48 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
48 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 1 ===
|
|||
|
|
Andreas SPÖRL
|
|||
|
|
DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT - UND
|
|||
|
|
RAUMFAHRT EV
|
|||
|
|
LINDER HOHE
|
|||
|
|
51147 KOLN
|
|||
|
|
GERMANY
|
|||
|
|
Subject: Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
|
|||
|
|
Call: HORIZON-SESAR-2025-DES-ER-03
|
|||
|
|
Project: 101289612 — QUANTAIR
|
|||
|
|
Rejection letter
|
|||
|
|
Dear Applicant,
|
|||
|
|
I am writing in connection with your proposal for the above-mentioned call.
|
|||
|
|
Having completed the evaluation, we regret to inform you that your proposal, despite its merits, can
|
|||
|
|
unfortunately not be funded, given the budgetary resources available for the call.
|
|||
|
|
Please find enclosed the evaluation summary report (ESR).
|
|||
|
|
More information on the evaluation of the call is published in a topic update in the Funding & Tenders
|
|||
|
|
Portal.
|
|||
|
|
I would be grateful if you could inform everyone involved in your proposal of this letter.
|
|||
|
|
We thank you for your interest and hope that you will not be discouraged from applying to our calls
|
|||
|
|
in the future.
|
|||
|
|
Yours faithfully,
|
|||
|
|
Andreas BOSCHEN
|
|||
|
|
Executive Director
|
|||
|
|
Enclosure: Evaluation summary report (ESR)
|
|||
|
|
1
|
|||
|
|
Ref. Ares(2026)1020198 - 29/01/2026
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=== PAGE 2 ===
|
|||
|
|
Information on the means of redress
|
|||
|
|
If you believe that the rejection of your proposal was based on an error in the selection procedure, you can submit a:
|
|||
|
|
– request for admissibility/eligibility or evaluation review (redress review) — within 30 days of receiving this letter
|
|||
|
|
(via your Funding & Tenders Portal account > My Proposal(s) > Actions > Follow-up > Launch new interaction
|
|||
|
|
with the EU)
|
|||
|
|
– action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU — within 2 months of receiving the letter (by application to the
|
|||
|
|
EU General Court).
|
|||
|
|
Please be aware that complaints against decisions taken by an EU executive agency or other EU body must be directed
|
|||
|
|
against that agency/body, NOT against the European Commission.
|
|||
|
|
You are free to choose any of the above means of redress. However, in the interest of good administration and procedural
|
|||
|
|
efficiency, it is recommended to use first the available administrative review procedures (if any). The objective of these
|
|||
|
|
procedures is to re-examine the circumstances of the selection procedure and to reach a final decision on your application.
|
|||
|
|
Deadlines for further redress will therefore run as from when you receive our reply with the final position.
|
|||
|
|
For more information and conditions (including on other types of complaints, such as to the European Ombudsman, etc),
|
|||
|
|
please see the Online Manual and IT How To.
|
|||
|
|
2
|