM and SecRAM catalogues to include HAO support
|
|||
|
|
and automating the assessment process.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 206 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 39 of 49
|
|||
|
|
• Researching solutions to mitigate radio frequency interference, with a focus on creating aircraft -installed
|
|||
|
|
active radio aerials capable of adapting to and mitigating the impact of jamming attacks.
|
|||
|
|
• Building a Cybersecurity Verifier Tool, a digital artefact that will allow HAPS operators to independently
|
|||
|
|
validate CNS data integrity and self-assess compliance.
|
|||
|
|
o Develop a HAPS Asset Classification Module: This task involves creating the core software module
|
|||
|
|
that allows operators to define their systems according to the new framework developed in WP4. It
|
|||
|
|
will provide a guided interface for identifying and documenti ng intangible Primary Assets (e.g.,
|
|||
|
|
communication relay services) and the tangible Supporting Assets (e.g., ground stations, platform
|
|||
|
|
hardware, data links) they rely on.
|
|||
|
|
o Implement a Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis Engine: This involves building the analytical engine
|
|||
|
|
of the verifier, which will facilitate a robust threat modelling process for each classified asset. The
|
|||
|
|
engine will assess vulnerabilities and potential att ack vectors, evaluating risks against the core
|
|||
|
|
security principles of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA).
|
|||
|
|
o Create a Standardised Cybersecurity Capability Report Generator: This final task focuses on creating
|
|||
|
|
a publicly accessible, open verifier tool. It will process the asset classification and risk analysis data
|
|||
|
|
to generate a standardised, evidence -based cybersecurity capability report. The key objective is to
|
|||
|
|
provide a common benchmark that any operator in the HAPS community can use to transparently
|
|||
|
|
assess their security posture against the framework. This approach promotes a consistent industry
|
|||
|
|
standard for security declarations, helping to streamline regulatory compliance and build trust across
|
|||
|
|
the entire HAPS ecosystem.
|
|||
|
|
• Investigating the use of the ICAO Trust Framework as a potential basis for authentication and security
|
|||
|
|
concepts.
|
|||
|
|
The intended reporting sub-deliverables for WP5.4 are the final version of the Security Assessment Plan (SecAP)
|
|||
|
|
and the specification of the security requirements to be documented in the SPR -INTEROP/OSED and TS/IRS,
|
|||
|
|
based on the SecRA results (stored on the member’s own systems) , in compliance with the rules established in
|
|||
|
|
SESAR Project Handbook.
|
|||
|
|
Note: This research element also covers the monitoring and mitigation of potential cybersecurity risks introduced
|
|||
|
|
by new entrants (e.g., HAO) and builds on ongoing work from the FCDI “Collaborative Cyber Security
|
|||
|
|
Framework for CNS” project.
|
|||
|
|
WP5.5 CNS as a service
|
|||
|
|
The work in this sub-work package will focus on validating and refining the CNS as a Service (CNSaaS) concept
|
|||
|
|
for Higher Airspace Operations (HAO). This approach aims to decouple the provision of critical CNS
|
|||
|
|
functionalities from physical infrastructure, a llowing for flexible, subscription -based services delivered by
|
|||
|
|
independent organisations. The work will proceed as follows:
|
|||
|
|
• CNSaaS Concept Development: We will validate the comprehensive CNSaaS concept, exploring new
|
|||
|
|
business models designed to enhance the resilience of existing CNS infrastructure by leveraging and
|
|||
|
|
interfacing with space-based assets.
|
|||
|
|
• Identification of Suitable Technologies: The project will validate which CNS technologies and functions
|
|||
|
|
are suitable for a CNSaaS model using the data collected in the flight trials.
|
|||
|
|
• Business Model Assessment: We will refine relevant business models for providing these services, ensuring
|
|||
|
|
they are cost-effective and align with the needs of HAO operators, Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs),
|
|||
|
|
and other aviation stakeholders. Support Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) by quantifying throughput, efficiency,
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 207 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 40 of 49
|
|||
|
|
and safety improvements enabled by CRS.
|
|||
|
|
• Technological Demonstrations: The project will outline possible technological demonstrations of several
|
|||
|
|
CNS components that can be tested in flight as part of the validation trials in WP4 and WP6. This will include
|
|||
|
|
investigating the potential use of a cryptographically verified vehicle identity.
|
|||
|
|
• Infrastructure Monitoring Services: The scope also includes the research and development of CNS
|
|||
|
|
infrastructure monitoring services to ensure the ongoing performance and reliability of the CNSaaS solution.
|
|||
|
|
WP5.6 Standardisation and Regulation
|
|||
|
|
This sub-work package will perform a comprehensive gap analysis and develop proposals to update the pertinent
|
|||
|
|
standardisation and regulatory frameworks for CNS provision in the higher airspace. Building on the CNS user
|
|||
|
|
needs, technological assessments, and flight trial data from WP4 and WP6, the team will prepare recommendations
|
|||
|
|
for new standards and regulatory amendments. We will submit proposals to relevant working groups at
|
|||
|
|
EUROCAE and prepare guidance material for submission to bodies such as EASA and J ARUS. Collaborative
|
|||
|
|
activities with national and international organisations (e.g., ICAO) will ensure that European developments are
|
|||
|
|
harmonised with global frameworks.
|
|||
|
|
Milestones for WP5:
|
|||
|
|
• Gap & Risk Analysis Based on Flight Data Completed (M24) A comprehensive report detailing the gap
|
|||
|
|
and risk analysis of the proposed CNS solutions, using the empirical data from the initial validation trials, is
|
|||
|
|
delivered.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Model Finalised (M30) The methodology and model for the CBA are
|
|||
|
|
complete, and preliminary results based on the consolidated technical solution are available.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Technical Specifications (TS/IRS) & OSED Delivered for TRL-6 (M34) The final, pre-deployment
|
|||
|
|
versions of the technical specifications and operational concept, incorporating all project findings and ready
|
|||
|
|
for the Exit Maturity Gate, are submitted.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Work package number 6
|
|||
|
|
Work package title VALIDATION TRIALS – PART 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Objectives
|
|||
|
|
1. To continue with the execution of the flight trials with HAPS (started in WP4) and to perform the flight test
|
|||
|
|
with a sounding rocket.
|
|||
|
|
2. To derive and consolidate the outcome of the assessment of CNS services for HAO as key elements of the
|
|||
|
|
final validation documents.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Description of work
|
|||
|
|
WP6.1 Continue the execution of flight trials with HAPS (three HAPS cases: Elson Space, Sceye, Skydweller),
|
|||
|
|
including CNS data collection and assessment, data modelling as well as cyber security analysis and validation.
|
|||
|
|
WP6.2 Execution - Test with sounding rocket – surveillance & tracking [DLR]
|
|||
|
|
The prototype ADS -B transponder will be integrated as a payload on a MAPHEUS sounding rocket during a
|
|||
|
|
suborbital launch campaign in Kiruna to test real -world performance. Signal reception will be monitored and
|
|||
|
|
recorded using ground-based ADS-B receivers positioned along the predicted flight path, and—where feasible—
|
|||
|
|
space-based ADS-B platforms to assess extended coverage potential. The collected data will be compared against
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 208 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 41 of 49
|
|||
|
|
performance from existing ADS-B transponders under equivalent conditions to quantify improvements in altitude
|
|||
|
|
coverage, track continuity, positional accuracy, and latency. Deploy refined CRS algorithms in second -phase
|
|||
|
|
HAPS/rocket trials and validate CRS within cooperative operating environment scenarios (multi-operator HAO +
|
|||
|
|
conventional traffic).
|
|||
|
|
WP6.3 Results of the Validation, deriving conclusions on CNS for HAO for the validation report.
|
|||
|
|
Milestones for WP6:
|
|||
|
|
• Second Phase of HAPS Flight Trials Completed (M24) All planned flight trials with the four HAPS
|
|||
|
|
platforms are successfully executed, and the corresponding CNS data sets have been collected and prepared
|
|||
|
|
for final analysis.
|
|||
|
|
• Sounding Rocket Validation Trial Successfully Executed (M28) The flight trial with the sounding rocket
|
|||
|
|
is completed, and the performance data for the modified ADS-B transponder has been successfully collected
|
|||
|
|
and logged.
|
|||
|
|
• Final Consolidated Validation Report (VALR) Delivered (M32) The comprehensive final VALR is
|
|||
|
|
submitted, containing the consolidated findings, data analysis, and performance assessments from all HAPS
|
|||
|
|
and sounding rocket flight trials conducted throughout the project.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Link
|
|||
|
|
to
|
|||
|
|
work
|
|||
|
|
packa
|
|||
|
|
ge
|
|||
|
|
ID
|
|||
|
|
Soluti
|
|||
|
|
on
|
|||
|
|
Solutio
|
|||
|
|
n Title
|
|||
|
|
Solution Definition Solutio
|
|||
|
|
n Lead
|
|||
|
|
Benefic
|
|||
|
|
iary
|
|||
|
|
Initial
|
|||
|
|
Maturity
|
|||
|
|
Level
|
|||
|
|
Forec
|
|||
|
|
ast
|
|||
|
|
Targ
|
|||
|
|
et
|
|||
|
|
Matu
|
|||
|
|
rity
|
|||
|
|
Level
|
|||
|
|
Qualitative
|
|||
|
|
Performance
|
|||
|
|
Expectation
|
|||
|
|
(as per
|
|||
|
|
project
|
|||
|
|
Handbook)
|
|||
|
|
All #1 Solution
|
|||
|
|
1: CNS
|
|||
|
|
means to
|
|||
|
|
serve
|
|||
|
|
HAO
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A highly cost -effective,
|
|||
|
|
resilient and secure CNS
|
|||
|
|
solution for HAO, that will be
|
|||
|
|
proven in flight and will adapt
|
|||
|
|
certain UTM technologies to
|
|||
|
|
HAO.
|
|||
|
|
ECTL
|
|||
|
|
SkyNa
|
|||
|
|
v
|
|||
|
|
Sceye
|
|||
|
|
TRL 2-6
|
|||
|
|
(functional
|
|||
|
|
prototype
|
|||
|
|
and early
|
|||
|
|
validation in
|
|||
|
|
ECHO).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
TRL
|
|||
|
|
6
|
|||
|
|
CNS service
|
|||
|
|
KPIs, e.g.
|
|||
|
|
positioning
|
|||
|
|
accuracy, com
|
|||
|
|
latency,
|
|||
|
|
integrity,
|
|||
|
|
service
|
|||
|
|
volume,
|
|||
|
|
service
|
|||
|
|
availability.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables
|
|||
|
|
Num
|
|||
|
|
ber Deliverable name Short description
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
packag
|
|||
|
|
e
|
|||
|
|
numbe
|
|||
|
|
r
|
|||
|
|
Short
|
|||
|
|
name of
|
|||
|
|
lead
|
|||
|
|
participa
|
|||
|
|
nt
|
|||
|
|
Type
|
|||
|
|
Disse
|
|||
|
|
minati
|
|||
|
|
on
|
|||
|
|
level
|
|||
|
|
Delivery
|
|||
|
|
date
|
|||
|
|
(in
|
|||
|
|
months)
|
|||
|
|
D1.1 Kick-off Meeting
|
|||
|
|
Report Report from KoM 1 ECTL R PU M1
|
|||
|
|
D1.2 Project Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan (PMP)
|
|||
|
|
Initial project and
|
|||
|
|
risk management
|
|||
|
|
plan
|
|||
|
|
1 ECTL R PU M3
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 209 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 42 of 49
|
|||
|
|
D1.3 Data Management
|
|||
|
|
Plan (DMP) DMP 1 ECTL DMP PU M6
|
|||
|
|
D1.4 Periodic Report -
|
|||
|
|
Reporting Period 1
|
|||
|
|
Report by the end of
|
|||
|
|
the 1st reporting
|
|||
|
|
period (M1-M18)
|
|||
|
|
1 ECTL OTHER PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D1.5
|
|||
|
|
Updated Project
|
|||
|
|
Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
(PMP)
|
|||
|
|
Updated project and
|
|||
|
|
risk management
|
|||
|
|
plan
|
|||
|
|
1 ECTL R PU M20
|
|||
|
|
D1.6
|
|||
|
|
Updated Data
|
|||
|
|
Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
(DMP)
|
|||
|
|
Updated DMP 1 ECTL DMP PU M22
|
|||
|
|
D1.7
|
|||
|
|
Final Data
|
|||
|
|
Management Plan
|
|||
|
|
(DMP)
|
|||
|
|
Final DMP 1 ECTL DMP PU M32
|
|||
|
|
D1.8 Final Project Report Final report 1 ECTL OTHER PU M36
|
|||
|
|
D2.1
|
|||
|
|
Communication,
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination and
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation (CDE)
|
|||
|
|
Plan
|
|||
|
|
Detailed plan for
|
|||
|
|
CDE
|
|||
|
|
2 ECTL R PU M3
|
|||
|
|
D2.2 Project Website and
|
|||
|
|
Online presence
|
|||
|
|
External (open
|
|||
|
|
access) website
|
|||
|
|
2 ECTL DEC PU M3
|
|||
|
|
D2.3 Updated CDE Plan Updated plan for
|
|||
|
|
CDE
|
|||
|
|
2 ECTL R PU M20
|
|||
|
|
D2.4
|
|||
|
|
Mid-project
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Workshop Report
|
|||
|
|
The report from the
|
|||
|
|
mid project
|
|||
|
|
dissemination event.
|
|||
|
|
2 ECTL R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D2.5
|
|||
|
|
End-project
|
|||
|
|
Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Workshop Report
|
|||
|
|
The report from the
|
|||
|
|
dissemination event
|
|||
|
|
by end of the
|
|||
|
|
project.
|
|||
|
|
2 ECTL R PU M36
|
|||
|
|
D3.1 Initial SPR-
|
|||
|
|
INTEROP/OSED
|
|||
|
|
Initial safety &
|
|||
|
|
performance/interop
|
|||
|
|
erability reqs.
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav R PU M12
|
|||
|
|
D3.2 Initial TS/IRS Initial technical
|
|||
|
|
specifications/interfa
|
|||
|
|
ce requirements
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav R PU M12
|
|||
|
|
D3.3 Intermediate SPR-
|
|||
|
|
INTEROP/OSED
|
|||
|
|
Intermediate SPR-
|
|||
|
|
INTEROP/OSED
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D3.4 Intermediate TS/IRS Intermediate
|
|||
|
|
TS/IRS
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D3.5 Initial STAND Initial input to
|
|||
|
|
standardisation
|
|||
|
|
activities.
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D3.6 Initial REG Initial regulatory
|
|||
|
|
elements on HAO
|
|||
|
|
3 SkyNav R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D4.1 Initial VALP Initial validation
|
|||
|
|
plan
|
|||
|
|
4 Sceye R PU M12
|
|||
|
|
D4.2 Initial VALR Initial validation
|
|||
|
|
report
|
|||
|
|
4 Sceye R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D4.3 Intermediate VALP Intermediate
|
|||
|
|
validation plan
|
|||
|
|
4 Sceye R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
D4.4 Initial CyberVerifier Initial tool 4 Sceye R PU M18
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 210 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 43 of 49
|
|||
|
|
D5.1 Final SPR-
|
|||
|
|
INTEROP/OSED
|
|||
|
|
Final SPR-
|
|||
|
|
INTEROP/OSED
|
|||
|
|
5 SkyNav R PU M34
|
|||
|
|
D5.2 Final TS/IRS Final technical
|
|||
|
|
specifications/interfa
|
|||
|
|
ce requirements
|
|||
|
|
5 SkyNav R PU M34
|
|||
|
|
D5.3 Final STAND Final input to stand.
|
|||
|
|
activities.
|
|||
|
|
5 SkyNav R PU M34
|
|||
|
|
D5.4 Final REG Final regulatory
|
|||
|
|
elements on HAO
|
|||
|
|
5 SkyNav R PU M34
|
|||
|
|
D5.5 CBA Cost benefit analysis 5 SkyNav R PU M34
|
|||
|
|
D5.6 Contextual Note Scope and main
|
|||
|
|
elements of the
|
|||
|
|
solution.
|
|||
|
|
5 SkyNav R PU M36
|
|||
|
|
D6.1 Intermediate VALR Intermediate
|
|||
|
|
validation report
|
|||
|
|
6 Sceye R PU M24
|
|||
|
|
D6.2 Final VALP Final validation plan 6 Sceye R PU M28
|
|||
|
|
D6.3 Final VALR Final validation
|
|||
|
|
report
|
|||
|
|
6 Sceye R PU M32
|
|||
|
|
D6.4 Final CyberVerifier Final tool 6 Sceye R PU M28
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1d: List of milestones
|
|||
|
|
Milestone
|
|||
|
|
number
|
|||
|
|
Milestone name Related
|
|||
|
|
work
|
|||
|
|
package(s)
|
|||
|
|
Due date
|
|||
|
|
(in
|
|||
|
|
month)
|
|||
|
|
Means of verification
|
|||
|
|
1 Kick-off Meeting
|
|||
|
|
(T0+1 month)
|
|||
|
|
WP1 M1 Minutes are distributed.
|
|||
|
|
2 PMP submission
|
|||
|
|
(T0+3 month)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M3 Check PMP is available and submitted.
|
|||
|
|
3 Full Project Web
|
|||
|
|
Presence Established
|
|||
|
|
WP2 M6 Public project website launched;
|
|||
|
|
Communication, Dissemination, and
|
|||
|
|
Exploitation (CDE) Plan finalised.
|
|||
|
|
4 CNS User Needs
|
|||
|
|
Assessment Completed
|
|||
|
|
WP3 M6 Comprehensive report on CNS requirements
|
|||
|
|
from HAPS, supersonic, and space launch
|
|||
|
|
operators delivered.
|
|||
|
|
5 Technical Project
|
|||
|
|
Review (T0+9-10
|
|||
|
|
months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M10 Review meeting takes place, minutes
|
|||
|
|
distributed, actions are identified and
|
|||
|
|
addressed.
|
|||
|
|
6 First Stakeholder
|
|||
|
|
Engagement Workshop
|
|||
|
|
WP2 M12 Workshop with key stakeholders to present
|
|||
|
|
initial findings on CNS user needs and gather
|
|||
|
|
feedback.
|
|||
|
|
7 Initial Technical
|
|||
|
|
Specifications
|
|||
|
|
(TS/IRS) and OSED
|
|||
|
|
Delivered
|
|||
|
|
WP3 M12 First complete draft of the operational concept
|
|||
|
|
and technical specifications for the modular
|
|||
|
|
CNS architecture submitted for review.
|
|||
|
|
8 Flight Authorisations
|
|||
|
|
for HTA HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Secured
|
|||
|
|
WP4 M12 Formal authorisations and permits to fly for
|
|||
|
|
Heavier Than Air HAPS vehicles (Elson
|
|||
|
|
Space and Skydweller) obtained from relevant
|
|||
|
|
aviation authorities.
|
|||
|
|
9 Flight Authorisations
|
|||
|
|
for LTA HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Secured
|
|||
|
|
WP4 M12 Formal authorisations and permits to fly for
|
|||
|
|
Lighter Than Air HAPS vehicles (Sceye)
|
|||
|
|
obtained from relevant aviation authorities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 211 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 44 of 49
|
|||
|
|
10 End of First Reporting
|
|||
|
|
Period (T0+18 months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M18 Meeting by coordinator and WP leaders,
|
|||
|
|
checking that work is progressing as planned,
|
|||
|
|
deliverables issued, and any deviation is
|
|||
|
|
properly addressed.
|
|||
|
|
11 Mid-Project
|
|||
|
|
Dissemination Event
|
|||
|
|
Completed
|
|||
|
|
WP2 M18 Public webinar or event to share results from
|
|||
|
|
the first reporting period.
|
|||
|
|
12 Final Gap Analysis for
|
|||
|
|
Standardisation &
|
|||
|
|
Regulation Delivered
|
|||
|
|
WP3 M18 Initial analysis identifying gaps in current
|
|||
|
|
standards and regulations finalised and
|
|||
|
|
delivered.
|
|||
|
|
13 First Phase of HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Flight Trials Executed
|
|||
|
|
& Data Analysed
|
|||
|
|
WP4 M18 At least one HAPS flight trial successfully
|
|||
|
|
completed, and initial CNS data documented
|
|||
|
|
in an initial Validation Report (VALR).
|
|||
|
|
14 Horizon Europe
|
|||
|
|
Project Review
|
|||
|
|
(T0+20-21 months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M21 Review takes place, minutes and actions
|
|||
|
|
taken.
|
|||
|
|
15 First Draft of
|
|||
|
|
Standardisation
|
|||
|
|
Contributions
|
|||
|
|
WP2 M24 Initial proposals based on project findings
|
|||
|
|
drafted and shared with relevant EUROCAE
|
|||
|
|
working groups.
|
|||
|
|
16 Gap & Risk Analysis
|
|||
|
|
Based on Flight Data
|
|||
|
|
Completed
|
|||
|
|
WP5 M24 Comprehensive report detailing the gap and
|
|||
|
|
risk analysis of the proposed CNS solutions
|
|||
|
|
delivered.
|
|||
|
|
17 Second Phase of HAPS
|
|||
|
|
Flight Trials
|
|||
|
|
Completed
|
|||
|
|
WP6 M24 All planned HAPS flight trials successfully
|
|||
|
|
executed, and data sets collected.
|
|||
|
|
18 Sounding Rocket
|
|||
|
|
Validation Trial
|
|||
|
|
Successfully Executed
|
|||
|
|
WP6 M28 Sounding rocket flight trial completed and
|
|||
|
|
performance data for the modified ADS -B
|
|||
|
|
transponder collected.
|
|||
|
|
19 Final Exploitation Plan
|
|||
|
|
Defined
|
|||
|
|
WP2 M30 The plan for the commercial and operational
|
|||
|
|
exploitation of the project's results is finalised.
|
|||
|
|
20 Final Cost-Benefit
|
|||
|
|
Analysis (CBA) Model
|
|||
|
|
Finalised
|
|||
|
|
WP5 M30 The methodology and model for the CBA are
|
|||
|
|
complete, and preliminary results are
|
|||
|
|
available.
|
|||
|
|
21 Final Solution
|
|||
|
|
Technical Deliverables
|
|||
|
|
(Tend–4 months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M32 Deliverables are issued.
|
|||
|
|
22 Final Consolidated
|
|||
|
|
Validation Report
|
|||
|
|
(VALR) Delivered
|
|||
|
|
WP6 M32 The comprehensive final VALR, containing
|
|||
|
|
findings from all flight trials, is submitted.
|
|||
|
|
23 Exit Maturity Gate(s)
|
|||
|
|
(Tend–2 months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M34 Solution conforms to TRL6.
|
|||
|
|
24 Final Non-Technical
|
|||
|
|
Deliverables (Tend–2
|
|||
|
|
months)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M34 Non-technical deliverables are issued.
|
|||
|
|
25 Final Technical
|
|||
|
|
Specifications
|
|||
|
|
(TS/IRS) & OSED
|
|||
|
|
Delivered for TRL-6
|
|||
|
|
WP5 M34 The final, pre -deployment versions of the
|
|||
|
|
technical specifications and operational
|
|||
|
|
concept are submitted.
|
|||
|
|
26 Grant Agreement
|
|||
|
|
Closure (Tend)
|
|||
|
|
WP1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
M36 All deliverables are issued on time, the
|
|||
|
|
solution on “CNS for HAO ” meets its
|
|||
|
|
objectives with the required maturity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 212 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 45 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1e: Critical risks for implementation #@RSK-MGT-RM@#
|
|||
|
|
Description of risk (indicate level
|
|||
|
|
of (i) likelihood, and (ii) severity:
|
|||
|
|
Low/Medium/High)
|
|||
|
|
Work
|
|||
|
|
package(s)
|
|||
|
|
involved
|
|||
|
|
Proposed risk-mitigation measures
|
|||
|
|
The guidance material on the
|
|||
|
|
“regulatory sandbox” under
|
|||
|
|
development by EASA is not
|
|||
|
|
available when needed due to
|
|||
|
|
external factors, lack of resources
|
|||
|
|
or any other reason, impacting
|
|||
|
|
simulation and validation
|
|||
|
|
schedules. (Low / High)
|
|||
|
|
WP4, WP6 1. Support EASA and Member States in the review process
|
|||
|
|
of the draft guidance material before publication, to ensure
|
|||
|
|
it is available when needed, reflecting a proportionate and
|
|||
|
|
consensus-based set of measures to allow early flight trails
|
|||
|
|
with HAPS, while g uaranteeing safety to uninvolved
|
|||
|
|
parties in the air and on the ground.
|
|||
|
|
2. Support EU Member States involved in the authorisation
|
|||
|
|
process of the flights e.g. to cross their airspace, as required
|
|||
|
|
depending on the intended mission trajectory.
|
|||
|
|
3. Alternative validation sites: As part of contingency
|
|||
|
|
planning, maintain a list of alternative validation
|
|||
|
|
sites/airspace (within and outside of the EU airspace) that
|
|||
|
|
could be used if the primary choice becomes unavailable.
|
|||
|
|
Delay in obtaining flight
|
|||
|
|
authorisation for HTA HAPS
|
|||
|
|
above FL500 due to lack of
|
|||
|
|
regulatory frame tailored to HTA
|
|||
|
|
HAPS flying at high altitude,
|
|||
|
|
currently based on UAS’s SORA
|
|||
|
|
which is appropriate for flights at
|
|||
|
|
low level. (Medium / High)
|
|||
|
|
WP4, WP6 1. Early & continuous engagement: initiate formal contact
|
|||
|
|
with EASA and relevant National Aviation Authorities
|
|||
|
|
within the first 3 months (M1-M3). [already established]
|
|||
|
|
2. Contingency Planning: Identify alternative testing
|
|||
|
|
locations/airspace in parallel, e.g. flight over the sea.
|
|||
|
|
3. Leverage consortium expertise: utilise
|
|||
|
|
EUROCONTROL's regulatory relationships and the
|
|||
|
|
experience of partners in securing flight permits.
|
|||
|
|
Technical failure of key CNS
|
|||
|
|
payload or HAPS/rocket platform
|
|||
|
|
during a critical flight trial,
|
|||
|
|
resulting in data loss.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
WP4, WP6 1. Extensive ground testing: mandate comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
ground integration tests for all payloads before flight.
|
|||
|
|
2. Redundancy: where feasible, fly redundant sensors to
|
|||
|
|
ensure data collection continues if a primary unit fails.
|
|||
|
|
3. Contingency flights: budget for a limited number of
|
|||
|
|
repeat flights within the project plan and schedule.
|
|||
|
|
Adverse weather conditions
|
|||
|
|
prevent or significantly delay
|
|||
|
|
multiple flight trials, for the HTA
|
|||
|
|
and LTA HAPS platform.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
WP4, WP6 1. Flexible scheduling: plan flight campaigns within wider
|
|||
|
|
operational windows rather than fixed dates.
|
|||
|
|
2. use tools for accurate meteo (e.g. wind, gust) forecast.
|
|||
|
|
3. Leverage multiple test sites: utilise the geographic
|
|||
|
|
diversity of the consortium's test locations (e.g. Teruel,
|
|||
|
|
Fuerteventura, etc.) to select favourable conditions.
|
|||
|
|
Significant discrepancy between
|
|||
|
|
theoretical CNS performance
|
|||
|
|
(from WP3/5) and real-world flight
|
|||
|
|
data (from WP4/6).
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
WP3, WP4,
|
|||
|
|
WP5, WP6
|
|||
|
|
1. Iterative feedback loop: establish a formal bi -monthly
|
|||
|
|
review between the technical study (WP3/5) and validation
|
|||
|
|
(WP4/6) teams.
|
|||
|
|
2. Flexible test plan: design the validation plan with the
|
|||
|
|
flexibility to add specific test points or scenarios based on
|
|||
|
|
initial findings.
|
|||
|
|
Key external dependencies (5G
|
|||
|
|
network coverage at altitude,
|
|||
|
|
Satcom payload and service) are
|
|||
|
|
not mature enough for validation.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
WP3, WP4 1. Technology monitoring: assign a partner to actively
|
|||
|
|
monitor the status of key enabling technologies.
|
|||
|
|
2. Alternative scenarios: develop validation scenarios that
|
|||
|
|
can proceed using simulated signals or alternative
|
|||
|
|
technologies (e.g., different SATCOM providers) if the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 213 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 46 of 49
|
|||
|
|
primary choice is unavailable.
|
|||
|
|
Insufficient quality or availability
|
|||
|
|
of data from flight trials to properly
|
|||
|
|
validate the technical solutions and
|
|||
|
|
KPIs.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / High)
|
|||
|
|
WP4, WP5,
|
|||
|
|
WP6
|
|||
|
|
1. Robust data acquisition plan: define a detailed data
|
|||
|
|
acquisition plan with primary and backup data logging
|
|||
|
|
systems for all flights.
|
|||
|
|
2. Pre-Flight testing: use simulation tools and ground tests
|
|||
|
|
to define the precise data quality and quantity required
|
|||
|
|
before flights commence, ensuring the collection plan is
|
|||
|
|
adequate.
|
|||
|
|
3. Data quality checks: implement real -time and/or rapid
|
|||
|
|
post-flight data quality check to identify any issues
|
|||
|
|
immediately, allowing for quick adjustments to subsequent
|
|||
|
|
flights.
|
|||
|
|
Difficulties in coordinating the
|
|||
|
|
diverse consortium, leading to
|
|||
|
|
delays in sharing information and
|
|||
|
|
completing interdependent tasks
|
|||
|
|
between work packages.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
All WPs 1. Establish a clear communication plan: implement a
|
|||
|
|
detailed communication plan with defined regular
|
|||
|
|
meetings, clear points of contact for each partner, and a
|
|||
|
|
centralised document repository.
|
|||
|
|
2. Use of collaboration tools: utilise a shared project
|
|||
|
|
management and collaboration platform to track progress,
|
|||
|
|
dependencies, and actions in real-time.
|
|||
|
|
Recruitment and retention of
|
|||
|
|
specialised personnel prove more
|
|||
|
|
difficult than anticipated,
|
|||
|
|
impacting the person -month
|
|||
|
|
allocation and project timeline.
|
|||
|
|
(Low / Medium)
|
|||
|
|
All WPs 1. Contingency staffing: have contingency plans with
|
|||
|
|
partners to temporarily re -allocate staff if a critical role
|
|||
|
|
becomes vacant.
|
|||
|
|
2. Cross-training: identify opportunities for cross -training
|
|||
|
|
personnel between partners to build resilience and cover
|
|||
|
|
potential gaps.
|
|||
|
|
3. Proactive recruitment: if needed, begin recruitment
|
|||
|
|
activities for key project roles before the official project
|
|||
|
|
start.
|
|||
|
|
Underestimation of the effort
|
|||
|
|
required for dissemination and
|
|||
|
|
stakeholder engagement, leading
|
|||
|
|
to a lower impact of the project's
|
|||
|
|
results. (Low / Low)
|
|||
|
|
WP2 1. Detailed dissemination plan: create a highly detailed
|
|||
|
|
dissemination plan with specific targets, timelines, and
|
|||
|
|
responsible partners for each activity.
|
|||
|
|
2. Dedicated resources: ensure that the partners leading
|
|||
|
|
dissemination activities have sufficient person -months
|
|||
|
|
allocated specifically for these tasks.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
#§RSK-MGT-RM§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 214 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 47 of 49
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1f: Summary of staff effort
|
|||
|
|
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total Person-
|
|||
|
|
Months per Participant
|
|||
|
|
1/ECTL 20.00 10.00 21.00 13.00 21.00 13.00 98.00
|
|||
|
|
2/DFS 4.22 1.26 2.44 1.43 9.35
|
|||
|
|
3/LFV 5.62 5.22 5.62 5.22 21.68
|
|||
|
|
4/ESSP 0.25 5.50 5.25 1.00 12.00
|
|||
|
|
5/NATS 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 4.20
|
|||
|
|
6/DSNA 1.00 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 15.00
|
|||
|
|
7/SkyNav 8.50 8.50 19.50 4.50 22.50 8.00 71.50
|
|||
|
|
8/ENAC 1.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 18.00
|
|||
|
|
9/LiU 3.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 11.00
|
|||
|
|
10/CIRA 2.00 10.00 4.50 8.50 4.00 29.00
|
|||
|
|
11/SCEYE 2.00 74.00 2.00 68.00 146.00
|
|||
|
|
12/SKYDWELLER 3.60 26.00 3.60 26.00 59.20
|
|||
|
|
13/SKYDWELLER
|
|||
|
|
14/PTFSA 0.50 10.00 12.00 22.50
|
|||
|
|
15/ELSON SPACE 36.00 52.00 88.00
|
|||
|
|
16/DLR 4.00 24.00 10.00 23.00 61.00
|
|||
|
|
17/PILDOLABS 18.00 4.00 18.00 40.00
|
|||
|
|
18/ENAIRE 1.50 1.50 4.60 2.30 6.10 5.80 21.80
|
|||
|
|
19/OpenUTM 1.00 8.50 7.00 16.50
|
|||
|
|
20/ANRA 7.00 14.00 6.00 14.00 41.00
|
|||
|
|
21/SKYPUZZLER 0.40 15.00 12.50 11.00 11.50 50.40
|
|||
|
|
22/HAPS Alliance
|
|||
|
|
Total Person Months 31.50 27.65 113.54 264.28 117.71 281.45 836.13
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Should this tender be successful, EUROCONTROL, as part of the consortium, will participate in the project actions
|
|||
|
|
without requesting funding. EUROCONTROL will, however, fully engage in the project and in particular is
|
|||
|
|
committed to providing the effort, contributions to deliverables and to other activities as set out in this tender and in
|
|||
|
|
the accompanying administrative forms.
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1g: ‘Subcontracting costs’ items
|
|||
|
|
11/SCEYE
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Description of tasks and justification
|
|||
|
|
Subcontracting 550 000 External software and cybersecurity support. External safety modelling,
|
|||
|
|
regulatory and legal support.
|
|||
|
|
16/DLR
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Description of tasks and justification
|
|||
|
|
Subcontracting 100 000 DLR will subcontract to Skysquitter company to develop hard - and
|
|||
|
|
software for a prototype transponder to be delivered and installed on a
|
|||
|
|
rocket for the Validation Trials on ADS-B tracking.
|
|||
|
|
WP4: 1 item with cost 50 000 EUR; WP6: 1 item with cost 50 000 EUR
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 215 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 48 of 49
|
|||
|
|
18/ENAIRE
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Description of tasks and justification
|
|||
|
|
Subcontracting 209 250 Some of the tasks committed by ENAIRE along WP3 /4/5/6 will be
|
|||
|
|
performed by subcontracted personnel from OBIZCO, which will support
|
|||
|
|
ENAIRE providing their expertise in ATM R&D and CNS technologies.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1h: ‘Purchase costs’ items (travel and subsistence, equipment and other goods, works and services)
|
|||
|
|
11/SCEYE
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Justification
|
|||
|
|
Travel and subsistence
|
|||
|
|
Equipment 2 175 000 Estimated cost of single -use HAPS hardware, hull fabric and
|
|||
|
|
associated avionics, and auxiliary equipment plus the rental of
|
|||
|
|
hangar facilities and associated tooling, machinery, helium
|
|||
|
|
supply, etc. for the duration of the program.
|
|||
|
|
Other goods, works and services
|
|||
|
|
Remaining purchase costs
|
|||
|
|
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total 2 175 000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
12/SKYDWELLER CANARIAS SL
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Justification
|
|||
|
|
Travel and subsistence
|
|||
|
|
Equipment 700 000 Depreciation cost for the use of the Skydweller HAPS during
|
|||
|
|
WP6.
|
|||
|
|
Other goods, works and services 400 000 The global insurance (aircraft, staff, operations) is 30000
|
|||
|
|
euros by month and the satellite communication plan needed
|
|||
|
|
to implement the aircraft costs is 35 000 euros by month.
|
|||
|
|
Total is therefore 325000 euros for 5 months of operations.
|
|||
|
|
Additionally, the hangar rental at the Stratoport of
|
|||
|
|
Fuerteventura has a cost of 15000 euros by month. Total is
|
|||
|
|
therefore 75000 euros for 5 months of operations.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining purchase costs
|
|||
|
|
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total 1.100.000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
14/PTFSA
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Justification
|
|||
|
|
Travel and subsistence 24.000 Traveling expenses for participation in progress meetings
|
|||
|
|
and meetings regarding WP4 and WP6
|
|||
|
|
Equipment
|
|||
|
|
Other goods, works and services 30.000 Expenses dedicated to arrangement of seminars and
|
|||
|
|
meetings within WP4 and WP6
|
|||
|
|
Remaining purchase costs
|
|||
|
|
(<15% of pers. Costs)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total 54.000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 216 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part B - Page 49 of 49
|
|||
|
|
15/Elson Space
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Justification
|
|||
|
|
Travel and subsistence € 125,349.00
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Covers flights, hotels, and per diem for the entire deployed team
|
|||
|
|
for the duration of each of the three trials. 3 Trials of 2 weeks x
|
|||
|
|
16 Persons.
|
|||
|
|
Equipment € 96,693.00 Accounts for performance degradation of the solar arrays.
|
|||
|
|
€ 90,000.00 Recurring cost reflecting the very limited life of the battery sets
|
|||
|
|
(2 flights per €60,000 set), a key operational constraint
|
|||
|
|
€ 96,693.00
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Accounts for the degradation of the solar arrays due to exposure
|
|||
|
|
to stratospheric environment during long-duration flights.
|
|||
|
|
€ 45,000.00 Site Equipment Rental & Logistics & Recovery Equipment
|
|||
|
|
€ 29,340.00 Cost of replacing life-limited propellers
|
|||
|
|
€ 20,700.00 Procurement of weather balloons and sensors to gather precise
|
|||
|
|
local atmospheric data.
|
|||
|
|
Other goods, works and
|
|||
|
|
services
|
|||
|
|
€ 105,000.00 Integration Materials (Cabling, integration housing, customized
|
|||
|
|
housing materials and fabrication)
|
|||
|
|
€ 90,000.00 UAS System Insurance, Cost of specialized insurance policy for
|
|||
|
|
the HAPS asset during each two-week operational period.
|
|||
|
|
€ 42,600.00 Service fees for SATCOM and other data links
|
|||
|
|
Remaining purchase
|
|||
|
|
costs (<15% of pers.
|
|||
|
|
Costs)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total € 644,682.00
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
16/DLR
|
|||
|
|
Cost (€) Justification
|
|||
|
|
Travel and subsistence 19 000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
19 x travel à € 1 000 to meetings and with a team to integrate the
|
|||
|
|
transponder on the rocket and to the launch campaign in Scandinavia
|
|||
|
|
Equipment
|
|||
|
|
Other goods, works and
|
|||
|
|
services
|
|||
|
|
100 000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Consumables for the integration of the prototype transponder into the
|
|||
|
|
MAPEUS rocket: Aviation and Space -Ops certified wires, hardware
|
|||
|
|
adapters, electronic interfaces, aviation RF and GNSS antennas.
|
|||
|
|
Remaining purchase
|
|||
|
|
costs(<15%ofpers. Costs)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Total 119 000
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1i: ‘Other costs categories’ items (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services)
|
|||
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|||
|
|
Table 3.1j: ‘In-kind contributions’ provided by third parties
|
|||
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|||
|
|
#§QUA-LIT-QL§# #§WRK-PLA-WP§#
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 217 ===
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
|
|||
|
|
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
|
|||
|
|
sealed.
|
|||
|
|
This digital signature mechanism, using a public -private key pair mechanism, uniquely
|
|||
|
|
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
|
|||
|
|
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integr ity.
|
|||
|
|
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
|
|||
|
|
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
|
|||
|
|
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
|
|||
|
|
signature, which can b e verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
|
|||
|
|
symbol.
|
|||
|
|
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
|
|||
|
|
Portal.
|
|||
|
|
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
|
|||
|
|
|